From rem-conf Sun Jun 01 13:45:46 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Sun Jun 01 13:45:46 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYHJg-0001wr-00; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:33:28 -0700
Message-Id: <199706012033.NAA06628@rx7.ee.lbl.gov>
To: Peter Parnes <peppar@cdt.luth.se>
cc: "H.A. Kippenhan Jr." <kipp@hep.net>, rem-conf@es.net, kippenhan@hep.net
Subject: Re: 640x480 support in VIC when using nv encoding
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 31 May 97 22:05:18 N.
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 97 13:33:43 PDT
From: Van Jacobson <van@ee.lbl.gov>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> Which parameter does one need to tweak to get that working under
> Solaris2.5.1? I get the following error-message with 'large' and
> nv:
> 
> RTVC_CMD_SEND_MESSAGE: Not enough space

Peter,

I very carefully said "640x480".  Full size PAL is 768x576 and
the rtvc board doesn't have enough on-board memory to capture
an image this size.  This is a limitation of the capture board,
not vic.  To be precise, it's a limit of the braindead XIL "3 band"
capture format built into the RTVC firmware.  XIL wants a Y U &
V for each pixel (3 bytes/pixel) rather than the 4:2:2 format (2
bytes/pixel) the video is actually captured in.  This means a
full frame image is 768*576*3 = 1327104 bytes & there's only
1210176 bytes of free buffer space on the board.  There's another
set of microcode for the rtvc that will grab 4:2:2 and this would
handle a full size PAL image (884736 bytes) but we were never
able to get it working reliably (there were funny chroma artifacts
at 8 or 16 pixel boundaries) so vic doesn't use it.

 - Van



From rem-conf Sun Jun 01 23:38:10 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Sun Jun 01 23:38:10 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYQYZ-0003lh-00; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 23:25:27 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>
Message-Id: <199706020624.IAA03434@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: 640x480 support in VIC when using nv encoding
To: van@ee.lbl.gov (Van Jacobson)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 08:24:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: peppar@cdt.luth.se, kipp@hep.net, rem-conf@es.net, kippenhan@hep.net
In-Reply-To: <199706012033.NAA06628@rx7.ee.lbl.gov> from "Van Jacobson" at Jun 1, 97 01:33:43 pm
Organisation: CSD IMMD IV, University of Erlangen, Germany
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> set of microcode for the rtvc that will grab 4:2:2 and this would
> handle a full size PAL image (884736 bytes) but we were never
> able to get it working reliably (there were funny chroma artifacts
> at 8 or 16 pixel boundaries) so vic doesn't use it.

How about running SunVideo with the XIL framegrabber ? Will that utilize
the 4:2:2 ucode ?



From rem-conf Mon Jun 02 08:17:12 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 02 08:17:12 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYYfs-0005RK-00; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 08:05:32 -0700
X-SMTP-Posting-Origin: maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA 
                       [132.206.35.2])
Message-ID: <01BC6F44.E3853B30@maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA>
From: Computing Centre <yves@cc.mcgill.ca>
To: "'mbone@isi.edu'" <mbone@isi.edu>
Cc: "'rem-conf@es.net'" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: IEEE ICC'97 broadcast
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 11:05:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


Hello,

I am proud (aren't we always?) to announce the broadcast of selected
technical sessions from IEEE's ICC 97 conference, which will happen
in Montreal from June 8th to June 12th.

ICC 97 is the International Conference on Communications which
is sponsered by IEEE. For more info about this conference, you
can go to http://happy.comsoc.org/confs/ICC/97/

The broadcast will last 3 days, from June 9 to June 11, inclusive. 
Rebroadcasts will take place at night to accomodate our friends
on the other side of the planet.

In the following schedule, a SAS session is a Systems, Applications and 
Services session.

Thanks,
Yves Lepage


June 9

08:00 - 09:15     Opening Plenary
                  Speakers: Kevin Lynch, Deputy Minister of Industry
                            John McLennan, CEO Bell Canada

09:30 - 10:45     SAS Session 01
                  Whiter Switching?
                  Dr. Ron Horn

11:15 - 12:30     SAS - Session 06 
                  Challenges Facing the Building of 
                  Information Infrastructures
                  Salah Aidarous

14:30 - 17:15     TECHNICAL SESSION - Network Video Services
                  Alex Gelman

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 10

08:00 - 09:15     SAS Session 10
                  The Evolution of Broadband Satellite Services
                  Peter Garland

09:15 - 10:30     SAS Session 09
                  Broadband Wireless Access
                  Richard J. Nowak

10:45 - 13:00     Theme Pleanry Session - Towards the Knowledge
Millennium
                  Panelists:Ian Craig, President Nortel Broadband
Networks
                            John MacDonald, CTO Bell Canada
                            Bob Lucky, Bellcore
                            Narayana Murthy, Infosys
                            Mario Vecci, Excalibur_TimeWarner
                  Moderator:Tom Rowbotham, British Telecom Director of 
                            Technology         

14:00 - 17:00     High Speed Access Over Wired Media
                  Vijay Bhagavath

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 11

09:00 - 12:00     SAS Session 03
                  Video over IP
                  Gary Crane

14:00 - 15:15     SAS session 
                  Content: The Killer Application
                  Victoria  Dickenson

15:45 - 17:00     SAS session 02
                  IP over ATM
                  Rolando Oliver





From rem-conf Mon Jun 02 14:43:16 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 02 14:43:16 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYeeq-0000BZ-00; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 14:28:52 -0700
Sender: jcoulter@on.bell.ca
Message-ID: <33933AF7.7FF3@on.bell.ca>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 17:28:23 -0400
From: John Coulter <jcoulter@on.bell.ca>
Organization: Bell Global Network Operations
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4m)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mbone@cilea.it
CC: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: mistaken mbone reservation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

I made a mistake with my first attempt at booking an mbone session.
could you please remove the session on June 25 from 14:00 to 23:00.

-- 
Regards



	John Coulter
	Network Engineer
	Bell Canada Communications Solutions
	Ph: +1 613 781-8891
	FAX:+1 613 781-8891
	jcoulter@on.bell.ca



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 07:40:31 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 07:40:31 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYuXr-0002yl-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 07:26:43 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>
Message-Id: <199706031426.QAA19634@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: URL's for conferences
To: rem-conf@es.net
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 16:26:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Organisation: CSD IMMD IV, University of Erlangen, Germany
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Hi

Is there a specification for URL's that can be used to describe
conferences ? I'd like to have such a thing to start up the
mbone tools for participation in conferences (i.e.: write an external
viewer shell-script to start up [rv]at/vic/wb ).

Thanks
	Toerless



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:01:13 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:01:13 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYuvj-0003MF-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 07:51:23 -0700
From: Mark Handley <mjh@isi.edu>
X-Organisation: Information Sciences Institute, USC
X-Phone: +1 617 253 6011
To: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jun 1997 16:26:34 +0200." <199706031426.QAA19634@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 10:50:12 -0400
Message-ID: <2584.865349412@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: mjh@buttle.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


>Is there a specification for URL's that can be used to describe
>conferences ? I'd like to have such a thing to start up the
>mbone tools for participation in conferences (i.e.: write an external
>viewer shell-script to start up [rv]at/vic/wb ).

Two possibilities seem to make sense:

1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
   Parse the description and start the tools.

2. Use an RTSP URL.

The choice should be determined by whether you want RTSP-style control
or not.  Probably you don't need it for a conference.

Mark



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:12:39 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:12:39 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYvCX-0003lI-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:08:45 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>
Message-Id: <199706031507.RAA20850@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
To: mjh@isi.edu (Mark Handley)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 17:07:46 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de, rem-conf@es.net
In-Reply-To: <2584.865349412@buttle.lcs.mit.edu> from "Mark Handley" at Jun 3, 97 10:50:12 am
Organisation: CSD IMMD IV, University of Erlangen, Germany
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> Two possibilities seem to make sense:
> 
> 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
>    Parse the description and start the tools.
> 
> 2. Use an RTSP URL.
> 
> The choice should be determined by whether you want RTSP-style control
> or not.  Probably you don't need it for a conference.

Hi & thanks for the info.

Given that conference control isn't just my hobby and that i simply want
to get a URL where users who are too stupid to start "sdr" can "click on
a conference" ;-) i wonder if you can point me to some place where i
can steal anything if this, i.e.: a shell script to parse such a
description and a sample web page that uses them. If not:

Where are the specs for SDP or RTSP (and what the hell do these
abbreviations mean ? ;-))

Best regards
	Toelress



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:14:52 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:14:52 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYvI1-0003zS-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:14:25 -0700
Sender: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <339434BD.78C1@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 11:14:05 -0400
From: Henning Schulzrinne <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University, Dept. of Computer Science
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Handley <mjh@isi.edu>
CC: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>, 
    rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
References: <2584.865349412@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Mark Handley wrote:
> 
> >Is there a specification for URL's that can be used to describe
> >conferences ? I'd like to have such a thing to start up the
> >mbone tools for participation in conferences (i.e.: write an external
> >viewer shell-script to start up [rv]at/vic/wb ).
> 
> Two possibilities seem to make sense:
> 
> 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
>    Parse the description and start the tools.
> 
> 2. Use an RTSP URL.

A third choice is to use the new data: URL
ftp://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-masinter-url-data-03.txt

Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be widely implemented yet.

> 
> The choice should be determined by whether you want RTSP-style control
> or not.  Probably you don't need it for a conference.
> 
> Mark

-- 
Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 212 939-7042
Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:16:25 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:16:25 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYvJj-0004DJ-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:16:11 -0700
From: Mark Handley <mjh@isi.edu>
X-Organisation: Information Sciences Institute, USC
X-Phone: +1 617 253 6011
To: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jun 1997 17:07:46 +0200." <199706031507.RAA20850@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 11:14:59 -0400
Message-ID: <2674.865350899@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: mjh@buttle.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


>> Two possibilities seem to make sense:
>> 
>> 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
>>    Parse the description and start the tools.
>> 
>> 2. Use an RTSP URL.
>> 
>> The choice should be determined by whether you want RTSP-style control
>> or not.  Probably you don't need it for a conference.
>
>Hi & thanks for the info.
>
>Given that conference control isn't just my hobby and that i simply want
>to get a URL where users who are too stupid to start "sdr" can "click on
>a conference" ;-) i wonder if you can point me to some place where i
>can steal anything if this, i.e.: a shell script to parse such a
>description and a sample web page that uses them. If not:

Sdr source is in ftp://cs.ucl.ac.uk/mice/sdr/ 

The SDP parser in sdp.tcl is one place to start.  But you'll have to
write quite a bit of code to take this from sdr and use it in any
meaningful way.  

I've always intended to make the mods to sdr so you can use sdr itself
as such a script, but I've not got around to it yet.

>Where are the specs for SDP or RTSP (and what the hell do these
>abbreviations mean ? ;-))

Session Description Protocol and Real-time Streaming Protocol.
See draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-* and draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-*

Mark



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:23:54 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:23:53 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYvPf-0004qO-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:22:19 -0700
From: Holger.Fahner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE (Holger Fahner)
Message-Id: <9706031722.ZM29905@kssun9.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 17:22:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de> "Re: URL's for conferences" (Jun 3, 5:07pm)
References: <199706031507.RAA20850@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 10apr95)
To: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

On Jun 3,  5:07pm, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
> > Two possibilities seem to make sense:
> >
> > 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
> >    Parse the description and start the tools.
> >
> > 2. Use an RTSP URL.
> >
> > The choice should be determined by whether you want RTSP-style control
> > or not.  Probably you don't need it for a conference.
>
> Hi & thanks for the info.
>
> Given that conference control isn't just my hobby and that i simply want
> to get a URL where users who are too stupid to start "sdr" can "click on
> a conference" ;-) i wonder if you can point me to some place where i
> can steal anything if this, i.e.: a shell script to parse such a
> description and a sample web page that uses them. If not:

Toerless,

check out this one:  http://www.cdt.luth.se/~peppar/progs/mSD/
I seems that they have what you are looking for,
and you can even download it ;-)

-- Holger





-- 

Holger Fahner
Communication Systems                  Phone        ++49 (0) 711 685 5736
National Supercomputer Center (RUS)    Fax          ++49 (0) 711 678 8363
University of Stuttgart                E-mail fahner@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Allmandring 3a / D-70550 Stuttgart / Germany



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:27:06 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:27:05 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYvU2-00056P-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:26:50 -0700
Message-ID: <7D06B4AA8B39D011A64900805F682CDA019A6441@RED-09-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
From: Arlie Davis <arlied@microsoft.com>
To: "'Holger.Fahner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE'" <Holger.Fahner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Cc: "'rem-conf@es.net'" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: RE: URL's for conferences
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:26:02 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.30)
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Though I haven't updated it in a while, my Win32 SD supports loading SDP
descriptions from text files.  It's trivial to bind the MIME type for
SDP descriptions (application/x-sd, I think) to the app, with Internet
Explorer or Netscape.

