From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Thu Mar 2 01:09:56 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25381 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 5CE8D52DA; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:57:53 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id A694352DB; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:57:52 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <028401bf8284$44618940$a5cc8489@engtanlk.nus.edu.sg> From: "ICON'2000 Secretariat" To: Subject: 14 days to countdown! Have you submitted your papers??? Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:06:17 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0281_01BF82C7.5284C940" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0281_01BF82C7.5284C940 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All =20 * Kindly ignore this email if you have received this before.=20 Thanks you for your kind attention. =20 The 8th IEEE International Conference On Networks will be held from=20 September 5- 8, 2000 in Singapore. The aim of the conference is to = provide=20 an international forum for experts to promote, share and discuss various = issues and developments in the broad field of computer and communication = networks. We thus seek and solicit your contributions in the form of original/unpublished papers, tutorials, and topics for=20 special sessions/panel discussions. More information on the scope of the = conference and the guidelines for the submission of contributions can be obtained at this web site :http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~icon/ We look forward to your participation. Thank you. Icon 2000 organizing Committee ------=_NextPart_000_0281_01BF82C7.5284C940 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All
 
*=20 Kindly ignore this email if you have received this before.=20
Thanks you for your kind = attention.
 

The 8th IEEE International Conference On Networks will be held from =

September 5- 8, 2000 in Singapore. The aim of the conference is to = provide=20

an international forum for experts to promote, share and discuss = various

issues and developments in the broad field of computer and = communication

networks. We thus seek and solicit your contributions

in the form of original/unpublished papers, tutorials, and topics for =

special sessions/panel discussions. More information on the scope of = the

conference and the guidelines for the submission of contributions = can

be obtained at this web site :http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~icon/

 

We look forward to your participation. Thank you.

Icon 2000 organizing Committee

 

= ------=_NextPart_000_0281_01BF82C7.5284C940-- --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 3 11:07:08 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01759 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 11:07:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 9D44052DA; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 10:53:59 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 91C7E52D5; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 10:53:54 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 10:52:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200003031552.KAA23011@ind.cs.columbia.edu> From: Jonathan Lennox To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com, cgi-wg@golux.com Cc: hgs@cs.columbia.edu, jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com Subject: Informal Last Call: Common Gateway Interface for SIP Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk With the submission of the most recent version of the SIP Common Gateway Interface, we'd like to announce an informal Last Call on this document (in place of a Working Group last call, since this draft has no associated working group). We'll solicit comments for four weeks, until March 31, 2000. At that time we'll submit this draft for Informational RFC status. Comments on the draft should be sent to the SIP mailing list sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, or to the authors. Title : Common Gateway Interface for SIP Author(s) : J. Lennox, J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne Filename : draft-lennox-sip-cgi-03.txt,.ps Pages : 38 Date : 02-Mar-00 In Internet telephony, there must be a means by which new services are created and deployed rapidly. In the World Wide Web, the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) has served as popular means towards programming web services. Due to the similarities between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), CGI seems a good candidate for service creation in a SIP environment. This draft proposes a SIP-CGI interface for providing SIP services on a SIP server. URLs for this Internet-Draft are: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lennox-sip-cgi-03.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lennox-sip-cgi-03.ps http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~lennox/draft-lennox-sip-cgi-03.pdf The Postscript and PDF versions contain changebars indicating changes from the previous version. -- Jonathan Lennox lennox@cs.columbia.edu --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Mon Mar 6 04:52:36 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA01438 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 04:52:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 3071552DB; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 04:39:52 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 83FA552C8; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 04:39:46 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com To: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 04:35:36 -0500 Message-ID: <00e101bf874f$1e26f920$0401a8c0@oleane.com> From: "Peter Lewis" Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk To: Subject: SIP 2000 International Conference Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:33:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00DE_01BF8757.73594D00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01BF8757.73594D00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Unknown and even rejected by many vendors and operators only a few = months ago, SIP is on the brink of making a definitive name for itself.=20 Visit the SIP 2000 International Conference programme: http://www.upperside.fr/basip.htm ------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01BF8757.73594D00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Unknown and even rejected by many vendors and operators only a few = months=20 ago, SIP is on the brink of making a definitive name for itself.
Visit the SIP 2000 International Conference programme:
http://www.upperside.fr/basip.= htm
 
