Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07545;
          16 Feb 95 15:46 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07541;
          16 Feb 95 15:46 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13712; 16 Feb 95 15:46 EST
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id PAA09925; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 15:28:15 -0500
X-Resent-To: ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 15:28:13 EST
Errors-to: owner-ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from sun4nl.NL.net by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id PAA09917; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 15:28:03 -0500
Received: from [193.78.6.6] by sun4nl.NL.net with SMTP
	id AA22237 (5.65b/CWI-3.3); Thu, 16 Feb 1995 21:27:47 +0100
Received: from vic1.6.78.193.in-addr.arpa by vicnl.victron.nl id aa19280;
          16 Feb 95 9:50 CET
Received: from VICTRON_ONE/TEMPQ by vic1.victron.nl (Mercury 1.13);
    Thu, 16 Feb 95 9:50:48 CET
Received: from TEMPQ by VICTRON_ONE (Mercury 1.13); Thu, 16 Feb 95 9:50:27 CET
Sender:ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jack Stiekema <JACK@vic1.victron.nl>
Organization:  Victron bv, UPS and software
To: ups-mib@cs.utk.edu
Date:          Thu, 16 Feb 1995 09:50:18 CET
Subject:       proxy rfc1628
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22
Message-Id: <111C9094880@vic1.victron.nl>

Hello UPS friends,

Anyone out there who knows how and when we can test our agents for:
IETF SNMP Interoperability Standards Compliance?
(Adam?)





Kind regards,
Jack Stiekema
Head Software Department
+------------------------------------------------+
|   Phone: +31 6 53145069 Fax: +31 50 424107     |
|  Fax number from 10-okt-1995: +31 50 5424107   |
|  Email: jack@victron.nl Ampr: pe0mot.ampr.org  |
| Victron bv  POB 31  9700 AA Groningen  Holland |
+------------------------------------------------+










Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22034;
          17 Feb 95 3:19 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22030;
          17 Feb 95 3:19 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24656; 17 Feb 95 3:19 EST
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id DAA24089; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 03:02:08 -0500
X-Resent-To: ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 03:02:07 EST
Errors-to: owner-ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from dub-img-1.compuserve.com by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id DAA24078; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 03:02:05 -0500
Received: by dub-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.9/5.941228sam)
	id CAA21739; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 02:57:31 -0500
Date: 17 Feb 95 02:54:13 EST
Sender:ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "A. Stolinski-Schneider" <74222.1151@compuserve.com>
To: Jack Stiekema-Victron <jack@victron.nl>
Cc: Chris Wellens-IntrwkgLab <chrisw@netcom.com>, 
    UPS WRKGRP <UPS-MIB@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: SNMP Test Summit III
Message-ID: <950217075412_74222.1151_BHT22-1@CompuServe.COM>

Hi Jack!

<<<Anyone out there who knows how and when we can test our agents for:
IETF SNMP Interoperability Standards Compliance?>>>

Following is an e-mail I received 13FEB95 from their mail list
(snmp-test@cavebear.com):

<The SNMP Test Summit III scheduled for March 6-10, 1995 is postponed.  We
will wait for the SNMPv2 work to be completed before announcing a new
date. 

Attendees at the last Test Summit requested more SNMPv2 tests for future
Summits.  While we have completed some tests for areas of the v2
specification that are unlikely to change, we're now at a point where we
need to wait for the final v2 specification before proceeding. 

We also believe that a Test Summit held in early March will detract from
the work and effort directed at completing v2, and we definitely want to
support this effort. 
 
Best of luck in Dallas this week and have a Happy Valentine's Day. We'll
be announcing dates for Test Summit III as soon as the v2 work completes. 


InterWorking Labs, Inc.
218 Carbonera Drive, Suite 102
Santa Cruz, CA  95060-1500
Tel:  +1 408 459 9817
Fax:  +1 408 459 9768
Email:  chrisw@iwl.com

<http://www.IWL.com/IWL/

>>>>

FYI:  On previous messages, they have expressed their intent to have
<functional> tests for UPS agents in the next Test Summit.

Best Regards,
Adam Stolinski,
Groupe Schneider











Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00501;
          21 Feb 95 5:03 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00497;
          21 Feb 95 5:03 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01646; 21 Feb 95 5:03 EST
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id EAA17164; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 04:52:06 -0500
X-Resent-To: ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 04:52:04 EST
Errors-to: owner-ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from sun4nl.NL.net by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id EAA17155; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 04:51:57 -0500
Received: from [193.78.6.6] by sun4nl.NL.net with SMTP
	id AA19134 (5.65b/CWI-3.3); Tue, 21 Feb 1995 10:51:35 +0100
Received: from vic1.victron.nl by vicnl.victron.nl id aa22717;
          21 Feb 95 9:50 CET
Received: from VICTRON_ONE/TEMPQ by vic1.victron.nl (Mercury 1.13);
    Tue, 21 Feb 95 9:50:26 CET
Received: from TEMPQ by VICTRON_ONE (Mercury 1.13); Tue, 21 Feb 95 9:50:21 CET
Sender:ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jack Stiekema <JACK@vic1.victron.nl>
Organization:  Victron bv, UPS and software
To: Chris Wellens <chrisw@cavebear.com>
Date:          Tue, 21 Feb 1995 09:50:13 CET
Subject:       Re: proxy rfc1628
Cc: ups-mib@cs.utk.edu
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22
Message-Id: <189BEC45B9E@vic1.victron.nl>

> Date sent:      Mon, 20 Feb 1995 22:03:27 -0800 (PST)
> From:           Chris Wellens <chrisw@cavebear.com>
> To:             Jack Stiekema <JACK@vic1.victron.nl>
> Subject:        Re: proxy rfc1628

> We are just now finishing up tests for the printer MIB, and then we
> were
> planning to start on the UPS MIB.  Do you see a need for
> interoperability
> testing or just conformance testing for the UPS MIB?  We are
> planning the Would be a nice feature in our brochures.

> but we had to postpone that since v2 is not completed).  If the
> implementors of the UPS MIB do not see a need for interoperability
> testing, then it might be easier to come up with a test specification,

I think there is a need.

> develop the test suites and sell you a product that you can use for
> testing in your lab, rather than attending a test summit.  Let me know
> your thoughts.

Depends on the price and time,
it't always nice to meet all UPS vendors and test the products,
it's also very convenient to do the testing at home (if we have the
equipment).


I cc't this to the IETF mailing group so let's see what my colleagues
are thinking.


Kind regards,
Jack Stiekema
Head Software Department
+------------------------------------------------+
|   Phone: +31 6 53145069 Fax: +31 50 424107     |
|  Fax number from 10-okt-1995: +31 50 5424107   |
|  Email: jack@victron.nl Ampr: pe0mot.ampr.org  |
| Victron bv  POB 31  9700 AA Groningen  Holland |
+------------------------------------------------+