From: stiemerling@netlab.nec.de (Martin Stiemerling) Date: Tue Jan 31 07:48:01 2006 Subject: [Hipsec-rg] Updated "Middlebox Traversal Issues of Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Communication" In-Reply-To: <267E2305-0948-4C5C-8146-C989051DC4B9@netlab.nec.de> References: <267E2305-0948-4C5C-8146-C989051DC4B9@netlab.nec.de> Message-ID: <5B1C8D4C-9F29-4166-9D66-A63B4B62F6B3@netlab.nec.de> --Apple-Mail-50--656563480 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-49--656563822 --Apple-Mail-49--656563822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I've pressed the send button to fast, since these two things got changed too: - removed reference to RFC 2766 (NAT-PT). The NAT-PT section was removed in the past and the reference was left behind - Updated to RFC 4303 which replaces RFC 2406 (IPsec ESP) Martin Am 31.01.2006 um 11:24 schrieb Martin Stiemerling: > Hi, > > We have posted an updated version of draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01.txt to > the I-D repository. > > Changes made: > > - Added statement as proposed by Tom in his email on January 18 > - Removed one reference which has been a left-over from old > versions (draft-eggert-hiprg-rr-prob-desc-00). This reference was > used in a (removed) part about twice-NATs. > - Removed the reference to the NSIS NATFW NSLP. The NATFW NSLP is > not yet completed and it will take a while until it becomes RFC. > Leaving this reference in the draft will block it in the RFC editor > queue until the NATFW NSLP itself is becoming an RFC. > > The draft is already available here: > > ftp://ftp.netlab.nec.de/pub/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-hiprg- > nat-01.txt > > The diff to the -00 version is available here: > > http://www.stiemerling.org/ietf/hiprg/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01- > from-0.diff.html > > > Please let Lars, Juergen, and me know if you have any comment or > question. > > Best regards, > > Lars, Juergen, and Martin --Apple-Mail-49--656563822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
I've pressed the send = button to fast, since these two things got changed too:

- removed reference to RFC = 2766 (NAT-PT). The NAT-PT section was removed in the past and the = reference was left behind
- Updated to RFC 4303 which replaces = RFC 2406 (IPsec ESP)

=A0 = Martin

Am 31.01.2006 um 11:24 schrieb Martin = Stiemerling:

Hi,

We = have posted an updated version of=A0draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01.txt to the = I-D repository.

Changes made:

- Added statement as = proposed by Tom in his email on January 18
- Removed one = reference which has been a left-over from old versions (draft-eggert-hiprg-rr-prob-desc-00). This reference was = used in a (removed) part about twice-NATs.
- Removed the = reference to the NSIS NATFW NSLP. The NATFW NSLP is not yet completed = and it will take a while until it becomes RFC. Leaving this reference in = the draft will block it in the RFC editor queue until the NATFW NSLP = itself is becoming an RFC.

The draft is already = available here:

ftp://ftp.netlab.nec.de/pub/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01= .txt

The = diff to the -00 version is available here:

http://www.stiemerling.org/ietf/hiprg/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-0= 1-from-0.diff.html


Please let Lars, Juergen, = and me know if you have any comment or question.

