Hi,

I have been asked to review this draft as a Routing Directorate reviewer.

Document:  draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15
Reviewer: Henning Rogge
Review Date: 15 January 2017
Intended Status: Informational

Summary:
I have no major concerns about this document.

Minor Issues:
The document states that the NVO3 networks can be layer-2 or layer-3
entities. While layer-2 networks leave the complete IP addressing
scheme to the connected VMs/servers, a layer-3 NVO3 network will (if I
understand it correctly) set some restrictions on the IP addresses of
the VMs (because the addresses have to fit the routing tables used on
the NVO3 network).

The draft mention the use of iBGP or static routes for connecting a
customer server/VM over the internet (Section 3.1), but does not
mention any such thing within the NVO3 network and does also not
mention the any handing of addressing. Is this 'out of scope' for this
Use Case draft or should it maybe mention who is responsible for
defining the addressing scheme for a layer-3 NVO3 VM?

Henning Rogge