draft:  

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's 

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These 

comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the 

IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews 

during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments 

just like any other last call comments.

 

Status: Review with nits (very minor nits)  

 

General comments:  Document is precise, well-written, and understandable to those who have read the documents this draft depends on.  There is not a specific operations section, but this mechanisms would be included in a PCE or other calculation engine.   This reviewer does not see any reason why additional text needs to be utilized.  Individuals who write such algorithms and programs are utilizing these mechanisms to provide better paths. 

 

Nit #1:  section 1.2

 

EF and AF abbreviations are not spelled out.  Unless these are part of the RFC editor’s abbreviations, it should be spelled out. 

 

Nit #2: section 2.3.1 

 

/Link Los sub-TLV/Link Loss sub-TLV/

/Sub-TLV[I-D-ietf.isis-te-metric-extensions]/sub-TLV [I-D-ietf.isis-te-metric-extensions]