------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01BF8757.73594D00-- --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Tue Mar 7 09:58:37 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA16975 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:58:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 8C11852E0; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:53:30 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id E864352DF; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:53:29 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <38C5176B.90A47AF7@indosat.net.id> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 22:51:23 +0800 From: "Perry Erick R." X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IP Tel Subject: Resource Reservation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I don't know whether I asked to the right forum, I hope I could find some pointers here. To my knowledge, SIP is a lightweight protocol designed for Internet, so ISP could offer telephone service (cmiiw), CPL is a programming framework to create Internet Telephony Services, such as IN. The question is: how to reserve resource (i.e. bandwidth) for a pair of source-destination in this Internet's TCP/IP mode. The PSTN enojoys a strict 64-kbps (PCM-30) of bandwidth, eventhough there's no signal transmitted. To my knowledge also: Telcordia has developed MGCP which include resource reservation in its packet-based telephone framework. Other framework offered is AT&T's DOSA (Distributed Open Signaling Architecture). Both offer a resource reservation process before communication between source-destination begins. How do I reserve resource in the IP Tel framework? I believe without a sturdy resource method, packet-based communication cannot match the PSTN (unless someone has another, better arguments). The RSVP, as I know it, is not sturdy enough to handle millions of call simultaneously to match PSTN's capability. Thanks for any answers, --rick Telkom Indonesia Network Division --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 10 02:40:10 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA18874 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:40:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 43A1652D4; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:28:00 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 8E96B52C4; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:27:54 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <38C8A521.DBDCCC08@dynamicsoft.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:32:49 -0500 From: Jonathan Rosenberg Organization: dynamicsoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: TRIP for gateway registrations Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Folks, Every once in a while, the question comes up of why SIP REGISTER is not the right vehicle for allowing gateways to register phone prefixes with a proxy. I believe TRIP is far better for this purpose. As it turns out, a small subset of TRIP is needed to solve this problem, and yet its still interoperable with full blown TRIP. Hussein Salama and I have written an I-D that discusses this. Until it appears in the archives, you can pick up a copy at: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen/papers/draft-rs-trip-gw-00.txt Thanks, Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg 200 Executive Drive Chief Scientist Suite 120 dynamicsoft West Orange, NJ 07052 jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (732) 741-4778 http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen PHONE: (732) 741-7244 http://www.dynamicsoft.com --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 10 10:10:43 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA13795 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:10:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id D219D52BB; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:04:46 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 3E34A52D6; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:04:45 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <003a01bf8971$4bd19780$f3cc8489@engtanlk.nus.edu.sg> From: "ICON'2000 Secretariat" To: Subject: 7 days to go ! Have you submitted your paper. Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:39:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0037_01BF89B4.59ED3660" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01BF89B4.59ED3660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All=20 =20 * Kindly ignore this email if you have received this before.=20 Thanks you for your kind attention. =20 The 8th IEEE International Conference On Networks will be held from=20 September 5- 8, 2000 in Singapore. The aim of the conference is to = provide=20 an international forum for experts to promote, share and discuss various = issues and developments in the broad field of computer and communication = networks. We thus seek and solicit your contributions in the form of original/unpublished papers, tutorials, and topics for=20 special sessions/panel discussions. More information on the scope of the = conference and the guidelines for the submission of contributions can be obtained at this web site :http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~icon/ We look forward to your participation. Thank you. Icon 2000 organizing Committee ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01BF89B4.59ED3660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All
 
*=20 Kindly ignore this email if you have received this before.=20
Thanks you for your kind = attention.
 

The 8th IEEE International Conference On Networks will be held from =

September 5- 8, 2000 in Singapore. The aim of the conference is to = provide=20

an international forum for experts to promote, share and discuss = various

issues and developments in the broad field of computer and = communication

networks. We thus seek and solicit your contributions

in the form of original/unpublished papers, tutorials, and topics for =

special sessions/panel discussions. More information on the scope of = the

conference and the guidelines for the submission of contributions = can

be obtained at this web site :http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~icon/

 

We look forward to your participation. Thank you.

