Folks,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: Ready for publication

Major issues:

None

Minor issues:

None

Nits:

The Nit Checker says:

== There are 1 instance of lines with non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses
     in the document.  If these are example addresses, they should be changed.

  == There are 3 instances of lines with non-RFC3849-compliant IPv6 addresses
     in the document.  If these are example addresses, they should be changed.

I understand why you had to break the rule for 0/0. But could the IPv6 addresses have been taken from documentation space?

Ron Bonica