From nobody Mon Nov 2 02:06:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325E21A036D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:06:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6qg_eA6xAeF for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:06:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE64A1A1A10 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:06:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDK05827; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:06:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMI404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.75.40) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:06:08 +0000 Received: from SZXEMI501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.73]) by SZXEMI404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.75.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:02:13 +0800 From: Jayaraghavendran k To: "dtls-iot@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Some interesting drafts to be considered before closing DICE? Thread-Index: AdEVVRQx8SltMbD/S3yv+b+DrNYykg== Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:02:13 +0000 Message-ID: <8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEB@SZXEMI501-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.194.185.216] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEBSZXEMI501MBXchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [Dtls-iot] Some interesting drafts to be considered before closing DICE? X-BeenThere: dtls-iot@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DTLS for IoT discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:06:14 -0000 --_000_8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEBSZXEMI501MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I feel the DICE could still consider some drafts like the below one (apart = from the group communication ones) before closure? I found this interesting= , but not sure why this was not considered. Couldn't find any info in the m= ailing lists. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-choi-dice-finegrained-dtls-security-0= 1.txt Thanks! Regards, Jay --_000_8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEBSZXEMI501MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All,

 

I feel the DICE could still consider some drafts like the below one = ;(apart from the group communication ones) before closure? I foun= d this interesting, but not sure why this was not considered. Couldn't find= any info in the mailing lists.

 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-choi-dice-finegr= ained-dtls-security-01.txt

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Jay

--_000_8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEBSZXEMI501MBXchi_--