hi grow mailing list=2C

Its that time again to look at agenda items for the meeting. &nb= sp=3BWe did cancel the meeting last ietf for lack of agenda items. =3B= We do have a few outstanding work items=2C and some new ones that would be = useful to make progress on...

-- BGP error handlin= g =3B-- was =3Bdraft-ietf-grow-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling

-- BMP status -- last active draft =3Bdraft-ietf-grow-bmp-07.txt=

-- =3Bdraft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations-01

-- =3Bdraft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-01 -- we had last call=2C= and past but did not receive any feedback on the list

-- New wor= k on RPSL attributes

London would be a good opport= unity to address many of these.

Thanks

<= br>

peter &=3B chris

= --_818beb34-ca5d-4bf2-9cd8-cd22bc5ddb48_-- From christopher.morrow@gmail.com Thu Jan 16 07:12:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABCB1AE430 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:12:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOo2H2pTLcUO for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717B71AE36A for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c6so2605299lan.39 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:11:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z7Vdd7fRHdXPdMPvP0Te5te6k3fshSmpA2KZ4t4sKuo=; b=lxCzOhjcLeOlNyvYgoVOYzTrpXvlhAnIczcl7/d2hEvRHLiSfrZhjsNmNuTx+5oLXd gL9kvP3aJ+i4R0RoOHA+Rp9GahorM/fUFCc1ikaYHY32I0jFtqZiw/cystJLvjcHfCYH k0FTfc7U4oFvR9mCJ9lYkVzkUuSKC7eEE6onwEx2mgCdTnGSx4JzpUs78xSXQqXMad8h rtAMRixZ95Fy3tXekcbrg9kttY6o3TGHNHkaM8bBUxu4m0Me2lU9Xm4Q5zDqryMaS0Yh ebG58t6+Rp8NHxCVtUUKCH7tUvSdAMOvnj2Uqfp0mZut8s2hyebSf/bO5MghDhXmYwoq vhRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.5.199 with SMTP id u7mr1286374lau.48.1389885114440; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.37.170 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:11:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:11:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Christopher Morrow To: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [GROW] Note about an IDR draft: draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:12:11 -0000 Grow folk, the IDR wg is spinning through the subject draft: The abstract is: Abstract This document reserves two Autonomous System numbers (ASNs) at the end of the 16 bit and 32 bit ranges, described in this document as "Last ASNs" and provides guidance to implementers and operators on their use. and the intro talks a bit more about the reasoning for the doc: 1. Introduction IANA has reserved the last Autonomous System Number (ASN), 65535, of the 16 bit autonomous system number range for over a decade with the intention that it not be used by network operators running BGP [RFC4271]. Since the introduction of BGP Support for Four-Octet AS Number Space [RFC6793], IANA has also reserved the ASN of the 32 bit autonomous system number range, 4294967295. This reservation has been documented in the IANA Autonomous System Numbers Registry [IANA.AS]. Although these "Last ASNs" border on Private Use ASN [RFC6996] ranges, they are not defined or reserved as Private Use ASNs by [IANA.AS]. This document describes the reasoning for reserving these Last ASNs and provides guidance both to operators and to implementers on their use. it'd would be worth our time to read and comment on the IDR list, if there are comments, or speak up in support of the document (or non-support even) when the time comes for WGLC. thanks! -chris From jhaas@slice.pfrc.org Thu Jan 16 07:41:01 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968CA1AE375 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:41:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.106 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guEePqR46Yt4 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B001AE05F for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DE64CC2D9; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:40:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:40:47 -0500 From: Jeffrey Haas To: Christopher Morrow Message-ID: <20140116154047.GA20758@pfrc> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [GROW] Note about an IDR draft: draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:41:01 -0000 On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:11:54AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: > This document reserves two Autonomous System numbers (ASNs) at the > end of the 16 bit and 32 bit ranges, described in this document as > "Last ASNs" and provides guidance to implementers and operators on > their use. FWIW, the authors consider this a "janitorial" document. 65535 is already effectively reserved but wasn't documented that way. 4294967295 isn't reserved but having a reserved magic value has proven an invaluable tool in code point allocation over the years. We hope the document is not controversial. -- Jeff From christopher.morrow@gmail.com Thu Jan 16 07:55:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2821AE0E2 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:55:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GSwrg0W61hmU for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24FB1ADED7 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e16so2640619lan.26 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:55:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z6V7HbJhxZTBbU65J/eKKJwFydFp9OvrK6B0s9R0v7s=; b=jOXV0kQZ2txC6dNbCKJkwadGEYofHthQJpOJogcaekMAuBWOpRMS6hN+LVf/PZNsWq ZW9IGaAT2ycv1LmbSvMfv59X0fckgO7UEymsKzSc+G830qk7IlXfXlBrU+tPyNAiSf7m lzVL9RkYugbsXrXyd/hb66bT3mFOjS5XjxddIdEe7U3YvaPVTuux+KoVmtW81nuTzhHU Y51jSH8Wu8EFGWu2WOTHjJ9x+z4wDNtQOwXPEnEnG/5l/c9QlBfTCt8fqwHJX9fThPME oVmN51FDGL1bQs/vE561+Gl5sKc53mT7B8NDIeQCQRuaO8A+Ioi8x36TZgFEW4gAoJ44 eyxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.219.166 with SMTP id pp6mr1386623lac.46.1389887739196; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.37.170 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:55:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:55:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: Christopher Morrow To: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [GROW] Note about current IDR WGLC: draft-ietf-idr-enhanced-refresh-impl X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:55:54 -0000 Grow folks, IDR is running a WGLC for a document which some folk here might also find interesting/relevant: Please have a read and toss comments/questions/tomatoes/flowers at the IDR list as appropriate. The abstract for this doc is: Abstract This document provides an implementation report for Enhanced Route refresh as defined