From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 03 07:05:15 1996 
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 3 Sep 1996 04:04:30 -0700
Received: from stanley.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP 
          id <g.10273-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 3 Sep 1996 12:04:04 +0100
To: rem-conf@es.net
Cc: merci@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: MERCI Seminar
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 12:04:03 +0100
Message-ID: <7297.841748643@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Roy Bennett <R.Bennett@cs.ucl.ac.uk>

The MERCI (Multimedia European Research Conferencing Integration)
project announces the next in an on-going series of seminars on
subjects in the fields of Multimedia, Communications, Networks,
Distributed Systems and CSCW

Time : 5 September at 14:00 BST (13:00 UTC) 

Title:   High Speed Networking in Canada. 
Chair:   Peter Kirstein 
Speaker: Doug Hughes
         Canadian Network for the Advancement of Research, Industry
            and Education (CANARIE)
         Canada 
 
An announcement will be made in sdr later.

The seminar has been booked in the MBone Broadcast Schedule 
(http://www.msri.org:80/computing/mbone/) and the MBone Session Agenda
(http://www.cilea.it/MBone/browse.html).  If there are still problems
with overlap, please contact me.

Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roy Bennett, Project Manager, MERCI
Computer Science                           Phone: +44 171 380 7934
University College London                  Fax:   +44 171 387 1397
Gower Street, LONDON WC1E 6BT              Email: rbennett@cs.ucl.ac.uk
---------- URL http://www-dept.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/R.Bennett ------------

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 03 17:39:23 1996 
Received: from hogw2.att.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 3 Sep 1996 14:38:54 -0700
Cc: rem-conf@es.net, casner@precept.com, mrc@big.att.com, bgh@big.att.com, 
    glenn@big.att.com
Received: from big.att.com by hoig2.att.att.com (SMI-8.6/EMS-1.2 sol2) 
          id RAA03098; Tue, 3 Sep 1996 17:33:59 -0400
Received: from march (march.research.att.com [135.16.210.57]) 
          by big.att.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA29356;
          Tue, 3 Sep 1996 17:37:19 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: mrc@big.att.com
Message-ID: <322CA50E.41C67EA6@att.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 17:37:18 -0400
From: "M. Reha Civanlar" <civanlar@att.com>
Organization: AT&T Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b5aGold (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3 sun4m)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Don Hoffman <hoffman@rebma.Eng.Sun.COM>
Original-CC: rem-conf@es.net, casner@precept.com, mrc@big.att.com, 
             bgh@big.att.com, glenn@big.att.com
Subject: Re: Changes to draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-01.txt
References: <9608231709.AA28656@rebma.>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Although MPEG-(1 & 2) use 3 bits for the "Picture-Type" field, I don't
see a reason for changing its length in the RTP encapsulation. MPEG ES's
can't use 00B in this field because of the "start code emulation
problem"; but, this does not apply to the RTP header. Given that there
isn't any proposal for increasing the number of usable picture types in
MPEG-(1 & 2) to more than four, two bits should be sufficient.

On the other hand, if this document is still being modified, it will
definitely benefit from some additions/explanations about MPEG-2.
Specifically, indicating that:

1. FBV, BFC, FFV and FFC fields are useless for MPEG2
2. the described error recovery techniques won't apply to MPEG-2 in
general because the information contained in the MPEG specific header is
inadequate.

For a more robust encapsulation approach for MPEG-2 you may consider
looking at: 

draft-civanlar-bmpeg-00.txt
( http://www.netlabs.net/hp/rcivanlar/draft-civanlar-bmpeg-00.html )

which describes a bundled payload; however, contains many ideas
applicable to a video only encapsulation also.

Regards.


 
-- 
M. Reha Civanlar
AT&T Labs-Research
101 Crawfords Crnr. Rd., 4C520
Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
Ph:  (908) 949 6705
Fax: (908) 949 3697

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 04 04:55:04 1996 
Received: from tis-mail.thepoint.net (actually tis-backup.thepoint.net) 
          by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 4 Sep 1996 01:54:25 -0700
Received: by tis-mail.thepoint.net with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.837.3) 
          id <01BB99EC.0EC4F120@tis-mail.thepoint.net>;
          Tue, 3 Sep 1996 23:03:02 -0400
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=ThePoint_Interne%l=TIS_MAIL-960904025029Z-1319@tis-mail.thepoint.net>
From: Arlie Davis <arlie@thepoint.net>
To: "'mbone@isi.edu'" <mbone@isi.edu>, "'rem-conf@es.net'" <rem-conf@es.net>
Cc: Michael Jung <mikej@finall.com>
Subject: Unicode under Win95 support in Win32 SD fixed.
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 22:50:29 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.837.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The Unicode support under Windows 95 in my Win32 SD tool has been fixed.
 Available in the usual spot: http://archive.thepoint.net/Win32SD/

-- arlie

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 05 09:59:20 1996 
Received: from sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 5 Sep 1996 06:58:43 -0700
Received: from japetus-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de (japetus [141.12.62.43]) 
          by sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA04324 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 15:58:38 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Mohsen Nasr <nasr@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Received: (from nasr@localhost) by japetus-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) 
          id PAA01231 for rem-conf@es.net;
          Thu, 5 Sep 1996 15:56:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 15:56:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199609051356.PAA01231@japetus-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: SOCKET-QUETION
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII

I have a problem concerning sockets and ports in unix. 
We work with VAT (video Audio tool) and I must write a program which starts on the same Computer as VAT.
The Program must be able to read from the same port as VAT and also write back in this port. 
The problem is, when I start these programs only the program which starts first can read from the port. 

I am not allowed to do any changes in the source code of VAT. 

My question is: under these conditions, does anyone know a possibility to give 

two programs read-access to one port?

I will be thankfull for any idea.

mohsen nasr. 



Mohsen Nasr----------------------------------------------------------------
        Institute for Telecooperation Technology
	GMD - German National Research Center for Information Technology
GMD-TKT               e-mail:       nasr@darmstadt.gmd.de
Rheinstr. 75          www   :       http://www.darmstadt.gmd.de/~nasr/
D-64295 Darmstadt     Tel   : ++49-6151-869-342 | Fax:869-224 | Room 41
   Germany

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 05 12:50:54 1996 
Received: from virginia.edu (actually mars.itc.Virginia.EDU) by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Thu, 5 Sep 1996 09:50:06 -0700
Received: from mail.cs.virginia.edu by mail.virginia.edu id aa28092;
          5 Sep 96 12:49 EDT
Received: from fddi-davis.cs.Virginia.EDU (fddi-davis.cs.Virginia.EDU [128.143.136.22]) 
          by archive.cs.Virginia.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA11864;
          Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:49:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from arb8n@localhost) by fddi-davis.cs.Virginia.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) 
          id MAA25126; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:49:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199609051649.MAA25126@fddi-davis.cs.Virginia.EDU>
Subject: Re: SOCKET-QUETION
To: Mohsen Nasr <nasr@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:49:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
In-Reply-To: <199609051356.PAA01231@japetus-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de> from "Mohsen Nasr" at Sep 5, 96 03:56:13 pm
From: Andrew Booker <andy@virginia.edu>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mohsen Nasr wrote:

> I have a problem concerning sockets and ports in unix. 
> We work with VAT (video Audio tool) and I must write a program which starts on the same Computer as VAT.
> The Program must be able to read from the same port as VAT and also write back in this port. 
> The problem is, when I start these programs only the program which starts first can read from the port. 
> 
> I am not allowed to do any changes in the source code of VAT. 
> 
> My question is: under these conditions, does anyone know a possibility to give 
> 
> two programs read-access to one port?
> 
> I will be thankfull for any idea.

It is possible for two sockets to bind() to the same port if the
REUSEADDR socket option is set.  Note, however, that how datagrams
are delivered when requested by multiple sockets is highly
implementation specific.

I have actually done what you want.  The technique I used was to
connect() my receiving socket specifically to the port of vat's sending
socket before running vat (this requires guessing what the port number
will be :( ).  Then, the idea is that the OS _should_ deliver data from
vat to my receiving socket since its connection is more specific than
vat's receiving socket.  This works under Linux, Irix, and AIX, but
notably not under any version of SunOS.

All of the above must be repeated twice of course, once for the data
channel and once for the control channel.  This is a very messy
technique, and should be avoided if you have the means.  Another
possibility is to use a local multicast group.  However, this requires
a multicast capable interface, such as an ethernet, and which the
loopback usually is not.

As a side note, this is a general problem among multicast applications,
in the name of simplicity (one port for the conference).  Has anyone
ever thought of implementing a more general scheme, in which sending
and receiving ports could differ?

I hope this helps,

Andrew Booker
andy@Virginia.EDU

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 05 14:38:11 1996 
Received: from bmrc.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:37:36 -0700
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) 
          by bmrc.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA08332 
          for <298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:33:30 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id LAA01638 
          for <298-list@bmrc>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:33:31 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 11:33:31 -0700
Message-Id: <199609051833.LAA01638@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Berkeley Multimedia and Graphics Seminar

                Berkeley Multimedia and Graphics Seminar
                     Wednesday, September 11, 1996
                          12:30-2:00 p.m. PDT
                             405 Soda Hall

                "Payment Systems for Electronic Commerce" 

                            Einar Stefferud 
                     Network Management Associates 

Commerce has come to the Internet and it demands that we find ways to
transfer money via the net. Several payment systems are now in operation.
This seminar reviews some leading payment systems and addresses the
important issues that must be understood. 

Topics: 

     DigiCash, First Virtual, Cybercash, Netscape, Microsoft, VISA/MC 
     Is Encryption Required? 
     Importance of End-to-end Control 
     Market Acceptance? 
     Some Global/International Issues 



From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 09 14:09:06 1996 
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU by osi-east.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:08:23 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id LAA25185 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:08:21 -0700
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:08:21 -0700
Message-Id: <199609091808.LAA25185@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Reminder: UC Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

Wednesday, September 11, 1996
12:30-2:00 PM PDT
405 soda Hall

"Payment Systems for Electronic Commerce"
Einar Stefferud, Network Management Associates

MBONE BROADCAST BEGINS AT 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 HOURS)

[This seminar will be broadcast on the Internet MBONE. See sd or
http://www.bmrc.berkeley.edu/298 for instructions on setting up, 
connecting to, and operating the MBONE tools.]


From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 10 10:51:47 1996 
Received: from cyclops.ece.ncsu.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 07:51:04 -0700
Received: by cyclops.ece.ncsu.edu (8.6.9/EC06jan95) id KAA20199;
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:51:01 -0400
From: Kathy Lynn Hewitt <klhewitt@eos.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <9609101051.ZM20197@eos.ncsu.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:51:00 -0400
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 10oct95)
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: wb/ps problems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I'm sorry to bother the list with this - I know it's already been discussed,
but I am having problems with the size constraints on the size of a ps file.
 This is our setup:  every Wed night we (NCSU) have been broadcasting an
interactive graduate class to UNC-Asheville (TTL is set to 63).  So far it has
been an amazing success.  NCSU transmits the professor's video and audio to
Asheville and likewise they transmit their video and audio (when a question is
asked).  I receive the prof's lecture slides on Wed afternoon (class is at 5pm)
in MSWord format.  I have a PC in my lab running Win95 with Word7.  I print out
the slides in ps format (optimized for compatibility - I've also tried
optimized for speed) and use "pssplit -lz" to split and compress them.  Even
after this though there are about 10 slides (out of 30) that are above the 32K
limit.  I tried using the distill function with a gs interpreter, but all that
does is give me garbage ps that I can't bring in ghostview/gs, or wb.  So to
get around this, I've bring up the slide in question in ghostview and use xv to
take a snapshot of a region around the slide.  I then save the snapshot as ps
file.  I then use lzps to compress it and so far all slides have been come in
under the limit using this technique.  I must mention that these slides in
question are all graphics (Harvard graphics to generate (I think) and then
imported into MSWord).  Wb is able to load these slides, but it takes an
enormous amount of time (30-45sec).  I could have sworn that I remember reading
somewhere that you can up the limit on ps file size up to 1M.  I certainly
don't need that much, but am looking for ways to minimize that load time.  I'm
thinking that compression upon compression is slowing it up.  Does anybody know
how to do this?  I haven't been able to find that specific reference to it,
merely a vague one that says you can get around the ps limitation (so maybe I'm
not going senile! :-)

The prof. is using a DEC Alpha station to control the wb and his audio.  I
don't have a wbimport that works on this station.  It says it needs tk v3.4 or
later, but I have v4.0 on it.  So anyway, I've been trying to recompile
wbimport with little success.  He's been forcing the students to a new slide by
making a mark up in the corner of the slide.  He comes into the classroom early
and preloads the 30 slides into, but those "rigged" slides still take the same
amount of time to load for him as it does for everybody else.  I'm thinking
that cache size has something to do with this?

Another question while I'm at it :-)
While we've used the MBone for the class itself, we're currently using the
MBone tools in a unicast mode for office hours.  We're having problems with the
quality we're getting.  There is a lot of loss in the audio quality and wb was
dropping about every third typed character.  Can somebody explain what the
difference is when you use the MBone tools in a multicast session vs. an
unicast session?  I've viewed MBone sessions during peak network times and
there is some loss - but not as much as I've seen with unicast sessions.

Thank you for any and all help that can be given.

Kathy Hewitt

-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Kathy Hewitt
Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
North Carolina State University
<klhewitt@eos.ncsu.edu>
919-515-5604
-------------------------------------------------


From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 10 12:16:51 1996 
Received: from www45.inria.fr by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:16:11 -0700
Received: from www45 by www45.inria.fr (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA01127 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 18:16:21 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: www45.inria.fr: Host localhost.inria.fr [127.0.0.1] 
                          claimed to be www45
Sender: Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr
Message-ID: <32359455.68BB@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 18:16:21 +0200
From: Philipp Hoschka <hoschka@w3.org>
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium -- INRIA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b6Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: "Real-time Multimedia and the Web" - Deadline extension
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Due to the many papers that were promised to arrive
after the deadline, it is only fair to give everyone a chance.

Thus, if you're interested in participating in the W3C
workshop on "Real-time Multimedia and the Web", please
submitt a short position statement (one to five pages)
to hoschka@w3.org 
until Friday, September 13 (HARD DEADLINE !)

http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/AudioVideo/RTMW96.html


[Image]

CALL FOR PARTICIPATION

World Wide Web Consortium
Workshop
"Real Time Multimedia and the Web"
(RTMW '96)

October 24-25, 1996
INRIA-Sophia Antipolis - France

NEW ! Submission Deadline extended: Friday, September 13

[Version francaise]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCOPE

In the last year, there has been an increasing interest into the
integration
of audio and video into the Web. The Web offers the unique opportunity
of
fully integrating audio/video with many other media types (hypertext,
images, ...), making Web technology a contender for the "television of
the
future".
However, lacking both a forum for standardisation and a common reference
implementation, current solutions for audio/video integration into the
Web
tend to be piecemeal and non-interoperable. The purpose of this workshop
is
to provide a forum for exploring future directions of standardisation
process in this area within the W3C (WWW Consortium). Participants will
be
representatives of W3C member organisations and other qualified experts
from
research and industry.
We solicit short position papers (one to maximally five pages)
describing
anything from a "wild idea" to a complete specification or
implementations.
The main areas of interest include (see also "W3C Activity: Audio and
Video"):

   * Building Web-based multimedia presentations
        o Time representation and media synchronisation
        o Defining audio/video presentation
   * Audio/Video hyperlinks
        o URL's for linking into audio and video files
        o Addressing "streaming" audio/video resources via URL's
        o Embedding URL's into audio and video streams
   * Audio/Video media formats
        o Describing the format of audio/video resources
        o A common fall-back format for audio and video data
   * Integration of RTP (Real Time Transport Protocol)
   * Multicasting and the Web

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFORMATION TO CONTRIBUTORS

There will be a limit of 70 participants. There is no registration fee.
Potential participants should submit to the workshop chair short
position
papers of one to five pages. Most importantly, the paper should state
clearly your potential contribution to/idea on the integration of
real-time
multimedia into the Web. The papers can be submitted via e-mail
(preferred)
or in paper form. Allowed formats for e-mail submissions are, in order
of
preference: a URL to the paper, HTML, Postscript, PDF, RTF and ASCII.
Papers will be reviewed by the program committee. Based on the reviews,
we
will ask a subset of participants to present talks. To maximize the time
spent in interactive discussions, not all attendees will make
presentations.
However, all position papers will be included on the workshop website,
and
will appear in the printed participants' proceedings. W3C may also
publish
accepted papers.
Note: The website will be available ot the general public, so position
papers must be available for public dissemination.
Workshop participants may also be interested visiting the "Protocol for
High-Speed Networks" conference, which is scheduled at INRIA
Sophia-Antipolis in the week after theW3C workshop.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLICATION

Papers will be made available on the Web. Printed participants'
proceedings
will be distributed to workshop attendees. W3C may also publish accepted
papers in other media.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

IMPORTANT DATES:

Today: Send a message the workshop chair stating your intention to
submit a
paper, or your general interest in the workshop.

