I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: Ready Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2019/05/11 IETF LC End Date: 2019/05/21 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 2: bad padding in 2. and 2.1. titles in text format. - ToC page 2 and many other places: there is a problem with the "acknowledgement" word spelling: correct spelling is "acknowledgment" but the term is used both in the protocol including in the ToC and in the document for its acknowledgments usual section. I propose if the other protocol documents use the UK "acknowledgement" spelling to keep it for similar usages. In all cases the section title should be in US spelling so Acknowledgments. - 4.1 page 7, 4.4 5. page 12 and A.1 5. page 18: i.e. -> i.e., - 4.3.1 page 10: atleast -> at least - 4.3.3 page 10: seqeunce -> sequence - 4.5.2 page 12: signalling -> signaling - 5 page 14 title: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - from 6 page 14 to 6.3 page 16: Acknowledgement -> Acknowledgment - 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 pages 15 and 16: there is a problem with the textual rendering of qualities: I got "oBit number..." without a space between the "o" and the entry name "Bit number". - authors page 21: please consider China -> PR China or simply move from country names to ISO IS 3166 2 letter codes (for instance France -> FR)? Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr PS: as they are mostly aesthetic points there is no need to address them by a new draft and BTW the RFC Editor can handle them.