Network Working Group P. Garg Internet-Draft J. Gould Intended status: Informational J. Colosi Expires: 16 September 2026 VeriSign, Inc. 15 March 2026 Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Change Mapping draft-garg-change-00 Abstract This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for provisioning and management of change request objects in a shared central repository, where a change request is one unit of work that is processed by submitting to a workflow to execute the linked EPP transform commands in order. The change request is a container with meta-data to ensure that the contained commands are processed as a group. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 16 September 2026. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 1] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Change Request Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Change Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3. Change Priority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.4. Change Request Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.5. Change Request Poll Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1. EPP Query Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1.1. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.2. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.3. EPP Query Command . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2. EPP Transform Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.1. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.2. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.2.3. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.2.4. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.2.5. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 1. Introduction A change request object enables the creation, deletion, clearing, withdrawal, and submission of an ordered set of Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) transform commands that are linked to a change request object with a change request identifier. The linked EPP transform commands will be executed only when the change request object is submitted. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 2] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 This document describes a change object mapping for version 1.0 of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [6]. This mapping is specified using the XML 1.0 as described in [1] and XML Schema notation as described in [2] and [3]. 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [4] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. In examples, "C:" represents lines sent by a protocol client and "S:" represents lines returned by a protocol server. Indentation and white space in examples is provided only to illustrate element relationships and is not a REQUIRED feature of this specification. XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the character case presented to develop a conforming implementation. The XML namespace prefix "change" is used for the namespace "http://www.verisign-grs.com/epp/change-1.0", but implementations MUST NOT depend on it; instead, they should employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents. 2. Object Attributes An EPP change request object has attributes and associated values that may be viewed and modified by the sponsoring client or the server. This section describes each attribute type in detail. The formal syntax for the attribute values described here can be found in the "Formal Syntax" section of this document and in the appropriate normative references. 2.1. Change Request Identifier All EPP Change Requests are identified by a server-unique identifier that is generated and provided by the client. Change Request Identifiers are character strings with a specific minimum length, a specified maximum length, and a specified format. Change Request Identifiers use the "clIDType" client identifier syntax described in [6]. Its corresponding element is . Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 3] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 2.2. Change Status The change request object contains a status value that can be made to support various state machine implementations. It is up to server policy to define a set of statuses. Each implementation will specify different behaviors for the submit operation of the command as it is related directly to status modification. The status values will be defined out-of-band of the protocol. Some of the examples of status values are: * "initial": Change Request has been created * "submitted": Change Request has been submitted * "complete": Change Request has been completed 2.3. Change Priority The change request object contains a priority value that can support order in which the change requests are implemented. It is up to server policy to define a set of priorities. The priority values will be defined out-of-band of the protocol. Some of the examples of priority values are: * "normal": Change Request need to be implemented within normal SLA * "urgent": Change Request need to be implemented within urgent SLA * "emergency": Change Request need to be implemented within emergency SLA 2.4. Change Request Operations The change request object contains an operation value for the command to define the operation being performed. Operation values are case sensitive. Supported values are: * "upAttrs": Update the change request attributes * "clear": Remove all change action objects associated with this change request Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 4] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 * "submit": Submit the change request to promote to next status * "withdraw": Withdraw the change request after submission 2.5. Change Request Poll Message The EPP command and response is defined in section 2.9.2.3 of [6]. For servers that support a change request object, the Change Info Response, as defined in Section 3.1.2, is inserted into the poll queue. Example command: C: C: C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 1 Example response: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 5] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 S: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue S: S: S: 2025-07-23T20:28:12.816Z S: This Change Request has been completed S: S: S: S: tk421 S: normal S: EXAMPLE S: A change request within .EXAMPLE S: completed S: 2025-07-11 S: 2025-07-23 S: userA S: userA S: S: S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 2 3. EPP Command Mapping A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found in the EPP core protocol specification [6]. The command mappings described here are specifically for use in provisioning and managing change information via EPP. 3.1. EPP Query Commands This document provides two commands to retrieve change information: to determine if a change request object can be provisioned within a repository and to retrieve detailed information associated with a change request object. This document does not define a mapping for the EPP command to retrieve change- object transfer status information. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 6] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 3.1.1. EPP Command The EPP command is used to determine if an object can be provisioned within a repository. It provides a hint that allows a client to anticipate the success or failure of provisioning an object using the command, as object-provisioning requirements are ultimately a matter of server policy. In addition to the standard EPP command elements, the command MUST contain an element. This element or its ancestor element MUST identify the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: * One or more elements that contain the server- unique identifier of the change request objects to be queried. Example command: C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: thx1138 C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 3 When a command has been processed successfully, the EPP element MUST contain a child element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: one or more elements that contain the following child elements: * The element MUST contain an "exists" attribute whose value indicates the object existence at the moment the command was completed. A value "1" or "true" means that the change request identifier exists and cannot be provisioned. A value of "0" or "false" means that the change request identifier does not exist and can be provisioned. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 7] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 Example response: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: tk421 S: thx1138 S: S: S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 4 An EPP error response MUST be returned if a command cannot be processed for any reason. 3.1.2. EPP Command The EPP command is used to retrieve change request information based on the specified Change Request Identifier. In addition to the standard EPP command elements, the command MUST contain a element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: * A element that contain the server-unique identifier of the change request objects to be queried. Example command: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 8] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 5 When an command has been processed successfully, the EPP element MUST contain a child element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: * An element that contains the change request identifier, defined in Section 2.1. * An element that contains the defined priority of the change request, described in Section 2.3. * One or more elements that contain the Top Level Domain (TLD) for the change request. The TLD may contain a single dot character (0x2e) to represent a change to the root zone. * An element that contains a freeform description of the purpose or reason for the change request. * An element that contains the server defined status of the change request, defined in Section 2.2. * An element that contains the date of change request creation. * An element that contains the date of the most recent change request modification. The element MUST NOT be present if the change request has never been modified. * An element that contains the identifier of the client that created the change request object. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 9] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 * An element that contains the identifier of the client that last updated the change request object. The element MUST NOT be present if the change request has never been modified. * Zero or more elements with the following change action elements: - An OPTIONAL element that contains the change request identifier, defined in Section 2.1. - An OPTIONAL element that contains client transaction identifier. - An elements that contains the server transaction identifier that is assigned by and unique to the server. - An OPTIONAL element that contains the date of the change action. Example response: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 10] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: tk421 S: normal S: EXAMPLE S: . S: A change request within .EXAMPLE S: initial S: 2026-09-21 S: 2026-10-30 S: userA S: userA S: S: tk421 S: 51125-CLI S: SRV-10122 S: S: S: tk421 S: SRV-10321 S: S: S: tk421 S: 51345-CLI S: SRV-10122 S: S: S: S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 6 An EPP error response MUST be returned if a command cannot be processed for any reason. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 11] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 3.1.3. EPP Query Command The transfer semantics do not apply to change request objects. No EPP query command is defined in this document. 3.2. EPP Transform Commands This document provides three commands to transform change request object information: to create an instance of a change request object, to delete an instance of a change request object, and to change information associated with a change request object. This document does not define a mapping for the EPP and command. 3.2.1. EPP Command The EPP command is used to construct a new change request object. In addition to the standard EPP command elements, the command MUST contain a element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: * An element that contains the change request identifier, described in Section 2.1. * An OPTIONAL element that contains the defined priority of the change request, described in Section 2.3. * One or more elements that contain the Top Level Domain (TLD) for the change request. The TLD may contain a single dot character (0x2e) to represent a change to the root zone. * An element that contains a freeform description of the purpose or reason for the change request. Example command: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 12] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: emergency C: EXAMPLE C: A new request within .EXAMPLE C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 7 When a command has been processed successfully, the server MUST respond with an EPP response with no element. Example response: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 8 An EPP error response MUST be returned if a command cannot be processed for any reason. 3.2.2. EPP Command The EPP command is used to modify an existing change request object. In addition to the standard EPP command elements, the command MUST contain a element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 13] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 * An element that contains the change request identifier, described in Section 2.1. * A choice of one of the following change request operation elements, described in Section 2.4: - An element to update the change request attributes that contains the following child elements, where at least one child element MUST be set: o An OPTIONAL element that contains the defined priority of the change request, described in Section 2.3. o Zero or more elements that contain the Top Level Domain (TLD) for the change request. The TLD may contain a single dot character (0x2e) to represent a change to the root zone. o An OPTIONAL that contains a freeform description of the purpose or reason for the change request. - An element to clear the change request actions. After execution of the clear operation, the change request will no longer be associated with any change request actions. - An element to submit the change request. Once the change request has been submitted, it can only be withdrawn. - An element to withdraw the change request. Once the submitted change request has been withdrawn, it can be deleted. If the element is present, then the change request record will be modified as specified by the , , and elements. NOTE: The element MUST not be empty. The schema will not allow a element without at least one of the , or elements, described in Section 2.3. If instead the element is present, then all change action objects associated with this change request will be removed. After execution the specified change request record will no longer be associated with any change action records. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 14] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 If instead the element is present, then the specified change request record is promoted to a new status. Statuses supported will be implementation specific. Example command with : C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: C: EXAMPLE C: . C: A change request within .EXAMPLE C: C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 9 Example command with : C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 10 Example command with : Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 15] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 11 When an command has been processed successfully, the EPP element MUST contain a child element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: * An OPTIONAL element that contains a submission receipt from change request submit operation. No element will be returned for non-submit operations. NOTE: The element will appear only in a response to a command with the response from an command with a element: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 16] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: S: [+] Begin Change Request Summary: DO NOT EDIT BELOW S: S: Change Request Id: tk421 S: Request Priority: NORMAL S: Top-level domain: EXAMPLE S: Purpose/Description: A change request within .EXAMPLE S: S: Operations: S: S: Domain Create S: Name: EXAMPLE S: S: [-] End Change Request Summary: DO NOT EDIT ABOVE S: S: S: S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 12 Example response from an command with a or element: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 17] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: S: S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 13 An EPP error response MUST be returned if a command cannot be processed for any reason. 3.2.3. EPP Command The EPP command is used to delete a change request object before it is submitted. In addition to the standard EPP command elements, the command MUST contain a element that identifies the change namespace. The element contains the following child elements: * An element that contains the change request identifier, described in Section 2.1, for the change request object to be deleted. Example command: Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 18] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 C: C: C: C: C: C: tk421 C: C: C: 51364-CLI C: C: Figure 14 When a command has been processed successfully, the server MUST respond with an EPP response with no element. Example response: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: 51364-CLI S: SRV-43659 S: S: S: Figure 15 An EPP error response MUST be returned if a command cannot be processed for any reason. 3.2.4. EPP Command Renewal semantics do not apply to change request objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. 3.2.5. EPP Command Transfer semantics do not apply to change request objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 19] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 4. Formal Syntax An EPP object mapping is specified in XML Schema notation. The formal syntax presented here is a complete schema representation of the object mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML instances. The BEGIN and END tags are not part of the schema; they are used to note the beginning and ending of the schema for URI registration purposes. BEGIN Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0 Change provisioning schema Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 20] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 21] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 22] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 23] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 END 5. IANA Considerations 5.1. XML Namespace This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas conforming to a registry mechanism described in [5]. The following URI assignment has been made by IANA: Registration request for the Change Mapping namespace: URI: http://www.verisign-grs.com/epp/change-1.0 Registrant Contact: VeriSign Inc., XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification. Registration request for the Change Mapping XML Schema: URI: http://www.verisign-grs.com/epp/change-1.0 Registrant Contact: VeriSign Inc., XML: See the "Formal Syntax" section of this document. Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 24] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 5.2. EPP Extension Registry The EPP extension described in this document has been registered by IANA in the "Extensions for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" registry described in [7]. The details of the registration are as follows: Name of Extension: "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Change Mapping" Document Status: Informational Reference: (insert reference to RFC version of this document) Registrant Name and Email Address: VeriSign Inc., TLDs: Any IPR Disclosure: None Status: Active Notes: None 6. Security Considerations The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any security services beyond those described by EPP [6] and protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described in these other specifications apply to this specification as well. 7. References 7.1. Normative References [1] Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Maler, E., and F. Yergeau, ""Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium FirstEdition REC-xml- 20040204", February 2004, . [2] Thompson, H., Beech, D., Maloney, M., and N. Mendelsohn, ""XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema- 1-20041028", October 2004, . [3] Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, ""XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-2-20041028", October 2004, . [4] Best Current Practice 14, . Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 25] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following: Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [5] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [6] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009, . 7.2. Informative References [7] Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451, February 2015, . Authors' Addresses Poonam Garg VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 United States of America Email: pogarg@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisign.com James Gould VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 United States of America Email: jgould@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisign.com Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 26] Internet-Draft EPP Change Mapping March 2026 John Colosi VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 United States of America Email: jcolosi@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisign.com Garg, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 27]