From nobody Fri Sep 4 01:02:20 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0D83A10E2 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhiLafdOhTdU for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magpie.corvid.ch (magpie.corvid.ch [46.101.110.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 225383A10EA for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=magpie.corvid.ch) by magpie.corvid.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kE6dg-0003Z3-ET for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 08:00:04 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============9079215131416294882==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: TAPS WG status robot To: taps@ietf.org Message-Id: Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 08:00:04 +0000 Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest) X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 08:02:19 -0000 --===============9079215131416294882== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC3) 2 issues created: - retransmission vs. loss? (by mirjak) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/647 [API] = - should prop-cc be an enum? (by martinduke) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/646 = 2 issues received 3 new comments: - #646 should prop-cc be an enum? (2 by mwelzl, martinduke) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/646 = - #635 Figure Legends in API (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/635 [API] [editorial] = [ready for text] = 1 issues closed: - should prop-cc be an enum? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/is= sues/646 = Pull requests ------------- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+3/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC3) 3 pull requests submitted: - Path Change event added (by mirjak) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/648 = - Fix figure legends in API (by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/645 [API] = - Clairified collections - closes #612 (by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/644 [API] = 1 pull requests received 3 new comments: - #648 Path Change event added (3 by mirjak, mwelzl, gorryfair) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/648 = Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts --===============9079215131416294882== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Friday September 04, 2020

Issues

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC3)

2 issues created:

2 issues received 3 new comments:

1 issues closed:

Pull requests

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+3/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC3)

3 pull requests submitted:

1 pull requests received 3 new comments:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============9079215131416294882==-- From nobody Thu Sep 10 09:36:08 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6853C3A0D72 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:36:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cbp-MGXnVe4i for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D1B3A0D9A for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id r8so5295893qtp.13 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:36:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=AfJuZrqkE15O2dXM9Jw30w2eZiiHYHacAZadqTfftfY=; b=EwpLlbFVoIQb4I9Ia5e0h8ynpYNQMr4tFIx9jZEBLHmaQNLKNZCJvz98jFD+N5unGa 2MQ3adiPIh/c3kpteMGv11KMO4Ujy0KlQZCS2CI9oAAYGQlNdHLXvELBz6G4I77JFhXf +Xf0YB3Em+gqzSrQ+r2CyNzrdbrbVibR+SqpDYQ1ztupx0GD70rbb8b+pJ3Ufgq/CpgR kh3S5H5qBl1MYFyqBNMUmw+0v4cSD9tWk4nbj8Dqszp9n0tz87Vti3q0lBPrA0zrL9n3 /hHQ6/allP2Z6AYgc51ls3UhxZGfZmFuamdbH95YppRflFFmxjdJHIaXpEQ9erdJ6VKS wFDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=AfJuZrqkE15O2dXM9Jw30w2eZiiHYHacAZadqTfftfY=; b=WYU6qmWLWvIj3+sTQeGoj61U12rC5ZsJ60UjIY07KdNJ+uCcLizNA4JeT+sXs5GxK1 LReuME2KhC0SJvKJ15Uq93K+sMa/Dh8K/wrzk8rtMZeZs4SxcAl8gAsG22zWCElChaWs oy7FNHFSy6736+AgwiaefFq42R+2ZTJzbrRb02J+vc68YOJIcPWoAXfXMPK5eJhRr/2F 8qDngTiAD+NUmT+i8gVA3HBmfCqKXnt8IjrBSkf2ag1uMtqbDWGRr3WV8YuKzm9Uere+ 33P84CtWwL+/DBDWLgLNqoP/0yrHqbOEzjnpAJ3B1uF9yl54iH1YAguVIZSt2ZtMBs6x f6/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GUtaHsHLQ3WXXR4CEek1/xjJms0sWXLeXpHRMqana3c2CI+4Q WA4SjTiTZN0UQRnSJMuwPFC5hWTeiDwYGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJITxVsRwRfSOSkZi4bWUQeZEDi1bEjkefMIlvHKdpDmgN2yvVwoa5+vkSWF9ZoGZJmb/Tzw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:75d2:: with SMTP id z18mr8929268qtq.346.1599755764668; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [169.254.68.115] ([2601:18f:702:c870:3df9:d01b:e54d:c63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v15sm6824874qkg.108.2020.09.10.09.36.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Falk" To: "taps WG" Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:36:02 -0400 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <7902133D-B876-4455-9AFA-003D0A7B7D1E@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_5060A682-6FD9-4182-8F49-1527691D7E84_=" Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] links for Sept interim X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:36:08 -0000 --=_MailMate_5060A682-6FD9-4182-8F49-1527691D7E84_= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown Reminder we are meeting tomorrow (Friday, Sept 11) at 11am US ET. --aaron | what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-sept-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues | | Gitbub PRs | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pulls | --=_MailMate_5060A682-6FD9-4182-8F49-1527691D7E84_= Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Reminder we are meeting tomorrow (Friday, Sept 11) at 11a= m US ET.

