Hello,
I am the assigned OPS-DIR reviewer for this draft. 
Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-16
Reviewer: Daniele Ceccarelli
Review Date: 2025-06-04
IETF LC End Date: 2025-06-06

Summary: Almost Ready
Major Concerns:  None
Minor Concerns: Improve readability

The draft is well written and understandable also to a someone that doesn't have a deep knowledge of TCP. While it's ok to have the abstract extremely straight to the point without major explanations, i found the intro pretty hard to understand. Things became more clear when reaching the background section. Probably it would be good idea to join the 2 sections into a single one, which could be called intro and backgorund, or simply intro (because in the end the scope of the intro is to provide a background).

I would also anticipate the definitions section (section 7) higher in the document as that's a pre-requirement to understand what is being described. E.g. SDN.UNA is described in section 5 and the definition is only provided in section 7.

In section 4 the draft says: "  This document describes two slightly different Reduction Bound algorithms", but in the rest of the text the split between 2 algorithms is lost, in fact section 8 speaks about 1 algorithm. 

I really appreciate the example section, very clear.

Thanks
Daniele