Icon 2000 organizing=20 Committee

= ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01BF89B4.59ED3660-- --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 10 15:41:48 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA08795 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:41:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 40DA552E3; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:30:14 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id A253352E5; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:30:13 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:28:24 -0600 From: Henry Sinnreich Subject: Interdomain SIP-QoS-OSP In-reply-to: <38C8A521.DBDCCC08@dynamicsoft.com> To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Reply-To: henry.sinnreich@wcom.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Until it appears in the archive, there is a new draft version available at: http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/drafts/draft-sinnreich-sip-qos-os p-01.txt Title: Interdomain IP Communications with QoS, Authorization and Usage Reporting Authors: H. Sinnreich, S. Donovan, D. Rawlins, S. Thomas Abstract Commercial grade IP telephony requires linkage between call setup, end-to-end QoS setup, interdomain authorization and accounting. This draft considers the network model for inter-domain QoS for access and transit networks, the service models and policy implementation options. Also, interdomain authorization and accounting may require the trust services of a clearinghouse, to which the local policy server may outsource authorization for support for inter-domain accounting. The draft defines two options for QoS support for telephony: PSTN- style "QoS Assured" or Internet-style "QoS Enabled" service. Implementing the local policy or QoS deployment can also have two options: The more usual policy "Pull Model" and the policy "Push Model" that may be advantageous for large IP telephony gateway deployments. The draft illustrates the various combinations of QoS service and policy implementation for interdomain QoS with authorization and accounting. Thanks, Henry Henry Sinnreich MCI WorldCom 400 International Parkway Richardson, Texas 75081 USA --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 10 16:44:21 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA00948 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:44:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 1693252E4; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:38:37 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 6B76352E6; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:38:36 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <63E0DAD7784FD21188310000F80824B3029C8D78@zmpkdx02.us.nortel.com> From: "Francois Audet" To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: RE: TRIP for gateway registrations Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:09:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BF8ABB.CAFA3198" Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF8ABB.CAFA3198 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I would point out that H.323 RAS messages are not normally used to register a range of phone numbers for gateways as it is quite impractical, especially for gateways handling a large number of phone numbers, and when keep-alive messages are used. While some implementations uses tricks such as registering "dialling prefixes" to map to telephone number, it is not the intent of prefixes which are supposed to be used for special services. Normally, a gateway registers an alias with its gatekeeper and the binding between the alias and the range of phone numbers handled by the gateway is "manually" configured in the gatekeeper, as described in the draft. I would think that TRIP could automate this process. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 11:33 PM > To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com; > iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com > Subject: TRIP for gateway registrations > > > Folks, > > Every once in a while, the question comes up of why SIP > REGISTER is not > the right vehicle for allowing gateways to register phone > prefixes with > a proxy. I believe TRIP is far better for this purpose. As it > turns out, > a small subset of TRIP is needed to solve this problem, and yet its > still interoperable with full blown TRIP. Hussein Salama and I have > written an I-D that discusses this. Until it appears in the archives, > you can pick up a copy at: > > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen/papers/draft-rs-trip-gw-00.txt > > Thanks, > Jonathan R. > -- > Jonathan D. Rosenberg 200 Executive Drive > Chief Scientist Suite 120 > dynamicsoft West Orange, NJ 07052 > jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (732) 741-4778 > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen PHONE: (732) 741-7244 > http://www.dynamicsoft.com > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF8ABB.CAFA3198 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: TRIP for gateway registrations

I would point out that H.323 RAS messages are not = normally
used to register a range of phone numbers for = gateways as it
is quite impractical, especially for gateways = handling a large
number of phone numbers, and when keep-alive = messages are used.

While some implementations uses tricks such as = registering
"dialling prefixes" to map to telephone = number, it is not the
intent of prefixes which are supposed to be used for = special services.

Normally, a gateway registers an alias with its = gatekeeper and the binding between the alias and the range of phone = numbers handled by the

gateway is "manually" configured in the = gatekeeper, as described
in the draft. I would think that TRIP could automate = this process.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 11:33 PM
> To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com;
> iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com
> Subject: TRIP for gateway registrations
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Every once in a while, the question comes up of = why SIP
> REGISTER is not
> the right vehicle for allowing gateways to = register phone
> prefixes with
> a proxy. I believe TRIP is far better for this = purpose. As it
> turns out,
> a small subset of TRIP is needed to solve this = problem, and yet its
> still interoperable with full blown TRIP. = Hussein Salama and I have
> written an I-D that discusses this. Until it = appears in the archives,
> you can pick up a copy at:
>
>
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen/papers/draft-rs-tr= ip-gw-00.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan R.
> --
> Jonathan D. = Rosenberg          &nb= sp;            = 200 Executive Drive
> Chief = Scientist          &nb= sp;           &nb= sp;      Suite 120
> = dynamicsoft          &= nbsp;           &= nbsp;          West = Orange, NJ 07052
> = jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com        &= nbsp;            = FAX:   (732) 741-4778
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen  &nb= sp;      PHONE: (732) 741-7244
> http://www.dynamicsoft.com
>
>

