This is a well written document and is OK for publication.

I do have one concern, and that it is a rich soup of three/four/five letter acronyms and it is very difficult to verify that all are either (a) formally exempt from the need for expansion in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list, or (b) have been expanded elsewhere in the text. This might be best addressed by including a glossary early in the document in which all the acronyms are expanded and ideally referenced. This would make the document more accessible to an audience that is not already familiar with the content.