I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-10>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION.

This document defines a straightforward extension to RDAP so that it can include geofeed information. Admittedly, I'm not an expert on the related standards, but I've not found any obvious problem in it. One possible point that is debatable is the introduction of new media type while the content is in the well known format (CSV), but the document explains the rationale and I have no objection to it.

I have no further concerns from an Internet Area perspective.