Submission deadline: Friday, September 13, 1996

Notification of acceptance: Friday, September 20, 1996

Paper Website available: Wednesday, September 25, 1996

Workshop: Thursday, October 24 and Friday, October 25, 1996

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE

Workshop Chair:

Philipp Hoschka, hoschka@w3.org

fax: +33 93 65 77 65

INRIA Sophia Antipolis
2004 route des Lucioles, BP-93
06902 Sophia Antipolis, Cedex
FRANCE

Program Committee Members:

   * Mostafa Ammar, Georgia Institute of Technology
   * Ernst Biersack, Eurecom
   * Jean Bolot, INRIA
   * Jim Gemmell, Microsoft
   * Henry Holtzman, MIT Media Lab
   * Christian Huitema, Bellcore (tentatively)
   * Tom Little, Boston University
   * Hui-Lan Lu, Lucent
   * Jeff Payne, Progressive Networks
   * Henning Schulzrinne, Columbia University
   * Patrick Soquet, HAVAS
   * Daniel Swinehart, Xerox Parc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

VENUE

The workshop will be held at INRIA Sophia Antipolis. Sophia Antipolis is
a
technology parc situated on the French Riviera, close to Cannes, Nice
and
the Italian border. It easily reachable from Nice International Airport
(20
minutes by car). Direct flights from the US (New York) and most major
airports in Europe are available. Hotel rooms at various price
categories
will be reserved and proposed to the participants.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last modified August 8, 1996.
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Philipp Hoschka              |   INRIA - WWW Consortium
   WWW: http://www.inria.fr/rodeo/personnel/hoschka/hoschka.html
   hoschka@sophia.inria.fr      |   2004, Route des Lucioles, BP 93
   Ph: (+33) 93 65 77 47        |   06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
   Fax:(+33) 93 65 77 65        |   France
----------------------------------------------------------------------

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 10 13:26:12 1996 
Received: from artemis.rus.uni-stuttgart.de by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:25:26 -0700
Received: from kssun9.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (kssun9.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.30.19]) 
          by artemis.rus.uni-stuttgart.de with SMTP 
          id TAA07937 (8.6.13/IDA-1.6); Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:25:12 +0200
Received: by kssun9.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (5.0/SVR4/BelWue-1.0) id AA27067;
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:24:15 --100
From: Peter Feil <Peter.Feil@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Message-Id: <9609101924.ZM27062@kssun9.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:24:14 +0200
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 10apr95)
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: MERCI Seminar Announcement
Cc: merci@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
              boundary="PART-BOUNDARY=.19609101924.ZM27062.rus.uni-stuttgart.de"
content-length: 1551


--PART-BOUNDARY=.19609101924.ZM27062.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Content-Description: Text
Content-Type: text/plain ; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Zm-Decoding-Hint: mimencode -q -u 

The MERCI (Multimedia European Research Conferencing Integration)
project announces the next in an on-going series of seminars on
subjects in the fields of Multimedia, Communications, Networks,
Distributed Systems, CSCW, etc.

Time : 12 September at 10:00 MET (8:00 UTC)

Title:    International Status and Perspectives of High Performance Compu=
ting
Speakers: G=FCnther H=E4fner/Daimler-Benz Research
          Prof. Richard D. Kenway/Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre
          Prof. Michael Levine/Pittsburgh Supercomputer Center
          Prof. Youichi Muraoka/Waseda University
          Pierre Chavy, i.R./CEA



An announcement will be made in sdr later.

The seminar has been booked in the MBone Broadcast Schedule
(http://www.msri.org:80/computing/mbone/) and the MBone Session Agenda
(http://www.cilea.it/MBone/browse.html).  If there are still problems
with overlap, please contact me.

Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Feil
University of Stuttgart
National Supercomputing Center (RUS)
Communication Systems    phone : ++49-711-685 5735
Allmandring 30           fax   : ++49-711-678 7626
70550 Stuttgart          e-mail: feil@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------

--PART-BOUNDARY=.19609101924.ZM27062.rus.uni-stuttgart.de--


From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 10 19:40:16 1996 
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:46 -0700
Received: from hplabsz.hpl.hp.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com 
          with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA189568782;
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:42 -0700
Received: by hplabsz.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.15/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) 
          id AA189698786; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:46 -0700
From: deleon@hplabsz.hpl.hp.com (Laura de Leon )
Message-Id: <9609101639.ZM18967@hplabsz.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:46 -0700
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: baylisa@baylisa.org, rem-conf@es.net, sage-members@usenix.org
Subject: BayLISA: Robert Harker on Sendmail V 8.8 and m4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0

The BayLISA group meets monthly to discuss topics of interest to systems
and network administrators.  The meetings are free and open to the public.

BayLISA holds monthly meetings on the third Thursday of each month at
7:30 PM PST.  We meet at Synopsys Building C in Mountain View, California
off Highway 237 at Middlefield.  The meetings are also broadcast via MBONE.

NOTE:  AS OF OCTOBER, WE ARE MOVING TO CISCO, near Highway 237 and 1st Street.
Stay tuned or check out the Web page for more info.  Thanks very much to
Synopsys for hosting us for all this time.

Schedule
--------

September 19th (still at Synopsys).

Sendmail V 8.8 && using the m4 preprocessor
Robert Harker

Robert Harker, of Harker systems, will talk about the latest sendmail
enhancements. He will review sendmail, and talk about the new features
in sendmail 8.8.  He'll also talk about using m4 to configure sendmail.cf.

Harker Systems focuses on training for TCP/IP and Internet managers and
system administrators to help them understand how to set-up, debug, and
manage electronic mail using sendmail and the TCP/IP protocol suite.


October 17 (At Cisco)

Windows NT for the Unix Systems Administrator
N.K. Krishnan, Hewlett Packard Company

What is Windows NT, and what do you need to know about it as it works its way
into your network?


November 21
BayLISA Board Elections & member meeting before the regular meeting
Talk to a current board member or send mail to blw@baylisa.org if you are
interested in running.

Speaker TBA


December 19
Our special holiday meeting-- suggestions being accepted now.


[Schedule subject to change]

For further information on BayLISA, check out our web site:
http://www.baylisa.org/

To get further information on the meeting location, you can also ftp it from

	ftp.baylisa.org:/BayLISA/location

or you can query the BayLISA mail server by cutting and pasting
the following line to your shell:

	echo "index baylisa" | mail majordomo@baylisa.org

BayLISA makes video tapes of the meetings available to members.  For more
information on available videos, please send email to:

	video@baylisa.org

For any other information, please send email to:

	info@baylisa.org

If you have any questions, please contact me or the info alias listed above.



From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 10 22:51:41 1996 
Received: from dns1.noc.best.net by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:51:07 -0700
Received: from shellx.best.com (shellx.best.com [206.86.0.11]) 
          by dns1.noc.best.net (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA16498;
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:47:47 -0700
Received: (baylisa@localhost) by shellx.best.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id TAA07464 
          for baylisa@baylisa.org; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:36:29 -0700
Received: from mail1.best.com (mail1.best.com [206.86.8.14]) 
          by shellx.best.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA20296 
          for <baylisa@shellx.best.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:14:15 -0700
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com (hplms26.hpl.hp.com [15.255.168.31]) 
          by mail1.best.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA10606 
          for <baylisa@baylisa.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:48 -0700
Received: from hplabsz.hpl.hp.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com 
          with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA189568782;
          Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:42 -0700
Received: by hplabsz.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.15/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) 
          id AA189698786; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:46 -0700
From: deleon@hplabsz.hpl.hp.com (Laura de Leon )
Message-Id: <9609101639.ZM18967@hplabsz.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:39:46 -0700
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: baylisa@baylisa.org, rem-conf@es.net, sage-members@usenix.org
Subject: BayLISA: Robert Harker on Sendmail V 8.8 and m4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-baylisa@baylisa.org
X-Loop: baylisa@best.com
Precedence: bulk

The BayLISA group meets monthly to discuss topics of interest to systems
and network administrators.  The meetings are free and open to the public.

BayLISA holds monthly meetings on the third Thursday of each month at
7:30 PM PST.  We meet at Synopsys Building C in Mountain View, California
off Highway 237 at Middlefield.  The meetings are also broadcast via MBONE.

NOTE:  AS OF OCTOBER, WE ARE MOVING TO CISCO, near Highway 237 and 1st Street.
Stay tuned or check out the Web page for more info.  Thanks very much to
Synopsys for hosting us for all this time.

Schedule
--------

September 19th (still at Synopsys).

Sendmail V 8.8 && using the m4 preprocessor
Robert Harker

Robert Harker, of Harker systems, will talk about the latest sendmail
enhancements. He will review sendmail, and talk about the new features
in sendmail 8.8.  He'll also talk about using m4 to configure sendmail.cf.

Harker Systems focuses on training for TCP/IP and Internet managers and
system administrators to help them understand how to set-up, debug, and
manage electronic mail using sendmail and the TCP/IP protocol suite.


October 17 (At Cisco)

Windows NT for the Unix Systems Administrator
N.K. Krishnan, Hewlett Packard Company

What is Windows NT, and what do you need to know about it as it works its way
into your network?


November 21
BayLISA Board Elections & member meeting before the regular meeting
Talk to a current board member or send mail to blw@baylisa.org if you are
interested in running.

Speaker TBA


December 19
Our special holiday meeting-- suggestions being accepted now.


[Schedule subject to change]

For further information on BayLISA, check out our web site:
http://www.baylisa.org/

To get further information on the meeting location, you can also ftp it from

	ftp.baylisa.org:/BayLISA/location

or you can query the BayLISA mail server by cutting and pasting
the following line to your shell:

	echo "index baylisa" | mail majordomo@baylisa.org

BayLISA makes video tapes of the meetings available to members.  For more
information on available videos, please send email to:

	video@baylisa.org

For any other information, please send email to:

	info@baylisa.org

If you have any questions, please contact me or the info alias listed above.



From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 11 15:15:35 1996 
Received: from mail2.digital.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:15:03 -0700
Received: from bigpink.pa.dec.com by mail2.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 
          for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA09584; Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:08:57 -0700
Received: by bigpink.pa.dec.com; id AA25713; Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:08:56 -0700
Message-Id: <9609111908.AA25713@bigpink.pa.dec.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Cc: band@std.org
Subject: tonight: STD does kimchi
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 96 12:08:55 -0700
From: berc@pa.dec.com
X-Mts: smtp


In the name of brotherhood, understanding, peace, bandwidth, and 
cheaper DRAM prices, Severe Tire Damage, be mcasting tonight live 
(~8pm PDT) from the Fabulous SubForum in Palo Alto, California. Special 
guests will be a Korean TV crew making a documentary on what American 
computer scientists do after dosing themselves with stale kimchi. 

STD - it's not just a rock band, it's an international media event.
http://www.std.org

lance

ps - no fog machine tonight, sorry

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 12 11:40:22 1996 
Received: from hillfoot.cent.gla.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 12 Sep 1996 08:39:50 -0700
Received: from hillhead.cent.gla.ac.uk by hillfoot.cent.gla.ac.uk 
          with SMTP-GLA (PP); Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:39:36 +0100
Received: from kestrel.mcg.gla.ac.uk by hillhead.cent.gla.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:39:09 +0100
Received: by kestrel.mcg.gla.ac.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA08132;
          Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:32:51 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:32:51 +0100
From: annemari@mcg.gla.ac.uk (Anne Marie Fleming)
Message-Id: <199609121532.QAA08132@kestrel.mcg.gla.ac.uk>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: ALT-C 96 multicast
Cc: mice-nsc-uk@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII


ALT-C 96 Conference


ALT-C 96 is being hosted jointly by Glasgow Caledonian University, 
University of Strathclyde and University of Glasgow.  

The conference will run from 16th-18th Sept with the theme of 
integrating technology into the curriculum.
 
The Multimedia Communications Group at Glasgow University
are multicasting a series of presentations from the ALT-C 96
Conference.

The session has been announced in sdr.

The session has been booked in the MBone Broadcast Schedule 
(http://www.msri.org:80/computing/mbone/) and the MBone Session Agenda
(http://www.cilea.it/MBone/browse.html).  

If there are any problems with time clashes etc please mail 
annemari@mcg.gla.ac.uk

Further details on the multicast can be found on http://www.mcg.gla.ac.uk/alt-c/
and for information on the conference in general see http://www.strath.gla.ac.uk/alt-c/

annemari fleming


=============================================================================
                                 Anne Marie Fleming
Multimedia Communications Group                email: annemari@mcg.gla.ac.uk
Department of Psychology                  www url: http://www.mcg.gla.ac.uk/
University of Glasgow                                  Tel:  +44 41 330 5424
62 Hillhead Street                                     Fax:  +44 41 339 8889
Glasgow G12 8QB                                         Telex: 777070 UNIGLA
=============================================================================



From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 12 19:19:34 1996 
Received: from bmrc.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:19:05 -0700
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) 
          by bmrc.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA03276 
          for <298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:14:00 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id QAA13059 
          for <298-list@bmrc>; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:13:57 -0700
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:13:57 -0700
Message-Id: <199609122313.QAA13059@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

                Berkeley Multimedia and Graphics Seminar
                     Wednesday, September 18, 1996
                            12:30 - 2:00 PDT
                              405 Soda Hall

"Integrating Technology into the Elementary Foreign Language Curriculum" 

                               Mark Kaiser 
                              U.C. Berkeley 

The instructional methodologies employed to assist students in the
acquisition of a second language have evolved over the past decade, and at
the same time the capabilities of the computer have been greatly expanded.
During this presentation of software for first-year Russian, we will explore
ways in which the computer can be used to teach language and culture,
including possibilities for a nonlinear presentation of material. We will
discuss implications for the role of instructors, the structure of the
curriculum, and evaluation of student
progress. 

------------------------

This seminar will be broadcast on the Internet MBONE.  The broadcast will
begin at 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 hrs.)  See sd or http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/298
for instructions on setting up, connecting to, and operating the MBONE tools.


From rem-conf-request@es.net Fri Sep 13 07:22:48 1996 
Received: from sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Fri, 13 Sep 1996 04:22:13 -0700
Received: from rhea-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de (rhea [141.12.62.41]) 
          by sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA08949;
          Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:22:02 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Mohsen Nasr <nasr@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Received: (from nasr@localhost) by rhea-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) 
          id NAA03809; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:22:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:22:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199609131122.NAA03809@rhea-atm.darmstadt.gmd.de>
To: andy@virginia.edu
Subject: Re: SOCKET-QUETION
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII


> From arb8n@archive.cs.virginia.edu Thu Sep  5 18:50 MET 1996
> Subject: Re: SOCKET-QUETION
> To: Mohsen Nasr <nasr>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 12:49:25 -0400 (EDT)
> Cc: rem-conf@es.net
> From: Andrew Booker <andy@virginia.edu>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Mohsen Nasr wrote:
> 
> > I have a problem concerning sockets and ports in unix. 
> > We work with VAT (video Audio tool) and I must write a program which starts on the same Computer as VAT.
> > The Program must be able to read from the same port as VAT and also write back in this port. 
> > The problem is, when I start these programs only the program which starts first can read from the port. 
> > 
> > I am not allowed to do any changes in the source code of VAT. 
> > 
> > My question is: under these conditions, does anyone know a possibility to give 
> > 
> > two programs read-access to one port?
> > 
> > I will be thankfull for any idea.
> 
> It is possible for two sockets to bind() to the same port if the
> REUSEADDR socket option is set.  Note, however, that how datagrams
> are delivered when requested by multiple sockets is highly
> implementation specific.
> 
> I have actually done what you want.  The technique I used was to
> connect() my receiving socket specifically to the port of vat's sending
> socket before running vat (this requires guessing what the port number
> will be :( ).  Then, the idea is that the OS _should_ deliver data from
> vat to my receiving socket since its connection is more specific than
> vat's receiving socket.  This works under Linux, Irix, and AIX, but
> notably not under any version of SunOS.
> 
> All of the above must be repeated twice of course, once for the data
> channel and once for the control channel.  This is a very messy
> technique, and should be avoided if you have the means.  Another
> possibility is to use a local multicast group.  However, this requires
> a multicast capable interface, such as an ethernet, and which the
> loopback usually is not.
> 
> As a side note, this is a general problem among multicast applications,
> in the name of simplicity (one port for the conference).  Has anyone
> ever thought of implementing a more general scheme, in which sending
> and receiving ports could differ?
> 
> I hope this helps,
> 
> Andrew Booker
> andy@Virginia.EDU
> 


Dear Andy,

Thank you for your answer. First we can't use your second suggesstion about multicast, because the program I write will be an encrypting application. This means
only my program should be capable of reading the data before its encrypted.
Your first suggestion seems to be good, I tried this before, without any success. Maybe there is a point I overlook. Could you please send me your program?