------_=_NextPart_001_01BF8ABB.CAFA3198-- --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Mon Mar 13 18:08:01 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA16890 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:07:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id AED9452C4; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:03:30 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 2502452DC; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:03:30 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:00:24 -0600 From: Dean Willis Subject: RE: Resource Reservation In-reply-to: <38C5176B.90A47AF7@indosat.net.id> To: "Perry Erick R." , IP Tel Message-id: <012901bf8d3f$ea742700$a6e123a6@mcit.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There is some reference to this problem in the SIP WG "QoS Interworking" task discussed at: http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/tasks/index.html Of particular interest are: http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/drafts/draft-manyfolks-sip-resource-00.txt http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/drafts/draft-sinnreich-sip-qos-osp-01.txt http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/drafts/draft-gibson-sip-qos-resv-00.txt and http://www.softarmor.com/sipwg/drafts/draft-dcsgroup-sip-resource-00.txt which I think was obsoleted by the first reference above. The basic approach is that SIP can use whatever IP level resource management approach the underlying networks support. Efforts have been made to work with MPLS, RSVP, DiffServ, DOCSYS, and other mechanisms. In the carrier arena, this looks likely to converge on a two-level model with RSVP at the edge and DiffServ in the core. -- Dean > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com > [mailto:owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com]On Behalf Of Perry > Erick R. > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 8:51 AM > To: IP Tel > Subject: Resource Reservation > > > Hi all, > I don't know whether I asked to the right forum, I hope I could find > some pointers here. To my knowledge, SIP is a lightweight protocol > designed for Internet, so ISP could offer telephone service (cmiiw), CPL > is a programming framework to create Internet Telephony Services, such > as IN. The question is: how to reserve resource (i.e. bandwidth) for a > pair of source-destination in this Internet's TCP/IP mode. The PSTN > enojoys a strict 64-kbps (PCM-30) of bandwidth, eventhough there's no > signal transmitted. > > To my knowledge also: Telcordia has developed MGCP which include > resource reservation in its packet-based telephone framework. Other > framework offered is AT&T's DOSA (Distributed Open Signaling > Architecture). Both offer a resource reservation process before > communication between source-destination begins. > > How do I reserve resource in the IP Tel framework? I believe without a > sturdy resource method, packet-based communication cannot match the PSTN > (unless someone has another, better arguments). The RSVP, as I know it, > is not sturdy enough to handle millions of call simultaneously to match > PSTN's capability. > > Thanks for any answers, > --rick > Telkom Indonesia > Network Division > > > --------- > This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. > --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Tue Mar 14 22:26:08 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA26195 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 22:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 1559852E7; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 22:21:30 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 8503D52F1; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 22:21:29 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <01d901bf8e25$67331b80$a2cb8489@engtanlk.nus.edu.sg> To: From: "ICON'2000 Secretariat" Subject: LAST day to call for papers. Have you submitted your paper? Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:15:25 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D6_01BF8E68.75565B80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01D6_01BF8E68.75565B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All A Gentle Reminder * Kindly ignore this email if you have received this before. Thank you for your kind attention. The 8th IEEE International Conference On Networks will be held from September 5- 8, 2000 in Singapore. The aim of the conference is to = provide an international forum for experts to promote, share and discuss various issues and developments in the broad field of computer and communication networks. We thus seek and solicit your contributions in the form of original/unpublished papers, tutorials, and topics for special sessions/panel discussions. More information on the scope of the conference and the guidelines for the submission of contributions can be obtained at this web site :http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~icon/ We look forward to your participation. Thank you. Icon 2000 organizing Committee ------=_NextPart_000_01D6_01BF8E68.75565B80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All
 
A Gentle Reminder

* Kindly ignore this email if you have = received=20 this before.
Thank you for your kind attention.

The 8th IEEE International Conference On Networks will be held=20 from

September 5- 8, 2000 in Singapore. The aim of the conference = is to=20 provide

an international forum for experts to promote, share and = discuss=20 various

issues and developments in the broad field of computer = and=20 communication

networks. We thus seek and solicit your=20 contributions

in the form of original/unpublished papers, = tutorials, and=20 topics for

special sessions/panel discussions. More information = on the=20 scope of the

conference and the guidelines for the submission of=20 contributions can

be obtained at this web site :http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~ic= on/



We=20 look forward to your participation. Thank you.