Then all you have to do is convince your web server to serve ".sdp"
files as application/x-sdp.  Create SDP descriptions, save them on the
web server, then point people at the URL.  It works very well.

The latest version (which is getting kind of stale -- yes I AM working
on a new one) is available at http://archive.thepoint.net/Win32SD/

-- arlie

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Holger.Fahner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
> [SMTP:Holger.Fahner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE]
> Sent:	Tuesday, June 03, 1997 8:22 AM
> To:	Toerless Eckert
> Cc:	rem-conf@es.net
> Subject:	Re: URL's for conferences
> 
> On Jun 3,  5:07pm, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
> > > Two possibilities seem to make sense:
> > >
> > > 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type
> application/sdp.
> > >    Parse the description and start the tools.
> > >
> > > 2. Use an RTSP URL.
> > >
> > > The choice should be determined by whether you want RTSP-style
> control
> > > or not.  Probably you don't need it for a conference.
> >
> > Hi & thanks for the info.
> >
> > Given that conference control isn't just my hobby and that i simply
> want
> > to get a URL where users who are too stupid to start "sdr" can
> "click on
> > a conference" ;-) i wonder if you can point me to some place where i
> > can steal anything if this, i.e.: a shell script to parse such a
> > description and a sample web page that uses them. If not:
> 
> Toerless,
> 
> check out this one:  http://www.cdt.luth.se/~peppar/progs/mSD/
> I seems that they have what you are looking for,
> and you can even download it ;-)
> 
> 



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 08:41:35 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 08:41:35 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYvev-0005gN-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:38:05 -0700
From: Mark Handley <mjh@isi.edu>
X-Organisation: Information Sciences Institute, USC
X-Phone: +1 617 253 6011
To: Henning Schulzrinne <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>
cc: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@Informatik.Uni-Erlangen.de>, 
    rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jun 1997 11:14:05 EDT." <339434BD.78C1@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 11:36:46 -0400
Message-ID: <2805.865352206@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: mjh@buttle.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


>Mark Handley wrote:
>> >Is there a specification for URL's that can be used to describe
>> >conferences ? I'd like to have such a thing to start up the
>> >mbone tools for participation in conferences (i.e.: write an external
>> >viewer shell-script to start up [rv]at/vic/wb ).
>> 
>> Two possibilities seem to make sense:
>> 
>> 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
>>    Parse the description and start the tools.
>> 
>> 2. Use an RTSP URL.
>
>A third choice is to use the new data: URL
>ftp://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-masinter-url-data-03.txt
 
I tend to believe this is a bad idea. Yes, in principle you can code
anything in a (very long) URL.  But in practice there are advantages
to be gained from a URL being a reference and not a description.  It
makes it much easier for the "owner" of the data to modify it and its
description without invalidating URL's to the session scattered
throughout the net.

Mark





From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 09:43:33 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 09:43:33 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYwcz-0006T4-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 09:40:09 -0700
Message-Id: <199706031639.MAA09644@zubin.dnrc.bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Mark Handley <mjh@isi.edu>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jun 1997 11:36:46 EDT." <2805.865352206@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 12:39:14 -0400
From: Zheng Wang <zhwang@dnrc.bell-labs.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

 
> 1. Use an HTTP URL to return data in MIME content-type application/sdp.
>    Parse the description and start the tools.
 

Would it be a good idea to extend the concept of a session to other
applications such as ftp, telnet, well any applications? So we can
have a platform/OS independent description of how one can start any
application (and maybe doing a few operations). I think this would
be a right drection towards a www/browser-based general use interface.

Cheers
Zheng




From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 10:49:26 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 10:49:25 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wYxc0-000779-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 10:43:12 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970603133301.04aaf2e8@mailee.bellcore.com>
X-Sender: stanm@mailee.bellcore.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 13:33:15 -0400
To: enternet@bbn.com, tccc@cs.umass.edu, dbworld@cs.wisc.edu, 
    end2end-interest@isi.edu, f-troup@CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU, 
    cost237-transport@comp.lancs.ac.uk, reres@laas.fr, hipparch@sophia.inria.fr, 
    xtp-relay@cs.concordia.ca, rem-conf@es.net, sigmedia@bellcore.com, 
    mobile-ip@tadpole.com, cellular@comnets.rwth-aachen.de, 
    ieeetcpc@ccvm.sunysb.edu, cnom@maestro.bellcore.com, 
    commsoft@cc.bellcore.com, comswtc@gmu.edu, giga@tele.pitt.edu, 
    multicomm@cc.bellcore.com
From: Stan Moyer <stanm@bellcore.com>
Subject: Call for Papers -- ENCOM '98
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

			   CALL FOR PAPERS
	  Enterprise Networking and Computing '98 (ENCOM-98)
	  in conjunction with ICC/SuperComm '98 (June7-11),
		 Atlanta, Georgia, Thursday, June 11



ENCOM-98 will provide an open forum for the 
enterprise networking and computing communities to 
review new and emerging technologies, services, and 
their implications from both business and technological 
viewpoints. The objective is to bridge the gap between: 
(a) Enterprise-wide business drivers and (b) Technology-
driven solutions and enablers.

The conference will include a keynote speech, panel 
discussions, and paper sessions by leaders, recognized 
experts and active researchers in the field.

Submission Instructions
-----------------------
The title page must include the corresponding author's 
full name, complete postal and e-mail addresses, 
telephone and fax numbers, and a 200-word abstract. 
Five double-spaced copies of papers (12 point times font, 
maximum 3000 words) on 8.5"x11" or A4 papers should 
be sent to the ENCOM-98 technical chair at the address 
given below. All submissions will be peer-reviewed and 
the accepted papers will be published in the proceedings 
of ENCOM-98. Proposals for panels should be submitted 
to the panel discussion arrangement chair. 

Schedule: 
---------
Complete Manuscript Due: 15 November 1997
Acceptance Note Mailed: 01 February 1998
Camera-ready Paper Due: 01 March 1998

Hot topics:
-----------
o Utilization of new and emerging technologies for the 
  evolution of enterprise networks
o Intranets, Extranets and Internets: How they are 
  transforming the enterprise networks
o Legacy systems integration 
o Integration of enterprise network subsystems to 
  provide "end-user" oriented services
o Enterprise network application/services integration 
o Internetworking and interoperability of enterprise 
  network components
o Enterprise-wide computing, including distributed 
  applications, client-serving computing, etc. 
o Enterprise information resource management.
o Enterprise network management 
o Business processes re-engineering enterprise 
  networks 
o Pros and cons of enterprise network outsourcing 
o Integration of network and systems management 
  from an enterprise viewpoint. 


General Chair:
--------------
Bhumip Khasnabish (bhumip@gte.com), MA, USA

Technical Chair:
----------------
Vijay K. Bhagavath (bhagavath@att.com)
AT&T Laboratories, Rm. 1L-333
101 Crawfords Corner Rd., Holmdel, NJ 07733, USA
Tel: +1-908-949-2837, Fax: +1-908-949-4852

Panels Chair:
-------------
Manu Malek (mmalek@lucent.com)

For more information, see:
--------------------------
http://www.comsoc.org/confs/encom/98

Sponsored by the IEEE Communications Society Technical Committee on 
Enterprise Networking




From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 13:40:18 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 13:40:17 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZ094-000103-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 13:25:30 -0700
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 16:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199706032025.QAA08620@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
To: zhwang@dnrc.bell-labs.com
Subject: Re: URL's for conferences
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
From: wchang@nist.gov (Wo Chang, x3439)
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


Zheng Wang <zhwang@dnrc.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> 
> Would it be a good idea to extend the concept of a session to other
> applications such as ftp, telnet, well any applications? So we can
> have a platform/OS independent description of how one can start any
> application (and maybe doing a few operations). I think this would
> be a right drection towards a www/browser-based general use interface.

I strongly agreed with platform/OS independent description environment
with a browser-based as the general interface.  This provides any user
to see what activities are being or will be multicasted even if a user 
does not have the multicast kernel running.  In addition, it allows
network administrator to check the MBone feed status since if there is 
no MBone traffic, there will not be any SDR entries (after the expiration
period).  A character based (something like curses) front-end would also 
be helpful, at the worst case, network administrator can always telnet to 
a multicast host to run the curses-based sdr to check the MBone feed status.

At NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), we are very
interested on Multicast/MBone measurement and performance statistics.  
Currently, we're developing an integrated performance package that will 
listening to SAP/SDP packets for the sdr entry (as well as allow user to
specify a specific mulitcast address/port) and by selecting a particular
sdr entry we then use RTP/RTCP packets to gather multicast audio/video 
stream performance statistics (just like the rtpmon).  Initially, it will 
be a character-based so it can offer remote telnet, and in addition, by 
changing its output to html format, it could serve from a web server. At 
the second phase (once we have a better understanding on what to measure), 
change the output portion into a java-based applet so a continuous graphs 
can be presented as well as avoiding a full page html reload for the 
delta performance statistics.  The final phase is to have the whole 
performance package written in a java applet, so the entire performance 
tool will be running locally at the user side.  This way, user can see 
the MBone performance statistics at his/her own subnet instead looking 
at the web server subnet.  [NOTE: there might be a problem running 
multicast within an applet, I have tried MS IE 3.x and Netscape 3.x with 
JDK 1.02 and MS IE 4.0 Preview with JDK 1.1.x, nothing works, but multicast 
under java application works.  Any comments and thoughs? ]

Actually, all 3 phases have its own usefulness which depends on how you
access (via telnet or browser) and what to access (local multicast 
statistics or remote multicast statistics).  Currently, I have completed 
70% of the first phase and it runs under both SunOS 4.1.x and Solaris 2.5.x.

Comments and thoughts on the above approaches would be greatly appreciated.

--Wo Chang <wchang@nist.gov>



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 14:01:38 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 14:01:37 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZ0gb-0001WJ-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:00:09 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970603165951.00b076d0@cis.gsu.edu>
X-Sender: rpadilla@cis.gsu.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 16:59:51 -0400
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: Roderick Padilla <rpadilla@gsu.edu>
Subject: Lost Sessions
In-Reply-To: <199706032025.QAA08620@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

I created a test session for GA State and after exiting sdr I could not see
it anymore. I created a second test to duplicate the problem and diag and
now I can not see it. Any ideas?

I am using sdr 2.3a1 for Solaris 2.4. The second test will expire in a
couple of hours.

Thanks!

