Gen-ART Last CAll review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-11.txt I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-11.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2017-01-26 IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-15 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready with nits -------- Comment: -------- I've been tracking this draft since the start and I'm very supportive of it. I have reviewed the changes since my previous review of -08, and I am happy them. I have made some comments on issues raised by other reviwers, but as one of them said perfection is impossible. Nits: ---- > 7. Evaluating Alternative Technologies in IETF Working Groups ... > technology in violation if this principle if there is a very good s/if this principle/of this principle/ > 13. Changes Since RFC 3979 and RFC 4879 > 16. Changes Since RFC 3979 Should the preamble to these sections state that they are provided for informational purposes only and that in case of doubt the text of sections 1-12 prevails? Should these two sections be merged?