I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

(My apologies for the lateness of this review.)

Document: draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update-20
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2025-12-23
IETF LC End Date: 2025-12-09
IESG Telechat date: 2026-01-08

Summary:  This document is basically ready for publication as a proposed standards RFC.   There is one wording issue that I believe should be addressed.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:
    I believe that this was mentioned in other reviews, and discussed, but I am still having trouble with it,  Section 3.1 says "The "ietf-te-types" module (Section 4) contains common TE types that are independent and agnostic of any specific technology or control-plane instance."  Except that section 3.1.1 then defines multiple MPLS specific identities.  Which are clearly technology specific.  If you have a narrower meaning of "specific technology" in mind, please use wording that conveys that meaning.

Nits/editorial comments: N/A