Roderick Padilla	                     	Office:(404) 651-3832
Systems & Network Administrator	Fax:   (404) 651-3842
http://www.cis.gsu.edu/~rpadilla		Email: rpadilla@gsu.edu

Department of Computer Information Systems 
College of Business Administration               
Georgia State University                       
PO Box 4015
Atlanta, Georgia, USA  30302-4015



From rem-conf Tue Jun 03 14:37:59 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 03 14:37:58 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZ1BQ-000238-00; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:32:00 -0700
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 97 14:30:44 PDT
From: schooler@cs.caltech.edu (Eve Schooler)
Message-Id: <9706032130.AA08404@vlsi.cs.caltech.edu>
To: rpadilla@gsu.edu
Subject: Re: Lost Sessions
Cc: schooler@cs.caltech.edu, rem-conf@es.net
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

>From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun  3 14:07:45 1997
>X-Sender: rpadilla@cis.gsu.edu
>Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 16:59:51 -0400
>To: rem-conf@es.net
>From: Roderick Padilla <rpadilla@gsu.edu>
>Subject: Lost Sessions
>
>I created a test session for GA State and after exiting sdr I could not see
>it anymore. I created a second test to duplicate the problem and diag and
>now I can not see it. Any ideas?
>
>I am using sdr 2.3a1 for Solaris 2.4. The second test will expire in a
>couple of hours.
>
>Roderick Padilla	                     	Office:(404) 651-3832
 
My understanding is that if you create a session in sdr, then
YOUR sdr application is responsible for sending the announcements
that periodically renew the session's existence -- until the end of
the session as specified in the description.  If you exit out
of the sdr that was used to create the session, then you have
effectively deleted the session.

Not sure if your local sdr will ever resume announcing a session that you
created but exited out of, if for instance sdr cached the entry 
and the session is still valid?

E.



From rem-conf Wed Jun 04 07:13:32 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 04 07:13:32 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZGak-0005EW-00; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 06:59:10 -0700
From: "Ian McComb" <I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK>
Organization: SML, University of Southampton
To: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 14:55:52 GMT
Subject: Losing fps when rat + vic run together
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Message-ID: <27617965593@lang.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

I have a problem using the MBone software rat 3.0.22 + vic 2.8   
for Windows 95. When vic is running on its own I can get 6,7,8   
fps and 150 - 300 Kbps. When rat is started (or any other 
program on my machine eg email or netscape) the fps starts 
going down and averages out about 1 fps. If I close the 
software the fps comes back up. Rat works well on its own or 
with vic. Is this what happens or do I have a bottleneck 
somewhere. We have monitored the network and we feel that at 
most we are using 10 percent. 

The computer configuration is,

200 MHz Pentium
64MB RAM
2MB Diamond Stealth 64 PCI graphics card
Videolabs stinger card
Videolabs Flexcam or Composite Video from recorder
Sond blaster 16

Our MBone router is a Sun Sparc 4, the software used is Mrouted.

I would be very grateful for any help.

Ian

---------------------------------------------------------
Ian McComb

School of Modern Languages
University of Southampton
SO17 1BF

Email - I.McComb@lang.soton.ac.uk
Phone - 01703 593978



From rem-conf Wed Jun 04 07:47:13 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 04 07:47:13 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZHEU-0005hf-00; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 07:40:14 -0700
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:38:01 -0400
From: luigi@mars.dgrc.doc.ca (John A. Stewart)
Message-Id: <199706041438.KAA00989@barney.dgrc.doc.ca>
To: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net, I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Losing fps when rat + vic run together
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Ian;

on our Sun workstations at work, and on my Linux '486 at home, vic
ties up the cpu. ie, it is 100% busy processing video. When you
start something else, less of that cpu is available to vic.

fyi, my 486 DX4-100, running Linux with a black and white Quickcam
runs 4-6 fps, and it takes 100% of the system cpu. When I start
something else, the frame rate drops, but I think that drop is never
more than about 50% (say, if I have a compile started)

I have heard that multitasking on Windows-95 is not so good, so if you
start up more, you get much less...

So, the drop is to be expected, but I would have thought that the drop
would not have been so great as you reported.

There are many people with Windows-95 boxes, hopefully someone else with
more direct experience will reply.

John Stewart
luigi@mars.dgrc.doc.ca


----- Begin Included Message -----

>From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun  4 10:15:37 1997
From: "Ian McComb" <I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK>

I have a problem using the MBone software rat 3.0.22 + vic 2.8   
for Windows 95. When vic is running on its own I can get 6,7,8   
fps and 150 - 300 Kbps. When rat is started (or any other 
program on my machine eg email or netscape) the fps starts 
going down and averages out about 1 fps. If I close the 
software the fps comes back up. Rat works well on its own or 
with vic. Is this what happens or do I have a bottleneck 
somewhere. We have monitored the network and we feel that at 
most we are using 10 percent. 



From rem-conf Wed Jun 04 08:42:37 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 04 08:42:37 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZI5T-0006DI-00; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 08:34:59 -0700
Message-Id: <199706041534.IAA06288@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: luigi@mars.dgrc.doc.ca (John A. Stewart)
cc: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net, I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Losing fps when rat + vic run together 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 1997 10:38:01 EDT."
             <199706041438.KAA00989@barney.dgrc.doc.ca> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 08:34:55 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

>From The Desk Of John A. Stewart :
> Ian;
> I have heard that multitasking on Windows-95 is not so good, so if you
> start up more, you get much less...
> 
> So, the drop is to be expected, but I would have thought that the drop
> would not have been so great as you reported.
> 
> There are many people with Windows-95 boxes, hopefully someone else with
> more direct experience will reply.
> 

Video for Windows is not necessarily the highest performance api nor the
the interface which vic uses to diplay . You probably want when available
to use DirectX and have the cards do the YUV to RGB conversion.

As for Video for Windows performance, the upcoming WDM drivers and 
and ActiveMovie should take care of the video processiong bottleneck.

	Amancio





From rem-conf Wed Jun 04 10:46:27 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 04 10:46:27 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZK1S-000762-00; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:38:58 -0700
From: Scott_Petrack@vocaltec.com
X-Lotus-FromDomain: VOCALTEC
To: casner@precept.com
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Message-ID: <C22564A0.003C0FC4.00@maskit1.vocaltec.co.il>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 20:25:53 +0200
Subject: Overriding a defined static payload type
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list






Scott Petrack
06/04/97 07:25 PM

This was written a few weeks ago, but I just got a note from my Notes
server saying that it didn't get send. Damn this Notes....

Steve,

I would like to suggest a small change to the RTP text to allow the dynamic
payload types to override the static types if there is a need in a single
session for more than the number of dynamic payload types available.

Here are my reasons:

1. With layered encodings becoming more and more important, and bandwidth
becoming more and more avaiable, I can see a situation where a single
session might need a lot of different payload types. Already a group of 8
or 10 participants using different layered codecs might need too many
dynamic payload types.

2. There are undoubtedly many coders in the basic A/V profile which will
not be very popular not too many years from now. It would be a shame to
have to write a new profile just because these by-then-obsolete coders take
up room in the payload type space.

3. Such a change will not break anything that exists now.

Of course it may be that if this problem ever actually appears, consenting
applications will just override the static types anyway. But it seems that
with this tiny change we can enable future applications to be compliant
with the basic A/V profile, even if they require lots of payload types to
support layered encodings.


Sincerely,

Scott Petrack





From rem-conf Wed Jun 04 21:56:05 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 04 21:56:04 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZUSm-0001E6-00; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 21:47:52 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 21:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706050446.VAA10114@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: mc-mbone <mc-mbone@iij-mc.co.jp>
Reply-to: mc-mbone@iij-mc.co.jp
Subject: Sapporo YOSAKOI Festival
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	Sapporo YOSAKOI Festival
Date:        
	Jun 07, 1997

Time:        
	03:00 GMT 12 hours

Contact:     
	mc-mbone@iij-mc.co.jp

URL:         
	http://www.iij-mc.co.jp/MBone/

Description:        
	YOSAKOI Festival realtime transmission from Sapporo, Japan.  We will use IP/TV server for encoding, but vic/vat can receive.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 00:16:46 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 00:16:46 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZWhK-0001qd-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:11:02 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:09:53 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Christoph Fleck <fleck@rcs.urz.tu-dresden.de>
X-Sender: fleck@rncmm1
Reply-To: Referenzzentrum fuer multimediale Teledienste <mmt-ref@tu-dresden.de>
To: Ian McComb <I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK>
cc: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: Re: Losing fps when rat + vic run together
In-Reply-To: <27617965593@lang.soton.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970605085852.22716B-100000@rncmm1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Hi  Ian,

I have used rat3.0.22 and the Win95-System-Monitor say
that 70% of CPU is used. I have used rat on some
diffrent PCs (P5/90 P5/166 4/100) but there was 
no Diffrence. Always 70% CPU. 
So I belive that rat (Version 3.0.22 and 3.0.20) waste
with your CPU. About the other Progs. i dont know.
Try rat 2.6 that dont waste CPU that much (but has some bug)
to check your vic. (or vat but it is still half-duplex on Win95)

rgs Christoph 

,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Referenzzentrum fuer multimediale Teledienste (MMRZ), TU Dresden |
|         Dr. Klaus Koehler, Christoph Fleck, Rainer Kranz         |
| e-mail: mmt-ref@tu-dresden.de             Tel.: 0351 / 463 5653  |
|    WWW: http://www-mm.urz.tu-dresden.de               (GERMANY)  |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'

On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Ian McComb wrote:
> I have a problem using the MBone software rat 3.0.22 + vic 2.8   
> for Windows 95. When vic is running on its own I can get 6,7,8   
> fps and 150 - 300 Kbps. When rat is started (or any other 
> program on my machine eg email or netscape) the fps starts 
> going down and averages out about 1 fps. If I close the 
> software the fps comes back up. Rat works well on its own or 
> with vic. Is this what happens or do I have a bottleneck 
> somewhere. We have monitored the network and we feel that at 
> most we are using 10 percent. 
> 
> The computer configuration is,
> 
> 200 MHz Pentium
> 64MB RAM
> 2MB Diamond Stealth 64 PCI graphics card
> Videolabs stinger card
> Videolabs Flexcam or Composite Video from recorder
> Sond blaster 16
> 
> Our MBone router is a Sun Sparc 4, the software used is Mrouted.
> 
> I would be very grateful for any help.
> 
> Ian
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Ian McComb
> 
> School of Modern Languages
> University of Southampton
> SO17 1BF
> 
> Email - I.McComb@lang.soton.ac.uk
> Phone - 01703 593978
> 
> 




From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 01:10:12 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 01:10:10 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZXbH-0002Ix-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 01:08:51 -0700
From: "Ian McComb" <I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK>
Organization: SML, University of Southampton
To: Steve Hopper <hopper@cs.ucsd.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:05:51 GMT
Subject: Re: Losing fps when rat + vic run together 
CC: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Message-ID: <28842A35A92@lang.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> Hi,
> 
> Are any of you able to create a new session using Windows 95 and sdr?  I
> get a variety of results when attempting this.  Mainly, after entering
> the options and parameters, then selecting OK, the sdr session quits and
> nothing is announced.
> 
> Pentium200
> SDR UCL 2.1a10
> 

Hi Steve

Try sdrwin (ftp://cs.ucl.ac.uk/mice/sdrtest/). I find it works 
very well. If it does start to produce error messages delete 
prefs file restart and enter information in prefs again. I had 
to do this a couple of times but in general its fine.

Ian

---------------------------------------------------------
Ian McComb

School of Modern Languages
University of Southampton
SO17 1BF

Email - I.McComb@lang.soton.ac.uk
Phone - 01703 593978



From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 03:44:21 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 03:44:18 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZZxZ-0002tR-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:40:01 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dxmint.cern.ch: Host hel3sn03.cern.ch 
                          [137.138.211.123] claimed to be hpl3sn03.cern.ch
Sender: hgalvez@cern.ch
Message-Id: <3396976A.7B38@cern.ch>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 12:39:38 +0200
From: Philippe GALVEZ <Philippe.Galvez@cern.ch>
Organization: CERN. European Lab. for Particle Physics
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.03 9000/712)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: "H.A. Kippenhan Jr." <kipp@hep.net>
Cc: rem-conf@es.net, kippenhan@hep.net, philippe.galvez@cern.ch
Subject: Re: 640x480 support in VIC when using nv encoding
References: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.970529140511.17617A-100000@utah>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------27744461415E"
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------27744461415E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

H.A. Kippenhan Jr. wrote:
>         I've tried using vic (as a replacement for nv) on a small number
>         of Sun and SGI workstations.  When using nv, I can transmit a
>         picture of 640x480 size.  When using vic (and it's nv compatibility
>         encoding) I find I can't transmit the 640x480 image size.