I will let you know if it worked then.

nasr

Mohsen Nasr----------------------------------------------------------------
        Institute for Telecooperation Technology
	GMD - German National Research Center for Information Technology
GMD-TKT               e-mail:       nasr@darmstadt.gmd.de
Rheinstr. 75          www   :       http://www.darmstadt.gmd.de/~nasr/
D-64295 Darmstadt     Tel   : ++49-6151-869-342 | Fax:869-224 | Room 41
   Germany

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 04:29:43 1996 
Received: from hplb.hpl.hp.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 01:28:52 -0700
Received: from spleen.hpl.hp.com by hplb.hpl.hp.com;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 09:28:43 +0100
Received: by spleen.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.16/15.6+ISC) id AA214662432;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 09:27:12 +0100
From: Max Barber <max@spleen.hpl.hp.com>
Message-Id: <9609160927.ZM21464@spleen.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 09:27:11 +0100
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 06sep94)
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: unsubscribe
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

unsubsribe


(If this is the incorrect way to be removed from this list, could some kind
sole point me in the right direction)

Thanks
Max
--
****     ******************************************************************
**  /_  __ *** Max Barber			Tel  : +44 (0117) 922 9363*
*  / / /_/  ** Network Technology Department	Fax  : +44 (0117) 922 9286*
**    /    *** Hewlett Packard Laboratories	EMail:  mb@hplb.hpl.hp.com*
****     ******************************************************************
Help Wanted: Telepath.  You know where to apply.

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 10:31:51 1996 
Received: from VNET.IBM.COM by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 07:31:20 -0700
Received: from RALVM6.VNET.IBM.COM by VNET.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) 
          with BSMTP id 6941; Mon, 16 Sep 96 10:31:36 EDT
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 96 10:31:36 EDT
From: ellesson@VNET.IBM.COM
To: casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, jeff@pulver.com
Subject: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)

FROM: ED ELLESSON, RALVM6(ELLESSON) / ellesson@vnet.ibm.com
      Networking Systems Architecture, C70/B664
      P.O. 12195, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Subject: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
Steve, Allison, and fellow avt'rs:

According to the attached posting, a patent has been issued to some
guys in Texas titled "System and Method for Communication of Audio
Data over a Packet-based Network."  I have a copy of the patent, but it
is barely readable in the form I have it, so it will not survive copying
or faxing.  The Patent Number is 5,526,353, issued June 11, 1996.
I'll try to pull a more legible copy.

Allison, you and Steve probably have the most documentation of the mbone
(or other) experiments which predate the subject patent.  Jeff Pulver has
proven himself an effective advocate of realtime over the Internet (his
VON Coalition pulled together an effective response to the ACTA filing
against Internet Telephony with the FCC).  I encourage you to send a note
to Jeff if you have such documentation of prior art.  (I would also
appreciate a copy, thanks!)

Regards,
Ed Ellesson
Emerging Technologies, Networking Architecture
T-444-4115, 919-254-4115 / FAX Number: T-444-5410, 919-254-5410
*** Forwarding note from SMTP2   --IINUS1   09/16/96 06:54 ***
=========================================================================
Received: from enterprise.pulver.com by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
   with TCP; Mon, 16 Sep 96 06:55:15 EDT
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by enterprise.pulver.com
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id GAA18215; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 06:45:22 -0400
From: owner-von-digest@Pulver.COM
Received: (from root@localhost) by enterprise.pulver.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
GAA17792 for von-digest-outgoing; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 06:25:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 06:25:04 -0400
Message-Id: <199609161025.GAA17792@enterprise.pulver.com>
To: von-digest@enterprise.pulver.com
Subject:   Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231
Reply-To: von@Pulver.COM
Errors-To: owner-von-digest@Pulver.COM
Precedence: bulk


Voice On the Net Digest     Monday, 16 September 1996     Volume 02 : Number
231

Today's topics:

 [VON]: The Next THREAT to the US Internet Telephony - US Patent no. 5,526,353
 [VON]: Details about Multicast

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Jeff Pulver <jeff@.pulver.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 23:41:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [VON]: The Next THREAT to the US Internet Telephony - US Patent no.
5,526,353

Hi There,

Looks like the next threat to the Internet Telephony industry may not be from
the threat of regulation - but from the US Patent and Trademark Office.

In this case, the threat is that the government will issue patents that have
broad claims that can be used to tax our industry or even put people out of
business.  The US patent system is not a perfect system, and often patents
get through that should never get through.

For those of you in the industry, you need to know about a recent patent
(US Patent No. 5,526,353) that issued to Henley and Grau in June 1996.
Let's call this the "Henley Patent".  The inventors of this patent claim to
have invented sending and receiving audio over packet-based networks.

(Note: A copy of the patent was distributed with the conference materials at
the Talking Net conference last week.)

Such a claim would broadly cover all Internet telephony and any product that
sends and receives audio over packet-based networks.  Henley and Grau claim
to have invented audio over packet-based networks in 1994, because they
filed the patent application on December 20, 1994.

Most people's first reaction to this is that this patent could never be
valid.  People were experimenting with and selling product for voice over
packet-based networks in 1993. (I know I was). But the patent has already
issued so it has the power of the US government behind it.
So, what can we do?

As an industry, we need to accumulate product literature, technical
literature, conference proceedings, or any other public or private written
disclosure that shows that people were sending and receiving packetized
audio prior to December 20, 1993.  This is the date one year before the
filing of the patent and there is no way that Henley and Grau can claim to
have invented this prior to any public information that was available prior
to December 20, 1993.  This will allow us to develop a storehouse of
information that will show that this patent should never have issued.

It is important that we respond to this as a unified industry, for the good
of the entire industry.

Regards,

Jeff Pulver                                   Tel. 516.487.1424
Publisher                                     Fax. 516.487.7269
The Pulver Report                             http://www.pulver.com/reports

------------------------------

From: "Steve Chiang" <schiang2@smtplink.acer.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 96 15:45:34 pst
Subject: [VON]: Details about Multicast

     >>[A request -- could someone put out a more detailed post about these
     issues, or recommend some RFCs or other materials that a non-engineer
     like me could understand?]<<

     If you are interested in Multicast, look for MBONE Web page, and there
     is also a book about MBONE, I do not consider either one as great
     references, but its a relatively new technology, you can get a feel of
     what's it about. On RFCs, go to the IETF(Internet Engineering Task
     Force) home page, the things that you want to look at are RTP(Realtime
     Transport Protocol) and RSVP(ReSource ReserVation Protocol), if you
     have time, there are a ton of other proposals in the general area of
     multimedia over Internet. As a matter of fact, RSVP, RTP and its
     offshoot XTP(eXpress Transport Protocol) have their own respective
     home pages in the Web.

     As I have posted in the past and what I beleive what Howard from Xing
     was saying, Interent broadcasting is a new technology and that
     traditional broadcast is really not a good model on how this
     technology should be employed.

     In the area of quality of service(QoS) on Internet multimedia
     delivery, as in most cases, technology is not a problem, the problem
     is really economics(as usual). In the most recent InterOp, Cisco and
     MCI, et al have demonstrated RSVP connections, in other words,
     guaranteed QoS multimedia stream realtime delivery. Right now this
     technology is targeted at the corporate private network(intranet)
     market. The problem of deploying this technology in the public sector
     is obvious: how much will the users be willing to pay for guaranteed
     QoS ? The same type of "will people willing to pay ?" problem is
     common to all these much talk about technologies, such as xDSL, Fibre
     to home,.....

     In Mar/April's IEEE Network publication, the editor(Mr. David C.
     Feldermeier) made an interesting observation, very much in line with
     my personal experience, and I quote verbatim,:

     "In my experience, people tend to be very careful with their own
     money, and not so careful with someone else's money, I am constantly
     seeing market studies in which people are asked what new
     communications services they might like. When money is not mentioned,
     people are interested in all kinds of new services. However, as soon
     as you tell people that some new service will cost $50 per month(or
     whatever), interest drop to practically zero..."

     stevec

------------------------------

End of Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231
**************************************

(c) 1996 Jeffrey L. Pulver, All Rights Reserved.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of the VON-Digest
provided the copyright notice and this paragraph is perserved on all copies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list is brought to you by:
The Talking Net Conference - September 10-11 1996 in NYC
See - http://www.talking-net.com for more information
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have been reading the VON-Digest.  The purpose of this mailing list
is to discuss all of the issues and underlying technologies regarding the
Voice on the Net (VON) products available on the Net Today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to this mailing list, send e-mail to: majordomo@pulver.com,
leave the subject blank, and in the body write: subscribe von-digest.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send e-mail to: majordomo@pulver.com,
leave the subject blank, and in the body write: unsubscribe von-digest

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 12:54:50 1996 
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 09:54:21 -0700
Received: from sol.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP 
          id <g.27206-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 17:52:05 +0100
To: ellesson@VNET.IBM.COM
cc: casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, jeff@pulver.com
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 10:31:36 EDT."
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 17:52:20 +0100
Message-ID: <6877.842892740@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>



a 94 patent on packet audio is indefensible

prior art:
Casner,     Steve and Steve Deering, "First IETF Internet Audiocast,
Computer Communications  Review, vol. Vol 22,3, July 1992.

an ACM publication with ISSN and ISBN and library of congress
indexing.....

the RFC on packet voice protocol predates this patent filing by
a bit (1977, rfc 741)

i bet there's even ATM voice products that predate this....

they lose.

cheers
jon

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 13:53:00 1996 
Received: from enterprise.pulver.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 10:52:15 -0700
Received: (from jeff@localhost) by enterprise.pulver.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) 
          id NAA02798; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 13:52:02 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 13:52:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Pulver <jeff@Pulver.COM>
To: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
cc: ellesson@VNET.IBM.COM, casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
In-Reply-To: <6877.842892740@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960916134246.1939E-100000@enterprise.pulver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi Jon & Ed,

On Mon, 16 Sep 1996, Jon Crowcroft wrote:

> a 94 patent on packet audio is indefensible

Thanks for the support.

While I also agree that a 94 patent on packet audio should be  
indefensible, we still need to focus on getting all of the materials 
together so that I or somebody else can make a case to the US Patent Office 
that this particular patent should not have been issued.

If anybody could point me toward additional related URLs - I will add 
them to my list.

Also - If somebody could suggest additional net resoures - mailing lists 
and/or usenet groups to post to, I would greatly appreciate it.


Regards,

Jeff Pulver                                          Tel. 516.487.1424
Publisher                                            Fax. 516.487.7269
The Pulver Report                                http://www.pulver.com


From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 14:05:31 1996 
Received: from igw2.watson.ibm.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 11:04:30 -0700
Received: from mailhub1.watson.ibm.com (mailhub1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.249.31]) 
          by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.7.4/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA15739 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:04:55 -0400
Received: from hawpub1.watson.ibm.com (hawpub1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.90.32]) 
          by mailhub1.watson.ibm.com (8.7.1/09-08-96) with SMTP id OAA497771 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:04:26 -0400
Received: by hawpub1.watson.ibm.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/6/25/96) id AA49339;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:04:26 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:04:26 -0400
From: Charlie Perkins <charliep@watson.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <9609161804.AA49339@hawpub1.watson.ibm.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Call for Papers for MONET special issue

--------
Dear Colleagues,

The following Call for Papers is also available on the Web, at
	http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dbj/monet-cfp.html
A PostScript version of the Call for Papers is available at
	http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dbj/monet-cfp.ps

Please distribute this notice to anyone you feel may be interested.
Also please feel free to add a pointer from your Web pages to the
abovementioned URL for the special issue.

Regards,
Charles E. Perkins

========================================================================

    Baltzer Science Publishers in cooperation with ACM announce a
      Special Issue of the Journal on Special Topics in Mobile
                 Networking and Applications (MONET)

                                  on

                  Mobile Networking in the Internet

                         with guest editors

                          Charles E. Perkins
                   IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

                           David B. Johnson
                      Carnegie Mellon University


 OVERVIEW:

 The continued exponential growth of the Internet, coupled with
 powerful new technology for wireless computing, has created the
 need for extensive development of protocols and techniques for
 handling wireless nodes as they move about and change their point
 of network attachment.  One major technological advance enabling
 mobile networking within the Internet has been Mobile IP, developed
 within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), but this is
 only the beginning of the wave of changes needed to support nomadic
 Internet users.  Problems introduced by mobility have been identified
 at every level of the network protocol stack, and many innovations
 are needed to enable the full potential of untethered nodes within
 the Internet.
 
 SCOPE:

 This special issue will concentrate on the problems associated with
 mobile and wireless networking in the Internet, primarily at the
 network layer and above.  A representative sampling of topics is
 provided below:

        - Mobile IP
        - Registration and location management
        - Route optimization
        - Interactions between geographic and network locality
        - Mobile multicast protocols
        - Mobile location of services and resources
        - Transport layer (TCP, RTP) effects
        - Multimedia and QOS support
        - Internet protocols in a wireless ad hoc network
        - Application adaptation to mobility and changing links
        - Proxy architectures for Web and other services
        - Internet security issues
        - Analysis and simulation of mobile networking protocols
        - Mobile node traffic analysis and simulation

 SUBMISSION GUIDELINES:

 Authors should email an electronic Postscript copy of their paper to
 one of the guest editors by November 15, 1996.  Submissions should be
 limited to 20 double spaced pages, excluding figures, graphs, and
 illustrations.  If email submission is impossible, then six (6) copies
 of the paper (double-sided if possible) should be sent by the due date
 to one of the guest editors.

 PUBLICATION SCHEDULE:

        MANUSCRIPT DUE:            November 15, 1996
        ACCEPTANCE NOTIFICATION:   January 31, 1997
        FINAL MANUSCRIPT DUE:      March 31, 1997

 GUEST EDITORS:

        Charles E. Perkins
        Room H3-D34
        IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
        30 Saw Mill River Rd.
        Hawthorne, NY  10532
        Tel:   +1-914-784-7350
        Fax:   +1-914-784-6205
        Email: perk@watson.ibm.com

        David B. Johnson
        Carnegie Mellon University
        Computer Science Department
        5000 Forbes Avenue
        Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3891
        Tel:   +1-412-268-7399
        Fax:   +1-412-268-5576
        Email: dbj@cs.cmu.edu

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 14:42:30 1996 
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 11:41:36 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id LAA26384 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 11:40:17 -0700
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 11:40:17 -0700
Message-Id: <199609161840.LAA26384@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: [Reminder] Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

                      Wednesday, September 18, 1996
                           12:30 - 2:00 PM PDT 
                              405 Soda Hall

"Integrating Technology into the Elementary Foreign Language Curriculum" 

                        Mark Kaiser, U.C. Berkeley 

        MBONE BROADCAST BEGINS AT 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 HOURS).