--aaron

what where
Webex https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps
Bluesheet / N= otes https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/t= aps-interim-sept-2020
Github Issues= https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts= /issues
Gitbub PRs https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/= pulls
--=_MailMate_5060A682-6FD9-4182-8F49-1527691D7E84_=-- From nobody Fri Sep 11 01:02:23 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCD63A0A69 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.896 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L0bUbl1_H7vN for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 01:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magpie.corvid.ch (magpie.corvid.ch [46.101.110.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C113A0A4E for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 01:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=magpie.corvid.ch) by magpie.corvid.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGdyY-00086B-6s for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:00:06 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5095736018510422837==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: TAPS WG status robot To: taps@ietf.org Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:00:06 +0000 Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest) X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:02:21 -0000 --===============5095736018510422837== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+17/-6/=F0=9F=92=AC9) 17 issues created: - Closed<> followed by ConnectionError<> (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/671 = - Connection termination clarity (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/670 = - Partial and interleaved receives (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/669 = - Reply mapping to connection (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/668 = - DF bit (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/667 = - Message properties (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/666 = - Infinite lifetime and reliability (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/665 = - Message framers form a pipeline (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/664 = - "Entangled" (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/663 = - SecurityParameters probably needs a rework (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/662 = - Preference level interaction (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/661 = - Unclear text near end of =C2=A75.2 (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/660 = - Example needed for session cache management (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/659 = - To abstract or not to abstract? That is the question (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/658 = - Early binding -> privacy considerations (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/657 = - Address family and port abstraction (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/656 = - Connection properties mutability unclear (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/655 = 6 issues received 9 new comments: - #647 retransmission vs. loss? (4 by abrunstrom, mwelzl, gorryfair) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/647 [API] [discuss] = - #619 Priority Framework is confusing (1 by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/619 [API] [editorial] = - #595 Protocol mappings for MPTCP (1 by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/595 [Implementation] = - #627 Does stop() add value to the API? (1 by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/627 [API] [editorial] = - #631 Peer user timeout (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/631 [mappings] = - #636 Rendezvous() example in =C2=A74.1.3 is simplistic (1 by squarootic= us) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/636 [API] = 6 issues closed: - Allow setting multiple values for some Security Parameters https://gith= ub.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/612 [API] [ready for text] = - Figure Legends in API https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/= 635 [API] [editorial] [ready for text] = - API for enum values? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/6= 21 [API] [editorial] = - Protocol mappings for MPTCP https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/i= ssues/595 [Implementation] = - In Arch.... this sentence reads like a paper, rather than an Arch spec.= https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/634 [Architecture] [edito= rial] = - Partial Coverage: Unclear Sentence https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-d= rafts/issues/624 [API] [ready for text] = Pull requests ------------- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+6/-5/=F0=9F=92=AC4) 6 pull requests submitted: - Various nits and wordsmithing (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/654 = - Text on clone for TCP, and a little bit for SCTP. Closes #507. (by mwel= zl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/653 = - Add a Group Connection Limit, extend Client example with clone. (by mwe= lzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/652 = - Editorial fixes to API draft. (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/651 = - Change Excessive Retransmit to Excessive Loss (by philsbln) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/650 [API] [discuss] = - Rename recvChecksumLen to draft-ietf-taps-interface.md (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/649 = 2 pull requests received 4 new comments: - #650 Change Excessive Retransmit to Excessive Loss (3 by abrunstrom, ph= ilsbln, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/650 [API] [discuss] = - #644 Clairified collections - closes #612 (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/644 [API] = 5 pull requests merged: - Clairified collections - closes #612 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/644 [API] = - Fix figure legends in API https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/645 [API] [editorial] = - remove requirement for enumeration of enumerations https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/638 [API] = - Rename recvChecksumLen to draft-ietf-taps-interface.md https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/649 = - Set of updates to API https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/642 [API] = Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts --===============5095736018510422837== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Friday September 11, 2020