Icon 2000 = organizing=20 Committee
------=_NextPart_000_01D6_01BF8E68.75565B80-- --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Wed Mar 15 11:26:16 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA02280 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:26:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 015AB52E1; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:14:07 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 2E49352FA; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:14:06 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <38CFB7C3.9D64461E@dynamicsoft.com> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:18:11 -0500 From: Jonathan Rosenberg Organization: dynamicsoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Liess, Laura" Cc: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: Re: uploading services from the user's home network to a sip server of the visited network within a 3G.IP environement References: <8FCDC1EF5ADCD211AC670800060D98A601522614@U8P15> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Liess, Laura" wrote: > > Hi, > > after doing a very good job by deciding to take SIP for call control for multimedia services within 3G.IP >networks, the 3G.IP operators have a lot of open items concerning the architecture, one of them being which >network controls the services for a roaming user: the home network, the visited network or shared control. >The concrete question: how can I upload at the begin or during the call the roamimg user's services >available in the home network into the SIP proxy of the visited network? As far as I know, the CPL and >REGISTER helps me to upload services only from the UA to the proxy. I'm not an expert in wireless, so I'm not certain of the scope of the services we are talking about. Mid call services, for example, are not currently within the scope of CPL. However, there is nothing which prevents the CPL-upload-in-register mechanism from being used by a server to upload scripts to another server. Registrations, in general, can be used for third party controls. The From field identifies the party initiating the registration. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg 200 Executive Drive Chief Scientist Suite 120 dynamicsoft West Orange, NJ 07052 jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (732) 741-4778 http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen PHONE: (732) 741-7244 http://www.dynamicsoft.com --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Thu Mar 16 00:42:39 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA10616 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:42:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 6E9DD530C; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:24:00 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id C0A73530A; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:23:58 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-Id: <8FCDC1EF5ADCD211AC670800060D98A601522614@U8P15> From: "Liess, Laura" To: sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: uploading services from the user's home network to a sip server of the visited network within a 3G.IP environement Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:12:18 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Hi, after doing a very good job by deciding to take SIP for call control for multimedia services within 3G.IP networks, the 3G.IP operators have a lot of open items concerning the architecture, one of them being which network controls the services for a roaming user: the home network, the visited network or shared control. The concrete question: how can I upload at the begin or during the call the roamimg user's services available in the home network into the SIP proxy of the visited network? As far as I know, the CPL and REGISTER helps me to upload services only from the UA to the proxy. Is anyone else working on similar issues? I know of the Telcordia mobility efforts, but the 3G.IP requirements and architecture seem to be somehow different. The 3G.IP operators would like to reuse their just implemented GPRS and the GPRS mobility. Thanks a lot Laura --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 17 01:42:26 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA09387 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:42:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 67EEC5300; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:37:27 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id CF7F15312; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:37:26 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <38D1D3BA.D6F748C2@dynamicsoft.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:42:02 -0500 From: Jonathan Rosenberg Organization: dynamicsoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "iptel, list" Subject: Agenda for Adelaide Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Agenda for the iptel Working Group IETF 47 1930-2200, Monday March 27 ================================== 1. Agenda Bashing [Rosenberg] 5 mins 2. Status of CPL & TRIP Frameworks [Rosenberg] 5 mins 3. Framework and Requirements for the Internet Intelligent Networks (IIN) [Slutsman] 15 mins 4. TRIP [Rosenberg] 45 mins 5. TRIP for Gateway Route Exporting [Rosenberg] 15 mins 6. CPL [Rosenberg] 45 mins Reading: draft-lslutsman-sip-iin-framework-00.txt draft-rs-trip-gw-00.txt draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt draft-ietf-iptel-trip-01.txt -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg 200 Executive Drive Chief Scientist Suite 120 dynamicsoft West Orange, NJ 07052 jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (732) 741-4778 http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen PHONE: (732) 741-7244 http://www.dynamicsoft.com --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 17 08:28:17 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24404 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id E4F4D52BB; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:23:26 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 6623952C8; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:23:26 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-Id: <200003171321.IAA21342@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" To: IETF-Announce: ; Cc: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Reply-To: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt,.ps Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:21:03 -0500 Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Telephony Working Group of the IETF. Title : CPL: A Language for User Control of Internet Telephony Services Author(s) : J. Lennox, H. Schulzrinne Filename : draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt,.ps Pages : 41 Date : 16-Mar-00 The Call Processing Language (CPL) is a language that can be used to describe and control Internet telephony services. It is designed to be implementable on either network servers or user agent servers. It is meant to be simple, extensible, easily edited by graphical clients, and independent of operating system or signalling protocol. It is suitable for running on a server where users may not be allowed to execute arbitrary programs, as it has no variables, loops, or ability to run external programs. This document is a product of the IP Telephony (IPTEL) working group of the Internet Engineering Task Force. Comments are solicited and should be addressed to the working group's mailing list at iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com and/or the authors. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <20000316144158.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-iptel-cpl-01.