Best regards,

=A0 Lars, Juergen, and = Martin

= --Apple-Mail-49--656563822-- --Apple-Mail-50--656563480 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGSTCCAwIw ggJroAMCAQICAw8BOzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUwNjI0MDkyNzMwWhcNMDYwNjI0MDkyNzMwWjBuMRQwEgYDVQQE EwtTdGllbWVybGluZzEPMA0GA1UEKhMGTWFydGluMRswGQYDVQQDExJNYXJ0aW4gU3RpZW1lcmxp bmcxKDAmBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWGXN0aWVtZXJsaW5nQG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDIdKncWwqQck8qYN+xvFwxSJqdZrf9zUATYsokkTe2h8B3Zvv6 8Xbyg0Zt4sG6ygQEB+pZodppRngNWsOY7bdUOb9ENCYAHAV+dbve0qx8JjakiiS8CjVv1q/W6xj7 mFIg32QdbOKzvkBi/FrA8G8KpJnymjsPkpcj1+18dHG9vY9VyjQUxTnfEkEEwjcKrxfGaukYNI/P XJm+sEx2ni39gDroHIx8Tql/jdNwjSQw1p+TqUP28UUPXwn4P/jrsCWwp1XXKLOUcfRCrcO3qMx2 k9a2FUfDjsBNiZg1ed2giEoJf+DdZUbrfbtPR+GW+g50nt59f59FUvubuVdgvH0pAgMBAAGjNjA0 MCQGA1UdEQQdMBuBGXN0aWVtZXJsaW5nQG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQC8bBqzxUKFH/gdvs4hTELn5WdR5sPp3A0iY+7DaKtR+XdyuYPyqzWDoonQ KXgks2QGxj6kyTUTWWYl7lvyc+GnTEFpi5/nJBcgVnNtmMI0UxpKUJqwxD5uLcdFGRybDerzoyxa OQEq7gYjgylUlvgB9KwTq5PkjBQa3Jd9E+yeWTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEF BQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUg VG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24g U2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTEr MCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAw MDBaFw0xMzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3Vs dGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWlu ZyBDQTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me 7L3N9VvyGna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r 1fOCdz0Dviv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCB kTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3Rl LmNvbS9UaGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAg pB4wHDEaMBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPq Cy7MDaNmrGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUa C4J0niVQlGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx 0x1G/11fZU8xggLnMIIC4wIBATBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNz dWluZyBDQQIDDwE7MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFTMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJ KoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA2MDEzMTEyNTE1MFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFHNyPnAVXTUPZHrzQ8+a nyF48+l9MHgGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFrMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBD b25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJ c3N1aW5nIENBAgMPATswegYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxa6BpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQK ExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwg RnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIDDwE7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBABtIX/OuIpTjnBdBsJrs AVn2lVEbNeSaBK7JKzIaLVyu/imUyCSO2EIn6MLoxep7RqCt+8Ca6Dc1ebloCN7aX/5nG+0/NCK/ bE+INMU2lM8EZi0o7uSEcUbVBeYd9RgcDJNcPZCdYiExjnHUppqFFtm/wqHfxqkKp03zBz3x/+fm /XZHOWAkISdZH79go6SF+58Hf9x5u12lyNlPMSP5NlA+w2I7gUxi0bX5w7Mcg+xpnPEj8hWKlSIQ ty8l3bwv7IDgE8AJvPzqNlXJZdBQmexdQzCF0e2WqJ6/ojDiR2TsMsHVhTB2ZL1lxElqo6PvBk4m hwZXR1MoyJcc1Cs9UFAAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-50--656563480-- From: stiemerling@netlab.nec.de (Martin Stiemerling) Date: Tue Jan 31 05:20:00 2006 Subject: [Hipsec-rg] Updated "Middlebox Traversal Issues of Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Communication" Message-ID: <267E2305-0948-4C5C-8146-C989051DC4B9@netlab.nec.de> --Apple-Mail-43--665425186 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-42--665425598 --Apple-Mail-42--665425598 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hi, We have posted an updated version of draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01.txt to the I-D repository. Changes made: - Added statement as proposed by Tom in his email on January 18 - Removed one reference which has been a left-over from old versions (draft-eggert-hiprg-rr-prob-desc-00). This reference was used in a (removed) part about twice-NATs. - Removed the reference to the NSIS NATFW NSLP. The NATFW NSLP is not yet completed and it will take a while until it becomes RFC. Leaving this reference in the draft will block it in the RFC editor queue until the NATFW NSLP itself is becoming an RFC. The draft is already available here: ftp://ftp.netlab.nec.de/pub/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01.txt The diff to the -00 version is available here: http://www.stiemerling.org/ietf/hiprg/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01- from-0.diff.html Please let Lars, Juergen, and me know if you have any comment or question. Best regards, Lars, Juergen, and Martin --Apple-Mail-42--665425598 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi,

We have posted an updated = version of=A0draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01.txt to the I-D = repository.

Changes made:

- Added statement as = proposed by Tom in his email on January 18
- Removed one = reference which has been a left-over from old versions (draft-eggert-hiprg-rr-prob-desc-00). This reference was = used in a (removed) part about twice-NATs.
- Removed the = reference to the NSIS NATFW NSLP. The NATFW NSLP is not yet completed = and it will take a while until it becomes RFC. Leaving this reference in = the draft will block it in the RFC editor queue until the NATFW NSLP = itself is becoming an RFC.

The draft is already = available here:

ftp://ftp.netlab.nec.de/pub/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01= .txt

The = diff to the -00 version is available here:

http://www.stiemerling.org/ietf/hiprg/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-0= 1-from-0.diff.html


Please let Lars, Juergen, = and me know if you have any comment or question.

