A number of JSON-based representations of email have been developed that are proprietary, non-standard, and incompatible with each other. These protocols are proliferating due to existing standards being insufficient or poorly suited to the environments they are operating in, particularly mobile and webmail. The use of multiple protocols to perform actions within a single application creates significant support challenges, as users may get a variety of partial failure modes (for example, can receive email, but can not send new messages). This is further exacerbated if the different protocols are authenticated separately. JMAP specifies the interactions between email clients and mail stores, providing an alternative to IMAP and SMTP submission. The JMAP working group will specify a mechanism to allow clients to both view and send email from a server over a single HTTPS channel with minimal round trips. A single protocol for receipt and submission will resolve long-standing difficulties users face setting up clients to talk to servers. The protocol will support push notification of changes using the mechanism defined in RFC 8030. This will give mobile clients benefits in terms of battery life and network usage. It will also support push notifications via server-sent events (https://www.w3.org/TR/eventsource/) for direct connection to clients that can support persistent TCP connections. Work on JMAP will be bound by the following constraints: 1) The protocol will operate on RFC 5322/MIME (RFC 2045-2047, etc) message objects or information extracted from them. 2) JMAP needs to be implementable on top of an IMAP server, which also supports IMAP extensions specified below. JMAP data model needs to remain backwards compatible with IMAP mailstore model (a message is always associated with a single mailbox), but it might support other underlying models (e.g. Gmail-style labels). The Working Group will discuss and document how a single server or proxy implementation can implement both IMAP and JMAP at the same time. 3) The work of this group is limited to developing a protocol for a client synchronising data with a server. Any server-to-server issues are out of scope for this working group. 4) New end-to-end encryption mechanisms are out of scope, but the work should consider how to integrate with existing standards such as S/MIME and OpenPGP. 5) The working group will coordinate with the Security Area on credential management and authentication. The work will be based on draft-jenkins-jmap and draft-jenkins-jmapmail. Note that consensus is required both for changes to the current protocol mechanisms and retention of current mechanisms. In particular, because something is in the initial document set does not imply that there is consensus around the feature or around how it is specified. However gratuitous changes to proposed design should be avoided. Input to working group discussions shall include: - CONDSTORE and QRESYNC [RFC 7162] - Collection Synchronisation for WebDav [RFC 6578] - IMAP SPECIAL-USE [RFC 6154] - IMAP SORT and THREAD Extensions [RFC 5256] - LEMONADE and experiences from adoption of its output [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lemonade/charter/] - SMTP SUBMISSION [RFC 6409] - SMTP BURL [RFC 4468] The working group will deliver the following: - A problem statement detailing the deployment environment and situations that motivate work on a new protocol for client to server email synchronisation. The working group may choose not to publish this as an RFC. - A document describing an extensible protocol and data structures, with support for flood control and batched operations, and operating over HTTPS. - A document describing how to use the extensible protocol over HTTPS with the data structures expressed as JSON. - A document describing a data model for email viewing, management, searching, and submission on top of the extensible protocol. - A document describing how JMAP to IMAP/SUBMIT proxies can be implemented. Among different considerations, the document will cover security considerations involved in operating such a proxy. - A document describing how a dual IMAP and JMAP server implementation can be done. This can be combined with the above document, if that makes sense. - An executable test suite and documented test cases to assist developers of JMAP servers to ensure they conform to the specifications.