Subject: RE: speaking of ND Proxy and NBMA etc.

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:03:32 +0100

Hi,

Exactly. In IPv4 the "tethering" can be done with NAT & DHCPv4 server in UE, but in IPv6 ND Proxy is needed until UEs can get more prefixes from 3GPP network with prefix delegation techniques (such as DHCPv6 PD).

Best regards,

Teemu

--- original message ---
From: "ext Laganier, Julien" <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: speaking of ND Proxy and NBMA etc.
Date: 18th November 2009
Time: 9:58:36 pm

Hello Teemu,

A question for clarification about the 3GPP use-case you have in mind. Are you thinking about a 3GPP User Equipment being allocated a /64 prefix on the 3GPP link and acting as an ND proxy between the 3GPP link and downstream links to which other nodes could attach (e.g. a laptop) ?

Thanks,

--julien

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> [email-masked]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:35 AM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: speaking of ND Proxy and NBMA etc.
>
> I'm supporting this work and the goal, with the 3GPP (modem) use-case
> particularly in my mind.
>
> Thanks for working on this,
>
> Teemu
> ________________________________________
> From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]] On Behalf Of ext
> Hemant Singh (shemant) [[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:14 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: speaking of ND Proxy and NBMA etc.
>
> Please see a short note we wrote.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wbeebee-6man-nd-proxy-std-00.txt
>
> Hemant
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email-masked]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------