Gunter and OPS-DIR:

 

I’m confused whether this draft is in my review queue or not.  Since Tim[‘s review has taken care of the other issues, I will confine my review to the link to draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.    Please note in the last review by IDR of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps there was a great deal of discussion on the draft.  

 

I reviewed this draft to determine if draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-06 matches draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06.txt.  It does.  I plan to start a WG LC on the draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-06.txt this week.  It may change during this review since the last WG LC caused several changes.

 

Of course, I could not resist indicating one editorial nit.  Otherwise they might take my editor’s red pen away from me (smile).

 

Please note in section 3, paragraph 1, 4th sentence

 

Old/If the Encapsulation Capability TLV appears more than one in an OSPF Router Information LSA, only the first occurrence MUST be processed and others MUST be ignored./

 

It may be wise to specify something more detailed in the dependent clause.

 

New /If the Encapsulation Capability TLV appears more than one in an OSPF Router Information LSA, only the first occurrence MUST be processed and the subsequent Encapsulation Capability TLVs MUST be ignored./

 

I only mention it because it might impact the testing of these features.

 

Best wishes, Sue Hares