From us@isaemailmarketing.info Sun May 1 23:31:15 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D48C159484 for ; Sun, 1 May 2022 23:31:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AAms4H9GKIf0 for ; Sun, 1 May 2022 23:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emailmarketingineurope.com (unknown [153.92.210.59]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9E5C159482 for ; Sun, 1 May 2022 23:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isaemailmarketing.info (unknown [177.136.12.226]) (Authenticated sender: us@emailmarketingineurope.com) by emailmarketingineurope.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4E2D121402 for ; Mon, 2 May 2022 06:15:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 emailmarketingineurope.com B4E2D121402 Reply-To: us@isaemailmarketing.info From: =?UTF-8?B?SVNB?= To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Subject: =?UTF-8?B?aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gYWJvdXQgZW1haWwgbWFya2V0aW5n?= Date: 02 May 2022 00:59:00 -0300 Message-ID: <20220502005900.0B4FFEAACD5CE1BF@isaemailmarketing.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=09
Good morning

My name is Fabian Torre and I am an Email Marketing technician
I would like to know if you are interested in receiving information about p= roducts and services for Email Marketing,=20 and to what email address I can send it.

Thanks a lot

Whatsapp: +55 719 9204-2292
Skype: chronskype

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 11:15:34 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88211C15E6F6; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651860934; bh=KC9YfabODGF5RQvzA6VyVfKCdWU24w8NtbRnGtfmw28=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=wf/5l/A6wbCmSdBl1ccc1fmoffcJNuF1oxvWuwU1l/7+0BslV0jfluxIH4/myuAp9 9f0YwCBm7OOCuFHwmZF6FqPwFMfBHLak+WAfMxi2C2W1Ns8asvkkKV3Sx0xxMbRoVT T/f0+WOgPxlRT+Ffhv96/XmFSQxR59mU+zFhjTcY= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 11:15:34 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A987C157B55; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651860934; bh=KC9YfabODGF5RQvzA6VyVfKCdWU24w8NtbRnGtfmw28=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=wf/5l/A6wbCmSdBl1ccc1fmoffcJNuF1oxvWuwU1l/7+0BslV0jfluxIH4/myuAp9 9f0YwCBm7OOCuFHwmZF6FqPwFMfBHLak+WAfMxi2C2W1Ns8asvkkKV3Sx0xxMbRoVT T/f0+WOgPxlRT+Ffhv96/XmFSQxR59mU+zFhjTcY= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E88C15948D; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.645 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D4a7qybhdAyJ; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BDBC157B37; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 63F1A8DED5; Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, babel@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220506181529.63F1A8DED5@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9229_on_IPv4_Routes_with_an_IPv6_Next_H?= =?utf-8?q?op_in_the_Babel_Routing_Protocol?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9229 Title: IPv4 Routes with an IPv6 Next Hop in the Babel Routing Protocol Author: J. Chroboczek Status: Experimental Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: jch@irif.fr Pages: 9 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9229 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9229 This document defines an extension to the Babel routing protocol that allows announcing routes to an IPv4 prefix with an IPv6 next hop, which makes it possible for IPv4 traffic to flow through interfaces that have not been assigned an IPv4 address. This document is a product of the Babel routing protocol Working Group of the IETF. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 12:28:56 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F319CC15EB36; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651865336; bh=HI2AND8uJ7EPgxBNSVqnAHMPLIWUeg0T0I2MiHGXbLE=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=MIbTjf7itnzoAA0OA5iPGUm0iwCfCVeOYVBD+IGMjTOCRhfIzUzQp2a4AYvp4AJyN nxr1dwoZZOSbT0SmdKTMXQ2MTpaX1fw0P3l7m6nUf3WhZ7RqDhw+paeGJp8rzHMWrd wQESutneUduj1UkZQFNYVBk4CdsougHevBlSE/k4= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 12:28:55 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A542C157B4A; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651865335; bh=HI2AND8uJ7EPgxBNSVqnAHMPLIWUeg0T0I2MiHGXbLE=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=KeBzRdpRmGfgU8vyU3o795aR374+8P8ZRv6bP5PPFS1Mg0gHcvYETD7psxW4vgTYI 1aK7PHSY6l0xQNFpWLdtgvbi7Y+4gn6cSQTdyBWltWZD1rxt9oYdhBkHvoq1A+LOKe 75PGaIKnmdRV6C2V0DxyL7byARIzH+XQ1NAZWkvw= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2454FC157B48; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rv4Suyn6Qqgw; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0483C157B4A; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id C68378DED5; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dispatch@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220506192850.C68378DED5@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9239_on_Updates_to_ECMAScript_Media_Typ?