Hi Kipp,

I sent last year to Van and Steve modified codes to allow:

	- Full video size support vith vic using nv, nvdct, cellb
	  with SGI irix5.3
	- Video voice switch at the source node (See later)

but I suppose their "To do" list should be quite big. 

Anyway, you will found at the end a modified version of grabber-vl.cc
file 
So, just replace it on the source distribution with the new one, compile 
and it should work fine.

Concerning "Video voice switch" I make some small modification to the
files:
	ui-ctrlmemu.tcl
	ui-main.tcl
	ui-resource.tcl
	ui-switcher.tcl

We obtained the following feature:
Allowing a Real voice switch at the source node.
I defined 2 more Ressources paramaters in Vic.

- One correspond to the maximun video bandwith allowed for all
  the participants : maxConfBand (defined at 200 kbps by default)
- Second is the percent of this maximun bandwith permits to the 
  speaker : percentForSpeaker (defined at 90% by default)

So at the end when you speak, vic will limite automatically 
your Maximun bandwith limitation set to :
      [(maxConfBand x percentForSpeaker)/100]
        That will be 180 kbps  by default.
And if you don't speak because someonelse is speaking, vic limites
automatically your vic video bandwith at a maximun of:
      [maxConfBand - ((maxConfBand x percentForSpeaker)/100)) / (nbre of
passive participant)]
That will be 20 kbps by default for 2 particants, 10 kbps for 3
participants and so one..
So, we will have always a total a maximun of maxConfBand kbps/s for
for all video streams within the conference and this whatever the number
of
participants all sending video.

If everybody is well configured, you can have in theorie infinite video
flux. Please, note that defining the parameter percentForSpeaker equal
to 100 imply total video switch (nothing is transmitted if you are
note the speaker). By the way it is more pleasant to receive all video
flux even if all of them (except the speaker) will be sent at a very low
bandwith and then very low frame rate.

Please, any comments are welcome.

So, for people interested, I can distribuated the modified source code.

				Best Regards,
				Philippe Galvez
				Caltech/CERN

--------------27744461415E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="grabber-vl.cc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="grabber-vl.cc"

/*
 * Copyright (c) 1993-1994 Regents of the University of California.
 * All rights reserved.
 *
 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
 * are met:
 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
 *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
 * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
 *    must display the following acknowledgement:
 *      This product includes software developed by the University of
 *      California, Berkeley and the Network Research Group at
 *      Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
 * 4. Neither the name of the University nor of the Laboratory may be used
 *    to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
 *    specific prior written permission.
 *
 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
 * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
 * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
 * ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
 * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
 * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
 * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
 * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
 * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
 * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
 * SUCH DAMAGE.
 */

#ifndef lint
static char rcsid[] =
    "@(#) $Header: grabber-vl.cc,v 1.50 95/12/03 22:41:47 mccanne Exp $ (LBL)";
#endif

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <vl/vl.h>

#include "grabber.h"
#include "crdef.h"
#include "module.h"
#include "device-input.h"
#include "Tcl.h"

class vlDevice;

class VLGrabber : public Grabber {
 public:
	VLGrabber(vlDevice&);
	virtual ~VLGrabber();
	virtual int command(int argc, const char*const* argv);
	virtual void fps(int);
	virtual void start();
	virtual void stop();
 protected:
	void startup_vl();
	void shutdown_vl();
	virtual void saveblks(const u_char*);
	void suppress(const u_char*);
	virtual int grab();
	virtual void setsize(int xsize, int ysize);
	u_char* next_frame();
	int closest_rate(int fps) const;

	VLServer vlServer_;
	VLPath vlPath_;
	VLBuffer transferBuf_;
	VLNode src_;
	VLNode drn_;
	int decimate_;
	int current_decimate_;
	int current_fps_;
	int current_port_;
	int is_pal_;

	int port_;
	vlDevice& device_;
};

class VLCIFGrabber : public VLGrabber {
    public:
	VLCIFGrabber(vlDevice&);
    protected:
	virtual void setsize(int xsize, int ysize);
	void saveblk(const u_char* in, u_char* yp, u_char* up,
		     u_char* vp, int stride, int is);
	virtual void saveblks(const u_char* in);
};

class VL411Grabber : public VLCIFGrabber {
    public:
	VL411Grabber(vlDevice&);
    protected:
	virtual void setsize(int xsize, int ysize);
};

class vlDevice : public InputDevice {
 public:
	vlDevice(const char* name, VLDev, VLNodeInfo* ports, int nport);
	virtual int command(int argc, const char*const* argv);
	inline int device() const { return (device_); }
	int lookup_port(const char*) const;
protected:
	VLDev device_;
	VLNodeInfo* ports_;
	int nport_;
};

static class vlBuilder {
public:
	vlBuilder();
	static VLNodeInfo* findports(VLNodeInfo* node, int& n);
} vlb;

vlDevice::vlDevice(const char* name, VLDev device,
		   VLNodeInfo* ports, int nport)
	: InputDevice(name), device_(device),
	  ports_(ports), nport_(nport)
{
	/* smash "ev1" insto galileo for better familiarity */
	if (nickname_[0] == 'e' && nickname_[1] == 'v') {
		nickname_ = "galileo";
	}
	char* cp = new char[80 + nport * (VL_NAME_SIZE + 1)];
	attributes_ = cp;
	strcpy(cp, "format { 411 422 422} size { small cif large } port { ");
	cp += strlen(cp);
	*cp++ = ' ';
	for (int i = 0; i < nport; ++i) {
		strcpy(cp, ports[i].name);
		cp += strlen(cp);
		*cp++ = ' ';
	}
	*cp++ = '}';
	*cp = 0;
}

int vlDevice::lookup_port(const char* name) const
{
	for (int i = 0; i < nport_; ++i) {
		if (strcasecmp(name, ports_[i].name) == 0)
			return (ports_[i].number);
	}
	abort();
}

int vlDevice::command(int argc, const char*const* argv)
{
	Tcl& tcl = Tcl::instance();
	if (argc == 3) {
		if (strcmp(argv[1], "open") == 0) {
			TclObject* o = 0;
			if (strcmp(argv[2], "422") == 0)
				o = new VLGrabber(*this);
			else if (strcmp(argv[2], "411") == 0)
				o = new VL411Grabber(*this);
			else if (strcmp(argv[2], "cif") == 0)
				o = new VLCIFGrabber(*this);
			if (o != 0)
				tcl.result(o->name());
			return (TCL_OK);
		}
	}
	return (InputDevice::command(argc, argv));
}

vlBuilder::vlBuilder()
{
	VLServer s = vlOpenVideo("");
	if (s == 0)
		return;
	VLDevList devlist;
	if (vlGetDeviceList(s, &devlist) == 0) {
		for (int i = 0; i < devlist.numDevices; ++i) {
			VLDevice* p = &devlist.devices[i];
			int n = p->numNodes;
			VLNodeInfo* ni = findports(p->nodes, n);
			if (n > 0)
				new vlDevice(p->name, p->dev, ni, n);
		}
	}
	vlCloseVideo(s);
}

/*
 * Lookup all video sources and smash spaces in names to dashes
 * to avoid tcl list problems.
 */
VLNodeInfo* vlBuilder::findports(VLNodeInfo* node, int& n)
{
	VLNodeInfo* result = new VLNodeInfo[n];
	int k = 0;
	for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
		if (node[i].type == VL_SRC && node[i].kind == VL_VIDEO) {
			result[k] = node[i];
			for (char* cp = result[k].name; *cp != 0; ++cp)
				if (isspace(*cp))
					*cp = '-';
			++k;
		}
	}
	n = k;
	return (result);
}

u_char* VLGrabber::next_frame()
{
	register u_char* p = 0;

	if (vlServer_ && transferBuf_) {
		/*
		 * wait at most one frame time (30ms) for a frame to show up.
		 */
		VLInfoPtr info = 0;
		for (register int i = 3; --i >= 0; ) {
			info = vlGetLatestValid(vlServer_, transferBuf_);
			if (info != 0)
				break;
			sginap(1);
		}
		if (info) {
			p = (u_char*)vlGetActiveRegion(vlServer_, transferBuf_,
						      info);
			if (p == NULL)
				vlPerror("vic: vlGetActiveRegion");
		}
	}
	return (p);
}

/* 422 */
inline void saveblk(const u_char* in,
		    u_char* yp, u_char* up, u_char* vp, int stride)
{
	int is = stride << 2;
	int cs = stride >> 1;
	
	for (int i = 16; --i >= 0; ) {
		/*
		 * Each iteration of this loop grabs 16 Ys & 8 U/Vs.
		 */
		register u_int y0, y1, u, v;

		u  = in[0]  << 24 | in[8]  << 16 | in[16] << 8 | in[24];
		v  = in[2]  << 24 | in[10] << 16 | in[18] << 8 | in[26];
		y0 = in[1]  << 24 | in[5]  << 16 | in[9]  << 8 | in[13];
		y1 = in[17] << 24 | in[21] << 16 | in[25] << 8 | in[29];

		((u_int*)yp)[0] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[1] = y1;
		*(u_int*)up = u;
		*(u_int*)vp = v;

		u  = in[32+0]  << 24 | in[32+8]  << 16 | in[32+16] << 8 | in[32+24];
		v  = in[32+2]  << 24 | in[32+10] << 16 | in[32+18] << 8 | in[32+26];
		y0 = in[32+1]  << 24 | in[32+5]  << 16 | in[32+9]  << 8 | in[32+13];
		y1 = in[32+17] << 24 | in[32+21] << 16 | in[32+25] << 8 | in[32+29];

		((u_int*)yp)[2] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[3] = y1;
		((u_int*)up)[1] = u;
		((u_int*)vp)[1] = v;

		in += is;
		yp += stride;
		up += cs;
		vp += cs;
	}
}
/* 422 NEW */
inline void saveblk_large(const u_char* in,
		    u_char* yp, u_char* up, u_char* vp, int stride)
{
	int is = stride << 2;
	int cs = stride >> 1;

	
	for (int i = 16; --i >= 0; ) {
		/*
		 * Each iteration of this loop grabs 16 Ys & 8 U/Vs.
		 */
		register u_int y0, y1, u, v;

		u  = in[0]  << 24 | in[4]  << 16 | in[8] << 8 | in[12];
		v  = in[2]  << 24 | in[6] << 16 | in[10] << 8 | in[14];
		y0 = in[1]  << 24 | in[3]  << 16 | in[5]  << 8 | in[7];
		y1 = in[9] << 24 | in[11] << 16 | in[13] << 8 | in[15];

		((u_int*)yp)[0] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[1] = y1;
		*(u_int*)up = u;
		*(u_int*)vp = v;

		u  = in[16+0]  << 24 | in[16+4]  << 16 | in[16+8] << 8 | in[16+12];
		v  = in[16+2]  << 24 | in[16+6] << 16 | in[16+10] << 8 | in[16+14];
		y0 = in[16+1]  << 24 | in[16+3]  << 16 | in[16+5]  << 8 | in[16+7];
		y1 = in[16+9] << 24 | in[16+11] << 16 | in[16+13] << 8 | in[16+15];

		((u_int*)yp)[2] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[3] = y1;
		((u_int*)up)[1] = u;
		((u_int*)vp)[1] = v;

		in += is/2;
		yp += stride;
		up += cs;
		vp += cs;
	}
}

void VLGrabber::saveblks(const u_char* in)
{
/**NEW**/
	const u_int8_t* crv = crvec_;
	u_int8_t* yp = frame_;
	u_int8_t* up = yp + framesize_;
	u_int off = framesize_ >> 1;
	int stride = 15 * outw_;
	int stride1 = stride / 2 ;

	for (int y = 0; y < blkh_; ++y) {
		for (int x = 0; x < blkw_; ++x) {
			int s = *crv++;