From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 14:58:26 1996 
Received: from jekyll.piermont.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 11:57:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (perry@localhost) 
          by jekyll.piermont.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA23170;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:56:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199609161856.OAA23170@jekyll.piermont.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: jekyll.piermont.com: Host perry@localhost didn't use 
                          HELO protocol
To: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
cc: ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, 
    jeff@pulver.com
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 17:52:20 BST." <6877.842892740@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:56:48 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>


More prior art: Etherphones at Parc in the mid 80s, Etherphones at
Bellcore in the late 80s...

Jon Crowcroft writes:
> a 94 patent on packet audio is indefensible
> 
> prior art:
> Casner,     Steve and Steve Deering, "First IETF Internet Audiocast,
> Computer Communications  Review, vol. Vol 22,3, July 1992.
> 
> an ACM publication with ISSN and ISBN and library of congress
> indexing.....
> 
> the RFC on packet voice protocol predates this patent filing by
> a bit (1977, rfc 741)
> 
> i bet there's even ATM voice products that predate this....
> 
> they lose.
> 
> cheers
> jon

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 15:06:17 1996 
Received: from iggy.iwsc.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:05:27 -0700
Received: from bmeandzija_nt (analog_dell.gi.com [168.84.65.19]) 
          by iggy.iwsc.com (post.office MTA v1.9.3 ID# 10-12202) with SMTP 
          id AAA240 for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:10:17 +0100
Message-ID: <323DA472.91A@metacomm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:03:14 -0700
From: Branislav Meandzija <bran@metacomm.com>
Reply-To: bran@metacomm.com
Organization: Meta Communications, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b8Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Call for Papers - Global Internet - IEEE Communications Magazine
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

CALL FOR PAPERS
                IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE
           SPECIAL ISSUE ON THE GLOBAL INTERNET

The IEEE Communications Magazine is soliciting original
tutorial-style manuscripts for a planned Special Issue on
the Global Internet. From its origins as a US government
research project, the Internet has grown to become a major
component of the global world-wide network infrastructure,
linking millions of machines and tens of millions of users
around the world. If the Internet were a stock it would be
considered a market phenomenon, with sustained double-digit
growth and no apparent end in sight to its upward spiral. 

Over 70 countries have full TCP/IP Internet connectivity, 
and about 150 have at least e-mail services through IP or
via more limited means of connectivity (e.g., UUCP or Fidonet).

Given such phenomenal growth, the Global Internet is increasingly
viewed as the catalyst for a communications revolution resulting
in a plethora of new technological, economic, and social changes.
The focus of the special issue is on the technologies of the 
Internet, the technological changes driven by the emergence of
a truly Global Internet, and collateral economic and social 
issues. Papers are solicited on the following specific subjects:

        * Internet Applications - information retrieval,
         directory services, catalogs, search tools and
         user agents; electronic publishing; education;
         www; languages; collaborative work environments.
 
        * Internet Connectivity Infrastructure - service
         characteristics ("best effort" vs. guaranteed); 
         reliability (utility); addressing; multicasting;
         routing; protocols.
 
        * Internet Administrative Infrastructure - regulation;
         public policy; economics; standards.
 
        * Internet Security - security technology; export 
         controls; privacy.
 
        * Internet Management - protocols; agent technology;
         standards; platforms.
 
        * Internet Commerce - electronic banking; virtual 
         retailing; payment systems.

Submitted manuscripts must be no longer than 12 single-spaced 
pages. The cover page should include the title of the paper, 
a brief abstract, a list of keywords, and the full name, 
affiliation, postal address, telephone number, and electronic 
mail address of each author. Papers may be submitted in 
postscript format via e-mail or as hardcopy (six copies).  
Authors should obtain company and government clearances prior
to submission of papers. Papers should be submitted by 
October 31, 1996 to either of the guest co-editors. 

All papers will go through a peer-review process. They will be
judged with respect to their quality and relevance to the 
Special Issue and the IEEE Communications Magazine. 
Authors will be notified of acceptance or rejection by 
December 15, 1996. Final copies of accepted papers will 
be due by January 31, 1997. Publication is scheduled 
for May 1997.

Please submit manuscripts by October 31 to either:

Branislav Meandzija     - OR-           Lyman Chapin
Meta Communications, Inc.               BBN CORPORATION
322 North Cleveland Ave., Suite 100     10 Moulton Street
Oceanside, CA 92054 USA                 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Phone:  +1 619 721 6033                 Phone:  +1 617 873 3133
Fax:    +1 619 456 7472                 Fax:    +1 617 873 3243
e-mail: bran@metacomm.com               e-mail: lyman@bbn.com

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 18:09:22 1996 
Received: from precept.com (actually hydra.precept.com) by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:08:41 -0700
Received: from little-toot.precept.com by precept.com (5.x/SMI-4.1) id AA16395;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:07:21 -0700
Message-Id: <9609162207.AA16395@precept.com>
From: Karl Auerbach <karl@precept.com>
To: Jeff Pulver <jeff@Pulver.COM>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: ellesson <ellesson@VNET.IBM.COM>, casner <casner@precept.com>, 
    mankin <mankin@isi.edu>, rem-conf <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:07:23 -0700
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> Thanks for the support.
> 
> While I also agree that a 94 patent on packet audio should be  
> indefensible

Just a reminder to folks -- reading a patent is somewhat of an arcane art. 
The patent is the collection of *all* the claims, not just one.  This
patent has 40 claims, some of which are pretty fuzzy (for example claim 26
speaks of periods of "about" 20 milliseconds.)  It wouldn't be surprising
if the patent is actually pretty narrow (but one would have to have a
readible copy, something it seems that few of us have, plus rather many
hours of boring reading, to even begin to find out.  There's also a lot of
very esoteric law on how one interprets this stuff.)

A comment on prior art -- I'm not an expert in this, but it is my
understanding that the US Patent and Trademark Office does not recognize a
lot of what we do in the net as constituting "prior art", at least not that
which the USPTO takes cognizance of without some special prompting.  In
general they look to established journals and other patents.  And we, being
more e-mail based, tend to not follow the formal journal paradigm found in
other scientific and engineering areas.  One might also expect that "prior
art" needs to be readily findable through normal library indexing systems. 
(I would hope, however, that IEEE and ACM proceedings would constitute the
kind of thing the USPTO recognizes.)

By-the-way, our practice of destroying internet drafts and such doesn't
help our case when we start shouting "prior art, prior art".

All this said, it certainly won't hurt to gather all relevant references
and documents from the past so that someone who wants to challange the
patent can be well armed.

               --karl--




From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 19:03:15 1996 
Received: from broon.off.connect.com.au by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 16:02:13 -0700
Received: from connect.com.au (ggm@localhost) by broon.off.connect.com.au 
          with ESMTP id JAA06803 (8.7.4/IDA-1.6);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:01:13 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: broon.off.connect.com.au: ggm owned process doing -bs
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.6 3/24/96
To: Karl Auerbach <karl@precept.com>
cc: Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson <ellesson@vnet.ibm.com>, casner <casner@precept.com>, 
    mankin <mankin@isi.edu>, rem-conf <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:07:23 MST." <9609162207.AA16395@precept.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:01:12 +1000
Message-ID: <6802.842914872@connect.com.au>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@connect.com.au>

From:

	http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/vat/

Acknowledgments
---------------

Funding for this work was provided by the Office of Energy Research,
Mathematical, Information, and Computational Sciences Division, of the U.S.
Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098. Equipment grants
and support were provided by Sun Microsystems, Digital Equipment Corporation,
and Silicon Graphics Inc. 


Do you think the patent office will take federally funded research documents
as proof of prior art?

-George

--
George Michaelson         |  connect.com.au pty/ltd
Email: ggm@connect.com.au |  c/o AAPT,
Phone: +61 7 3834 9976    |  level 8, the Riverside Centre,
  Fax: +61 7 3834 9908    |  123 Eagle St, Brisbane QLD 4000



From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 22:01:42 1996 
Received: from alpha.xerox.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 19:00:42 -0700
Received: from reynaldo.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.96]) by alpha.xerox.com 
          with SMTP id <25750(6)>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 17:10:37 PDT
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by reynaldo.parc.xerox.com with SMTP 
          id <304513>; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:45:18 PDT
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
cc: ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, 
    jeff@pulver.com, kerch@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 09:52:20 PDT." <6877.842892740@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:45:18 PDT
From: Berry Kercheval <kerch@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Sep16.154518pdt."304513"@reynaldo.parc.xerox.com>

>>>Jon Crowcroft said:
 > a 94 patent on packet audio is indefensible
 > 
 > prior art:


"Packet Voice Communications on an Ethernet Local COmputer Network", by 
Timothy Gonsalves, Xerox PARC Technical Report CSL-82-5, March 1982.

"Adding Voice to an Office Computer Network", Dan Swinehart, L Stewart and S 
Ornstein.
CSL-83-8, Feb. 1984.

"An Overview of the Etherphone System and its Applications", Polle Zellweger, 
D. Terry, D. Swinehart, Proc. 2nd IEEE Conf. on Computer Workstations, pp 
160-168, March 1988.

and so on.

  --berry

Berry Kercheval :: kerch@parc.xerox.com :: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center



From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 23:04:48 1996 
Received: from myri.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 20:03:43 -0700
Received: from juno.myri.com by myri.com (4.1/1.34.1) id AA05068;
          Mon, 16 Sep 96 20:02:19 PDT
Message-Id: <9609170302.AA05068@myri.com>
To: casner@precept.com (Steve)
To: estrin@usc.edu (Deborah Estrin)
To: Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>
To: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
To: ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net
Cc: Danny Cohen <Cohen@myri.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Packetized Audio Patent
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 96 20:02:11 -0700
From: cohen@myri.com

All;

This is the history of Packet Audio, as I recall it:

Aug-74: Realtime Packet Voice demonstrated between USC/ISI and MIT/LL,
        using CVSD and NVP.

Dec-74: Realtime Packet Voice demonstrated between CHI and MIT/LL,
        using LPC and NVP.

Jan-76: Live Packet Voice-Conferencing demonstrated between USC/ISI,
        MIT/LL, CHI, and SRI, using LPC and NVCP.

        The above demonstrations were reported in various technical
        papers and conferences, and were also described in technical
	reports submitted to the Government.

Apr-77: Flanagan (of BTL) applied for a patent on packet transmission
        of speech.

Jul-78: USA patent 4,100,377 granted to Flanagan.

Jun-96: USA patent 5,526,353, granted for "System and Method for
        Communication of Audio Data over a Packet-based Network".

						     Danny

Since Flanagan's patent expired in 1995 (unless it was a design-patent,
valid for 14 years only), what the world needs now is a new patent !
..............................................................................

Feel free to use this message any way you wish, including posting it on
"Voice On the Net Digest".
						     Danny

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 16 23:41:33 1996 
Received: from rah.star-gate.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 18:12:39 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) 
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA00417;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 18:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609170111.SAA00417@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Karl Auerbach <karl@precept.com>
cc: Jeff Pulver <jeff@Pulver.COM>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson <ellesson@VNET.IBM.COM>, casner <casner@precept.com>, 
    mankin <mankin@isi.edu>, rem-conf <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:07:23 PDT." <9609162207.AA16395@precept.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 18:11:54 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>


prior art: 
	Ericsson Digital Cellular Phone (uses gsm data compression in
	                                 a digital network )
	I bought it July, 1995 .

Now lets see what Ericsson, Motorola, etc.. have to say about the patent 8)


	Enjoy,
	Amancio






From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 03:37:49 1996 
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:36:59 -0700
Received: from sol.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP 
          id <g.11177-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:19:21 +0100
To: cohen@myri.com
cc: casner@precept.com (Steve), estrin@usc.edu (Deborah Estrin), 
    Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, 
    P.Kirstein@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Integrity-Clear (MIC), Integrity Non-Clear (MIO), Encrypted (ENC): 
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Packetized Audio Patent
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 20:02:11 PDT." <9609170302.AA05068@myri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4952.842944756.1@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:19:19 +0100
Message-ID: <4965.842944759@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Peter KIRSTEIN <P.Kirstein@cs.ucl.ac.uk>

In message <9609170302.AA05068@myri.com>you write:
>All;
>
>This is the history of Packet Audio, as I recall it:
>
>Aug-74: Realtime Packet Voice demonstrated between USC/ISI and MIT/LL,
>        using CVSD and NVP.
>
>Dec-74: Realtime Packet Voice demonstrated between CHI and MIT/LL,
>        using LPC and NVP.
>
>Jan-76: Live Packet Voice-Conferencing demonstrated between USC/ISI,
>        MIT/LL, CHI, and SRI, using LPC and NVCP.
>
>        The above demonstrations were reported in various technical
>        papers and conferences, and were also described in technical
>	reports submitted to the Government.
>
I believe the first packetised speech internationally over SATNET was
something like 1976 between Lincoln Labs and both NTA (Norway) and UCL
(UK). I believe that I can establish the date if it is important.

Peter Kirstein
>Apr-77: Flanagan (of BTL) applied for a patent on packet transmission
>        of speech.
>
>Jul-78: USA patent 4,100,377 granted to Flanagan.
>
>Jun-96: USA patent 5,526,353, granted for "System and Method for
>        Communication of Audio Data over a Packet-based Network".
>
>						     Danny
>
>Since Flanagan's patent expired in 1995 (unless it was a design-patent,
>valid for 14 years only), what the world needs now is a new patent !
>..............................................................................
>
>Feel free to use this message any way you wish, including posting it on
>"Voice On the Net Digest".
>						     Danny

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 05:19:22 1996 
Received: from mailsun.aber.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 02:18:50 -0700
Received: from mailhost.aber.ac.uk (actually host saturn.aber.ac.uk) 
          by mailsun.aber.ac.uk with SMTP (XTPPst-c);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:16:12 +0100
To: cohen@myri.com
cc: casner@precept.com (Steve), estrin@usc.edu (Deborah Estrin), 
    Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, dap@aber.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Packetized Audio Patent
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 16 Sep 1996 20:02:11 -0700. <9609170302.AA05068@myri.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:15:53 +0100
Message-ID: <15926.842951753@mailhost.aber.ac.uk>
From: D E PRICE <dap@mailhost.aber.ac.uk>

Dear All,
	I have just located a reference to cambridge
ring audio ....
A paper entitled

ORGANIZATION OF VOICE COMMUNICATION ON THE CAMBRIDGE RING
by
 LESLIE_IM, BANERJEE_R, LOVE_SJ 
was presented at a conf in London in May 1981
and was then reproduced in printed proceedings.

LOCAL NETWORKS & DISTRIBUTED OFFICE SYSTEMS, 1981, Vol.1981, Ch.45,
      pp.465-474
Dave Price

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 05:21:45 1996 
Received: from mailsun.aber.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 02:20:58 -0700
Received: from mailhost.aber.ac.uk (actually host saturn.aber.ac.uk) 
          by mailsun.aber.ac.uk with SMTP (XTPPst-c);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:17:13 +0100
To: perry@piermont.com
cc: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, 
    casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, jeff@pulver.com, 
    dap@aber.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:17:05 +0100
Message-ID: <15946.842951825@mailhost.aber.ac.uk>
From: D E PRICE <dap@mailhost.aber.ac.uk>

Dear All,

	There was also some activity with a phone
service operating over Cambridge Ring. I can't
find a document at the moment but perhaps Jon Crowcroft
remembers ?

Dave Price

	---------------------------------------------------------
	| David Price, Computer Science				|
	|							|
	|  Computer Science, University of Wales, Aberystwyth,	|
	|	Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, SY23 3DB	|
	|                                                       |
	| Email: dap@aber.ac.uk WWW: http://www.dcs.aber.ac.uk/ |
	|  Phone: +44 1970 622428   FAX: +44 1970 622455	|
	---------------------------------------------------------

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 08:32:05 1996 
Received: from enterprise.pulver.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 05:31:20 -0700
Received: (from jeff@localhost) by enterprise.pulver.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) 
          id IAA07559; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:30:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Pulver <jeff@Pulver.COM>
To: D E PRICE <dap@mailsun.aber.ac.uk>
cc: cohen@myri.com, Steve <casner@precept.com>, Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu>, 
    Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, 
    mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, dap@aber.ac.uk
Subject: Research regarding Packetized Audio Patent
In-Reply-To: <15926.842951753@mailhost.aber.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960917081504.27125O-100000@enterprise.pulver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi There,

I just wanted to thank everybody for their continuing contributions with 
regard to this research. 