= =?utf-8?q?es?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9239 Title: Updates to ECMAScript Media Types Author: M. Miller, M. Borins, M. Bynens, B. Farias Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net, mylesborins@github.com, mths@google.com, bradley.meck@gmail.com Pages: 13 Obsoletes: RFC 4329 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-17.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9239 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9239 This document describes the registration of media types for the ECMAScript and JavaScript programming languages and conformance requirements for implementations of these types. This document obsoletes RFC 4329 ("Scripting Media Types)", replacing the previous registrations with information and requirements aligned with common usage and implementation experiences. This document is a product of the Dispatch Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 12:48:31 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F70FC2D3F3B; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651866511; bh=x460vTbsgEObv/ucPXSnzg9vJw+qo5Yk+NGWZ0OfgVI=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=EE9L4iJj7/6WlgWZoYBvNu7LqFu+NQUc5/2WzTMuZEe7ajze9llBxnz/Ed6J4blU2 48DOsI9HPtYoRrt2Dz+NUyW/MZCNScXLw9G976wtL+AbItjJ1Os+UhmWiFBl4Y3IMC ApCGNOh4R7io/vBHfwwqGP3Csz9pxiKHk4wmx7iM= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 6 12:48:30 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C4C26E8CE; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651866510; bh=x460vTbsgEObv/ucPXSnzg9vJw+qo5Yk+NGWZ0OfgVI=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=xF4UG1LIIZhZla8qaOlroyVkZirpjI6s70rnjK0aFU+Ny/aPF65OQgFNGdXIp58am kixDkHALC+qSWpfNE5pS0s14Ma0J5Lu0pQXwD0NMgBO2Rx5IOzSpfiil1wt7xcdYOu ZeFsIAW9uFBAyvu0QjTDyJqV5Z/TXJRbWHQkmJAs= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D6AC157B55; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.646 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkPav1UTjMQw; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B38C159489; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E0F758DED5; Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:18 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, idr@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220506194818.E0F758DED5@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 12:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9234_on_Route_Leak_Prevention_and_Detec?= =?utf-8?q?tion_Using_Roles_in_UPDATE_and_OPEN_Messages?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9234 Title: Route Leak Prevention and Detection Using Roles in UPDATE and OPEN Messages Author: A. Azimov, E. Bogomazov, R. Bush, K. Patel, K. Sriram Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: a.e.azimov@gmail.com, eb@qrator.net, randy@psg.com, keyur@arrcus.com, ksriram@nist.gov Pages: 12 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-24.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9234 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9234 Route leaks are the propagation of BGP prefixes that violate assumptions of BGP topology relationships, e.g., announcing a route learned from one transit provider to another transit provider or a lateral (i.e., non-transit) peer or announcing a route learned from one lateral peer to another lateral peer or a transit provider. These are usually the result of misconfigured or absent BGP route filtering or lack of coordination between autonomous systems (ASes). Existing approaches to leak prevention rely on marking routes by operator configuration, with no check that the configuration corresponds to that of the External BGP (eBGP) neighbor, or enforcement of the two eBGP speakers agreeing on the peering relationship. This document enhances the BGP OPEN message to establish an agreement of the peering relationship on each eBGP session between autonomous systems in order to enforce appropriate configuration on both sides. Propagated routes are then marked according to the agreed relationship, allowing both prevention and detection of route leaks. This document is a product of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 11 16:36:07 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9117CC3A4B76; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652312167; bh=mvZU4V3tj5TZWXHul7UNcS7eg1Gg0tbRH1KaDiC8j4s=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=J3CZoPtlUEpAySV/7QVXfPJCc1yfv81wsNFCghepaxVpLMfo++80DvrWFfCH1Nmp0 /qkgG01OstwuKONG5DyEUoaU4RnjX72KZSX+P5dYMafEO1VWycuSnkG4jyj7v8d/B5 dVcDya7ewc0t1G0aoJstHUjjrGKKI2E7eQ4YYI5g= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 11 16:36:07 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793A2C2CE8DF; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:36:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652312166; bh=mvZU4V3tj5TZWXHul7UNcS7eg1Gg0tbRH1KaDiC8j4s=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Ch+3ff29NLLlHWbMNz9M8Csf37p1WMHgrNsGSj71cSTSg2WwAsFdvfHfAqfcjUW6b KuAxNMNq44nVN4ze4jnbej0eaQY5HmwLGYQrsXkF/wAAh4T1nDcOrM04oqztdFoUFg IQJojtGOh8wMiVvtYO+d1i5a7wuZogAI+3ibeIEM= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD1AC15949A; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:36:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.645 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrWbvLZ-D5lM; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE5FC1595FB; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 91E8F119F0; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:35:56 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220511233556.91E8F119F0@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9250_on_DNS_over_Dedicated_QUIC_Connect?= =?utf-8?q?ions?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9250 Title: DNS over Dedicated QUIC Connections Author: C. Huitema, S. Dickinson, A. Mankin Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: huitema@huitema.net, sara@sinodun.com, allison.mankin@gmail.com Pages: 27 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9250 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9250 This document describes the use of QUIC to provide transport confidentiality for DNS. The encryption provided by QUIC has similar properties to those provided by TLS, while QUIC transport eliminates the head-of-line blocking issues inherent with TCP and provides more efficient packet-loss recovery than UDP. DNS over QUIC (DoQ) has privacy properties similar to DNS over TLS (DoT) specified in RFC 7858, and latency characteristics similar to classic DNS over UDP. This specification describes the use of DoQ as a general-purpose transport for DNS and includes the use of DoQ for stub to recursive, recursive to authoritative, and zone transfer scenarios. This document is a product of the DNS PRIVate Exchange Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu May 12 05:54:55 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8113CC15E6F9; Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652360095; bh=ck9rYZ+mGiPmig4FZ9bd36/78DsjwKHZYjOkbSMCvoM=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=uyvfPLQmfwbfJxB01gCBjGgL572FIc6jY+jeJKx+4S13pfc4F9vNYHuaeqSKv+ri/ TLY66TQxsDXxTP2nTtWe3TNi1FPaQwEK1Vk0GZxfWX/eYA588mVNNKpy+CfpKJ+gdL 8ibL170NilSypWjwr+PCIx/vhx6bMUtF01imuPJU= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu May 12 05:54:55 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26295C14F74E; Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652360095; bh=ck9rYZ+mGiPmig4FZ9bd36/78DsjwKHZYjOkbSMCvoM=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=uyvfPLQmfwbfJxB01gCBjGgL572FIc6jY+jeJKx+4S13pfc4F9vNYHuaeqSKv+ri/ TLY66TQxsDXxTP2nTtWe3TNi1FPaQwEK1Vk0GZxfWX/eYA588mVNNKpy+CfpKJ+gdL 8ibL170NilSypWjwr+PCIx/vhx6bMUtF01imuPJU= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909A8C157B50; Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtKoL1ywpZtc; Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89D1C14F73B; Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 8C2D56AAC3; Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:49 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tcpm@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220512125449.8C2D56AAC3@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 05:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9235_on_TCP_Authentication_Option_=28TC?= =?utf-8?q?P-AO=29_Test_Vectors?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9235 Title: TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) Test Vectors Author: J. Touch, J. Kuusisaari Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: touch@strayalpha.com, jkuusisaari@infinera.com Pages: 25 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9235 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9235 This document provides test vectors to validate implementations of the two mandatory authentication algorithms specified for the TCP Authentication Option over both IPv4 and IPv6. This includes validation of the key derivation function (KDF) based on a set of test connection parameters as well as validation of the message authentication code (MAC). Vectors are provided for