From nobody Mon Aug 4 00:07:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBC51B288E for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 00:07:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.021 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97zDsg9DFS4w for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 00:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C69121B2883 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 00:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.9]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee553df312ffba-dc002; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:07:27 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee553df312ffba-dc002 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmccPC (unknown[183.244.136.58]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee553df312e99e-7205c; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:07:27 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee553df312e99e-7205c From: "Cao, Zhen $CZ$" To: Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 15:07:27 +0800 Message-ID: <00d001cfafb2$c049df60$40dd9e20$@chinamobile.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D1_01CFAFF5.CE6EF420" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac+vsqJoPNHAkFfsSZqdbbVolMqPyA== Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/Aua2GLSiYZLTtfgqOaaR8jEvDwo Subject: [Lwip] Minutes @IETF90 X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Lightweight IP stack List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 07:07:32 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01CFAFF5.CE6EF420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear All, Please check the minutes below. Thank Ari again for help taking minutes. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-lwig let me know if there is any problems with the minutes. Best regards, zhen ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01CFAFF5.CE6EF420 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear All,

Please = check the minutes below. Thank Ari again for help taking minutes. =

http:= //www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-lwig

let me = know if there is any problems with the minutes.

Best = regards,

zhen

------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01CFAFF5.CE6EF420-- From nobody Wed Aug 13 13:41:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCC41A06F4; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rjHzsgmbxkRg; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51E61A06EB; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:41:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.2.p5 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140813204113.6384.62815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:41:13 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/k4HdJ8QfN161RqFCgWwZcZL_YII Cc: lwip@ietf.org Subject: [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-02.txt X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Lightweight IP stack List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:41:19 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Light-Weight Implementation Guidance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Building Power-Efficient CoAP Devices for Cellular Networks Authors : Jari Arkko Anders Eriksson Ari Keranen Filename : draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-02.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2014-08-13 Abstract: This memo discusses the use of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) protocol in building sensors and other devices that employ cellular networks as a communications medium. Building communicating devices that employ these networks is obviously well known, but this memo focuses specifically on techniques necessary to minimize power consumption. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-cellular/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Aug 26 04:34:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587D11A6F84 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:34:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.568 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7XK5fAWv-3r for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57591A6F7D for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.254.100] ([80.92.114.249]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LslCb-1WKlPt3Ke1-012Hkk for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:34:00 +0200 Message-ID: <53FC70A8.10006@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:34:00 +0200 From: Hannes Tschofenig User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lwip@ietf.org References: <53F88813.8060403@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <53F88813.8060403@gmx.net> OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9 X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <53F88813.8060403@gmx.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="12fm5976A0X1BGwp83WHprVIEGceHixWI" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ps8fNSZ8bDUyZYsFYpzwSWFbWL4Y7Q6r//DyUWBdYO9Cok5s+1o JWfc1T6J9PNsx9fW14nVf5BrSd+5fTo32TWT/eYbUY7OQ2DVcwkZfaSrcQmpUmcjitRFq3Z GQz84Tz5ycW0CPTpv6bwOY2hLs8ML0myCRa67MEwVKPphTUcB5v9Y843iml8R6WW43FLK4C /amqH2IyqPpdact8VW55A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/f9MPelTo6VLZ_Y_SDveaxCIc1N8 Subject: [Lwip] Fwd: [Ace] Webex Conference Call about "How to Select Hardware for IoT Systems?" X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Lightweight IP stack List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:34:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --12fm5976A0X1BGwp83WHprVIEGceHixWI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI: I believe this topic is relevant because of the scope of this working group. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Ace] Webex Conference Call about "How to Select Hardware for IoT Systems?" Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:24:51 +0200 From: Hannes Tschofenig To: Ace@ietf.org Hi all, Various groups in the IETF currently standardize technology for use with constrained devices and the choice of hardware impacts the design of Internet of Things (IoT) systems. To provide guidance RFC 7228 "Terminology for Constrained-Node Networks" defines three classes of devices depending on their RAM and flash memory size. Class 0 characterizes devices that have less than 10 KiB of RAM and less than 100 KiB of flash memory and RFC 7228 adds "... most likely they will not have the resources required to communicate directly with the Internet in a secure manner." For others even class 2 with ~ 50 KiB of RAM and ~ 250 KiB of flash memory is too constrained. With the increasing commercial interest in IoT the question about a reasonable hardware configuration surfaces again and again. At IETF#90 I offered to bring a hardware expert along. Peter Aldworth, a hardware engineer with more than 19 years of experience, will lead the discussion at an upcoming webinar. Please indicate your availability here: http://moreganize.com/bzTrVxhqaHp Ciao Hannes --12fm5976A0X1BGwp83WHprVIEGceHixWI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT/HCoAAoJEGhJURNOOiAta5oH/0evpLRUQuQzRypB+zKGBENo nkNTM3PoNsyHtyRf4tadhQzgRaCP0P8pnliiWhRNFczgZuKN+7NX40mGuCEnCyMI fsZkhlAF+PbJw/JcrGHitmlHi3B0P8VqG/gHA9JGstV/PcvD+3tr9ofHRruCNiSt Z8KCUTUx+YF3BwRP1aSZRUFkzBi6U8er6AZ2yYQNf5kLT1EhBkfXnFWinyMKel14 Fpzu0wIsu65O36Sw0+Nkk+pdVg6VvQxVVIWioNw2XI7kQPxpxwwMeOh3NrsbwdmY QvMRhUSqcRFTQat2WsR0POzMWNoJDq4C5U01EOPTB5jXesL6pjoSXJSaPLnQNKg= =Iau5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --12fm5976A0X1BGwp83WHprVIEGceHixWI--