Issues

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+17/-6/=F0=9F=92=AC9)

17 issues created:

6 issues received 9 new comments:

6 issues closed:

Pull requests

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+6/-5/=F0=9F=92=AC4)

6 pull requests submitted:

2 pull requests received 4 new comments:

5 pull requests merged:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============5095736018510422837==-- From nobody Fri Sep 11 11:16:36 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4B13A1645 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:16:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0LRCpEUAmSb for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C473E3A163B for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id r8so8550924qtp.13 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AC1NB9mJhQwWuydeen9zLu7iYKdwV4/znAJ9s6I4rMk=; b=dT6W29IB5wEMEN1TKoBL14K7fxvioRoFqeBd7gYNN1BBbL+60UbY1/Jj1lI0ndX/0e eoSVYEExRV5/eOj3gOQ0mJ0L3Ujr9/gXEF17NNkiLjW//zDzAdon1eV4zwRwiR3uj+f3 QfWbr2dwSxwXLp1PSlVwwFeb1nhM4Rbt7bT1OaQqdLEhBlmWEAN5aN31gSXw/1uwEqTt pjMqoSMkO4RduAnW0YlMn2q69j7nyTg42JjRkAYY1E3oGkac4DUqPCoMaFzn1KhDfM4t hBJ3wV3TCTq3k5KAvSBUS2JdABqy68Hy+epE6ablBDo51BYmyv3uobKJKOK9H9qQVo8u xHcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AC1NB9mJhQwWuydeen9zLu7iYKdwV4/znAJ9s6I4rMk=; b=i66e/ZbUrFotJgOVG4rSSfeE49cXHh/hk6BPtsVGv/pY7ZkZvDDDfOruI2BgXQSNZr GvUiPQXAqlOj3QZJzD4KWwUZUnhN4cCLL2aNlK8EFVS5lOjo+N2UZvHpHzjvMgEgnA3O /5QsLzK9J7f8/fvlsujc+E4UrGNVz9r/Bu2mej/IP7yNpQ/KzYXm5z7KufvM3MGn/PPs VOMnzHKNxRVOghCpIzKxLwUXN+I2PpXEznamTRKyscDBCcs1juYXrIk95wR2pYqmTRQ3 /REBwfOaAZF1CdNzs8uY5g6TBT7Cdflkur+y1yTz8eE2itGhYEDOZApJZ6c2ZYOOsH25 xFXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qsDA1PG7YwVEYjhVFNfpztVIu0vt06ntLfVVPVGG4PRjWXhxo YfrjEaQjIeL8jp2Fgu/fAnyX7jehcao15A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKwNlWjzrUCdwMjLj9g/zUnwoNFsd/hGmrt1YvKcp8VpY2w9NE76ev7zTYZlv2yhbV6BFGlg== X-Received: by 2002:aed:2c61:: with SMTP id f88mr3141698qtd.388.1599848192483; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([2601:18f:702:c870:75ea:d512:ee2b:477b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p68sm3688385qkd.29.2020.09.11.11.16.31 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:16:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Falk" To: "taps WG" Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:16:30 -0400 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_88952C7F-6BC3-4CF5-855C-0136C7A45CB0_=" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] Notes from September interim X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:16:35 -0000 --=_MailMate_88952C7F-6BC3-4CF5-855C-0136C7A45CB0_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We discussed pull requests and issues for the API draft but did not resolve all of them. There was general agreement that another 1-2 meetings would be required to settle the remaining issues so that the doc could go to WGLC. Given the tight relationship between the arch, API, and implementation docs, the group was on-board with taking them to WGLC separately but revisiting all three afterwards to resolve any inconsistencies. The group hasn’t focused on the implementation doc in some time so the goal for the next meeting will be to take a quick pass on open issues in that doc to prod folks to resolve them and prepare for more focused discussion when the API doc is settled. Kyle, Brian, and Martin agreed to do a deep review of the implementation doc when the time was right (ie, not before the next meeting). The group also agreed to move to a 3 week cadence for interims to accelerate completion of the work. Also, there was agreement not to have a wg meeting during IETF-109 but Brian will give an update in TSV. | what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-sept-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues | | Gitbub PRs | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pulls | Next meeting: Oct 2, 11-13 US ET --=_MailMate_88952C7F-6BC3-4CF5-855C-0136C7A45CB0_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We discussed pull requests and issues for the API draft b= ut did not resolve all of them. There was general agreement that another= 1-2 meetings would be required to settle the remaining issues so that th= e doc could go to WGLC. Given the tight relationship between the arch, A= PI, and implementation docs, the group was on-board with taking them to W= GLC separately but revisiting all three afterwards to resolve any inconsi= stencies. The group hasn=E2=80=99t focused on the implementation doc in = some time so the goal for the next meeting will be to take a quick pass o= n open issues in that doc to prod folks to resolve them and prepare for m= ore focused discussion when the API doc is settled. Kyle, Brian, and Mar= tin agreed to do a deep review of the implementation doc when the time wa= s right (ie, not before the next meeting). The group also agreed to move= to a 3 week cadence for interims to accelerate completion of the work. = Also, there was agreement not to have a wg meeting during IETF-109 but Br= ian will give an update in TSV.