both currently required pairs of KDF and MAC algorithms: KDF_HMAC_SHA1 and HMAC- SHA-1-96, and KDF_AES_128_CMAC and AES-128-CMAC-96. The vectors also validate both whole TCP segments as well as segments whose options are excluded for middlebox traversal. This document is a product of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu May 12 09:44:06 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11682C2B6E99; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652373846; bh=Wn++Z9btNCxPYcLx+66ld9ASKi/XOgI+Fh1QOk1eLC0=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=buHu4bfpDa25U8sNkV20YpFQ0wZ2wtINHkP8FAefhPZBOlhnPc2Y92ik0uw+jMoP1 iPmuanEtqHsZSl9Hxnbb4ASgwsqE+OmtmNfvq0QOeB9dsa8JvbEhczcWJWI2xc7h2e A56rNPD29enW38VFT/I2YX1GVpMH8VMSJTeTra+s= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu May 12 09:44:05 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E12C26E8B3; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:44:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652373845; bh=Wn++Z9btNCxPYcLx+66ld9ASKi/XOgI+Fh1QOk1eLC0=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=p2/GOysSNmfw0plmC7AAvsRW1CkXX0XghmBDU+SABsS+iOzwfbrOTT1PMMrCL4zVB ppBiomt+KIOsBh//RGT7KpMJ6wTd9qqdKnigfUF5SZQCBMcPZMwBvNQyX4LnT3r68+ HxCj7W1hkRsk6CJVJ2/mhBavstXpsG7iWjeOnrBw= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D043EC1D3502; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:44:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbxWm6-CfpFu; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293C4C159826; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4D9FF120A57; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:43:48 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org Message-Id: <20220512164348.4D9FF120A57@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9238_on_Loading_Manufacturer_Usage_Desc?= =?utf-8?q?ription_=28MUD=29_URLs_from_QR_Codes?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9238 Title: Loading Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) URLs from QR Codes Author: M. Richardson, J. Latour, H. Habibi Gharakheili Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: May 2022 Mailbox: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, jacques.latour@cira.ca, h.habibi@unsw.edu.au Pages: 12 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-richardson-mud-qrcode-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9238 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9238 This informational document details a protocol to load Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) definitions from RFC 8520 for devices that do not have them integrated. This document is published to inform the Internet community of this mechanism to allow interoperability and to serve as a basis of other standards work if there is interest. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 23 11:59:00 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB50C3A9170; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:59:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653332340; bh=Yyc3QX2qupKwl7rczdXx/WbU+npUVygWv+hIThSYQvY=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Pl24bzL+F0uChQWbH2b+W4A9srFwOmzwXMT0l+6zpPrLvbQbSL+ejqCnxP6+18xme E8h+HijYO/FNuYRxQrf8jWcxW3lLSILemZ6doTn0cCMD4nlbvbTaGgn54m6GXyqOBG 8sBlaC5B68kyQ9WYsoSeQ8nV8zXc4NB3gvRQbg6k= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 23 11:59:00 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F405BC2D736B; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653332339; bh=Yyc3QX2qupKwl7rczdXx/WbU+npUVygWv+hIThSYQvY=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=FOv1+h0P79ZKA4NRq/nsRv+n3nBGGfu0xUJF+p7528gcGULwmKKsB82xBwI/XuqoO Vhyi+7zIaojnL8EF0t3Sob4/hgFU1Qa8T9BIPjBEZ6JlJc0dkjX6TxZG49sw8/uYYN CFpNbX0+WqQdaeuQNhhIYRytGuSrVqrefnFqHots= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31454C1D34FD; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CABoVg0KF6V; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3F7C1D34FE; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 35151D8454; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ippm@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220523185849.35151D8454@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9197_on_Data_Fields_for_In_Situ_Operati?= =?utf-8?q?ons=2C_Administration=2C_and_Maintenance_=28IOAM=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9197 Title: Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Author: F. Brockners, Ed., S. Bhandari, Ed., T. Mizrahi, Ed. Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: fbrockne@cisco.com, shwetha.bhandari@thoughtspot.com, tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com Pages: 40 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-17.