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <20000316144158.I-D@ietf.org> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart-- --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 17 16:45:36 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA16529 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:45:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 23AB752DF; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:33:49 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 9082952E2; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:33:48 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-Id: <4.3.2.20000317153054.00bb8100@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: rshockey/popd.ix.netcom.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:32:37 -0600 To: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com From: Richard Shockey Subject: FYI: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk For those of you interested in how phone numbers really work in the IN... >To: IETF-Announce: ; >From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org >Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org >Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:22:10 -0500 >Sender: nsyracus@cnri.reston.va.us > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. > > > Title : Number Portability in the GSTN: An Overview > Author(s) : M. Foster, J. Yu, T. McGarry > Filename : draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt > Pages : 28 > Date : 16-Mar-00 > >This document provides an overview of E.164 telephone number >portability (NP) in the Global Switched Telephone Network (GSTN). >There are three types of number portability: service provider >portability (SPNP), location portability, and service portability. >Service provider portability, the focus of the present draft, is a >regulatory imperative in many countries seeking to liberalize local >telephony service competition, by enabling end-users to retain pre- >existing telephone numbers while changing service providers. >Implementation of NP within national GSTN entails potentially >significant changes to numbering administration, network element >signaling, call routing and processing, billing, service management, >and other functions. NP changes the fundamental nature of a dialed >E.164 number from a hierarchical physical routing address to a >virtual address, thereby requiring the transparent translation of >the later to the former. In addition, there are various regulatory >constraints which establish relevant parameters for NP >implementation, most of which are not network technology specific. >Consequently, the implementation of NP behavior consistent with >applicable regulatory constraints, as well as the need for >interoperation with the existing GSTN NP implementations, are >relevant topics for numerous areas of IP telephony work-in-progress >at IETF. > >A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username >"anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, >type "cd internet-drafts" and then > "get draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt". > >A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in >http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > >Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. > >Send a message to: > mailserv@ietf.org. >In the body type: > "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt". > >NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in > MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this > feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" > command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or > a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers > exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with > "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split > up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on > how to manipulate these messages. > > >Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader >implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the >Internet-Draft. >Content-Type: text/plain >Content-ID: <20000316144422.I-D@ietf.org> > >ENCODING mime >FILE /internet-drafts/draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting LLC 8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110 St. Louis, MO 63119 Voice 314.918.9020 eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax) INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey@ix.netcom.com GSTN Fax 314.918.9015 MediaGate iPost VoiceMail and Fax 800.260.4464 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Sun Mar 19 23:36:17 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA01304 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 23:36:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 033D052C8; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 23:31:29 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 7598052D4; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 23:31:28 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com To: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: I'd like to speak in the IPTEL session From: KITAGAWA Takurou MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.4 - "Terai") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 20 Mar 2000 13:29:05 +0900 Message-ID: <3g8zzenu26.fsf@jog.kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Lines: 9 User-Agent: Semi-gnus/6.10.12 SEMI/1.13.4 (Terai) FLIM/1.12.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Y=FEzaki?=) Emacs/20.4 (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.6) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk I'd like to talk about a directory service for IP telephony using HTTP, in the IPTEL session in 47th IETF meeting. Can I have a time (about a few minutes) to speak? -- Kitagawa Takurou Graduate School of Kyoto University kitagawa@kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Thu Mar 23 23:54:23 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA00427 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:54:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id C06A952E3; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:49:27 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 3E94752E4; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:49:27 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com To: Jonathan Rosenberg Cc: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: phone directory server for IP telephony applications References: <3g8zzenu26.fsf@jog.kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <38D5BB36.1A2B7FDE@dynamicsoft.com> <3gu2i1vsk6.fsf@jog.kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <38D7036C.C1EDDDF7@dynamicsoft.com> From: KITAGAWA Takurou In-Reply-To: <38D7036C.C1EDDDF7@dynamicsoft.com> (Jonathan Rosenberg's message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:06:52 -0500") MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.4 - "Terai") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 24 Mar 2000 13:46:15 +0900 Message-ID: <3gbt45ou08.fsf_-_@jog.kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Lines: 118 User-Agent: Semi-gnus/6.10.12 SEMI/1.13.4 (Terai) FLIM/1.12.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Y=FEzaki?=) Emacs/20.4 (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.6) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk If I can, I would like to speak about this server in the IPTEL session in 47th IETF meeting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract A telephone directory server, which changes a traditional telephone number into the information that an IP telephony application uses, is defined. This server uses HTTP and CGI to communicate with a client. 