/* Not clever way to check Large image but anyway */

	 	if (outw_ < 600) {
			if ((s & CR_SEND) != 0)
				saveblk(in, yp, up, up + off, outw_);
			in += 64;
		} else {
			if ((s & CR_SEND) != 0)
                                saveblk_large(in, yp, up, up + off, outw_);
                        in += 32;
		}
			yp += 16;
			up += 8;
		} 

		yp += stride;
		up += stride >> 1;

	if (outw_ > 400) 
		in += stride1 << 2;
	else 	
		in += stride << 2;

	}
}

/*
 * define these for REPLENISH macro used below
 */

/* With again not clever way to check Large image but anyway */


#define DIFF4(in, frm, v, nume) \
        v += (in)[1] - (frm)[0]; \
        v += (in)[3+nume] - (frm)[1]; \
        v += (in)[5+2*nume] - (frm)[2]; \
        v += (in)[7+3*nume] - (frm)[3];



#define DIFFLINE(in, frm, left, center, right) \
	if (outw_ < 600) { \
	DIFF4(in, frm, left, 2); \
	DIFF4(in + 1*16, frm + 1*4, center, 2); \
	DIFF4(in + 2*16, frm + 2*4, center, 2); \
	DIFF4(in + 3*16, frm + 3*4, right, 2); \
	}else{\
	DIFF4(in, frm, left, 0); \
        DIFF4(in + 1*8, frm + 1*4, center, 0); \
        DIFF4(in + 2*8, frm + 2*4, center, 0); \
        DIFF4(in + 3*8, frm + 3*4, right, 0); \
	}\
\
	if (right < 0) \
		right = -right; \
	if (left < 0) \
		left = -left; \
	if (center < 0) \
		center = -center;



void VLGrabber::suppress(const u_char* devbuf)
{
	const u_char* start = frame_ + 16 * vstart_ * outw_ + 16 * hstart_;

/* Not clever way to check Large image but anyway */

                if (outw_ < 600) {
			REPLENISH(devbuf, start, inw_ << 2 , 4,
		  		hstart_, hstop_, vstart_, vstop_);
		} else {
			REPLENISH(devbuf, start, (inw_/2) << 2 , 2,
				hstart_, hstop_, vstart_, vstop_);
		}

}


int VLGrabber::grab()
{
	u_char* p = next_frame();
	if (p == 0)
		return (0);
	suppress(p);
	saveblks(p);
	vlPutFree(vlServer_, transferBuf_);

	YuvFrame f(media_ts(), frame_, crvec_, outw_, outh_);
	return (target_->consume(&f));
}

void VLGrabber::setsize(int w, int h)
{
	set_size_422(w, h);
}

int VLGrabber::command(int argc, const char*const* argv)
{
	if (argc == 3) {
		if (strcmp(argv[1], "decimate") == 0) {
			int d = atoi(argv[2]);
			Tcl& tcl = Tcl::instance();
			if (d <= 0) {
				tcl.result("divide by zero");
				return (TCL_ERROR);
			}
			decimate_ = d;
			startup_vl();
			return (TCL_OK);
		}
		if (strcmp(argv[1], "port") == 0) {
			port_ = device_.lookup_port(argv[2]);
			startup_vl();
			return (TCL_OK);
		}
	}
	return (Grabber::command(argc, argv));
}

void VLGrabber::start()
{
	startup_vl();
	Grabber::start();
}

void VLGrabber::stop()
{
	shutdown_vl();
	Grabber::stop();
}

void VLGrabber::fps(int f)
{
	Grabber::fps(f);
	startup_vl();
}

void VLGrabber::shutdown_vl()
{
	if (vlServer_) {
		if (vlPath_) {
			if (transferBuf_) {
				vlEndTransfer(vlServer_, vlPath_);
				vlDeregisterBuffer(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_,
						   transferBuf_);
				vlDestroyBuffer(vlServer_, transferBuf_);
				transferBuf_ = 0;
			}
			vlDestroyPath(vlServer_, vlPath_);
			vlPath_ = 0;
		}
		vlCloseVideo(vlServer_);
		vlServer_ = 0;
	}
}

static int vl_ntsc_rates[] = { 30, 25, 24, 20, 18, 15, 12, 10, 6, 5 };
static int vl_pal_rates[] = { 25, 20, 15, 10, 5 };

int VLGrabber::closest_rate(int fps) const
{
	if (fps <= 5)
		return (5);
	int* rate = is_pal_ ? vl_pal_rates : vl_ntsc_rates;
	while (rate[1] > fps)
		++rate;
	return (*rate);
}

void VLGrabber::startup_vl()
{
	if (vlServer_ != 0 &&
	    decimate_ == current_decimate_ && fps_ == current_fps_ &&
	    port_ == current_port_)
		return;

	current_decimate_ = decimate_;
	current_fps_ = fps_;
	current_port_ = port_;
	shutdown_vl();

	VLControlValue val;
	int xsize;
	int ysize;

	vlServer_ = vlOpenVideo("");
	if (vlServer_ == 0)
		goto failed;
	src_ = vlGetNode(vlServer_, VL_SRC, VL_VIDEO, port_);
	drn_ = vlGetNode(vlServer_, VL_DRN, VL_MEM, VL_ANY);
	vlPath_ = vlCreatePath(vlServer_, device_.device(), src_, drn_);
	if (vlPath_ < 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: create path");
		goto failed;
	}
	if (vlSetupPaths(vlServer_, (VLPathList)&vlPath_, 1,
			 VL_SHARE, VL_SHARE) < 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: set up paths");
		goto failed;
	}
	val.intVal = VL_PACKING_YVYU_422_8;
	if (vlSetControl(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, VL_PACKING, &val) < 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: set control packing");
		goto failed;
	}

	vlGetControl(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, VL_SIZE, &val);
	xsize = val.xyVal.x;
	ysize = val.xyVal.y &~ 7;
	if (xsize != 640)	/*XXX there must be a better way */
		is_pal_ = 1;
	else
		is_pal_ = 0;
	xsize /= decimate_;
	ysize /= decimate_;

	val.fractVal.numerator = closest_rate(fps_);
	val.fractVal.denominator = 1;
	if (vlSetControl(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, VL_RATE, &val) < 0)
		vlPerror("vic: set rate");

	val.intVal = decimate_ == 1? VL_CAPTURE_INTERLEAVED :
				     VL_CAPTURE_EVEN_FIELDS;

	if (vlSetControl(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, VL_CAP_TYPE, &val) < 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: vl set captype");
		goto failed;
	}
	if (decimate_ != 1) {
		val.fractVal.numerator = 1;
		val.fractVal.denominator = decimate_ >> 1;
		if (vlSetControl(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, VL_ZOOM, &val) < 0)
			vlPerror("vic: zoom");
	}

	/* Create ring buffers to hold captured data of new size. */
	transferBuf_ = vlCreateBuffer(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, 2);
	if (transferBuf_ == 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: create Buffer");
		goto failed;
	}
	/* Tell VL to use newly created ring buffer. */
	if (vlRegisterBuffer(vlServer_, vlPath_, drn_, transferBuf_) < 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: buffer registration");
		goto failed;
	}
	/*
	 * Try to get into frame sync for the first transfer to minimize
	 * interlace artifacts in the captured picture.
	 * it would be nice to use VL_TRANSFER_MODE_AUTOTRIGGER here so
	 * we'd stay in frame sync but it seems to do nothing but make
	 * videod hang with a galileo.
	 */
#ifdef notdef
	VLTransferDescriptor xfer;
	xfer.mode = VL_TRANSFER_MODE_CONTINUOUS;
	xfer.trigger = VLFrameVerticalRetraceMask;
	xfer.delay = 0;
	xfer.count = 1;
	if (vlBeginTransfer(vlServer_, vlPath_, 1, &xfer) < 0)
#endif
	if (vlBeginTransfer(vlServer_, vlPath_, 0, NULL) < 0) {
		vlPerror("vic: begin transfer");
		goto failed;
	}
#ifdef notdef
	/*
	 * it would be nice to wait on frame available events from
	 * videod rather than busy-waiting in next_frame() but the VL
	 * interface doeson't expose the fd so you can't select on it.
	 */
	vlSelectEvents(vlServer_, vlPath_, VLNoEventsMask);
#endif
	setsize(xsize, ysize);
	return;
 failed:
	shutdown_vl();
	status_ = -1;
}

VLGrabber::VLGrabber(vlDevice& device)
	: device_(device), port_(VL_ANY)
{
	frame_ = 0;
	framebase_ = 0;
	current_decimate_ = -1;
	current_fps_ = -1;
	current_port_ = -1;
	transferBuf_ = 0;
	Grabber::fps(2);
	decimate_ = 2;
	vlServer_ = 0;
	transferBuf_ = 0;
	vlPath_ = 0;
}

VLGrabber::~VLGrabber()
{
	shutdown_vl();
}

VLCIFGrabber::VLCIFGrabber(vlDevice& device)
	: VLGrabber(device)
{
}

void VLCIFGrabber::setsize(int w, int h)
{
	set_size_cif(w, h);
}

/* 411 */
inline void 
VLCIFGrabber::saveblk(const u_char* in, u_char* yp, u_char* up,
		      u_char* vp, int stride, int is)
{
	int cs = stride >> 1;

	for (int i = 8; --i >= 0; ) {
		register u_int y0, y1, u, v;

		u  = in[0]  << 24 | in[8]  << 16 | in[16] << 8 | in[24];
		v  = in[2]  << 24 | in[10] << 16 | in[18] << 8 | in[26];
		y0 = in[1]  << 24 | in[5]  << 16 | in[9]  << 8 | in[13];
		y1 = in[17] << 24 | in[21] << 16 | in[25] << 8 | in[29];

		((u_int*)yp)[0] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[1] = y1;
		((u_int*)up)[0] = u;
		((u_int*)vp)[0] = v;

		u  = in[32+0]  << 24 | in[32+8]  << 16 | in[32+16] << 8 | in[32+24];
		v  = in[32+2]  << 24 | in[32+10] << 16 | in[32+18] << 8 | in[32+26];
		y0 = in[32+1]  << 24 | in[32+5]  << 16 | in[32+9]  << 8 | in[32+13];
		y1 = in[32+17] << 24 | in[32+21] << 16 | in[32+25] << 8 | in[32+29];

		((u_int*)yp)[2] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[3] = y1;
		((u_int*)up)[1] = u;
		((u_int*)vp)[1] = v;

		in += is;
		yp += stride;
		up += cs;
		vp += cs;

		/* do the 2nd (y only instead of yuv) line */
		y0 = in[1]  << 24 | in[5]  << 16 | in[9]  << 8 | in[13];
		y1 = in[17] << 24 | in[21] << 16 | in[25] << 8 | in[29];

		((u_int*)yp)[0] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[1] = y1;

		y0 = in[32+1]  << 24 | in[32+5]  << 16 | in[32+9]  << 8 | in[32+13];
		y1 = in[32+17] << 24 | in[32+21] << 16 | in[32+25] << 8 | in[32+29];

		((u_int*)yp)[2] = y0;
		((u_int*)yp)[3] = y1;

		in += is;
		yp += stride;
	}
}

void VLCIFGrabber::saveblks(const u_char* in)
{
	int is = 4 * inw_;
	const u_int8_t* crv = crvec_;
	u_int8_t* lum = frame_;
	u_int8_t* chm = frame_ + framesize_;
	u_int off = framesize_ >> 2;

	crv += vstart_ * blkw_ + hstart_;
	lum += vstart_ * outw_ * 16 + hstart_ * 16;
	chm += vstart_ * (outw_ >> 1) * 8 + hstart_ * 8;

	int skip = hstart_ + (blkw_ - hstop_);

	for (int y = vstart_; y < vstop_; ++y) {
		const u_char* nin = in;
		for (int x = hstart_; x < hstop_; ++x) {
			int s = *crv++;
			if ((s & CR_SEND) != 0)
				saveblk(in, lum, chm, chm + off, outw_, is);

			in += 64;
			lum += 16;
			chm += 8;
		}
		crv += skip;
		lum += 15 * outw_ + skip * 16;
		chm += 7 * (outw_ >> 1) + skip * 8;
		in = nin + 16 * is;
	}
}

VL411Grabber::VL411Grabber(vlDevice& device)
	: VLCIFGrabber(device)
{
}

void VL411Grabber::setsize(int w, int h)
{
	set_size_411(w, h);
}

--------------27744461415E--




From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 04:54:20 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 04:54:19 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZazh-0003Kp-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 04:46:17 -0700
From: Isidor Kouvelas <I.Kouvelas@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Organisation: University College London, CS Dept.
X-Phone: +44 171 419 3670
To: Referenzzentrum fuer multimediale Teledienste <mmt-ref@tu-dresden.de>
cc: Ian McComb <I.McComb@LANG.SOTON.AC.UK>, rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: Re: Losing fps when rat + vic run together
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jun 1997 09:09:53 +0200." <Pine.GSO.3.95.970605085852.22716B-100000@rncmm1>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 12:45:56 +0100
Message-ID: <13005.865511156@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: I.Kouvelas@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Christoph Fleck writes:
>I have used rat3.0.22 and the Win95-System-Monitor say
>that 70% of CPU is used. I have used rat on some
>diffrent PCs (P5/90 P5/166 4/100) but there was 
>no Diffrence. Always 70% CPU. 
>So I belive that rat (Version 3.0.22 and 3.0.20) waste
>with your CPU. About the other Progs. i dont know.