what where
Webex https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps
Bluesheet / N= otes https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/t= aps-interim-sept-2020
Github Issues= https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts= /issues
Gitbub PRs https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/= pulls

Next meeting: Oct 2, 11-13 US ET

--=_MailMate_88952C7F-6BC3-4CF5-855C-0136C7A45CB0_=-- From nobody Mon Sep 14 10:43:43 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietf.org Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111333A046A; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:43:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool To: Cc: taps@ietf.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, aaron.falk@gmail.com, taps-chairs@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <160010542098.8393.1372543768438434498@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:43:41 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] taps - Not having a session at IETF 109 X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:43:41 -0000 Aaron Falk, a chair of the taps working group, indicated that the taps working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 109. This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool. From nobody Mon Sep 14 11:13:24 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietf.org Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F553A0DD6; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:13:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IESG Secretary To: "IETF-Announce" Cc: taps@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <160010719897.8366.7125715245490918113@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:13:19 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-10-02 X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:13:19 -0000 The Transport Services (taps) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2020-10-02 from 11:00 to 13:00 America/New_York (15:00 to 17:00 UTC). Agenda: Review PRs and Issues for draft-ietf-taps-impl and draft-ietf-taps-interface. Information about remote participation: https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps From nobody Fri Sep 18 01:02:40 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFE93A0F01 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:02:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjZkS1pR0w1w for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magpie.corvid.ch (magpie.corvid.ch [46.101.110.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4233A080C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=magpie.corvid.ch) by magpie.corvid.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJBJO-0000Ql-Gm for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:00:06 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5533369898538417717==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: TAPS WG status robot To: taps@ietf.org Message-Id: Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:00:06 +0000 Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest) X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:02:39 -0000 --===============5533369898538417717== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+4/-14/=F0=9F=92=AC28) 4 issues created: - Remove "excessive retransmissions" event (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/677 [API] [editorial] = - `Preconnection.Resolve()` adds endpoints to a `Preconnection` (by csper= kins) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/676 = - Preconnection needs to support multiple Local and Remote Endpoints (by = csperkins) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/675 = - For the love of Satan, normalize the capitalization (by squarooticus) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/672 = 10 issues received 28 new comments: - #667 Fragmentation (9 by squarooticus, mwelzl, gorryfair) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/667 [API] = - #666 Message properties (4 by squarooticus, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/666 [API] = - #656 Address family and port abstraction (3 by squarooticus, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/656 [API] = - #669 Partial and interleaved receives (3 by squarooticus, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/669 [API] = - #571 How do you add multiple IP addresses/interfaces to an endpoint? (2= by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/571 [API] [ready for t= ext] = - #655 Strange disappearing sentence compilation mistery (2 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/655 [API] = - #658 To abstract or not to abstract? That is the question (2 by squaroo= ticus, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/658 [API] = - #647 retransmission vs. loss? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/647 [API] [discuss] = - #664 Message framers form a pipeline (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/664 [API] = - #668 Reply mapping to connection (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/668 [API] = 14 issues closed: - Priority Framework is confusing https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-draf= ts/issues/619 [API] [editorial] = - Address family and port abstraction https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-= drafts/issues/656 [API] = - Problems with temporary local addresses https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/= api-drafts/issues/626 [API] = - Preference level interaction https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/= issues/661 [API] = - Streams/Connections Relationship is unclear https://github.com/ietf-tap= swg/api-drafts/issues/618 [API] [ready for text] = - Closed<> followed by ConnectionError<> https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/a= pi-drafts/issues/671 [API] = - minSendRate, minRecvRate https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issu= es/629 [API] [editorial] = - Does stop() add value to the API? