Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10227; 2 Nov 92 2:39 EST Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10223; 2 Nov 92 2:39 EST Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13292; 2 Nov 92 2:40 EST Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <20720-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Mon, 2 Nov 1992 01:37:09 +0000 Received: from ics.uci.edu by cs.wisc.edu; Mon, 2 Nov 92 01:37:02 -0600 Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id aa16459; 1 Nov 92 23:31 PST Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa25359; 1 Nov 92 20:01 PST To: Steve Hardcastle-Kille Cc: wg-msg@rare.nl, ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu, snmp@psi.com, ifip-emailmgt@ics.uci.edu Subject: Re: FORW: Meeting Plans for EMailMgt at IETF -- 19-20 Nov in Was In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 01 Nov 1992 00:00:38 +0000. <1103.720576038@isode.com> Reply-To: Stef@nma.com Sender:ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US From: Einar Stefferud Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 20:01:11 -0800 Message-Id: <25357.720676871@nma.com> X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com Sorry Steve, about our colliding with the SAM (SNMP Application Monitoring) BOF on thursday morning. Perhaps we can minimize the difficulty by avoiding SAM related topics in EMailMgt durng the period of conflict during the morning session. Lets work on how to deal with this at IETF prior to our meetings on Thursday. If the over lap is great enough, we should meet jointly in one of our assigned rooms. Can you send some background information on SAM to the ifip-emailmgt mailing list? Thanks...\Stef --------- Begin From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille To: Stef@nma.com Cc: wg-msg@rare.nl, ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu, nmsig@ics.uci.edu, mhsig@ics.uci.edu, snmp@psi.com Subject: Re: FORW: Meeting Plans for EMailMgt at IETF -- 19-20 Nov in Was Date: Sun, 01 Nov 92 00:00:38 +0000 Stef, You are clashing with the SAM (SNMP Application Monitoring) BOF on Thursday morning, which is VERy relevant to MHS management. Steve -------- End