I have reviewed this informational document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I see this draft as a useful document to achieve the bureaucratic function of getting some elliptic curves that are already specified in an IETF RFC into an already existing IANA Registry because that Registry is referenced by already adopted standards (including 802.11). The only complicating factor is that the original intended use of this Registry is deprecated so this draft provides for the added entries to be annotated to exclude such deprecated use. (In case you were wondering, there is no inherent problem in appropriate IANA actions being based on an Informational RFC.) The Security Considerations section seems to be a reasonable for the elliptic curves covered by this draft but for that purpose. I do not think that the Reference to RFC 2119 is necessary and the one 2119 word used, "MUST", does not need to be in all capitals. MINOR: arithmatical -> arithmetical I suggest that the body of [IEEE802.11] reference be change to: IEEE, "Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks - Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications", IEEE Std 802.11-2012, 29 March 2012. I verified the Domain Parameters that have been copied from RFC 5639 (all but the z parameter) and they appear to have been faithfully copied. I have not verified the test data. Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3 at gmail.com