=I have reviewed this document. Because it extends a document (RFC 5208) that was published via the IETF process, I believe that the appropriate way to proceed is for this to go through the IETF process as well, specifically SECDISPATCH. If the IETF decides it does not want to take it on, then we can revisit this question. For that reason, I believe that the appropriate response is: The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.