1. Introduction When a user employs IP telephony, he or she must specify many types of information such as IP address, port number, protocol for communication, audio codec, and etc. This specification bothers users very much. Thus, when a user can specify all information just by one telephone number, it will save him or her much trouble and IP telephony will become easier to use. In this draft, a telephone directory server, which changes a telephone number given by a user into the information that IP telephony applications require, is defined. This server uses HTTP and CGI as a protocol for communication with a client. 2. Query from client to server A client accesses to following URI with HTTP, using a GET method. http:///[path]? is the host name (or IP address) of a telephone directory server. A server MAY require [path], to specify a telephone directory in it. is the telephone number given by a user, and is composed of digit 0-9, *, and/or #. and [path] in this URI, which are required information to specify a telephone directory, are set up in a client in advance. 3. Answer from server to client A server receives a requested telephone number with the CGI scheme. Then a sever refers to internal database, whether the information copes with the requested telephone number. 3.1 The case that server found matched information A server returns HTTP status code 200 (OK) to a client, and a body part of the answer contains the information. The information returned to a client depends on a telephony system, but usually contains: o A hostname or IP address of callee o A port number of callee o A protocol used in calling o An audio codec used in calling The description format of the information is notified of the client by the Content-Type field. For example, SDP can be used as a concrete description format,. Example: ( C> indicates the data from a client to a server, and S> indicates the data from a client to a server ) C>GET /?1234 HTTP/1.0 C> S>200 OK S>Content-Type: application/sdp S> S>v=0 S>o=user@somedomain S>s=IP telephone call S>c=IN IP4 somehost.somedomain S>t=0 0 S>m=audio 10001 RTP/AVP 0 3.2 The case that the server could not find information A server returns HTTP status code 404 (Not Found) to a client. Example: C>GET /?1234 HTTP/1.0 C> S>404 Not Found S> 3.3 Timeout A client waits for an answer from a server during the specified time after it sent an query. When a client receives no answer from a server during the time, it judges that a server error occurred. 3.5 Other status codes A server MAY return other status codes to a client if necessary. When a client receives an HTTP Status Code not described above, it SHOULD deal it as an usual HTTP user agents does. 4. Security A telephone directory server MAY authenticate a client in accordance with the HTTP framework, if necessary. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Kitagawa Takurou Graduate School of Kyoto University kitagawa@kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 24 04:02:11 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA11546 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:02:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 00D8052E4; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:57:28 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 6B02C52E8; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:57:27 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com To: Jonathan Rosenberg Cc: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Subject: Re: phone directory server for IP telephony applications References: <38DB0B83.8AC2D38D@dynamicsoft.com> <3gbt45ou08.fsf_-_@jog.kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp> From: KITAGAWA Takurou In-Reply-To: <38DB0B83.8AC2D38D@dynamicsoft.com> (Jonathan Rosenberg's message of "Fri, 24 Mar 2000 01:30:27 -0500") MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.4 - "Terai") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 24 Mar 2000 17:55:39 +0900 Message-ID: <3gwvmsoigk.fsf@jog.kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Lines: 42 User-Agent: Semi-gnus/6.10.12 SEMI/1.13.4 (Terai) FLIM/1.12.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Y=FEzaki?=) Emacs/20.4 (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.6) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Jonathan Rosenberg writes: > This is simply too late to be considered for a slot. In a general IETF WG meeting, a sudden speaker is usually also welcome. And... IETF 47 1930-2200, Monday March 27 ================================== 1. Agenda Bashing [Rosenberg] 5 mins 2. Status of CPL & TRIP Frameworks [Rosenberg] 5 mins 3. Framework and Requirements for the Internet Intelligent Networks (IIN) [Slutsman] 15 mins 4. TRIP [Rosenberg] 45 mins 5. TRIP for Gateway Route Exporting [Rosenberg] 15 mins 6. CPL [Rosenberg] 45 mins slots still remain apparently. 5 or 10 ten minutes for this topic are enough. > Please submit as an > I-D after the meeting if you wish to pursue this. In any case, I believe > this to be outside of the charter of iptel. I belive this theme interests most people attending IPTEL WG. Let's discuss this topic openly. > > -Jonathan R. -- Kitagawa Takurou Graduate School of Kyoto University kitagawa@kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Tue Mar 28 09:03:56 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA21055 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:03:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 181FE52F6; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:59:27 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 8516752F9; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:59:26 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com X-Lotus-FromDomain: MITEL From: Tom_Gray@Mitel.COM To: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com, Tom_Gray@Mitel.COM Message-ID: <852568B0.004CB3CE.00@kanmta01.software.mitel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 07:51:28 -0500 Subject: Internet Telephony Research Position Available Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk 3/27/2000 Mitel Corporation Position Description Position Title: Senior Researcher Strategic Technology Group Mitel Corporation www.mitel.com Mitel Corporation is a leading participant in the enterprise communications market. It has recently announced its DIVA architecture that allows for the creation of Internet based voice and data applications. Mitel's Strategic Technology group is now staffing a research position to act as a participant in a small dynamic team. This successful candidate willact as an 'independent contributor' within our new technology team. This senior person will be given freedom to set his/her own objectives and workingconditions. Education: A Ph.D. or M.Sc. in Computer Science, Systems Engineering or equivalent. Knowledge: Research done recently in the group has included: agent based applications and architectures, Bluetooth and other mobility technologies, application of ontologies to policy-based call routing, use case maps, patterns and other software engineering topics, and feature interaction detection and resolution. The ideal candidate should have expertise in one or more of the following areas: intelligent software agents, artificial intelligence, telecommunication and Internet technologies, mobile and distributed computing concepts (CORBA, RMI, Mobile Agents), and software systems design concepts (UML, UCM, OO design), and application ontologies (XML, policies). Duties: The successful candidate?s primary duties will include: identifying and introducing external technology of relevance to Mitel, initiating and participating in external university research and sponsoring internal demonstrations. Abilities: Ability to relate academic research objectives to Mitel?s needs and thereby contribute to advanced communication systems. Develop effective relationships with other research, and development teams within Mitel. Develop effective relationships with Mitel?s collaborating organizations. Communicate results clearly and effectively through publications or presentations. Personal Suitability: Must have demonstrated skills as a team contributor. Must be enthusiastic and demonstrate effective communication skills. Must be highly motivated and a self-starter while participating in team projects. Must be open to learning new concepts. Contact: Tom Gray Strategic Technology Group 350 Legget Dr. P.O. Box 13089 Kanata, Ontario, K2K 2W7 Tel: 613 592-2122 x1742 Fax: 613 592-4784 Email: Tom_Gray@mitel.