Later today I will create a web page at pulver.com 
(http://www.pulver.com/patent) which contains all of the references and 
citations people have provided to date.

Please feel free to continue to send e-mail.  

I'm also trying to obtain a cleaner copy of the patent filing - so that if 
somebody would like to receive a copy - the document would be readable.


Best Regards,

Jeff Pulver                                   Tel. 516.487.1424
Publisher                                     Fax. 516.487.7269
The Pulver Report                         http://www.pulver.com

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 10:01:11 1996 
Received: from cs.columbia.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 07:00:32 -0700
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (erlang.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.27.35]) 
          by cs.columbia.edu (8.7.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA24337;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:58:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by erlang.cs.columbia.edu (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA24962;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:00:22 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <323EAEF6.6CF@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:00:22 -0400
From: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cohen@myri.com
CC: Steve <casner@precept.com>, Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu>, 
    Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
References: <9609170302.AA05068@myri.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I collected some of this information in the "History" section of the RTP
web pages at
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/rtp/

Corrections/additions are welcome.
-- 
Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 212 939-7042
Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 10:50:33 1996 
Received: from cs.columbia.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 07:49:32 -0700
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (erlang.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.27.35]) 
          by cs.columbia.edu (8.7.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA26663;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:47:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by erlang.cs.columbia.edu (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA25008;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:49:22 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <323EBA71.127D@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:49:21 -0400
From: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: D E PRICE <dap@mailsun.aber.ac.uk>
CC: cohen@myri.com, Steve <casner@precept.com>, Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu>, 
    Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net, dap@aber.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
References: <15926.842951753@mailhost.aber.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If you search for "packet voice" at
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/netbib/, you will find a bunch of early
published references (you might want to ask for "packet voice 1975",
say, to limit the output volume). Let me know of any additions or
corrections (the Leslie paper has been added).

Henning

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 10:52:05 1996 
Received: from mwunix.mitre.org by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 07:51:06 -0700
Return-Path: apiszcz@vector2.mitre.org
Received: from vector2. (vector2.mitre.org [128.29.104.208]) 
          by mwunix.mitre.org (8.6.10/8.6.4) with ESMTP id KAA24387;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:50:59 -0400
Received: by vector2. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA19194;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:51:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:51:46 -0400
From: apiszcz@vector2.mitre.org (Al Piszcz 'peesh')
Message-Id: <199609171451.KAA19194@vector2.>
Reply-To: Alan Piszcz <apiszcz@mitre.org>
To: cohen@myri.com, schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
Cc: casner@precept.com, estrin@usc.edu, jeff@pulver.com, 
    J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, 
    rem-conf@es.net
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII


US patent office URL

I'm not sure if anyone has searched this but it may be worth
a look.


http://patents.cnidr.org:4242/access/search-adv.html




> From schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu Tue Sep 17 10:26:29 1996
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:00:22 -0400
> From: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: cohen@myri.com
> CC: Steve <casner@precept.com>, Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu>,
>         Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>,
>         Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com,
>         mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net
> Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-MDF: Mail for apiszcz sent to  apiszcz@mwunix.mitre.org
> 
> I collected some of this information in the "History" section of the RTP
> web pages at
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/rtp/
> 
> Corrections/additions are welcome.
> -- 
> Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
> Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 212 939-7042
> Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
> New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
> 

      :-----------------------------------------------------------:
      : Al Piszcz                               apiszcz@mitre.org :
      : MITRE Corporation    Distributed Systems and Technologies :
      : 703.883.7124                             FAX 703.883.3308 :
      :-----------------------------------------------------------:


From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 12:07:34 1996 
Received: from cs.columbia.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:06:31 -0700
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (erlang.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.27.35]) 
          by cs.columbia.edu (8.7.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA00844;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:04:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by erlang.cs.columbia.edu (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA25123;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <323ECC84.4C30@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:06:28 -0400
From: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg.Vaudreuil@Octel.Com
CC: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Voice mail MIME type
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I note with some disappointment that RFC 1911 specifies the deprecated
G.721 32 kb/s data type as the default type of voice mail storage. (It's
even a registered MIME type, the only other audio MIME type beyond
audio/basic.) ITU specifically no longer considers this recommendation
"in force". In terms of complexity and performance for this particular
task, there seem to be encodings which are superior in terms of
complexity, performance and availability of source code. I realize that
RFC 1911 is experimental; I'd hope that should this move to the
standards track, some coordination with AVT might help. 

-- 
Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 212 939-7042
Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 12:20:46 1996 
Received: from hep.net (actually utah.hep.net) by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:19:19 -0700
Received: from nhmxw0.fnal.gov by hep.net (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA26892;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:18:34 -0500
Received: from nhmxw2.fnal.gov.fnal.gov by nhmxw0.fnal.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1-DNI) 
          id AA03907; Tue, 17 Sep 96 11:18:34 CDT
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 96 11:18:34 CDT
From: roediger@hep.net (Gary Roediger)
Message-Id: <9609171618.AA03907@nhmxw0.fnal.gov>
To: cohen@myri.com, dap@mailhost.aber.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Packetized Audio Patent
Cc: casner@precept.com, estrin@usc.edu, jeff@pulver.com, 
    J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, 
    rem-conf@es.net, dap@aber.ac.uk


ALL:
	In the mid 80's I worked as a consultant for ATT Bell Labs in
their forward looking switching systems research department.  I was one
of the chief architects for a packet switch/router which put 200Mbs to the
desktop and in the lab packet switched 100,000+ packets/sec.  The switch
was called SuperMAN.  ATT marketing saw no future in the switch but quite
a few patents where filed and granted.  As the patents were being filed
the patent attorney for Bell Labs handling the filings made the observation
that SuperMAN could packet switch voice very efficiently so he added a
patent to that effect.

Gary Roediger

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 12:52:44 1996 
Received: from myri.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:50:30 -0700
Received: from juno.myri.com by myri.com (4.1/1.34.1) id AA06668;
          Tue, 17 Sep 96 09:49:22 PDT
Message-Id: <9609171649.AA06668@myri.com>
To: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: Steve <casner@precept.com>, Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu>, 
    Jeff Pulver <jeff@pulver.com>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, 
    ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net
Cc: Danny Cohen <Cohen@myri.com>
Subject: History of Packetized Audio
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 96 09:49:18 -0700
From: cohen@myri.com

Great job! (re http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/rtp/)

A few more entries, fron the 70's, for your history section:

	"Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol"
	ISI/RR-75-39, USC/Information Sciences Institute
	(4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292),
	March 1976, Available from DTIC (AD~\#A023506).

	"Issues in Transnet Packetized Voice Communication",
	Proceedings of the Fifth Data Communications Symposium
	Snowbird, Utah, September 1977
	(IEEE Catalog No. 77CH1260-9C), pp.6-10/13.


	"A Protocol for Packet Switching Voice Communication"
	Proceedings of Computer Network Protocols Symposium
	February 1978, Liege, Belgium.

	--- Also in Computer Networks, Special Issue, Vol.2,
	No.~4/5, September/October 1978, pp.320-331.

								Danny

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 14:53:07 1996 
Received: from inet1.tek.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:52:04 -0700
Received: by inet1.tek.com id <AA27530@inet1.tek.com>;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:50:10 -0700
Received: from icebox.vndad.tek.com(128.181.120.101) by inet1 via smap (V1.3) 
          id sma031294; Tue Sep 17 11:49:51 1996
Received: from icebox (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by icebox.vndad.tek.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA07813;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609171855.LAA07813@icebox.vndad.tek.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Cc: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, 
    casner@precept.com, mankin@isi.edu, jeff@pulver.com, perry@piermont.com
From: "Ted Brunner 503.627.1317" <ted.brunner@tek.com>
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 16 Sep 1996 14:56:48 -0400. <199609161856.OAA23170@jekyll.piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:55:19 -0700
Sender: tedb@vndad.tek.com


Perry Metzger sez:
> More prior art: Etherphones at Parc in the mid 80s, Etherphones at
> Bellcore in the late 80s...

The Bellcore Etherphone stuff:
IEEE JSAC Dec 1983 sac-1 #6 ISSN 0733-8716
"A Distributed Experimental Communications System"
DeTreville and Sincoskie pg 1070

> Jon Crowcroft writes:
> > i bet there's even ATM voice products that predate this....

And for an example of an ATM-like telephone,
PhD thesis at Columbia University 1989,
"Implementation and Analysis of a Voice Messaging System"
available through microfiche.



Ted Brunner			Video and Networking Division
				Tektronix
				MS 50-490
ted.brunner@tek.com		14150 SW Karl Braun
503.627.1317			Beaverton OR 97005	
		

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 15:45:46 1996 
Received: from hep.net (actually utah.hep.net) by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:44:37 -0700
Received: by hep.net (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA28825; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:43:50 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:43:50 -0500
From: lidinsky@hep.net (Bill Lidinsky)
Message-Id: <9609171943.AA28825@hep.net>
To: cohen@myri.com, dap@mailhost.aber.ac.uk, roediger@hep.net
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Packetized Audio Patent
Cc: casner@precept.com, estrin@usc.edu, jeff@pulver.com, 
    J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu, 
    rem-conf@es.net, dap@aber.ac.uk
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII

All:

I too was one of the chief architects on the "SuperMAN" system to which
Gary Roediger refers.  The packet voice patent is

  "Integrated Packetized Voice and Data Switching System"

   Patent Number:    4,872,160
   Date of Patent:   Oct 3, 1989

Some (but not all) related patents on the same "SuperMAN" system are

   4,893,302         Jan  9, 1990
   4,897,874         Jan 30, 1990
   4,896,319         Jan 23, 1990
   4,922,486         May  1, 1990
   4,872,157         Oct  3, 1989
   4,872,159         Oct  3, 1989


While the above dates are the dates of issue of the patents, it can be
shown that work bagan in 1985 or 1986.

(As an aside, the "SuperMAN" architecture seems to bear strong
resemblances to Fibre Channel.)

There were at about the same time several patents applied for using
"fast packet" technology (i.e., omega fabrics and the like).  Some of
these also included packet voice.

Also, David Vlack and I authored a book on the topic.  The reference is

     W. Lidinsky, D. Vlack, "Perspectives on Packetized Voice and Data
        Communications", IEEE Press, 1991, ISBN 0-87942-233-5

The book describes packet voice issues and includes a number of papers
on the subject.  Some of these papers show prior art dating back to the
mid-1980s and earlier.

			Bill Lidinsky


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 11:24 CDT 1996
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:18:34 -0500 (CDT)
> From: roediger@hep.net (Gary Roediger)
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Packetized Audio Patent
> To: cohen@myri.com, dap@mailhost.aber.ac.uk
> Cc: casner@precept.com, estrin@usc.edu, jeff@pulver.com,
>         J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, ellesson@vnet.ibm.com, mankin@isi.edu,
>         rem-conf@es.net, dap@aber.ac.uk
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 620
> 
> 
> ALL:
> 
> In the mid 80's I worked as a consultant for ATT Bell Labs in their
> forward looking switching systems research department.  I was one of
> the chief architects for a packet switch/router which put 200Mbs to the
> desktop and in the lab packet switched 100,000+ packets/sec.  The
> switch was called SuperMAN.  ATT marketing saw no future in the switch
> but quite a few patents where filed and granted.  As the patents were
> being filed the patent attorney for Bell Labs handling the filings made
> the observation that SuperMAN could packet switch voice very
> efficiently so he added a patent to that effect.
> 
> Gary Roediger
> 

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 17 17:08:00 1996 
Received: from precept.com (actually hydra.precept.com) by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:07:21 -0700
Received: from little-bear.precept.com by precept.com (5.x/SMI-4.1) id AA18768;
          Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:07:19 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Packetized Audio Patent (was: Voice On the Net Digest V2 #231)
In-Reply-To: <199609171855.LAA07813@icebox.vndad.tek.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960917133216.6300C-100000@little-bear.precept.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Ted Brunner referenced the Bellcore article in IEEE JSAC Dec 1983
sac-1 #6 ISSN 0733-8716.  In fact, that whole issue is on "Packet
Switched Voice and Data Communication".  Other articles of particular
relevance to this discussion are:

"Experience with Speech Communication in Packet Networks",
C.J. Weinstein and J.W. Forgie from MIT Lincoln Laboratory, p. 963

"Speech Transport in Packet-Radio Networks with Mobile Nodes",
N. Shacham, E.J. Craighill, and A.A. Poggio from SRI International.

These two articles include portions on the use of timestamps, sequence
numbers, buffers and reconstitution delay adaptation which are
directly relevant to the claims in the recent patent.  The first
article includes an excellent set of references for those who want to
dig further regarding the work of that time, particularly the work
sponsored by ARPA.

		       ----- Please Note -----

I've removed the cc's from this message.  I think all the individuals
that were listed are on the rem-conf list.  Since my name was one of
them, I was getting two copies, which I'd prefer didn't happen.

							-- Steve


From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 18 09:45:28 1996 
Received: from burdell.cc.gatech.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 06:44:33 -0700
Received: from morticia.cc.gatech.edu (kevin@morticia.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.8.11]) 
          by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA13396 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 09:44:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from kevin@localhost) by morticia.cc.gatech.edu (8.7.5/8.6.9) 
          id JAA06067 for rem-conf@es.net;
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 09:44:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 09:44:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: kevin@cc.gatech.edu (Kevin C. Almeroth)
Message-Id: <199609181344.JAA06067@morticia.cc.gatech.edu>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Networld+Interop


The following sessions will be broadcast from the Georgia World Congress
Center as part of Networld+Interop '96 here in Atlanta.  All broadcast
times are EST.

At times other than what are listed we may be doing a roaming camera
using IP TV, and a wireless subnet.

Wednesday, September 18
-----------------------

   *  2:00pm -  3:30pm The Future of Routing -- Dr. Yakov Rekhter, Cisco;
                       Ramesh Govindan, USC/ISI; and Bala Rajagopalan, Bellcore

   *  4:00pm -  5:30pm Satellite Futures for Networking -- 
                       Dr Hans-Werner Braun, Teledesic, Dr. Horst Clausen,
                       University of Salzburg and gcs GmbH; Jeffrey Deutsch,
                       Deutsch Research; Doug Hoder, NASA Lewis Research Center
Thursday, September 19
----------------------

   * Morning           Roaming Broadcast of the Show Floor

   *  4:00pm -  5:30pm Firewalls and the Future of Internet Security
                       Thomas Waldow, Pilot Network Services Inc; Frederick
                       Avolio, Trusted Information Systems Inc; Bruce Hartley,
                       Trident Data Systems, Inc; and Christopher Klaus,
                       Internet Security Systems Inc

   *  6:00pm -  7:30pm Security Mechanisms for Electronic Commerce
                       

Friday, September 20
--------------------

   * 10:15am - 11:45am Gigabit Ethernet:  The Next Campus Backbone of Choice?
                       Tony Rybczynski, Nortel Multimedia Networks; Paul
                       Krystosek, Argonne National Laboratories; Tony Lee,
                       Sun Microsystems; and Joe Skorupa, Fore Systems

   * Afternoon         Possible Last Quarter Broadcast of MBone Tutorial

Additional Information about sessions can be found at 
   http://www.sbexpos.com/interop/atlanta/conference
under the section on the general conference.

-Kevin Almeroth

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 18 10:38:58 1996 
Received: from gw3.octel.com by osi-east.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 07:38:18 -0700
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by gw3.octel.com (8.6.10/8.6.12) id HAA16532;
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 07:36:44 -0700
Received: from elroy.corp.octel.com(148.147.20.25) by gw3.octel.com 
          via smap (V1.3) id sma016527; Wed Sep 18 07:36:39 1996
Received: from m-internet.corp.octel.com by elroy.corp.octel.com 
          with SMTP (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA01693;
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 07:36:38 -0700
Received: from ccMail 
          by m-internet.corp.octel.com (IMA Internet Exchange 2.02 Enterprise) 
          id 240081C0; Wed, 18 Sep 96 07:33:00 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 09:22:55 -0700
Message-Id: <240081C0.1240@corp.octel.com>
From: greg.vaudreuil@octel.com
Subject: Re[2]: Voice mail MIME type
To: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: rem-conf@es.net, glenn.parsons@bnr.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part


     Henning,
     
     Help me understand what you mean when you say G.721 is "depreciated".  
     In an administrative action, G.721 has been replaced with G.726, an 
     identical encoding.  This encoding is still widely used in the 
     store-and-forward voice processing industry as a good quality, low 
     computation algorithm.  draft-ema-vpim-00.txt is the hopefully proposed 
     standard replacement for RFC 1911 and clarifies several byte-orderings, 
     nibble packing ambiguities in the G.726 standard, and re-registers the 
     audio/32kbadpcm mime content-type as G.726.  (VPIM also refined the 
     definition of Image/Tiff to better conform existing practice of the FAX 
     board vendors)
     
     Are you suggesting that VPIM should use GSM, LD-CELP (G.728), or some 
     other telco-grade algorithm rather than ADPCM?
     
