Security review of Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-12 Do not be alarmed. I generated this review of this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts. Comments not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Nodes can join a 6TiSCH (IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e) network) by issuing a request that is validated using pre-shared keys. The document defines the Constrained Join Protocol and its data structures. The security considerations section has been done well. The "short identifier" space consideration on page 34 might be problematic under extreme conditions. If almost all values have been used, a set of nodes might cause trouble by constantly sending join requests. The JRC(s) would have to time out their previous information, and there might be long delays before a short identifier could be freed up. Perhaps there should be a rate limit on join requests from any single node. (If there is such a limit I didn't see it). Page 20 and page 23 mention "the user", but it is unclear what "user" means in this framework. Page 34 says that "the loss of security properties is eminent". That intended word was probably "imminent". I suggest rephrasing. Page 37 asks the reader to recall a "well-known" Bluetooth problem, but there is no citation for it. Either document it or remove it. Hilarie Orman