Best regards,

=A0 Lars, Juergen, and = Martin
= --Apple-Mail-42--665425598-- --Apple-Mail-43--665425186 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGSTCCAwIw ggJroAMCAQICAw8BOzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUwNjI0MDkyNzMwWhcNMDYwNjI0MDkyNzMwWjBuMRQwEgYDVQQE EwtTdGllbWVybGluZzEPMA0GA1UEKhMGTWFydGluMRswGQYDVQQDExJNYXJ0aW4gU3RpZW1lcmxp bmcxKDAmBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWGXN0aWVtZXJsaW5nQG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDIdKncWwqQck8qYN+xvFwxSJqdZrf9zUATYsokkTe2h8B3Zvv6 8Xbyg0Zt4sG6ygQEB+pZodppRngNWsOY7bdUOb9ENCYAHAV+dbve0qx8JjakiiS8CjVv1q/W6xj7 mFIg32QdbOKzvkBi/FrA8G8KpJnymjsPkpcj1+18dHG9vY9VyjQUxTnfEkEEwjcKrxfGaukYNI/P XJm+sEx2ni39gDroHIx8Tql/jdNwjSQw1p+TqUP28UUPXwn4P/jrsCWwp1XXKLOUcfRCrcO3qMx2 k9a2FUfDjsBNiZg1ed2giEoJf+DdZUbrfbtPR+GW+g50nt59f59FUvubuVdgvH0pAgMBAAGjNjA0 MCQGA1UdEQQdMBuBGXN0aWVtZXJsaW5nQG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQC8bBqzxUKFH/gdvs4hTELn5WdR5sPp3A0iY+7DaKtR+XdyuYPyqzWDoonQ KXgks2QGxj6kyTUTWWYl7lvyc+GnTEFpi5/nJBcgVnNtmMI0UxpKUJqwxD5uLcdFGRybDerzoyxa OQEq7gYjgylUlvgB9KwTq5PkjBQa3Jd9E+yeWTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEF BQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUg VG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24g U2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTEr MCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAw MDBaFw0xMzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3Vs dGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWlu ZyBDQTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me 7L3N9VvyGna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r 1fOCdz0Dviv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCB kTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3Rl LmNvbS9UaGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAg pB4wHDEaMBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPq Cy7MDaNmrGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUa C4J0niVQlGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx 0x1G/11fZU8xggLnMIIC4wIBATBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNz dWluZyBDQQIDDwE7MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFTMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJ KoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA2MDEzMTEwMjQwOFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFHPJwU7Lehx7yBwqius1 t2MT1em9MHgGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFrMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBD b25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJ c3N1aW5nIENBAgMPATswegYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxa6BpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQK ExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwg RnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIDDwE7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAEWH59bvVh8tcEz/odVr yupIx6AO5iEieUQ5RimZkBNcmVCZAUcXfaLXBBVKZd2RscYWxApjxr3/gaxYv6oyGw3e18plbFKJ a7tHNo+KBUjtyMAuigw4L+H1cfPX9jqoCXpmkFQpXAj95lwUYdUG27BkU7rEvSKB86VQWhMv4WAG AQ9fKCpGRvss11YbQtjWO90kU1F++LLckbmrOZdFlKqvYI1ydlU/BAKbgS5DBDHSIE2v6fZsc02T AVqfnEqB9L+e9yJ93btDbkIDCt+buT5QlbhvgSoCEKs6BiUcsM3RDKvbQ7Ydo2zomLM2qnhs5slz ZN1HIYDhIi8ebLukEAwAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-43--665425186-- From: pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com (Pekka Nikander) Date: Thu Jan 19 05:17:00 2006 Subject: [Hipsec-rg] RG consensus on draft-irtf-hip-nat-00 In-Reply-To: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6DC9E935@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> References: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6DC9E935@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> Message-ID: <08A2F1A9-E3BD-4759-BE89-5B86F5178254@nomadiclab.com> > ..., I would like to propose that the following statement be added > to the above HIP RG draft, and am asking whether the RG supports > such a > statement: > > This memo was discussed and modified in the Host Identity Protocol > > Research Group and represents a consensus view of the research > group at the time of its submission for publication. > > Comments on this statement or the draft itself? Works for me. --Pekka From: thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com (Henderson, Thomas R) Date: Wed Jan 18 15:02:01 2006 Subject: [Hipsec-rg] RG consensus on draft-irtf-hip-nat-00 Message-ID: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6DC9E935@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> The authors of the below I-D would like to submit it to the RFC Editor's queue as an individual submission for Informational RFC: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-00.txt Since there is no RG track for documents presently (although there are some discussions among the IRTF chairs about creating one for the future), what does it mean for RG drafts? Presently, such drafts are treated as individual submissions in the RFC Editor process. However, some drafts that have achieved consensus in the RGs have, in the past, added a note in the Introduction stating this consensus (for whatever that is worth). For example, the RED manifesto (RFC 2309), a product of the e2e RG, contains this at the end of the Introduction: Preparation of this memo resulted from past discussions of end-to- end performance, Internet congestion, and RED in the End-to-End Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Likewise, I would like to propose that the following statement be added to the above HIP RG draft, and am asking whether the RG supports such a statement: This memo was discussed and modified in the Host Identity Protocol Research Group and represents a consensus view of the research =20 group at the time of its submission for publication. Comments on this statement or the draft itself? This is not formally a Last Call, but I will assume lazy consensus (i.e. no comments implies tacit approval) on this issue. Tom From: thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com (Henderson, Thomas R) Date: Wed Jan 18 14:45:00 2006 Subject: [Hipsec-rg] IETF 65 Message-ID: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6DC9E933@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> Since scheduling is now open for IETF-65, I am notifying the RG that we intend to hold a meeting in Dallas in our usual Friday afternoon slot (last time, was 12:30-3PM), in case you want to make travel plans accordingly. =20 If you would like an agenda slot (even if only tentative), please email Andrei or me before the IETF scheduling deadline (March 13). Thanks, Tom