A new binary (3.0.23) is now available for windows95 which should fix this
problem. It is available from:
ftp://cs.ucl.ac.uk/mice/rat/current/rat-3.0.23-win32.zip
Please let me know of any problems you have.

Isidor



From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 10:43:29 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 10:43:28 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZgNX-0004nt-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 10:31:15 -0700
Message-Id: <199706051736.OAA04612@bicudo.remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.0544.0
From: "Ildeu R. Borges J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=FA?=nior" <ildeu@remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
To: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net>
Subject: Mrouted.
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 14:33:05 -0300
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.0544.0
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

I'm triyng to use the Mrouted 3.8 with Solaris 2.5, but when I try to
execute it with the -d parameter I see the following message:

kernel (v0.25)/mrouted (v3.6) version mismatch

Can some one help me ?
________________________________________________________________________

  \\\\\\\\////////
  ////////\\\\\\\\
    Telebrasilia
    Unidade de Negocio - Telecomunicacoes Avancadas

        Ildeu R. Borges Junior           
        tel: +55-61-323-2411
        fax: +55-61-322-2992
     




From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 10:53:55 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 10:53:53 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZgcI-00053K-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 10:46:30 -0700
Message-ID: <503A2A3C2932CF118D8800805FD44E18039BD6D5@RED-68-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
From: Eric Fleischman <ericfl@MICROSOFT.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: RTSP session length bug
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 10:46:05 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.30)
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

There is a bug in RTSP in that a session identifier is defined as being
one or more octets long (see below) and is encouraged to be a very large
random value in the Security section (section 15). I would therefore
interpret this as encouraging a 4 or 8 octet session id length.

However, Section 9.11 (which deals with embedded binary data) states
that a session identier should be solely one byte long. No mention is
made as to how to map between session ids of multiple bytes to session
ids of one byte. However, I think that such mapping would be
problematic: one should consistently use the same session-identifier
value to refer to the same session.

Therefore, I suggest that Section 9.11 be ammended to state that a one
byte length value (giving the length of the session ID) preceeds the
session identifier in the encapsulation approach: $ session-ID-length
session-ID binary-data-length binary-data.

--------------------------------
Session ID length: Section 11.26 of RTSP states that the session
identifier has the same syntax as the conference identifier. Section 3.3
states that the syntax of the conference identifier is 1*OCTET. RFC 2068
section 2.1 (whose syntax is used by RTSP) states that the meaning of
the Augmented BNF description of 1*element is "one or more instances" of
element. Therefore, the session identifier must be one or more octets
long (e.g., a 4 or an 8 byte long session identifier is legal). 






From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 11:08:55 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 11:08:54 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZgw9-0005W5-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 11:07:01 -0700
Date: Thu,  5 Jun 97 14:01:10 -0400
From: James Dryfoos <dryfoos@ll.mit.edu>
X-Sender: dryfoos@deneb.llan
To: "Ildeu R. Borges J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=FA?=nior" <ildeu@remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
Cc: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: Re: Mrouted.
In-Reply-To: <199706051736.OAA04612@bicudo.remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
Message-Id: <9706051401.AA21072@LL.MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

On Wed, 5 Jun 1996, Ildeu R. Borges J[iso-8859-1] =FAnior wrote:

> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 14:33:05 -0300
> From: "Ildeu R. Borges J[iso-8859-1] =FAnior"
     <ildeu@remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
> To: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
> Subject: Mrouted.
>=20
> I'm triyng to use the Mrouted 3.8 with Solaris 2.5, but when I try to
> execute it with the -d parameter I see the following message:
>=20
> kernel (v0.25)/mrouted (v3.6) version mismatch
>=20
> Can some one help me ?
> ________________________________________________________________________
>=20
>   \\\\\\\\////////
>   ////////\\\\\\\\
>     Telebrasilia
>     Unidade de Negocio - Telecomunicacoes Avancadas
>=20
>         Ildeu R. Borges Junior          =20
>         tel: +55-61-323-2411
>         fax: +55-61-322-2992

See the following:


From=20Sangeeta.Mukherjee@Eng.Sun.COM Thu Jun  5 14:00:39 1997
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 14:27:21 -0800
From: Sangeeta Mukherjee <Sangeeta.Mukherjee@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: mbone@isi.edu, hamby@aris.jpl.nasa.gov, joe@acomp.usf.edu,
    Yutaka.Matsumoto@Japan.Sun.COM, Sangeeta.Mukherjee@Eng.Sun.COM
Cc: jfwang@vislab.epa.gov, jcallaha@willamette.edu, onabe@Japan.Sun.COM,
    dryfoos@ll.mit.edu
Subject: IP Multicast 3.5/3.8 available for Solaris 2.5


Multicast version 3.5 is available for Solaris 2.5
You can get the necessary files and instructions via ftp from:=20

playground.sun.com:/pub/multicast

The two relevant files are:

README_mc35+.2.5 and Solaris_mc35+.2.5.tar.Z

The README file gives installation instructions and other information


=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
     James Dryfoos (JD243)              | mailto:dryfoos@ll.mit.edu
     MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Group 48   |
     244 Wood Street, MailStop: B-120   | (617) 981-2008 - office
     Lexington, MA 02173-9108, Earth    | (617) 981-0782 - fax
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D




From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 11:50:03 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 11:50:02 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZhYS-0006CJ-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 11:46:36 -0700
Sender: hgs@dnrc.bell-labs.com
Message-ID: <3397085C.2848@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 14:41:32 -0400
From: "Henning Schulzrinne (BL)" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4m)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Fleischman <ericfl@microsoft.com>
CC: rem-conf@es.net, confctrl@isi.edu
Subject: Re: RTSP session length bug
References: <503A2A3C2932CF118D8800805FD44E18039BD6D5@RED-68-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

A choice needs to be made if in-band TCP data (a hopefully rare
occurrence) should be allowed only when one TCP connection represents
one RTSP session at a time. If so, the in-band data session ID is
unnecessary; if not, it needs to be of variable and unbounded length
(basically, a string) and be the same as the session identifier carried
as "Session:". Comments?

Eric Fleischman wrote:
> 
> There is a bug in RTSP in that a session identifier is defined as being
> one or more octets long (see below) and is encouraged to be a very large
> random value in the Security section (section 15). I would therefore
> interpret this as encouraging a 4 or 8 octet session id length.
> 
> However, Section 9.11 (which deals with embedded binary data) states
> that a session identier should be solely one byte long. No mention is
> made as to how to map between session ids of multiple bytes to session
> ids of one byte. However, I think that such mapping would be
> problematic: one should consistently use the same session-identifier
> value to refer to the same session.
> 
> Therefore, I suggest that Section 9.11 be ammended to state that a one
> byte length value (giving the length of the session ID) preceeds the
> session identifier in the encapsulation approach: $ session-ID-length
> session-ID binary-data-length binary-data.
> 
> --------------------------------
> Session ID length: Section 11.26 of RTSP states that the session
> identifier has the same syntax as the conference identifier. Section 3.3
> states that the syntax of the conference identifier is 1*OCTET. RFC 2068
> section 2.1 (whose syntax is used by RTSP) states that the meaning of
> the Augmented BNF description of 1*element is "one or more instances" of
> element. Therefore, the session identifier must be one or more octets
> long (e.g., a 4 or an 8 byte long session identifier is legal).

-- 
Henning Schulzrinne         email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Dept. of Computer Science   phone: +1 908 949 8344 (at Bell Labs)
Columbia University         fax:   +1 212 666-0140
New York, NY 10027          URL:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs



From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 11:50:16 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 11:50:15 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZhbW-0006JV-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 11:49:46 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 11:28:18 -0700 ()
From: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
To: Scott Petrack <Scott_Petrack@vocaltec.com>, 
    "Michael F. Speer" <speer@Eng.Sun.COM>, 
    Steven McCanne <mccanne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Overriding a defined static payload type
In-Reply-To: <C22564A0.003C0FC4.00@maskit1.vocaltec.co.il>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.3.95.970605110509.-333473C-100000@oak.precept.com>
X-X-Sender: casner@little-bear.precept.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Scott,

> I would like to suggest a small change to the RTP text to allow the dynamic
> payload types to override the static types if there is a need in a single
> session for more than the number of dynamic payload types available.

Given that I have been promoting wider use of dynamic payload types, I
guess I should be in favor of this proposal.  Somehow it makes me a
little uncomfortable, though.  I guess the question is whether there
should be any provision for allowing some endpoints to participate
with, say, manually entered partial information.  If we evolve to the
point where in many cases only dynamic payload types are used, then
the manual mode won't work anyway.

> 1. With layered encodings becoming more and more important, and bandwidth
> becoming more and more avaiable, I can see a situation where a single
> session might need a lot of different payload types. Already a group of 8
> or 10 participants using different layered codecs might need too many
> dynamic payload types.

That's a possibility, but I wonder if it is realistic that many
different layered codecs will be used in the same session.

Also, the question of needing many payload types for a layered codec
is not one that I recall discussing before.  The Speer/McCanne draft
(draft-speer-avt-layered-video-01.txt) on extensions to RTP for
layered encodings does not mention payload types, unless I overlooked
it.  The RTP code would be cognizant of the grouping of sequential
pairs of ports (and sequential multicast addresses for the multicast
case), so perhaps it was expected that the same payload type could be
used for all of the layers.  Michael or Steve, do you have a comment
on that?

> 2. There are undoubtedly many coders in the basic A/V profile which will
> not be very popular not too many years from now. It would be a shame to
> have to write a new profile just because these by-then-obsolete coders take
> up room in the payload type space.

True, although if in practice the 32 codes preallocated for dynamic
payload formats are sufficient for any given session, then there would
be no need to make use of the obsolete static codes.  The real impetus
for writing a new profile would come from needing to make more static
assignments once the space was full.  If everything is dynamic at that
point, then there's no problem.

> 3. Such a change will not break anything that exists now.

At least not until one of the static codes was overridden.

> Of course it may be that if this problem ever actually appears, consenting
> applications will just override the static types anyway.

That's probably true.  Adopting that behavior may cause interoperation
to fail given some implementations that perform a validity check on
the dynamic payload type range.  Presumably that's the point of
proposing the change.