     I have not been following the AVT work closely.  (Please retain my 
     address in the CClist)  What encodings are being used in AVT that 
     would be a suitable alternative?
     
     Greg V.
     
     
     
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Voice mail MIME type
Author:  "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu> at 
P_Internet_mail
Date:    9/17/96 12:06 PM
     
     
I note with some disappointment that RFC 1911 specifies the deprecated 
G.721 32 kb/s data type as the default type of voice mail storage. (It's 
even a registered MIME type, the only other audio MIME type beyond 
audio/basic.) ITU specifically no longer considers this recommendation 
"in force". In terms of complexity and performance for this particular 
task, there seem to be encodings which are superior in terms of 
complexity, performance and availability of source code. I realize that 
RFC 1911 is experimental; I'd hope that should this move to the standards 
track, some coordination with AVT might help. 
     
-- 
Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu 
Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 212 939-7042
Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 18 12:39:19 1996 
Received: from dirty.research.bell-labs.com by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Wed, 18 Sep 1996 09:38:38 -0700
Received: from research.research.bell-labs.com by dirty;
          Wed Sep 18 12:36:34 EDT 1996
Received: from allegra.tempo.att.com by research; Wed Sep 18 12:30:47 EDT 1996
Received: from phero (phero.tempo.att.com) by allegra.tempo.att.com; id AA05669;
          Wed, 18 Sep 96 12:30:46 EDT
Received: by phero; id AA08253; Wed, 18 Sep 96 12:30:43 EDT
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 96 12:30:43 EDT
From: slo@research.bell-labs.com (W. Steven Lo)
Message-Id: <9609181630.AA08253@phero>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: setsockopt question



I am developing some application programs based on "vic", and am having
problem in the following "setsockopt" system call under SunOS Release 
4.1.3_U1 multicast kernel.

if(setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP, (char *)&mr, sizeof (mr)) < 0)


My program was compiled successfully. When I ran it, it returned with 
errno = 22, which should mean EINVAL Invalid argument. The system does
not understand "setsockopt" with socket-level option IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP.

The same program compiled and ran fine under Solaris 2.4 or 2.5. I need 
the program running under SunOS, and hope that someone can tell me 
how to solve the problem. FYI, vic or vat ran fine on the SunOS system.

Thanks in advance!!


Steven
slo@bell-labs.com
908-582-5298

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 18 19:41:53 1996 
Received: from mail1.digital.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 16:41:16 -0700
Received: from bigpink.pa.dec.com by mail1.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 
          for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA16058; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 16:37:43 -0700
Received: by bigpink.pa.dec.com; id AA09352; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 16:37:42 -0700
Message-Id: <9609182337.AA09352@bigpink.pa.dec.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: The Return of Kimchi
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 96 16:37:41 -0700
From: berc@pa.dec.com
X-Mts: smtp


Our Korean friends didn't get enough Severe Tire Damage last, so 
they're coming back for more.  Join the fun tonight at 8:30pm PDT 
for some networked rock & roll.

http://www.std.org

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 18 19:44:14 1996 
Received: from mail2.digital.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 16:43:30 -0700
Received: from bigpink.pa.dec.com by mail2.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 
          for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA08047; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 16:38:59 -0700
Received: by bigpink.pa.dec.com; id AA09397; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 16:38:58 -0700
Message-Id: <9609182338.AA09397@bigpink.pa.dec.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: The Return of Kimchi
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 96 16:38:58 -0700
From: berc@pa.dec.com
X-Mts: smtp


[ I should say that this is an mcast w/H.261 video & PCM2 audio ]

Our Korean friends didn't get enough Severe Tire Damage last week, so 
they're coming back for more.  Join the fun tonight at 8:30pm PDT 
for some networked rock & roll.

http://www.std.org

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 08:05:20 1996 
Received: from hermes.cti.gr by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 05:04:20 -0700
Received: (from dimakop@localhost) by hermes.cti.gr (8.7.4/8.7.3) id PAA28543;
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:02:27 +0300 (EET DST)
Organization: Computer Technology Institute - (CTI) Kolokotroni 3, 262 21 
              Patras, P.O.Box 1122, 261 10 Patras, Greece Tel: +30(61)992061, 
              994317-18 Fax: +30(61)993973, 222086 TELEX: 312515 CTI GR
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:02:26 +0300 (EET DST)
From: "Pan.Dimakopoulos" <Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr>
To: Video Conferencing Matters <rem-conf@es.net>
cc: Dimakopoulos Panagiotis <dimakop@cti.gr>
Subject: MPEG, M-JPEG etc
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.92.960919145640.24746E-100000@hermes.cti.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I am trying to find a PC card to support MPEG but almost all the
types I have found support M-JPEG. Does anybody know if M-JPEG
is a superset of MPEG and if there is any backwards compatibility?

Could anybody suggest any URL site where I could read more about
all these different standards and their compatibilities with
each other?

I am sorry if I am asking trivial things but I am new in the
subject and I come accross all these matters while trying to
setup an MBone on our Local LAN with applications such as
video conferencing, audio and whiteboard.

Thank you,

           ------------------------------------------------------
           | Panos Dimakopoulos             dimakop@cti.gr      |
           | COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE                      |
           | P.O. Box 1122                                      |
           | 261 10 Patras, Greece                              |
           | Tel (+30) 61 994317            Fax (+30) 61 993973 |
           ------------------------------------------------------


From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 11:44:31 1996 
Received: from gelatin.ieee.org by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 08:43:57 -0700
Received: from jolt (jolt.eab.ieee.org [140.98.33.53]) 
          by gelatin.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA13752;
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <2.2.16.19960919153634.3417b7ba@gelatin.ieee.org>
X-Sender: jcals@gelatin.ieee.org
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:36:34 -0400
To: enternet@bbn.com, itc@fokus.gmd.de, tccc@cs.umass.edu, dbworld@cs.wisc.edu, 
    end2end-interest@isi.edu, f-troup@aurora.cis.upenn.edu, 
    cost237-transport@comp.lancs.ac.uk, reres@laas.fr, hipparch@sophia.inria.fr, 
    xtp-relay@cs.concordia.ca, rem-conf@es.net, mobile-ip@tadpole.com, 
    cellular@comnets.rwth-aachen.de, ieeetcpc@ccvm.sunysb.edu, 
    cnom@maestro.bellcore.com, commsoft@cc.bellcore.com, comswtc@gmu.edu, 
    ahmadi@engn.uwindsor.ca, braudyb@aol.com, rlfike@aol.com, bran@silcom.com, 
    just4net@aol.com, stanm@bellcore.com, pogran@bbn.com, 
    vkb@mvgsf.mv.lucent.com, bhagavath@bell-labs.com, w2xd@mtnms.mt.lucent.com, 
    dnzuckerman@bell-labs.com, w2xd@mtnms.mt.lucent.com, aidarous@bnr.ca, 
    kjl@bellcore.com, bhumip@gte.com, sbw@ccrl.nj.nec.com, c.desmond@ieee.org, 
    nkc@bellcore.com, Ron.Horn.0090874@nt.com, mouftah@eleceng.ee.queensu.ca, 
    t.stevenson@ieee.org, christos@ece.miami.edu, saracco@cselt.stet.it, 
    xrjo@atc.boeing.com, wz@prosun.first.gmd.de, hegering@lrz-muenchen.de, 
    yoshida@netwk.ntt-at.co.jp, craig@bbn.com, yemini@cs.columbia.edu, 
    lanworks@delphi.com, ahmed@ece.concordia.ca, sie@probe.mt.att.com, 
    knecht@mvuss.mv.lucent.com, a.pakstas@ieee.org, mike@sce.carleton.ca, 
    yang@trix.genie.uottawa.ca, rne@hybrid.com, daniel.heer@att.com, 
    bumblis@mcc.com, rdantu@tddcae99.fnts.com, jamoussi@nortel.ca, 
    bhumip@gte.com, scott_linke@aus.hp.com, pradeep@dstc.uts.edu.au, 
    guthery@austin.sar.slb.com, paulcov@bnr.ca, mohan@ccmail.inet.com, 
    lewis@ctron.com, clytle@sed.stel.com, bobchap@ibm.net, oliveira@eurecom.fr, 
    sidou@eurecom.fr, labetoul@eurecom.fr, dotti@fokus.gmd.de, bk00@ns.gte.com
From: "Jill R. Cals" <j.cals@ieee.org>
Subject: ATM Selected Readings

Now in one place--a collection of the leading published papers on this
increasingly significant technology!

        DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF ATM: Selected Readings
        ------------------------------------------------------
     edited by Dr. Mehmet Toy, Lucent Technologies/Bell Laboratories

The telecommunications industry is always researching and implementing new
technologies to overcome deficiencies and aim toward perfection.  The
telecom infrastructure must be constantly upgraded to support all these
applications. ATM has strengthened this by providing high speed, low delay
multiplexing and switching networking for all user traffic, including voice,
data and video.  This book, just released contains over 60 of the best
papers available on ATM, chosen by a leading practitioner in the field.


This comprehensive book presents papers on:

* "Survey of ATM Switching Architectures"

* "Technologies for Broadband Switching"

* "Routing Subject to Quality of Service Constraints in Integrated
Communication Networks"

* "Network Management of ATM Networks"

* "ATM Operation via Satellite: Issues, Challenges, and Resolutioms"

* "ATM-Based Transport Architecture for Multiservices Wireless Personal
Communications Networks"

. . . .  And much more


Just $34.95 for IEEE members and $44.95 list price.

To order, call the IEEE at 1-800-678-IEEE and use product number HL5727.
Credit card orders (Visa, MasterCard, Diner's Club, American Express) are
accepted.










From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 12:16:37 1996 
Received: from calvin.dgbt.doc.ca by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 09:16:05 -0700
Received: by calvin.dgbt.doc.ca (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA23004;
          Thu, 19 Sep 96 12:15:45 EDT
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 96 12:15:45 EDT
From: andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick)
Message-Id: <9609191615.AA23004@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
In-Reply-To: slo@research.bell-labs.com (W. Steven Lo) "setsockopt question" (Sep 18, 12:30pm)
Reply-To: andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: slo@research.bell-labs.com (W. Steven Lo), rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: setsockopt question

On Sep 18, 12:30pm, W. Steven Lo wrote:
} Subject: setsockopt question
| 
| 
| I am developing some application programs based on "vic", and am having
| problem in the following "setsockopt" system call under SunOS Release 
| 4.1.3_U1 multicast kernel.
| 
| if(setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP, (char *)&mr, sizeof (mr)) < 0)
| 
| 
| My program was compiled successfully. When I ran it, it returned with 
| errno = 22, which should mean EINVAL Invalid argument. The system does
| not understand "setsockopt" with socket-level option IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP.
| 
| The same program compiled and ran fine under Solaris 2.4 or 2.5. I need 
| the program running under SunOS, and hope that someone can tell me 
| how to solve the problem. FYI, vic or vat ran fine on the SunOS system.
| 
| Thanks in advance!!
| 
| 
| Steven
| slo@bell-labs.com
| 908-582-5298
}-- End of excerpt from W. Steven Lo


I ran into this when trying to compile the RTPtools.  It looks like
there is a problem with the system header file "netinet/in.h".  The
build procedure I ended up using for the RTPtools was to use a
version of the header file that was supplied with the RTPtools for
SunOS 4.x machines, and the standard header file for Solaris 2.5
machines.

I suggest you get the RTPtools and have a look at that header file.
Sorry, I don't have the URL for the source handy.


-- 
           Andrew Patrick, Ph.D. <andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
               Networks Services & Interfaces Laboratory
                     Communications Research Centre
                       http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 12:47:33 1996 
Received: from sirius.ctr.columbia.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 09:46:41 -0700
Received: from quino.ctr.columbia.edu (quino.ctr.columbia.edu [128.59.64.58]) 
          by sirius.ctr.columbia.edu (8.7.6/8.6.4.287) with SMTP id MAA09870;
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:46:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0b16.32.19960919124606.0071260c@sirius.ctr.columbia.edu>
X-Sender: eleft@sirius.ctr.columbia.edu (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0b16 (32)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:46:08 -0400
To: "Pan.Dimakopoulos" <Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr>
From: Alexandros Eleftheriadis <eleft@ctr.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: MPEG, M-JPEG etc
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 03:02 PM 9/19/96 +0300, Pan.Dimakopoulos wrote:
>I am trying to find a PC card to support MPEG but almost all the
>types I have found support M-JPEG. Does anybody know if M-JPEG
>is a superset of MPEG and if there is any backwards compatibility?
>
>Could anybody suggest any URL site where I could read more about
>all these different standards and their compatibilities with
>each other?
>
>I am sorry if I am asking trivial things but I am new in the
>subject and I come accross all these matters while trying to
>setup an MBone on our Local LAN with applications such as
>video conferencing, audio and whiteboard.
>

Try out http://www.mpeg.org/, an unofficial but extensive reference site
maintained by Tristan Savatier, or the official MPEG site maintained by
Leonardo Chiariglione (the convenor of WG11), http://www.cselt.stet.it/mpeg


--
A. Eleftheriadis
eleft@ee.columbia.edu


From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 13:47:04 1996 
Received: from tide21.microsoft.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:46:27 -0700
Received: by tide21.microsoft.com 
          with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.993.5) 
          id <01BBA617.D8CA5D20@tide21.microsoft.com>;
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:46:43 -0700
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960919174423Z-27202@tide21.microsoft.com>
From: Thomas Pfenning <thomaspf@microsoft.com>
To: "'Pan.Dimakopoulos'" <Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr>, 
    'Video Conferencing Matters' <rem-conf@es.net>
Cc: 'Dimakopoulos Panagiotis' <dimakop@cti.gr>
Subject: RE: MPEG, M-JPEG etc
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:44:23 -0700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.993.5
Encoding: 37 TEXT

MJPEG is the acronym for motion JPEG which is of course something
different. There is a card build by Omnimedia Technology which provides
MPEG video and Audio encoding/decoding for about $1000. (www.omt.com).

I happen to own a different card from them and have no experience at all
with te MPEG board.

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Pan.Dimakopoulos [SMTP:Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr]
>Sent:	Thursday, September 19, 1996 5:02 AM
>To:	Video Conferencing Matters
>Cc:	Dimakopoulos Panagiotis
>Subject:	MPEG, M-JPEG etc
>
>I am trying to find a PC card to support MPEG but almost all the
>types I have found support M-JPEG. Does anybody know if M-JPEG
>is a superset of MPEG and if there is any backwards compatibility?
>
>Could anybody suggest any URL site where I could read more about
>all these different standards and their compatibilities with
>each other?
>
>I am sorry if I am asking trivial things but I am new in the
>subject and I come accross all these matters while trying to
>setup an MBone on our Local LAN with applications such as
>video conferencing, audio and whiteboard.
>
>Thank you,
>
>           ------------------------------------------------------
>           | Panos Dimakopoulos             dimakop@cti.gr      |
>           | COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE                      |
>           | P.O. Box 1122                                      |
>           | 261 10 Patras, Greece                              |
>           | Tel (+30) 61 994317            Fax (+30) 61 993973 |
>           ------------------------------------------------------
>

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 15:13:54 1996 
Received: from rah.star-gate.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:12:11 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) 
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA03136;
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609191911.MAA03136@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "Pan.Dimakopoulos" <Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr>
cc: Video Conferencing Matters <rem-conf@es.net>, 
    Dimakopoulos Panagiotis <dimakop@cti.gr>
Subject: Re: MPEG, M-JPEG etc
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:02:26 +0300." <Pine.SOL.3.92.960919145640.24746E-100000@hermes.cti.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:11:39 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>

Try http://www.omt.com for boards that can do mpeg encoding and decoding.