in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh. The editor did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by respondents or by any alternative means. The respondents are experts with the implementations they reported on, and their responses are considered authoritative for the implementations for which their responses represent. thanks! -chris From christopher.morrow@gmail.com Thu Jan 16 08:34:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857A1AE3B6 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFDHc0rPzZs6 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307EE1AE3B5 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w6so2081138lbh.6 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eQYDiuO0qCfd8HKZ6hofivLc0Ozl0G9wBgoxfNZ1uxM=; b=NV7hg+dYxcw69YkwKVlawciqNuG64YTKv2P49Rra8GNOkOv7XBjrLXuR2g3Sa9W1P+ Ugbo4MeWmdoHLGdlvUxO5G6Sw/A4uio3BQRr26bC2Nt74U+kf5TI39AMWbTYImmVGrdj JDZCDBT9giZDqMd1U3dH5jz45k/9HxGiXHB06x7u+yQjbDag82EGl3c2egIAplIcZwM8 mfGIGCGcH5zxEiG2tgAlCFTeXK/4nc2epFb5rAycs9z57SkoZ9kFPTxioCon8IM1u/Qf Ytbymxa+EKTWvkK5F+QWEH4mKjv+5nOkTJtTAM3OsObe5WKCPWN/ABRKiji8eukb82aR wDTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.148.104 with SMTP id tr8mr5359752lbb.42.1389890065037; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.37.170 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:34:24 -0500 Message-ID: From: Christopher Morrow To: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [GROW] Note about current IDR WGLC: draft-ietf-idr-enhanced-refresh-impl X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:34:40 -0000 oops, and the IDR folk also reminded me that: this is the doc that describes the actual change, not the survey of how well it did/didn't work out :) and is what is ACTUALLY in WGLC... http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh/ Enhanced Route Refresh Capability for BGP-4 draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-05.txt Abstract In this document we enhance the existing BGP route refresh mechanisms to provide for the demarcation of the beginning and the ending of a route refresh. The enhancement can be used to facilitate correction of BGP RIB inconsistencies in a non-disruptive manner. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > Grow folks, > IDR is running a WGLC for a document which some folk here might also > find interesting/relevant: > > > Please have a read and toss comments/questions/tomatoes/flowers at the > IDR list as appropriate. > > The abstract for this doc is: > Abstract > > This document provides an implementation report for Enhanced Route > refresh as defined in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh. The > editor did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by > respondents or by any alternative means. The respondents are experts > with the implementations they reported on, and their responses are > considered authoritative for the implementations for which their > responses represent. > > thanks! > > -chris From joelja@bogus.com Sat Jan 18 10:36:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659381ADF88 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:36:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.438 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEL0LSwThNhd for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:36:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157451ADF7C for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.134] ([172.56.39.223]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0IIaWAx056344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:36:33 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com) Message-ID: <52DAC9AB.7000209@bogus.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:36:27 -0800 From: joel jaeggli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pds@lugs.com, "grow@ietf.org" References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wMXwn1NXPQsU2DVG9sPmQnthVf9ciQFsh" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [GROW] Agenda for london ietf X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:36:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --wMXwn1NXPQsU2DVG9sPmQnthVf9ciQFsh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Note all that the draft submission deadline is now just slightly less than a month away 2014-02-14 thanks! On 1/13/14, 5:29 AM, pds@lugs.com wrote: > hi grow mailing list, > Its that time again to look at agenda items for the meeting. We did ca= ncel the meeting last ietf for lack of agenda items. We do have a few ou= tstanding work items, and some new ones that would be useful to make prog= ress on... > -- BGP error handling -- was draft-ietf-grow-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-ha= ndling-- BMP status -- last active draft draft-ietf-grow-bmp-07.txt-- dra= ft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations-01-- draft-ietf-grow-filterin= g-threats-01 -- we had last call, and past but did not receive any feedba= ck on the list-- New work on RPSL attributes > London would be a good opportunity to address many of these. > Thanks > peter & chris > =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > GROW@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >=20 --wMXwn1NXPQsU2DVG9sPmQnthVf9ciQFsh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLayasACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJhKQCfV0GB7CsIaNFgUUPVrtNYFiPZ iK4AoIMIBkgrZUQfLzOE4vbZvfTTrC3N =0xhd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wMXwn1NXPQsU2DVG9sPmQnthVf9ciQFsh-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Jan 28 04:20:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064791A03B7; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:20:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QB0lVxTjcw1h; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6C91A01F2; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140128122007.30847.22805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:20:07 -0800 Cc: grow@ietf.org Subject: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-05.txt X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:20:09 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations Working Group o= f the IETF. Title : Graceful BGP session shutdown Authors : Pierre Francois Bruno Decraene Cristel Pelsser Keyur Patel Clarence Filsfils Filename : draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-05.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2014-01-28 Abstract: This draft describes operational procedures aimed at reducing the amount of traffic lost during planned maintenances of routers or links, involving the shutdown of BGP peering sessions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/