I'd like to hear opinions from other AVT working group participants
(which means any interested parties).
							-- Steve




From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 17:55:11 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 17:55:10 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZnF2-0001Gu-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 17:50:56 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970605175018.00ef3610@mail.prognet.com>
X-Sender: robla@mail.prognet.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 17:50:30 -0700
To: "Henning Schulzrinne (BL)" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, 
    Eric Fleischman <ericfl@microsoft.com>
From: Rob Lanphier <robla@prognet.com>
Subject: Re: RTSP session length bug
Cc: rem-conf@es.net, confctrl@isi.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

At 02:41 PM 6/5/97 -0400, Henning Schulzrinne (BL) wrote:
>A choice needs to be made if in-band TCP data (a hopefully rare
>occurrence) should be allowed only when one TCP connection represents
>one RTSP session at a time. If so, the in-band data session ID is
>unnecessary; if not, it needs to be of variable and unbounded length
>(basically, a string) and be the same as the session identifier carried
>as "Session:". Comments?

Since the rtp/tcp wasn't fully speced out, I can see why there's confusion
here.  I was presuming the interaction would go something like the following:

C->S   SETUP rtsp://foo.com/bar.file RTSP/1.0 2
       Transport: rtp/tcp;mplex=0

S->C   RTSP/1.0 200 2 OK
       Date: 05 Jun 1997 18:57:18 GMT
       Transport: rtp/tcp;mplex=0
       Session: 12345

C->S   PLAY rtsp://foo.com/bar.file RTSP/1.0 3
       Session: 12345

S->C   RTSP/1.0 200 3 OK
       Session: 12345
       Date: 05 Jun 1997 18:59:15 GMT
       
S->C   $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}

C->S   SETUP rtsp://foo.com/blech.file RTSP/1.0 4
       Transport: rtp/tcp;mplex=1

S->C   RTSP/1.0 200 4 OK
       Date: 05 Jun 1997 18:57:18 GMT
       Transport: rtp/tcp;mplex=1
       Session: 67890

C->S   PLAY rtsp://foo.com/blech.file RTSP/1.0 5
       Session: 67890

S->C   RTSP/1.0 200 5 OK
       Session: 67890
       Date: 05 Jun 1997 18:59:15 GMT
       
S->C   $\001{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\001{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
S->C   $\001{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
.....

This would allow 256 streams over a single TCP connection.  Not perfect,
but in the case where you have more than 256 sessions, one could argue that
a second TCP connection is no great hardship.

There are Huffman-esque tricks that I think we can do, but I would prefer
not to bother specing them (and hence adding one more complience hoop) and
instead negotiate those via PEP if folks find it necessary (hey, a great
use for PEP!)

Rob

---
Rob Lanphier               Voice: (206)674-2322         Fax: (206)674-2699
Program Manager-Protocols                         Email: robla@prognet.com
Progressive Networks-Home of RealAudio            Web: http://www.real.com
For more information on firewalls:       http://www.real.com/firewall.html
For more information on RTSP:               http://www.real.com/prognet/rt



From rem-conf Thu Jun 05 22:36:20 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 05 22:36:19 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZrbh-00026N-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 22:30:37 -0700
Message-ID: <3397A19E.EC019F96@nwork.chungbuk.ac.kr>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 1997 14:35:27 +0900
From: "Jongil, Park" <jipark@nwork.chungbuk.ac.kr>
Reply-To: jipark@nwork.chungbuk.ac.kr
Organization: Computer Engineering of CBU
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b5 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Henning Schulzrinne (BL)" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
CC: Eric Fleischman <ericfl@microsoft.com>, rem-conf@es.net, confctrl@isi.edu
Subject: [Q] About vic?
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <503A2A3C2932CF118D8800805FD44E18039BD6D5@RED-68-MSG.dns.microsoft.com> <3397085C.2848@cs.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Hi, everyone.
I'm studying about RTP and control of multimedia application control.
Has Vic jiiter tolerance in some degree?
and other prgoram?

sorry poor english...puhehe
----------------------------------------------------------
Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Korea
Network Laboratory
Jong-il, Park (Webmaster)
http://nwork.chungbuk.ac.kr/~jipark
http://dce3.chungbuk.ac.kr/bbs/
http://cbubbs.chungbuk.ac.kr/ (Administrator)
----------------------------------------------------------




From rem-conf Fri Jun 06 04:38:36 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 06 04:38:36 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZxHx-0003H6-00; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 04:34:37 -0700
Message-Id: <199706061139.IAA07370@bicudo.remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.0544.0
From: "Ildeu R. Borges J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=FA?=nior" <ildeu@remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
To: <dryfoos@ll.mit.edu>
Cc: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net>
Subject: Mrouted again.
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 08:36:48 -0300
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.0544.0
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Sorry, but I didn't understand, I have to use the patch "Solaris_mc35+_2_5-p
atch" ? I already used the Mrouted 3.5 and I got the same message (kernel
version ......mrouted version).

________________________________________________________________________

  \\\\\\\\////////
  ////////\\\\\\\\
    Telebrasilia
    Unidade de Negocio - Telecomunicacoes Avancadas

        Ildeu R. Borges Junior           
        tel: +55-61-323-2411
        fax: +55-61-322-2992
     




From rem-conf Fri Jun 06 04:50:23 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 06 04:50:23 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZxVo-0003bm-00; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 04:48:56 -0700
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 12:41:20 +0100 (BST)
From: Graeme Wood <jaw@ucs.ed.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Graeme.Wood@ucs.ed.ac.uk
To: "Ildeu R. Borges J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=FA?=nior" <ildeu@remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
cc: dryfoos@ll.mit.edu, rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: Re: Mrouted again.
In-Reply-To: <199706061139.IAA07370@bicudo.remav.telebrasilia.gov.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970606124024.4885J-100000@scorpio.ucs.ed.ac.uk>
X-Department: "Unix Systems Support, Computing Services"
X-Organisation: "The University of Edinburgh"
X-URL: "http://ugwww.ucs.ed.ac.uk/People/Graeme.Wood/"
X-Phone: +44 131 650 5003
X-Fax: +44 131 650 6552
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Ildeu R. Borges J=FAnior wrote:

> Sorry, but I didn't understand, I have to use the patch "Solaris_mc35+_2_=
5-p
> atch" ? I already used the Mrouted 3.5 and I got the same message (kernel
> version ......mrouted version).

That patch is not mrouted 3.5. That patch is a kernel patch (version 3.5)
which provides support for mrouted 3.8. You must apply this patch for
mrouted 3.8 to work.=20

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Graeme Wood                                 Email: Graeme.Wood@ucs.ed.ac.uk
Unix Systems Support                        Phone: +44 131 650 5003
The University of Edinburgh                 Fax:   +44 131 650 6552
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
Scottish MICE National Support Centre       Email: mice-nsc-scotland@ed.ac.=
uk
for your multimedia conferencing support    WWW:   http://mice.ed.ac.uk/mic=
e/
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D




From rem-conf Fri Jun 06 05:40:37 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 06 05:40:36 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wZyGy-00042M-00; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 05:37:40 -0700
To: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
cc: Scott Petrack <Scott_Petrack@vocaltec.com>, 
    "Michael F. Speer" <speer@Eng.Sun.COM>, 
    Steven McCanne <mccanne@eecs.berkeley.edu>, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Overriding a defined static payload type
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jun 1997 11:28:18 PDT." <Pine.WNT.3.95.970605110509.-333473C-100000@oak.precept.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 1997 13:34:10 +0100
Message-ID: <1247.865600450@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Colin Perkins <C.Perkins@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

--> Stephen Casner writes:
>> I would like to suggest a small change to the RTP text to allow the dynamic
>> payload types to override the static types if there is a need in a single
>> session for more than the number of dynamic payload types available.
>
>Given that I have been promoting wider use of dynamic payload types, I
>guess I should be in favor of this proposal.  Somehow it makes me a
>little uncomfortable, though.  I guess the question is whether there
>should be any provision for allowing some endpoints to participate
>with, say, manually entered partial information.  If we evolve to the
>point where in many cases only dynamic payload types are used, then
>the manual mode won't work anyway.

Presumably the change would be to allow, for example, the video range of
static payload types to be used for audio, hence expanding the valid audio
range. This is, at least, an easily detectable change and a tool writer can
choose to treat this as an additional dynamic range if necessary. The
profile could be rewritten to specify three distinct payload type ranges:
audio, video and dynamic. Tools which only understand audio could treat the
video range as dynamic, and vice versa.

The option of overriding, say, an existing static audio payload type, with
another audio payload, seems to be inviting trouble.

Colin



From rem-conf Sun Jun 08 13:50:36 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Sun Jun 08 13:50:35 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0waofD-0002rO-00; Sun, 8 Jun 1997 13:34:11 -0700
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 16:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ramana M Lavu <rlavu@bacon.gmu.edu>
X-Sender: rlavu@bacon
To: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: encrypted mbone session
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.94.970608161215.3946A-100000@bacon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Hi!
	I want to create an private mbone session using 
encryption can you please tell me where I can find documentation
for using encryption with sdr, or any other kind of help
is greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Ramana.




From rem-conf Mon Jun 09 11:36:31 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 09 11:36:30 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wb99M-0005eG-00; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 11:26:40 -0700
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 1997 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Michael F. Speer" <Michael.Speer@Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: "Michael F. Speer" <Michael.Speer@Eng.Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Overriding a defined static payload type
To: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
Cc: Scott Petrack <Scott_Petrack@vocaltec.com>, 
    "Michael F. Speer" <speer@Eng.Sun.COM>, 
    Steven McCanne <mccanne@eecs.berkeley.edu>, rem-conf@es.net
In-Reply-To: "Your message with ID" <Pine.WNT.3.95.970605110509.-333473C-100000@oak.precept.com>
Message-ID: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.865880733.6172.speer@valathar >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Comments enclosed:

> Scott,
> 
> > I would like to suggest a small change to the RTP text to allow the dynamic
> > payload types to override the static types if there is a need in a single
> > session for more than the number of dynamic payload types available.
> 
> Given that I have been promoting wider use of dynamic payload types, I
> guess I should be in favor of this proposal.  Somehow it makes me a
> little uncomfortable, though.  I guess the question is whether there
> should be any provision for allowing some endpoints to participate
> with, say, manually entered partial information.  If we evolve to the
> point where in many cases only dynamic payload types are used, then
> the manual mode won't work anyway.
> 
> > 1. With layered encodings becoming more and more important, and bandwidth
> > becoming more and more avaiable, I can see a situation where a single
> > session might need a lot of different payload types. Already a group of 8
> > or 10 participants using different layered codecs might need too many
> > dynamic payload types.
> 
> That's a possibility, but I wonder if it is realistic that many
> different layered codecs will be used in the same session.
> 
> Also, the question of needing many payload types for a layered codec
> is not one that I recall discussing before.  The Speer/McCanne draft
> (draft-speer-avt-layered-video-01.txt) on extensions to RTP for
> layered encodings does not mention payload types, unless I overlooked
> it.  The RTP code would be cognizant of the grouping of sequential
> pairs of ports (and sequential multicast addresses for the multicast
> case), so perhaps it was expected that the same payload type could be
> used for all of the layers.  Michael or Steve, do you have a comment
> on that?

Origiallny when written, we assumed the same payload type for all layers.
This is certainly true for the layered coders that I know of.  I think the
issue of dyanmic payload types is orthogonal to the layered codecs.  Do
layered coders really generate different types of video or audio from that
of the base layer?


Michael






From rem-conf Mon Jun 09 16:58:48 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 09 16:58:47 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbE5y-00003S-00; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 16:43:30 -0700
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 09:43:24 +1000 (EST)
From: Mr Kieran Power <kpower@dgs.monash.edu.au>
To: Ramana M Lavu <rlavu@bacon.gmu.edu>
cc: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: Re: encrypted mbone session
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.94.970608161215.3946A-100000@bacon>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970610094008.935A-100000@mercury.dgs.monash.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list




On Sun, 8 Jun 1997, Ramana M Lavu wrote:

> Hi!
> 	I want to create an private mbone session using 
> encryption can you please tell me where I can find documentation
> for using encryption with sdr, or any other kind of help
> is greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Ramana.
> 
> 
>

Hi,

Try looking at http://nic.merit.edu/~mbone/index/titles.html. Under the
section Audio Utils there is an application called SpeakFreely. It
supports DES and IDEA and can be used with PGP.

Have Fun,

Kieran Power. 




