X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Delivered-To: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.161.209 with SMTP id s17csp46532qcx;
        Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.68.164.164 with SMTP id yr4mr39281552pbb.57.1408406118655;
        Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <abnf-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org. [2001:1900:3001:11::2c])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z10si24087318pas.134.2014.08.18.16.55.16
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of abnf-discuss-bounces@ietf.org designates 2001:1900:3001:11::2c as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1900:3001:11::2c;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of abnf-discuss-bounces@ietf.org designates 2001:1900:3001:11::2c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=abnf-discuss-bounces@ietf.org;
       dkim=pass header.i=@ietf.org
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450DA1A0033;
	Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
	t=1408406114; bh=2fxFiKazGIMJXXfhNH7w0yUQrNR5JWEjFcqMFWtxTHY=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:
	 Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:
	 List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender;
	b=UK4/+ZUYK/2JhOykVRgRo12ovUvJcl/okD6WxxmG5T8+ej5zq6+yddzwHin0qVg0+
	 fdmQeauoNS1yLryvyPK43apS9TAmhWaanWorHXvxbd1DRvp6kLfSOPCz4qze09YyOl
	 0f5cTh6KMQk/SoYNGfrwa7r3LQPDKFEIeh/CuIQU=
X-Original-To: abnf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abnf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC381A002C
 for <abnf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id WWAdCvG3Ru6O for <abnf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net
 (qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:80])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345E01A0028
 for <abnf-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12])
 by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
 id gNrh1o0070Fqzac58Pv9U3; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:55:09 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151])
 by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
 id gPv91o00K3Ge9ey3UPv9o4; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:55:09 +0000
Message-ID: <53F2925D.70707@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:55:09 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <53E3B22E.5000708@alum.mit.edu>	<53EF8C18.3030004@alum.mit.edu>
 <CAC4RtVCii_j-54ixnuB6CqwQZSO_9rQstjqswDXsfuSy9ChDnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCii_j-54ixnuB6CqwQZSO_9rQstjqswDXsfuSy9ChDnA@mail.gmail.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;
 s=q20140121; t=1408406109;
 bh=SWIu2+SDBZNN6Lk24bOLZRnA2+KCXjWuSPAYxXKYI7U=;
 h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:
 Content-Type;
 b=u3H0d1KrT3Zvf9GxwKDTfBO3V4/Ldd6+MqXgL+R7pLqAIsGyO/ZqRbtqpZPJ4SXvc
 lkKjYUS2ijWHg87dyM3CWbtqMiD5vwTtdt74C2cvmiwIbg061+a3uEclpRyc7dHtpt
 6wO8XhfPtljWTHNMd3hk5SYhLfU4DSYXdSsnnUqSG9T5sfFP4ZVvPXh2wWoArijdFp
 /yEpY43OQvgVdHr5+mN+vV+K/oLAdVl6RNIFOfzpuOy2I4yRZFxmtoYlCmQunecGhn
 b8tdAuAAFDAr6LCDzGVPvZJzAh97u4P430oFnY3WO+KaPIgQfCc+q/qHIzC+d3e2b6
 liG+mVx3qbsnw==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abnf-discuss/50-t20IholnaQstYhB0OmURazX4
Cc: "abnf-discuss@ietf.org" <abnf-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [abnf-discuss] Case-sensitive string constants in ABNF
X-BeenThere: abnf-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "General discussion about tools,
 activities and capabilities involving the ABNF meta-language"
 <abnf-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abnf-discuss>,
 <mailto:abnf-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/abnf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:abnf-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abnf-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abnf-discuss>,
 <mailto:abnf-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: abnf-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Sender: "abnf-discuss" <abnf-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>

On 8/18/14 7:31 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf/
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what to do with it after this. But I guess we could start
>> with comments here.
>
> Thanks, Paul.  The only comment I have is that I would make one thing
> more explicit:
>
> OLD
>     Another way to define a rule that is case sensitive is to specify the
>     individual characters numerically.
>
>     For example:
>
>           rulename    =  %d97 %d98 %d99
>
>     or
>
>           rulename    =  %x61.62.63
>
>     will match only the string that comprises only the lowercase
>     characters, abc.
>
> NEW
>     The way that has been used in the past to define a rule that
>     is case sensitive is to specify the individual characters
>     numerically.
>
>     For example:
>
>           rulename    =  %d97 %d98 %d99
>
>     or
>
>           rulename    =  %x61.62.63
>
>     will match only the string that comprises only the lowercase
>     characters, abc.  This mechanism has a clear readability
>     disadvantage, with respect to using a literal text string with
>     a prefix, and new the prefix mechanism is preferred.
>
> END

An excellent improvement! I'll re-spin the draft with that change.

> I will be happy to AD-sponsor this any time you're ready for it to go.

Thanks! There is no huge rush here. I think I'll let it "age" a little 
while to allow others to comment. If no other comments come in, then we 
can go ahead.

If this moves along fast enough I have a good use for it in the 
in-progress 4566bis (SDP).

There may be one thing to be slightly concerned about: ABNF validators. 
Without updating them validation of ABNF that uses this will fail.

	Thanks,
	Paul

_______________________________________________
abnf-discuss mailing list
abnf-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abnf-discuss

