I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-05 Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2024-05-27 IETF LC End Date: 2024-06-04 IESG Telechat date: ? Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. Disclaimer: This reviewer is "YANG challenged". Hence I have not verified the syntax or semantics of the YANG content. I trust there has been or will be a separate review by a YANG expert. ISSUES: 3 NITS: 1 1) ISSUE - General I find the language in this document to be extremely difficult to follow. (For instance, see the confusing language cited in the next issue.) The main problem is that it is formally referencing and defining terms/entities named using sequences of words and acronyms including spaces. (This includes YANG entities, IANA registry table names, and the names of entries in IANA registries.) These terms are used in descriptions with nothing to distinguish them from the surrounding text. Hence it becomes a struggle to parse the text. I strongly recommend revising the document to syntactically set off the formal names of the entities being defined and referenced from the surrounding text. For instance: 'IGP MSD-Types' 2) ISSUE - Confusing language in Section 1 I can't parse: "... defines the identities for Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Types as the IANA the IGP MSD-Types registry." I still can't follow it even if I make the change I requested above: "... defines the identities for Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Types as the IANA the 'IGP MSD-Types' registry." . I *think* you might mean: "... defines the identities for 'Maximum SID Depth (MSD)' Types in the IANA 'IGP MSD-Types' registry." But I am far from certain of this. 3) ISSUE - Possible missing IANA action Section 4 defines a YANG module named 'iana-msd-types'. I *think* there is an intent to add this as a new entry in the IANA registry 'IGP MSD-Types'. But I don't find anything that does this. (I would expect something more in IANA Considerations.) 4) NIT The document heading shows "Workgroup: Internet" but shouldn't it be the MPLS WG?