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-dr= afts/issues/627 [API] [editorial] = - Connection termination clarity https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-draft= s/issues/670 [API] = - Infinite lifetime and reliability https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-dr= afts/issues/665 [API] = - "Entangled" https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/663 [API] = - Unclear text near end of =C2=A75.2 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-d= rafts/issues/660 [API] = - Clarify Use of Application Congestion Control https://github.com/ietf-t= apswg/api-drafts/issues/625 [API] [editorial] [ready for text] = - Rendezvous() text should be a bit more detailed https://github.com/ietf= -tapswg/api-drafts/issues/584 [API] [ready for text] = Pull requests ------------- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+4/-8/=F0=9F=92=AC7) 4 pull requests submitted: - Clarifying example for partial receives. Closes #669. (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/679 = - Remove "excessive retransmissions". Closes #677. (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/678 = - move text on early name binding to privacy consideration (by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/674 = - Various edits, addressing Kyle's easier points. (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/673 = 5 pull requests received 7 new comments: - #637 Clarify behaviour of Rendezvous() (3 by mwelzl, csperkins) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/637 [API] = - #640 caveats on temporary local addresses (1 by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/640 [API] = - #650 Change Excessive Retransmit to Excessive Loss (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/650 [API] [discuss] = - #643 Add new sections on keep alives (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/643 [API] = - #639 Clarify priority framework (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/639 [API] = 8 pull requests merged: - Clarify priority framework https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/639 [API] = - caveats on temporary local addresses https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/640 [API] = - Add a Group Connection Limit, extend Client example with clone. https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/652 [API] = - Various nits and wordsmithing https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/654 [API] [editorial] = - Path Change event added https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/648 [API] = - Various edits, addressing Kyle's easier points. https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/673 [API] = - Editorial fixes to API draft. https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/651 [API] [editorial] = - Clarify behaviour of Rendezvous() https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/637 [API] = Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts --===============5533369898538417717== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Friday September 18, 2020

Issues

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+4/-14/=F0=9F=92=AC28)

4 issues created:

10 issues received 28 new comments:

14 issues closed:

Pull requests

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+4/-8/=F0=9F=92=AC7)

4 pull requests submitted:

5 pull requests received 7 new comments:

8 pull requests merged:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============5533369898538417717==-- From nobody Fri Sep 25 01:02:16 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9B53A1281 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:02:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZALGnsi2Zuol for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magpie.corvid.ch (magpie.corvid.ch [46.101.110.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C513A127F for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=magpie.corvid.ch) by magpie.corvid.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kLieA-0008Rl-7E for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:00:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============3311604467401862172==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: TAPS WG status robot To: taps@ietf.org Message-Id: Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:00:02 +0000 Archived-At: Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest) X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:02:16 -0000 --===============3311604467401862172== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+0/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC2) 1 issues received 2 new comments: - #666 Message properties (2 by squarooticus, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/666 [API] = 1 issues closed: - retransmission vs. loss? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issu= es/647 [API] = Pull requests ------------- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Inherit some msg defaults from the connection, and divide fragmentation= into layers 3 and 4. (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/680 = Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts --===============3311604467401862172== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Friday September 25, 2020

Issues

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+0/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC2)

1 issues received 2 new comments:

1 issues closed:

Pull requests

ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 pull requests submitted:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============3311604467401862172==--