There a couple of more low end boards one uses the samsung mpeg encoding/decoding
chipset and a company name Visual Circuits also makes mpeg encoder/decoder.

At the board level, watch out for http://www.mpact.com.

	Enjoy,
	Amancio


>From The Desk Of "Pan.Dimakopoulos" :
> I am trying to find a PC card to support MPEG but almost all the
> types I have found support M-JPEG. Does anybody know if M-JPEG
> is a superset of MPEG and if there is any backwards compatibility?
> 
> Could anybody suggest any URL site where I could read more about
> all these different standards and their compatibilities with
> each other?
> 
> I am sorry if I am asking trivial things but I am new in the
> subject and I come accross all these matters while trying to
> setup an MBone on our Local LAN with applications such as
> video conferencing, audio and whiteboard.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
>            ------------------------------------------------------
>            | Panos Dimakopoulos             dimakop@cti.gr      |
>            | COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE                      |
>            | P.O. Box 1122                                      |
>            | 261 10 Patras, Greece                              |
>            | Tel (+30) 61 994317            Fax (+30) 61 993973 |
>            ------------------------------------------------------
> 



From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 15:24:27 1996 
Received: from sol (actually sol.genie.uottawa.ca) by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:23:09 -0700
Received: by sol (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA12682; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:22:29 +0500
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:22:29 +0500
From: devi@sol.genie.uottawa.ca (Sridevi Palacharla)
Message-Id: <9609191922.AA12682@sol>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: MJpeg using SunVideo
Content-Length: 213


Hi,

 Does anyone know how SunVideo stores Jpeg video? Does it store any information
on frame offsets? 
What is the best way to get to the next frame while reading a huge MJPEG file
created by SunVideo?

sridevi

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 18:42:38 1996 
Received: from bordeaux.nijenrode.nl by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:42:04 -0700
Received: from bordeaux.nijenrode.nl (michel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by bordeaux.nijenrode.nl (8.7.4/8.7.1) with ESMTP id AAA20633;
          Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:41:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199609192241.AAA20633@bordeaux.nijenrode.nl>
To: devi@sol.genie.uottawa.ca (Sridevi Palacharla)
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: MJpeg using SunVideo
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:22:29 +0500." <9609191922.AA12682@sol>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:41:55 +0200
From: Michel <michel@nijenrode.nl>


I don't think SunVideo stores MJPEG... I thought it was just plain MPEG ?
If it helps, here's where you can (also) find source code on how
to yank JPG's and MPEG's from SunVideo boards:

http://lrcwww.epfl.ch/~oechslin/webcam.html



-- 
 Michel van der Laan	-	michel@nijenrode.nl
				http://www.nijenrode.nl/~michel
In your mail from 19-9-1996 you write:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  Does anyone know how SunVideo stores Jpeg video? Does it store any informati
>on
> on frame offsets? 
> What is the best way to get to the next frame while reading a huge MJPEG file
> created by SunVideo?
> 
> sridevi

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 19 21:00:44 1996 
Received: from bmrc.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:59:58 -0700
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) 
          by bmrc.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA29736 
          for <298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:54:25 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id RAA26726 
          for <298-list@bmrc>; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:54:24 -0700
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:54:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199609200054.RAA26726@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

                BERKELEY MULTIMEDIA & GRAPHICS SEMINAR
      (Wednesday September 25, 1996 12:30-2:00 PDT 405 Soda Hall) 

           "Anecdote - A Multimedia Storyboarding Software" 

                            Komei Harada 
                 C&C Research Laboratories San Jose 
                                 NEC 

We have developed an authoring software called Anecdote to support the
early-design phase as well as the whole development process of multimedia
applications. Anecdote employs the concept of surrogate media (such as
sketches), and surrogate scene (such as a design sketch of a screen). Both
can be used to simulate the execution of the scenario and can serve as the
specification of the data to be created. Anecdote allows authors to choose
>from different authoring styles to construct the framework and helps them to
create the final application seamlessly. We will show these functional
capabilities by demonstrating some actual applications. 

---------------------------------------

This seminar will be broadcast on the Internet MBONE.  The broadcast will
begin at 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 hours).  See sd or http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/298
for instructions on setting up, connecting to, and operating the MBONE tools.


From rem-conf-request@es.net Fri Sep 20 06:04:54 1996 
Received: from hermes.cti.gr by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Fri, 20 Sep 1996 03:04:14 -0700
Received: (from dimakop@localhost) by hermes.cti.gr (8.7.4/8.7.3) id NAA07142;
          Fri, 20 Sep 1996 13:02:22 +0300 (EET DST)
Organization: Computer Technology Institute - (CTI) Kolokotroni 3, 262 21 
              Patras, P.O.Box 1122, 261 10 Patras, Greece Tel: +30(61)992061, 
              994317-18 Fax: +30(61)993973, 222086 TELEX: 312515 CTI GR
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 13:02:22 +0300 (EET DST)
From: "Pan.Dimakopoulos" <Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr>
To: Alexandros Eleftheriadis <eleft@ctr.columbia.edu>
cc: "Pan.Dimakopoulos" <Pan.Dimakopoulos@cti.gr>, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: MPEG, M-JPEG etc
In-Reply-To: <3.0b16.32.19960919124606.0071260c@sirius.ctr.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.92.960920130116.6321E-100000@hermes.cti.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Thanks a lot for your info.
I'll have a look there.

           ------------------------------------------------------
           | Panos Dimakopoulos             dimakop@cti.gr      |
           | COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE                      |
           | P.O. Box 1122                                      |
           | 261 10 Patras, Greece                              |
           | Tel (+30) 61 994317            Fax (+30) 61 993973 |
           ------------------------------------------------------


From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 23 11:39:02 1996 
Received: from mgate.uni-hannover.de by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 23 Sep 1996 08:38:34 -0700
Received: from helios (actually helios.tnt.uni-hannover.de) by mgate 
          with SMTP (PP); Mon, 23 Sep 1996 17:38:14 +0200
Received: from ikarus.tnt.uni-hannover.de by helios (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) 
          id RAA00028; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 17:37:47 +0200
Received: from ikarus (localhost) by ikarus.tnt.uni-hannover.de (4.1/SMI-4.1) 
          id AA00926; Mon, 23 Sep 96 17:37:44 +0200
Sender: mech@tnt.uni-hannover.de
Message-Id: <3246AEC8.2F1CF0FB@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 17:37:44 +0200
From: Roland Mech <mech@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
Organization: Universitaet Hannover, Theoretische Nachrichtentechnik
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3 sun4m)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: using wb and sdr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I have the following problem: if I try to import a postscript file
into the wb, which is larger than 32kb, I yield the error message

  -wb: can't send PS pages larger than 32768 bytes (is 630819)

I get this message only if I use sdr. Using the old sd tool it is
no problem to import larger postscript files. Is there any way or
parameter to solve that problem?

Thank you in advance,

  Roland

________________________________________________________________________________

Dipl.-Inform. Roland Mech          Universitaet Hannover
                                   Institut fuer Theoretische
Nachrichtentechnik
                                   und Informationsverarbeitung
phone:  +49-511-762-5308           Appelstrasse 9A
fax:    +49-511-762-5333           30167 Hannover, Germany
email:  mech@tnt.uni-hannover.de
www:	http://www.tnt.uni-hannover.de/wiss/mech.html    
________________________________________________________________________________

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 23 15:14:06 1996 
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 23 Sep 1996 12:12:55 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id MAA06236 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 12:12:57 -0700
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 12:12:57 -0700
Message-Id: <199609231912.MAA06236@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: [Reminder] U.C. Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

Wednesday, September 25, 1996 12:30-2:00 PM PDT 405 Soda Hall

      "Anecdote - A Multimedia Storyboarding Software" 

                     Komei Harada 
          C&C Research Laboratories San Jose 
                         NEC 

MBONE BROADCAST BEGINS AT 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 HOURS)


From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 23 15:21:42 1996 
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 23 Sep 1996 12:20:48 -0700
Received: from merci.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP 
          id <g.01329-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 20:20:36 +0100
From: Mark Handley <M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Organisation: University College London, CS Dept.
X-Phone: +44 171 419 3666
To: Roland Mech <mech@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: using wb and sdr
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Sep 1996 17:37:44 +0200." <3246AEC8.2F1CF0FB@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 20:20:36 +0100
Message-ID: <2574.843506436@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk


>I have the following problem: if I try to import a postscript file
>into the wb, which is larger than 32kb, I yield the error message
>
>  -wb: can't send PS pages larger than 32768 bytes (is 630819)
>
>I get this message only if I use sdr. Using the old sd tool it is
>no problem to import larger postscript files. Is there any way or
>parameter to solve that problem?

This is not an sdr problem - wb has this size limit built in.  Someone
must have overridden this in your .sd.tcl file.  In general it's a bad
idea to override this size limit for non-local groups.

Mark



From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 24 04:25:55 1996 
Received: from max3.rrze.uni-erlangen.de by osi-west.es.net 
          with ESnet SMTP (PP); Tue, 24 Sep 1996 01:25:23 -0700
Return-Path: <unrzg5@rrze.uni-erlangen.de>
Received: from urmel.rrze.uni-erlangen.de by max3.rrze.uni-erlangen.de;
          Tue, 24 Sep 96 10:25:19 +0200
Sender: unrzg5@MailHub.rrze.uni-erlangen.de
Message-ID: <32479AEE.93B@rrze.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 10:25:18 +0200
From: Martin Fangmeyer <unrzg5@rrze.uni-erlangen.de>
Organization: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: wb postscript import
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I have the following problem: if I try to import a postscript file
> into the wb, which is larger than 32kb, I yield the error message
>
>  -wb: can't send PS pages larger than 32768 bytes (is 630819)

Roland,

you can use the -P switch. If you give "-P 999999" as parameter
wb even will import ps files of nearly one megabyte. More is
not possible.

Ciao, MARTIN.

-- 
  address Martin Fangmeyer/Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 12/Erlangen/Germany
 homepage http://www.rrze.uni-erlangen.de/~unrzg5
motorbike 1988-94 Suzuki GS 500 '80 oldie but goldie
          1994-?  Yamaha XJ900 '90 ... ten years after
      car Renault R4 can't beat _this_ feeling (now sold)

From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Sep 24 17:46:57 1996 
Received: from trystero.media.org by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 24 Sep 1996 14:46:20 -0700
Received: (carl@localhost) by trystero.media.org (8.7.6/960629.01bjb) 
          id RAA08175 for rem-conf@es.net;
          Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:46:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Carl Malamud [IMS]" <carl@media.org>
Message-Id: <199609242146.RAA08175@trystero.media.org>
Subject: The 1996 IgNoble Ceremony
To: rem-conf@es.net
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:46:15 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Internet Multicasting Service
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The Sixth First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony will be held on Thursday 
evening, October 3, 1996 (by the Gregorian calendar), at Harvard's Sanders 
Theater. The ceremony honors individuals whose achievements "cannot or 
should not be reproduced". Genuine Nobel Laureates will hand out the prizes, 
and will also perform in the world premiere of a new mini-opera. 

Those interested in attending this event live but not in person are
encouraged to consult sdr or visit the Annals of Improbable Research
(AIR) at http://www.improb.com/ on the web.

Yours in pursuit of a serious academic career,

Carl Malamud
MIT Media Lab

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 25 15:36:07 1996 
Received: from dns2.anl.gov by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 25 Sep 1996 12:35:22 -0700
Received: from qmgate.anl.gov (qmgate.anl.gov [146.137.160.48]) 
          by dns2.anl.gov (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id OAA11647 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 14:35:20 -0500
Message-ID: <n1368460307.62956@qmgate.anl.gov>
Date: 25 Sep 1996 14:41:01 U
From: Mike Marino <mike_marino@qmgate.anl.gov>
Subject: mbone request
To: MBone Request <rem-conf@es.net>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2

                                             9/25/96            2:27 PM

We will be broadcasting an mbone broadcast on 9/26/96 from 9:00 am until 12:30
pm Central Standard time.  I appologise for the last minute notice.  We just
found about about the request ourselves.

Dr. John H. Shinn, Chevron Research and Technology Company, Richmond, CA will
speak on "Visualization of Complex Hydrocarbon Reaction Systems".  


If there are any questions or problems please do not hesitate to E-Mail me.

      Special
      Announcement

From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 25 16:24:28 1996 
Received: from elaine.crcg.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 25 Sep 1996 13:23:57 -0700
Received: by elaine.crcg.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01744;
          Wed, 25 Sep 96 16:24:22 EST
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 17:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Macedonia <mmacedon@crcg.edu>
X-Sender: mmacedon@elaine
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Windows NT video capture
In-Reply-To: <323EAEF6.6CF@cs.columbia.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960925170704.672G-100000@elaine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Does anyone have a recommendation for capturing video for mbone on an NT 
machine?

Thanks,

- Mike

-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Michael R. Macedonia, Ph.D.  	| URL:   http://www.crcg.edu	|
| Vice President		| EMAIL: mmacedon@crcg.edu	|
| Fraunhofer CRCG 		|				|
| 167 Angell Street 		| PH :   (+1) 401 453-6363	|
| Providence, RI 02906		| FAX:   (+1) 401 453-0444	|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
					



From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Sep 25 22:56:19 1996 
Received: from piper.cs.colorado.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:55:37 -0700
Received: (from evi@localhost) by piper.cs.colorado.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) 
          id UAA21491; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:55:25 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:55:25 -0600 (MDT)
From: Evi Nemeth <evi@piper.cs.colorado.edu>
Message-Id: <199609260255.UAA21491@piper.cs.colorado.edu>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: MBONE Broadcast -- USENIX LISA Conference, Oct 2-4, 1996
Cc: evi@piper.cs.colorado.edu

The USENIX LISA conference for system administrators plans to broadcast
a mix of technical sessions and invited talks including the keynote
address by Dick Lampman, Hewlett-Packard Company on "Information
Technology - The Next Ten Years".  Sessions run from 9:00AM to
5:00PM Central Daylight Time (GMT-5).  For a detailed program see
www.usenix.org.


From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 26 08:13:32 1996 
Received: from gatekeeper.es.dupont.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 05:13:00 -0700
Received: by gatekeeper.es.dupont.com; id IAA26698;
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:12:58 -0400
Received: by aladdin.es.dupont.com; id IAA10073; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:12:56 -0400
Message-Id: <199609261212.IAA10073@aladdin.es.dupont.com>
To: Mike Macedonia <mmacedon@crcg.edu>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Windows NT video capture
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 25 Sep 1996 17:24:19 EDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:12:56 -0400
From: Mike Minnich <minnich@aladdin.es.dupont.com>

> Does anyone have a recommendation for capturing video for mbone on an NT 
> machine?

Last I perused the source (vic-2.7b4), only the still grabber 
was compiled in;  are there plans or potential time frames for
when video capture will be supported?

-- 
Mike Minnich
minnich@aladdin.es.dupont.com


From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 26 11:17:54 1996 
Received: from antares.mcs.anl.gov (actually antares10.mcs.anl.gov) 
          by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:17:22 -0700
Received: from mcs.anl.gov (putnam10.mcs.anl.gov [140.221.10.71]) 
          by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id KAA26784;
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:17:07 -0500
Message-Id: <199609261517.KAA26784@antares.mcs.anl.gov>
To: Mike Minnich <minnich@aladdin.es.dupont.com>
cc: Mike Macedonia <mmacedon@crcg.edu>, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Windows NT video capture
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:12:56 EDT." <199609261212.IAA10073@aladdin.es.dupont.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:17:06 -0500
From: Bob Olson <olson@mcs.anl.gov>

I'm quite interested in a grabber for windows; I've written one
grabber (the AIX Ultimedia one) and am game to attack a VfW grabber;
assuming I find the time and enough VfW documentation. If I get enough
documentation, I can make the time .. 