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9197 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9197 In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) collects operational and telemetry information in the packet while the packet traverses a path between two points in the network. This document discusses the data fields and associated data types for IOAM. IOAM-Data-Fields can be encapsulated into a variety of protocols, such as Network Service Header (NSH), Segment Routing, Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve), or IPv6. IOAM can be used to complement OAM mechanisms based on, e.g., ICMP or other types of probe packets. This document is a product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 23 12:25:20 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA617C2BCDF7; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653333920; bh=LCJoSQ5ZhjHKkU//xzjUbiTmMPKsgKsvIRn/eO68YxA=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=O2OHew50ecZ9brJ8CmhngvzkBDyl2r9OnfUWGgH3RGVKtApkhB4rQZ32jbyLLak+7 /9VPVql0zvYd3KScR1S99iPhV675lJpJb9kKzghhGkFG6nLifuRotwLWFYBJ1brxuY aiFDaF1ubDUoo+ZzupjSr55etJYRd+nnsB7bVpBg= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 23 12:25:20 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F469C2B71C0; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653333920; bh=LCJoSQ5ZhjHKkU//xzjUbiTmMPKsgKsvIRn/eO68YxA=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=O2OHew50ecZ9brJ8CmhngvzkBDyl2r9OnfUWGgH3RGVKtApkhB4rQZ32jbyLLak+7 /9VPVql0zvYd3KScR1S99iPhV675lJpJb9kKzghhGkFG6nLifuRotwLWFYBJ1brxuY aiFDaF1ubDUoo+ZzupjSr55etJYRd+nnsB7bVpBg= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD8EC15AE07; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdxMEKoC3YqU; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0E2C15AE08; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3B81DD8454; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ippm@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220523192508.3B81DD8454@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9198_on_Advanced_Unidirectional_Route_A?= =?utf-8?q?ssessment_=28AURA=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9198 Title: Advanced Unidirectional Route Assessment (AURA) Author: J. Alvarez-Hamelin, A. Morton, J. Fabini, C. Pignataro, R. Geib Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar, acm@research.att.com, joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at, cpignata@cisco.com, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de Pages: 23 Updates: RFC 2330 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ippm-route-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9198 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9198 This memo introduces an advanced unidirectional route assessment (AURA) metric and associated measurement methodology based on the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) framework (RFC 2330). This memo updates RFC 2330 in the areas of path-related terminology and path description, primarily to include the possibility of parallel subpaths between a given Source and Destination pair, owing to the presence of multipath technologies. This document is a product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 08:14:42 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4C9C5EE5F9; Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653664482; bh=ybAFuduZqVhTBhrjbC39ahYd65HKOBLruB7o3IkFgR4=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=cGhOeg5Sz5aI3D1u8P2liluSOiHNluyjCo6kKyVrs65CO8klRW+WePmrwL2zgtJup HDgv+EfJmVLS2AcOuoERaHI69Sxc89LhoACp+Y4qn9xta5Mh/TlLO2XQclKBzv/ePv 37GpaZEvEqsex1zJ5hTwPiEUVHVOtZyF5sjaVZWI= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 08:14:42 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A37C417F46; Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653664482; bh=ybAFuduZqVhTBhrjbC39ahYd65HKOBLruB7o3IkFgR4=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=cGhOeg5Sz5aI3D1u8P2liluSOiHNluyjCo6kKyVrs65CO8klRW+WePmrwL2zgtJup HDgv+EfJmVLS2AcOuoERaHI69Sxc89LhoACp+Y4qn9xta5Mh/TlLO2XQclKBzv/ePv 37GpaZEvEqsex1zJ5hTwPiEUVHVOtZyF5sjaVZWI= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D463C26D45A; Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.645 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwoXpsZJj0Tn; Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6788BC19E85E; Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4842E2262275; Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, opsawg@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220527151430.4842E2262275@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9232_on_Network_Telemetry_Framework?