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 31 09:47:44 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA14177 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:47:42 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 4AAD852E5; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:10:44 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 662BA52B6; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:09:49 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Message-ID: <38E2065B.95DCA085@research.att.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:34:19 -0500 From: IPTS 2000 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com, pint@lists.research.bell-labs.com, sigtran@standards.nortelnetworks.com, sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com Cc: ipts2000@research.att.com Subject: Initial CFP: IP Telecom Services 2000 Workshop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [Please accept our apologies for multiple copies of this call.] ------------- PRELIMINARY CALL FOR PAPERS --------------- IP TELECOM SERVICES WORKSHOP 2000 (IPTS 2000) co-located with Fall 2000 Voice on the Net (VON) organized by AT&T Labs Research pulver.com Cobb Galleria, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A September 11, 2000 submission deadline: June 16, 2000 http://www.research.att.com/conf/ipts2000/ ----------------------------------------------------------- IPTS 2000 is a new workshop dedicated to the important, emerging field of IP Telecom Services research. In contrast to the services available on the PSTN, a new world of telecom services is possible on an IP-based infrastructure. This world presents new challenges for service development, deployment and management. This one-day workshop will serve as a forum for the dissemination of research relating to these challenges. The IPTS 2000 Program Committee invites submission of papers on substantial, original and previously unpublished research in IP telecom services, including, but not limited to: - service architectures (e.g. AIN, SoftSwitch, JAIN, Parlay, DFC) - service creation environments - protocols, standards and interoperability (e.g. H.323, SIP, MGCP, Megaco/H.248, etc.) - service programming languages - service management - billing, fault tolerance, monitoring - novel services We welcome papers describing original research; position papers describing research interests in the field, work in progress, or future directions of research; project or system descriptions. IMPORTANT DATES June 16, 2000 Submission deadline July 21, 2000 Notification of acceptance August 25, 2000 Final version of papers September 11, 2000 IPTS 2000 PAPER SUBMISSIONS Papers must describe original, previously unpublished work that has not been simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. They must be written in English, not exceeding 6 pages including figures, tables and references in 10-12 point font on 8.5x11-inch (US letter) paper. The first page must include an abstract of up to 200 words, keywords, and email address of the corresponding author. All papers must be submitted electronically unless specifically approved by the Workshop Co-Chairs. Submissions in PostScript or PDF format should be sent to mailto:ipts2000@research.att.com. Authors of accepted papers are expected to present their contribution at the workshop. The proceedings will be published in hardcopy and on the web. REVIEW PROCEDURE All submissions will be subject to academic peer review by the IPTS 2000 Program Committee under the chairmanship of the Workshop Co-Chairs. Each paper will receive three written reviews, and reviews will be returned to the authors. The Workshop Co-Chairs have final authority over the review process and all decisions relating to acceptance of papers. Review criteria include originality of ideas, technical soundness, significance of results, and quality of presentation. CONFERENCE VENUE AND RELATED EVENTS IPTS 2000 will be held on September 11, 2000 in Atlanta, Georgia. The workshop will be co-located with Fall 2000 Voice on the Net (VON). Details about Fall 2000 VON can be found at http://pulver.com. IPTS 2000 is organized by AT&T Labs Research (http://www.research.att.com) and pulver.com (http://pulver.com). WORKSHOP CO-CHAIRS Greg Bond, AT&T Labs Research Eric Cheung, AT&T Labs Research PROGRAM COMMITTEE Mauricio Arango, Sun Microsystems Labs Joanne Atlee, University of Waterloo Ralph Blumenthal, Daewoo Telecom Scott Hoffpauir, BroadSoft Evan Magill, University of Strathclyde Peter Mataga, dynamicsoft Bernie Pagurek, Carleton University Jonathan Rosenberg, dynamicsoft Henning Schulzrinne, Columbia University Greg Utas, Nortel Networks Pamela Zave, AT&T Labs Research FURTHER GENERAL INFORMATION http://www.research.att.com/conf/ipts2000 --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List. From owner-iptel-outgoing@lists.research.bell-labs.com Fri Mar 31 15:48:00 2000 Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA18087 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:48:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 9A90352BB; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:43:28 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 1E87252DD; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:43:28 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: iptel-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com From: "Eber Mello" To: Subject: "Otherwise" as mandatory output node Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:43:04 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <38E2065B.95DCA085@research.att.com> Sender: owner-iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rosenberg, Would you comment on this? The current CPL draft (March 10/2000) states that "Otherwise" is an optional node on the output list of the "Switch-" nodes; we understand that it makes more sense to always be able to find a way out of a non signalling action node, meaning that a CPL script would be able to handle all calls given to it. It seems quite simple to expect a user to specify either to drop ("Reject") or forward ("Proxy") all other calls not handled by the other output nodes of a "Switch-" node. This probably simplifies the script execution and seems safer as gives no room for mistakenly performing an action not meant to be executed (all actions are defined by the latest signalling action node visited vis-a-vis the latest request, response or internal event arrived). If we could go this way we could have the SIP registration define either "proxy", "redirect" or "script" policy for a user, meaning that this user either has services (policy=script) or not (policy=redirect or proxy). Thanks, Eber Mello SS8 Networks Canada. www.ss8networks.com phone: 613-5921418 --------- This message came from the IETF IPTEL Working Group Mailing List.