--bob

From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 26 11:37:36 1996 
Received: from mail1.digital.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:36:47 -0700
Received: from bindmaster.zko.dec.com by mail1.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 
          for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA32375; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:30:14 -0700
Received: from mmsrv by zkons1.zko.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/28Oct95-0953AM) 
          id AA02608; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:30:19 -0400
Received: by mmsrv.zko.dec.com; id AA04847; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:30:18 -0400
Received: by sauron.zko.dec.com with Microsoft Mail 
          id <01BBAB9E.F31CE440@sauron.zko.dec.com>;
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:36:25 -0400
Message-Id: <01BBAB9E.F31CE440@sauron.zko.dec.com>
From: Jeff Walker <jwalker@zko.dec.com>
To: "'rem-conf@es.net'" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: Tunnel software (mrouted) for NT
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:36:23 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is there an implentation of mrouted, mrinfo, etc, for NT available?
I poked around Microsoft's web pages, to no avail.

Alpha/NT would be ultimately cool :)

Thanks,
-jeff walker

jwalker@zko.dec.com


From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 26 14:32:37 1996 
Received: from bmrc.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:31:35 -0700
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) 
          by bmrc.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA13888 
          for <298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:25:08 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id LAA02711 
          for <298-list@bmrc>; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:23:21 -0700
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:23:21 -0700
Message-Id: <199609261823.LAA02711@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

(Wednesday October 2, 1996 12:30-2:00 PDT 405 Soda Hall) 

                  "Introduction to the MERCI Project" 

                            Peter Kierstein 
                      University College, London 

This talk will present an overview of the Multimedia European Research 
Conferencing Integration project.  A detailed description of the project is 
available at http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mice/merci/merci_project.html.

The previous project, named MICE, was the first group to broadcast a regularly 
scheduled seminar on the Internet MBone.  This seminar motivated the creation 
of the Berkeley Multimedia and Graphics Seminar series.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This seminar will be broadcast on the Internet MBONE.  The broadcast will
begin at 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 hrs).  See sd or http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/298
for instructions on setting up, connecting to, and operating the MBONE tools.




From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Sep 26 15:20:49 1996 
Received: from elaine.crcg.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 26 Sep 1996 12:20:08 -0700
Received: by elaine.crcg.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00748;
          Thu, 26 Sep 96 15:20:40 EST
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:20:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Macedonia <mmacedon@crcg.edu>
X-Sender: mmacedon@elaine
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Quickcam driver for Windows NT
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960926161922.20667T-100000@elaine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 09:27:12 -0700
From: Kathy Westergaard <kwester@connectix.com>
To: mmacedon@crcg.edu
Subject: Re: FW: nt driver

A beta version of the QuickCam driver for Windows NT has been posted on:

http://www.connectix.com/connect/files/driver/driver.exe

Please read the FAQ below and the read-me file for the driver for more
information.

Regards,

Kathy Westergaard
Connectix Technical Support


Frequently Asked Questions and Answers:

Why is Connectix doing an Open Beta with the Grayscale QuickCam Driver 
for Windows NT?

Many customers have requested a driver for the Grayscale QuickCam under 
Windows NT. In fact, we promised to have the driver available in July. 
Our QA department is very confident that this driver is stable. However,  
we would like to get it to a wider audience to insure this stability.

Since Windows NT is a new operating system for us to support, we want to 
start slowly. The Technical Support staff is in training and will be 
ready to support Windows NT fully in the coming weeks.

When will the Grayscale QuickCam Driver be released?

We hope to release it officially in September.

What does the Installer include?

The installer includes all files necessary to use the Grayscale QuickCam 
with a Video for Windows compatible application under the Windows NT 
operating system. We do not include a Windows NT version of QuickPICT or 
QuickMovie, they are still in development. Users will need to have an 
application that runs under Windows NT (such as Premiere, CUSEEME, 
VIDCAP, etc.)

Will this driver work with the Color QuickCam?

No, this driver is designed for the grayscale QuickCam only! It will not 
support the Color QuickCam. We are investigating development of a Color 
QuickCam driver for Windows NT but do not have a schedule or a release 
date at this time.

What Technical Support is available for the Open beta?

Connectix will not support this Open Beta release through our standard 
telephone, electronic mail or online service support systems. Connectix 
will support the final release of the Windows NT Driver for the Grayscale 
QuickCam when it is released. 

If the user would like to report a problem with the installer or the 
driver, please send mail to: thunder@connectix.com. Again, this email 
address can not be used for support issues.

Can I use VideoPhone with this driver under Windows NT?

No, the current version of VideoPhone, 1.1.2 , does not work under 
Windows NT. Connectix is working on the problem and a future release of 
VideoPhone will support Windows NT.




At 09:23 AM 9/26/96 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>----------
>From: 	Michael R. Macedonia[SMTP:mmacedon@crcg.edu]
>Sent: 	Wednesday, September 25, 1996 2:21 PM
>To: 	vphone@connectix.com
>Subject: 	nt driver
>
>Where can I find the nt driver at your site?
>
>Thanks
>
>- Mike Macedonia
>
>
>
>
>




From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 05:10:30 1996 
Received: from alpes.eurecom.fr by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 02:09:32 -0700
Received: from nelke.eurecom.fr (nelke.eurecom.fr [193.55.114.12]) 
          by alpes.eurecom.fr (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA13872 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 11:09:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost by nelke.eurecom.fr with 4.1/2.28 
          id <AA03343@nelke.eurecom.fr>; Mon, 30 Sep 96 10:13:28 +0100
Message-Id: <9609300913.AA03343@nelke.eurecom.fr>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95
To: rem-conf@es.net
Cc: blum@alpes.eurecom.fr
Subject: silence detection
X-Face: 4x|.=ezwRqlfy/YLHZ7j(gQxu:3utGYq/C|w~.)aGLRzN)ttL]!=c+Hz!+,5EpG/KL9rC`o 
        Yk-C=WS`<c6#gFksQIT}Akk_QHj/?3aOi@Hz,,TU/}t<nB{7}SD9?"=0acAA@P<%$<Dhs-Hs}NQrkZ 
        \m$5'Uxh!XG;"Hn>CeVd[=[F/\T)<xSyZH0VR#
X-Uri: http://www.eurecom.fr/~blum/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 96 10:13:26 +0100
From: Christian Blum <blum@eurecom.fr>


I am looking for references on articles that discuss/propose audio silence 
detection algorithms. The only article I found so far is

M. Claypool and J. Riedl,"Silence is Golden? The Effects of Silence Deletion 
on the CPU Load of an Audio Conference", Multimedia Computing and Systems 
Conference, May 1994, Boston, USA.

I guess there must be more than that....thanks in advance for some help.

-- Christian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Christian Blum                  Institut EURECOM
Voice/Fax:  +33 93.00.26.38/27  Corporate Communications Department
http://www.eurecom.fr/~blum/    B.P.193     
E-mail: blum@eurecom.fr         06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex FRANCE 
--------------------------------------------------------------------



From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 07:37:43 1996 
Received: from cs.columbia.edu by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 04:37:10 -0700
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (erlang.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.27.35]) 
          by cs.columbia.edu (8.7.6/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA17890;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from erlang.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by erlang.cs.columbia.edu (8.7.6/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA04483;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <324FB0CF.735@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:36:47 -0400
From: "Henning G. Schulzrinne" <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University, Dept. of Computer Science
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Blum <blum@eurecom.fr>
CC: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: silence detection
References: <9609300913.AA03343@nelke.eurecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If you look at http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/netbib under "silence
detection", you will find a few additional entries, including some of
the early packet voice work at ISI reported in a TR (reproduced in the
NeVoT internals documentation) and a master's thesis on a SD for mobile
applications (albeit a bit old) with a fairly extensive list of
references. Note also that the GSM codec can be used as a silence
detector (sorry, don't have the reference handy).

Henning
-- 
Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 212 939-7042
Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 08:10:50 1996 
Received: from arl-img-5.compuserve.com by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 05:09:52 -0700
Received: by arl-img-5.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id IAA05567;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 08:09:35 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 08:09:11 -0400
From: sancha dunstan <106124.1051@compuserve.com>
Subject: Copy of: Copy of: mailing list
To: unknown <mbone-eu@sics.se>
Cc: unknown <mbone-eu@isi.edu>, unknown <jips-mbone-ops@sun.mhs.relay.ac.uk>, 
    unknown <confctrl@isi.edu>, unknown <rem-conf@es.net>
Message-ID: <199609300809_MC1-9E6-52C1@compuserve.com>


---------- Forwarded Message ----------

From:   sancha dunstan, 106124,1051
TO:     unknown, INTERNET:mbone-uk-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
DATE:   9/30/96 11:13 AM

RE:     Copy of: Copy of: mailing list


---------- Forwarded Message ----------

From:   sancha dunstan, 106124,1051
TO:     Hans Erikson, INTERNET:mbone-eu-request@sics.se
DATE:   9/27/96 12:35 PM

RE:     Copy of: mailing list

Dear Hans
I am a telecommunications researcher based in the UK and would very much
like to be on your mailing list. Although we have many projects on the go,
I am currently concentrating on one concerned with practical strategies for
deploying ATM. I am in the process of collecting case studies on ATM - do
you have any that I could have? Is there anyone else who has any ATM case
studies and would like to be featured in our publication? It is from a
global perspective so any country would be of interest. If you can fax me
some, my fax no. is (UK) 01727 868848.
I am also particularly interested in Telemedicine and would be grateful if
you know of anyone I could contact about information on this.

NB Please see attached.

I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
Sancha Dunstan
Research Analyst
BNIS (Broadband Networking Information Services)

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 13:15:41 1996 
Received: from cs.nps.navy.mil by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:15:07 -0700
Received: by cs.nps.navy.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09968;
          Mon, 30 Sep 96 10:13:38 PDT
From: brutzman@cs.nps.navy.mil (Don Brutzman)
Message-Id: <9609301713.AA09968@cs.nps.navy.mil>
Subject: InfoWeek: Vendors Form IP Multicast Initiative (fwd)
To: rem-conf@es.net (Remote Conferencing mail list), 
    www-vrml@vag.vrml.org (Virtual Reality Modeling Language list)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2766

Subject: InfoWeek: Vendors Form IP Multicast Initiative

Thursday, Sept. 26

Vendors Form IP Multicast Initiative

  A group of hardware and software vendors composed of little-known
startups and industry giants such as Cisco Systems, Hewlett-Packard,
Microsoft, and Netscape have banded together to form the IP Multicast
Initiative, an organization dedicated to promoting the growth of
multicasting and solving the problems that plague it.

  The initiative is the brainchild of Judy Estrin, co-founder of startup
Precept Software Inc., a company that develops corporate-focused products
using the multicast technology, where data, audio, video and multimedia are
broadcast across the network to several addresses at once rather than a
single address, thus conserving network bandwidth. The industry recently
received a big boost when Microsoft recently announced its NetShow IP
multicasting product.

  Multicasting, while just starting to attract the attention of corporate
users, is still "a niche market," according to Tim Sloane, an analyst at
the Aberdeen Group, a technology consulting firm in Boston. "Because the
infrastructure doesn't support multicasting, applications aren't written to
support it," he said. However, as the infrastructure becomes more
ubiquitous, companies will increasingly seek out multicasting solutions for
things like training videos and any application where data must be
transmitted to a number of different points simultaneously.

  Estrin, who was also a co-founder of Network Computing Devices, said the
group is not set up to create standards or establish technical directives
for the IP multicast market. The architecture has already been created with
the Internet Engineering Task Force's M-BONE multicasting backbone. Rather,
she said, "We're really looking at those places where we can solve real
business problems." The group will also be a place where customers can give
the vendors feedback.

  The initiative will be managed by Stardust Technologies Inc., another
startup, and will have its first meeting on Oct. 3, at which it will
establish specific priorities for action. Other charter members, all of
whom paid $25,000 to be part of the initiative, include Bay Networks,
Cabletron, FTP Software, Intel, Silicon Graphics, StarBurst Communications,
Sun Microsystems, 3Com, Vivo Software, White Pine Software and Xerox Parc.

  --Jeff Sweat

InformationWeek http://techweb.cmp.com/iw



[a search of these pages revealed no restrictions on duplication]

all the best, Don
-- 
Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code UW/Br Root 200  work 408.656.2149
              Monterey California 93943-5000 USA              fax  408.656.3679
Virtual worlds/underwater robots/Internet http://www.stl.nps.navy.mil/~brutzman

From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 15:10:08 1996 
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:09:32 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id MAA18440 
          for <rem-conf@es.net>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:09:32 -0700
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:09:32 -0700
Message-Id: <199609301909.MAA18440@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: [Reminder] U.C. Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

        Wednesday, October 2, 1196 12:30 - 2:00 PM PDT 405 Soda Hall

                    "Introduction to the MERCI Project" 

                             Peter Kierstein 
                        University College, London 

This talk will present an overview of the Multimedia European Research
Conferencing Integration project. A detailed description of the project is
available at MERCI Project. The previous project, named MICE, was the first
group to broadcast a regularly scheduled seminar on the Internet MBone. This
seminar motivated the creation of the Berkeley Multimedia and Graphics
Seminar series.

____________________________________________________________________________

This seminar will be broadcast on the Internet MBONE.  The broadcast will
begin at 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 hrs).  See sd or http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/298
for instructions on setting up, connecting to, and operating the MBONE tools.


From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 15:13:56 1996 
Received: from bmrc.Berkeley.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:13:20 -0700
Received: from nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.58]) 
          by bmrc.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA01906 
          for <298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:07:49 -0700
Received: from sockeye (sockeye.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.36.74]) 
          by nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.3) with SMTP id MAA15428 
          for <298-list@bmrc>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:07:49 -0700
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 12:07:49 -0700
Message-Id: <199609301907.MAA15428@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Sender: jerrlyn@nobozo.CS.Berkeley.EDU
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 298-list@bmrc.Berkeley.EDU
From: Jerrlyn Iwata <jerrlyn@postgres.berkeley.edu>
Subject: [Reminder] U.C. Berkeley Multimedia & Graphics Seminar

        Wednesday, October 2, 1196 12:30 - 2:00 PM PDT 405 Soda Hall

                    "Introduction to the MERCI Project" 

                             Peter Kierstein 
                        University College, London 

This talk will present an overview of the Multimedia European Research
Conferencing Integration project. A detailed description of the project is
available at MERCI Project. The previous project, named MICE, was the first
group to broadcast a regularly scheduled seminar on the Internet MBone. This
seminar motivated the creation of the Berkeley Multimedia and Graphics
Seminar series.

____________________________________________________________________________

This seminar will be broadcast on the Internet MBONE.  The broadcast will
begin at 12:40 PDT (GMT - 8 hrs).  See sd or http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/298
for instructions on setting up, connecting to, and operating the MBONE tools.


From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Sep 30 17:49:29 1996 
Received: from boron.Stanford.EDU by osi-west.es.net with ESnet SMTP (PP);
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 14:48:50 -0700
Received: from [36.53.0.74] (kohn-centris.Stanford.EDU [36.53.0.74]) 
          by boron.Stanford.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA12234;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 14:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: jkohn@jessica
Message-Id: <v02130506ae75f0c5f665@[36.53.0.74]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 14:49:09 -0700
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: jkohn@networking.stanford.edu (Jay Kohn)
Subject: Message to send to the MBONE community (Not SDR stuff)
Cc: morgan@jessica.Stanford.EDU, rgr@jessica.Stanford.EDU, jcole@precept.com, 
    gc.jhh@forsythe.Stanford.EDU, gd.jit@forsythe.Stanford.EDU, 
    haven@jessica.Stanford.EDU, tnavarrete@forsythe.Stanford.EDU

Stanford University will begin ongoing multicasting of the Stanford Channel
using a Precept Software IP/TV server on October 1st from 2pm to 5pm PDT
Monday through Friday on the MBONE network.  These high quality audio and
video broadcasts will provide a window to the many cultural experiences and
learning opportunities available on campus.  Viewers can enjoy lectures,
symposia, health-related presentations, faculty interviews; sporting
events, student films and more!  Further details on the Stanford Channel
are available at

http://www-commserv-isdn.stanford.edu/ch51/CH51.intro.html

These transmissions are part of an effort to support MBONE testing.  We
will defer the transmission so as not to conflict with other major MBONE
events, such as IETF meetings.

Details of the transmission are as follows:

Audio will be in DVI format, 40 kbps (224.2.167.31/30758)
Video in H261 format, not to exceed 128 kbps (224.2.143.197/50290)

Questions or comments regarding this transmission may be sent to
mbone-support@stanford.edu.



