I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-14
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2024-12-02
IETF LC End Date: 2024-12-09
IESG Telechat date: Unknown


Summary: Almost Ready


Major Concerns:  None


Minor Concerns:

Section 7:  The text says:

   ...  These protocols have to use a
   secure transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC
   [RFC9000]) and have to use mutual authentication.

I assume that NETCONF and RESTCONF REQUIRE a secure transport and mutual
authentication.  Is that correct?  If so, can this be written in a way
that makes it clear that these other protocols already impose these
requirements?


Nits:

IDnits points out some outdated references:

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-18) exists of
     draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-17

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-13) exists of
     draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-12

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-21) exists of
     draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-20

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-11) exists of
     draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-10

IDnits also complains about a non-ASCII character.  This is not a
concern because it appears in a name (Björklund).