Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-06.txt Reviewer: Jia He Review Date: Oct. 27, 2020 IETF LC End Date: date-if-known Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This document is basically ready for publication, but I have one minor concern that I think should be considered before publication. Comments: The draft is clearly writtern and easy to understand. It describes the extensions to the Babel routing protocol to support source-specific routing. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: In Paragraph 5, it is written as "In the original protocol, three TLVs carry a destination prefix: Updates, Route Requests and Seqno Requests. This specification extends these messages to optionally carry a Source Prefix sub-TLV, as described in Section 7 below. The sub-TLV is marked as mandatory, so that an unextended implementation will silently ignore the whole enclosing TLV. " I understand the the Source Prefix sub-TLV is mandatory to support the functions defined in this specification. However, "optionally" used in the paragraph above is confusing. One suggestion is to simply delete "optionally" in the sentence. B.R. Jia