Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (l1vpn) ---------------------------------------- Charter Last Modified: 2006-06-15 Current Status: Active Working Group Chair(s): Hamid Ould-Brahim Adrian Farrel Tomonori Takeda Routing Area Director(s): Ross Callon Bill Fenner Routing Area Advisor: Ross Callon Mailing Lists: General Discussion:l1vpn@ietf.org To Subscribe: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l1vpn/index.html Description of Working Group: The L1VPN Working Group's task is to specify mechanisms necessary for providing layer-1 VPN services (establishment of layer-1 connections between CE devices) over a GMPLS-enabled transport service-provider network. The following two service models will be addressed: 1. Basic mode: the CE-PE interface's functional repertoire is limited to path setup signalling only. Provider's network is not involved in distribution of customer network's routing information. 2. Enhanced mode: the CE-PE interface provides the signaling capabilities as in the Basic mode, plus permits limited exchange of information between the control planes of the provider and the customer to help such functions as discovery of reachability information in remote sites, or parameters of the part of the provider's network dedicated to the customer. The WG will work on the following items: 1. Framework document defining the reference network model, L1VPN service model, fundamental assumptions, and terminology. 2. Specification of the L1VPN signaling functionality between the customer and the provider network to support the basic mode. 3. Specification of the L1VPN signaling and routing functionality within the provider network to support the basic mode. 4. OAM features and MIB modules and/or extensions required for the basic mode. 5. Specification of the L1VPN signaling and routing functionality between the customer and the provider network to support the extended mode. 6. Specification of the L1VPN signaling and routing functionality within the provider network to support the extended mode. 7. OAM features and MIB modules and/or extensions required for the extended mode. 8. Applicability guidelines to compare the basic and extended modes. At this point the WG will address the single-AS scenario only. The multi-AS/provider scenario may be considered in future. Protocol extensions required for L1VPN will be done in cooperation with MPLS, CCAMP, OSPF, IS-IS, IDR, L3VPN, and other WGs where necessary. L1VPN WG shall also cooperate with ITU-T SG13 through the established IETF process, and use documents Y.1312 and Y.1313 (describing L1VPN requirements and network architectures) as input to its design process. The documents will be available at the IETF liaison web-site. Goals and Milestones: Done Submit first Internet Draft of L1VPN framework Done Submit first Internet Drafts of basic mode specifications Dec 2005 Submit first Internet Drafts of MIB modules for basic mode Apr 2006 Submit basic mode specifications to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard Jun 2006 Submit first Internet Drafts of enhanced mode specifications Aug 2006 Submit MIB modules for basic mode to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard Dec 2006 Submit enhanced mode specifications to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard Dec 2006 Submit L1VPN framework to IESG for publication as Informational RFC Aug 2007 Submit MIB modules for enhanced mode to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard Dec 2007 Recharter or disband Internet-Drafts: Posted Revised I-D Title ------ ------- -------------------------------------------- Aug 2005 Sep 2006 Framework and Requirements for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks May 2006 Oct 2006 BGP-based Auto-Discovery for L1VPNs May 2006 Oct 2006 Layer 1 VPN Basic Mode Jun 2006 Oct 2006 OSPF Based L1VPN Auto-Discovery Nov 2006 Nov 2006 Applicability analysis of Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) protocols for the Layer 1 Virtual Private Network (L1VPN) Enhanced Mode Nov 2006 Nov 2006 Applicability Statement for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (L1VPNs) Basic Mode Request For Comments: None to date.