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9232 Title: Network Telemetry Framework Author: H. Song, F. Qin, P. Martinez-Julia, L. Ciavaglia, A. Wang Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: haoyu.song@futurewei.com, qinfengwei@chinamobile.com, pedro@nict.go.jp, laurent.ciavaglia@rakuten.com, wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn Pages: 33 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9232 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9232 Network telemetry is a technology for gaining network insight and facilitating efficient and automated network management. It encompasses various techniques for remote data generation, collection, correlation, and consumption. This document describes an architectural framework for network telemetry, motivated by challenges that are encountered as part of the operation of networks and by the requirements that ensue. This document clarifies the terminology and classifies the modules and components of a network telemetry system from different perspectives. The framework and taxonomy help to set a common ground for the collection of related work and provide guidance for related technique and standard developments. This document is a product of the Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 13:47:36 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F614C06D840; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653684456; bh=10SfAbENydOQPgAXv5KJ3J9pD8mI90hsupZHVVnpzgI=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=nkTSbXaNvTBqZYq0fzvehhe87STnLXp4x+Z+otT7QiR4J4UO/nO4UTSHzlCGc2iR0 lLeEchIporQ2vi9wq1wf7IEwXT231ufhvoTcbePYycwE7U+bIHw/oZf5AEEPFqHt/t WtkyAFyxTfh4ZJywXBnS2NFPipubGkBFUGDgXwwo= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 13:47:35 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA119C14F73A; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653684455; bh=10SfAbENydOQPgAXv5KJ3J9pD8mI90hsupZHVVnpzgI=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=kHlP2nkRseVtQW16sYUv/gSrbJUOQBr1lHmcljkhd9igasx+75sDDKrlvms+l7mSw d+UQjziD4hzaELbSxuefpINnkijvrnPgb5eFmR15OOqgK0UJ0l7in5gO2cw+FHLM89 +MsommUFNRgY92ZoM90Vp7UqJSyu434dE2lr++Ho= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB734C14F606; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.648 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k6IqGnvqVzkW; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 955C6C14F608; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4C486226734C; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:24 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, lwip@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220527204724.4C486226734C@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 13:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9178_on_Building_Power-Efficient_Constr?= =?utf-8?q?ained_Application_Protocol_=28CoAP=29_Devices_for_Cellular_Netw?= =?utf-8?q?orks?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDkxNzgKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgQnVpbGRpbmcgUG93ZXItRWZmaWNpZW50IENvbnN0cmFpbmVkIEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIAogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFByb3RvY29sIChDb0FQKSBEZXZpY2VzIGZvciBDZWxsdWxhciBOZXR3 b3JrcyAKICAgICAgICBBdXRob3I6ICAgICBKLiBBcmtrbywKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBB LiBFcmlrc3NvbiwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBLiBLZXLDpG5lbgogICAgICAgIFN0YXR1 czogICAgIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwKICAgICAgICBTdHJlYW06ICAgICBJRVRGCiAgICAgICAgRGF0 ZTogICAgICAgTWF5IDIwMjIKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICBqYXJpLmFya2tvQHBpdWhhLm5l dCwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBhbmRlcnMuZS5lcmlrc3NvbkBwb3N0aGVtLnNlLAogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGFyaS5rZXJhbmVuQGVyaWNzc29uLmNvbQogICAgICAgIFBhZ2VzOiAg ICAgIDE0CiAgICAgICAgVXBkYXRlcy9PYnNvbGV0ZXMvU2VlQWxzbzogICBOb25lCgogICAgICAg IEktRCBUYWc6ICAgIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbHdpZy1jZWxsdWxhci0wNi50eHQKCiAgICAgICAgVVJM OiAgICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvaW5mby9yZmM5MTc4CgogICAgICAg IERPSTogICAgICAgIDEwLjE3NDg3L1JGQzkxNzgKClRoaXMgbWVtbyBkaXNjdXNzZXMgdGhlIHVz ZSBvZiB0aGUgQ29uc3RyYWluZWQgQXBwbGljYXRpb24gUHJvdG9jb2wKKENvQVApIGluIGJ1aWxk aW5nIHNlbnNvcnMgYW5kIG90aGVyIGRldmljZXMgdGhhdCBlbXBsb3kgY2VsbHVsYXIKbmV0d29y a3MgYXMgYSBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucyBtZWRpdW0uIEJ1aWxkaW5nIGNvbW11bmljYXRpbmcgZGV2 aWNlcwp0aGF0IGVtcGxveSB0aGVzZSBuZXR3b3JrcyBpcyBvYnZpb3VzbHkgd2VsbCBrbm93biwg YnV0IHRoaXMgbWVtbwpmb2N1c2VzIHNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBvbiB0ZWNobmlxdWVzIG5lY2Vzc2Fy eSB0byBtaW5pbWl6ZSBwb3dlcgpjb25zdW1wdGlvbi4KClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgYSBwcm9k dWN0IG9mIHRoZSBMaWdodC1XZWlnaHQgSW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24gR3VpZGFuY2UgV29ya2luZyBH cm91cCBvZiB0aGUgSUVURi4KCgpJTkZPUk1BVElPTkFMOiBUaGlzIG1lbW8gcHJvdmlkZXMgaW5m b3JtYXRpb24gZm9yIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5ldCBjb21tdW5pdHkuCkl0IGRvZXMgbm90IHNwZWNpZnkg YW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgc3RhbmRhcmQgb2YgYW55IGtpbmQuIERpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBvZgp0aGlzIG1l bW8gaXMgdW5saW1pdGVkLgoKVGhpcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaXMgc2VudCB0byB0aGUgSUVURi1B bm5vdW5jZSBhbmQgcmZjLWRpc3QgbGlzdHMuClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSBvciB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwg c2VlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pZXRmLWFubm91bmNl CiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsbWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWRp c3QKCkZvciBzZWFyY2hpbmcgdGhlIFJGQyBzZXJpZXMsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRp dG9yLm9yZy9zZWFyY2gKRm9yIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIFJGQ3MsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMt ZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9yZXRyaWV2ZS9idWxrCgpSZXF1ZXN0cyBmb3Igc3BlY2lhbCBkaXN0cmlidXRp b24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFkZHJlc3NlZCB0byBlaXRoZXIgdGhlCmF1dGhvciBvZiB0aGUgUkZDIGlu IHF1ZXN0aW9uLCBvciB0byByZmMtZWRpdG9yQHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnLiAgVW5sZXNzCnNwZWNp ZmljYWxseSBub3RlZCBvdGhlcndpc2Ugb24gdGhlIFJGQyBpdHNlbGYsIGFsbCBSRkNzIGFyZSBm b3IKdW5saW1pdGVkIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbi4KCgpUaGUgUkZDIEVkaXRvciBUZWFtCkFzc29jaWF0 aW9uIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgU29sdXRpb25zLCBMTEMKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpyZmMtZGlzdCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcmZjLWRpc3RAcmZj LWVkaXRvci5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsbWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGlu Zm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwo= From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 16:27:51 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381E4C157B48; Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653694071; bh=tbZwTf/OY+Kh8OsSe82xip1Tk0yZCOEJCAASf2PoNfM=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=LyFkDPLXNZfhV2RM+oz+xdx5KmX3fdO/+YTQH5qMNoqxZu3XUPDPZNLhescLfEx3t itE50eQYVdvWz6gFHbJa6siNt2FwAnqStkM3l7GfzVG7MweMLZmp/VcrFy8UVHKylT pNZMAqFeuVdsFCNmhJUfagIGHpQt8rlZuoLIU3qk= X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 16:27:51 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C207CC14F724; Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653694070; bh=tbZwTf/OY+Kh8OsSe82xip1Tk0yZCOEJCAASf2PoNfM=; h=To:From:Cc:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=s1gRddXlFKftr0lM1uJoxtIEld6wEq8y575pMtsXEaQYHwbCNwUIJ5laca+oFvfN2 NQ5u0EQlGmODotKja9eZz78D9orqfb/VphJqyhimJQcnzVqj50xfjPUNMjbJbZNbnx 8Fq0tL4EnBHMrjK3HpcCGqmvPW4kjE8vCC2gKTZ0= X-Original-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-dist@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2400FC14F726; Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.646 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Y1OxnFLTtUP; Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A76FC14F723; Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 365872267521; Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ipsec@ietf.org Message-Id: <20220527232745.365872267521@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_9242_on_Intermediate_Exchange_in_the_In?= =?utf-8?q?ternet_Key_Exchange_Protocol_Version_2_=28IKEv2=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9242 Title: Intermediate Exchange in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Author: V. Smyslov Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2022 Mailbox: svan@elvis.ru Pages: 14 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9242 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9242 This document defines a new exchange, called "Intermediate Exchange", for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2). This exchange can be used for transferring large amounts of data in the process of IKEv2 Security Association (SA) establishment. An example of the need to do this is using key exchange methods resistant to Quantum Computers (QCs) for IKE SA establishment. The Intermediate Exchange makes it possible to use the existing IKE fragmentation mechanism (which cannot be used in the initial IKEv2 exchange), helping to avoid IP fragmentation of large IKE messages if they need to be sent before IKEv2 SA is established. This document is a product of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org