From rem-conf Tue Jun 10 03:18:16 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 10 03:18:16 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbNuO-0001WP-00; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 03:12:12 -0700
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.6 3/24/96
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: MERCI Seminar tomorrow, Wednesday 11 June
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 11:08:53 +0100
Message-ID: <694.865937333@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Roy Bennett <R.Bennett@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

The Multimedia European Research Conferencing Integration (MERCI) project,
funded by the Commisssion of the European Community, will tomorrow 
multicast another seminar in an occasional series on subjects in 
Multimedia, Communications, Networks, Distributed Systems and CSCW.  

The session is advertised in sdr as "MERCI Seminar". The slides must be 
accessed via the web at the URL specified in sdr and you are encouraged 
to provide us with feedback on your experience in participating in the 
seminar via the form provided. 

Those completing the form will be provided with a summary of the results.


Time:           15-16:00 UTC

From:           University College London (UCL)
 
Chair:		Professor Peter Kirstein

Speaker:	Danny Cohen, Myrinet

Title:		"Myrinet, an EXISTING gigabit/sec network"

Abstract:

Myrinet is a Gigabit-per-second network that has been shipping since 1994. 
Myrinet is used for applications such as LAN (e.g., at USC/ISI), for 
inter-cabinet and intra-cabinet SAN, and also as anintra-card SAN. 

Today's Myrinet components include full duplex, 1.28+1.28 Gigabit/s links, 
cut-through switches, and programmable PCI and SBus interfaces. 

Like Ethernet, Myrinet is defined at the Data Link level, and has multiple 
Physical implementations:
SAN (System-Area Network) cables for in-cabinet applications, LAN cables for 
moderate distances, and fiber for longer distances. 

Due to its excellent performance/cost, Myrinet is already used in 120 sites in 
14 countries, particularly for "clusters" of workstations and PCs. 

The talk will cover: 

       Myrinet technology, components, and software 
       Applications (NOWs, COWs, and SANs) 
       Benchmarks 
       Technology roadmap 
       Lessons for other Gigabit networks -- bottlenecks and market 
	

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roy Bennett, Project Manager, MERCI http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/merci/
Computer Science                           Phone: +44 171 380 7934
University College London                  Fax:   +44 171 387 1397
Gower Street, LONDON WC1E 6BT              Email: rbennett@cs.ucl.ac.uk
----------- http://www-dept.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/R.Bennett --------------





From rem-conf Tue Jun 10 08:12:10 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 10 08:12:09 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbSVs-0002MK-00; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 08:07:12 -0700
From: Mark Handley <mjh@isi.edu>
X-Organisation: Information Sciences Institute, USC
X-Phone: +1 617 253 6011
To: Mr Kieran Power <kpower@dgs.monash.edu.au>
cc: Ramana M Lavu <rlavu@bacon.gmu.edu>, rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Subject: Re: encrypted mbone session 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Jun 1997 09:43:24 +1000."
             <Pine.SOL.3.96.970610094008.935A-100000@mercury.dgs.monash.edu.au> 
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 11:05:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20034.865955159@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: mjh@buttle.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


>> 	I want to create an private mbone session using 
>> encryption can you please tell me where I can find documentation
>> for using encryption with sdr, or any other kind of help
>> is greatly appreciated.

Sdr 2.3a1 supports DES encryption.  You must communicate a plain-text
key (at least 10 characters), key-name (human readable) and key-id
(numeric, 0 .. 2^32-1) to the people in your private group.  Do this
out of band using any channel you feel is secure.  Enter this
information into sdr on the Security preferences panel.  Then you can
make encrypted announcements.  

There was a bug in the DES code that broke sdr encryption on
little-endian machines in sdr 2.3a1, but I'm no longer working on sdr
encryption code as I'm now subject to US export restrictions.  Someone
else will have to fix this from the original source on
ftp://cs.ucl.ac.uk/mice/sdr/.  I believe someone at UCL is going to do
further work on SAP security.

Note also that the key-id field is being removed from the SAP protocol
specification, so future versions of session directories will not be
compatible with sdr 2.3a1 when using encryption.

Mark



From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 09:03:57 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 09:03:56 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbppS-00077z-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:00:58 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706111600.JAA12957@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: mmadrid <mmadrid@psc.edu>
Reply-to: mmadrid@psc.edu
Subject: PSC Computational Neuroscience Workshop
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	PSC Computational Neuroscience Workshop
Date:        
	Jun 13, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 EST 7 hours

Contact:     
	mmadrid@psc.edu

URL:         
	http://www.psc.edu/biomed/workshops/wk-97/neuro/neural.html

Description:        
	 Agenda and lecture notes can be found at the URL   above. Participants in this workshop will learn to  use PGENESIS, a parallel version of the GENESIS   simulator, and PNEURON (under development), a   parallel version of the NEURON simulator.     









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 09:03:58 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 09:03:58 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbpdM-00072O-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 08:48:28 -0700
From: chris.whittenburg@wcom.com (Chris Whittenburg)
Message-Id: <9706111547.AA03922@phantom.wcom.com>
Subject: VIC q-factor
To: rem-conf@es.net
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 10:47:18 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: kevin@cc.gatech.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
UUEncode: TRUE
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list



I've found it's easy to start vic from a command line and
specify bandwidth, fps, capture device, transmitOnStartup,
but I can't find how to set the q-factor this way.

My goal is low frame rate but very high resolution images
viewable from Precept's IP/TV viewer.  The only thing
I've found close to this is to use vic set h.261 and a very
low Q-factor.

thanks for any pointers,
chris

-- 
Chris Whittenburg
Data Network Mechanic			(918) 590-5845
Worldcom Inc.				chris.whittenburg@wcom.com




From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 09:03:58 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 09:03:58 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbppb-000781-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:01:07 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706111600.JAA12930@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: mmadrid <mmadrid@psc.edu>
Reply-to: mmadrid@psc.edu
Subject: PSC Computational Neuroscience Workshop
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	PSC Computational Neuroscience Workshop
Date:        
	Jun 12, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 EST 7 hours

Contact:     
	mmadrid@psc.edu

URL:         
	http://www.psc.edu/biomed/workshops/wk-97/neuro/neural.html

Description:        
	 Agenda and lecture notes can be found at the URL   above. Participants in this workshop will learn to  use PGENESIS, a parallel version of the GENESIS   simulator, and PNEURON (under development), a   parallel version of the NEURON simulator.     









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 09:07:21 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 09:07:21 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbpt9-0007ZO-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:04:47 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706111601.JAA12984@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: mmadrid <mmadrid@psc.edu>
Reply-to: mmadrid@psc.edu
Subject: PSC Computational Neuroscience Workshop
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	PSC Computational Neuroscience Workshop
Date:        
	Jun 14, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 EST 1.5 hours

Contact:     
	mmadrid@psc.edu

URL:         
	http://www.psc.edu/biomed/workshops/wk-97/neuro/neural.html

Description:        
	 Agenda and lecture notes can be found at the URL   above. Participants in this workshop will learn to  use PGENESIS, a parallel version of the GENESIS   simulator, and PNEURON (under development), a   parallel version of the NEURON simulator.     









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 09:40:19 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 09:40:18 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbqOH-00016E-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:36:57 -0700
Message-ID: <01BC764A.243A76C0@christian.icast.com>
From: Christian McMillan <chris@icast.com>
To: 'Chris Whittenburg' <chris.whittenburg@wcom.com>, 
    "rem-conf@es.net" <rem-conf@es.net>
Cc: "kevin@cc.gatech.edu" <kevin@cc.gatech.edu>
Subject: RE: VIC q-factor
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:30:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Chris, Kevin, and others.

Our ICAST server allows for "on the fly" settings of quality, fps and =
bandwidth all integrated in one UI. If you are interested please let me =
know and I can provide a 30 day demo software trial.

ICAST Corporation's servers (encoders really) run on Win 95, NT 4.0 and =
Unix Free BSD. (Solaris 2.x soon).=20

The Channel viewer and guide (SD) run on Win 95, NT 4.0 and also as =
plug-in's for Navigator and Explorer 3.0.

Regards,
Christian McMillan

=3D_____________________________________________=3D
          Christian McMillan	408.874.0714 Direct=09
          ICAST Corporation	408.874.0710 Fax
          Sales Manager	         1-888-945-1637 Pager
          E-Page Christian@metrocall.com
=3D_____________________________________________=3D

-----Original Message-----
From:	Chris Whittenburg [SMTP:chris.whittenburg@wcom.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 11, 1997 8:47 AM
To:	rem-conf@es.net
Cc:	kevin@cc.gatech.edu
Subject:	VIC q-factor



I've found it's easy to start vic from a command line and
specify bandwidth, fps, capture device, transmitOnStartup,
but I can't find how to set the q-factor this way.

My goal is low frame rate but very high resolution images
viewable from Precept's IP/TV viewer.  The only thing
I've found close to this is to use vic set h.261 and a very
low Q-factor.

thanks for any pointers,
chris

--=20
Chris Whittenburg
Data Network Mechanic			(918) 590-5845
Worldcom Inc.				chris.whittenburg@wcom.com









From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 10:17:05 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 10:17:04 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbqut-0001iU-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 10:10:39 -0700
X-Sender: deering@cheerios.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v03102800afc48c3c297e@[171.69.116.90]>
In-Reply-To: <01BC764A.243A76C0@christian.icast.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 10:10:36 -0700
To: Christian McMillan <chris@icast.com>
From: Steve Deering <deering@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: VIC q-factor
Cc: "rem-conf@es.net" <rem-conf@es.net>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

At 9:30 AM -0700 6/11/97, Christian McMillan wrote:
> ICAST Corporation's servers (encoders really) run on Win 95, NT 4.0 and
> Unix Free BSD. (Solaris 2.x soon).
>
> The Channel viewer and guide (SD) run on Win 95, NT 4.0 and also as
> plug-in's for Navigator and Explorer 3.0.

Sigh.  Let me know when you have a MacOS version.

Steve





From rem-conf Wed Jun 11 19:47:54 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 11 19:47:53 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wbzrE-0004H2-00; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 19:43:28 -0700
Message-Id: <199706120243.TAA27651@tikal.synopsys.com>
To: baylisa@baylisa.org, rem-conf@es.net, sage-members@usenix.org
Cc: bigmac@baylisa.org
Subject: BayLISA June 19: Robert Harker on Sendmail
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 19:43:23 -0700
From: Bryan McDonald <bigmac@synopsys.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


The BayLISA group meets monthly to discuss topics of interest to systems
and network administrators.  The meetings are free and open to the public.
Please feel free to redistribute this meeting announcement.
 
BayLISA holds monthly meetings on the third Thursday of each month at
7:30 PM PST.  We meet at Cisco Building J in San Jose, on Tasman Drive near
First street. See www.baylisa.org for more information.  The meetings are also
broadcast via MBONE.

Schedule
--------

June 19, 1997: Robert Harker, Sendmail

[Schedule subject to change]
 
For further information on BayLISA, check out our web site:
http://www.baylisa.org/
 
To get further information on the meeting location, you can also ftp it from
 
        ftp.baylisa.org:/BayLISA/location
 
For any other information, please send email to:
 
        info@baylisa.org
 
If you have any questions, please contact me or the info alias listed above.

===============================================================================
Bryan McDonald                                          bigmac@baylisa.org
President						president@baylisa.org
BayLISA							http://www.baylisa.org
===============================================================================



From rem-conf Thu Jun 12 07:53:38 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 12 07:53:38 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wcB8c-0006TI-00; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 07:46:10 -0700
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: RTP Payload Format for H.263 Video Streams to 
         Proposed Standard
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:26:40 -0400
Sender: scoya@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9706121026.aa11053@ietf.org>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list



  The IESG has approvedRTP Payload Format for H.263 Video Streams
  <draft-ietf-avt-rtp-payload-03.txt>  for publication as a Proposed
  Standard.This document is the product of the Audio/Video Transport
  Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Allyn Romanow and Scott
  Bradner.


Technical Summary

This document descibes a scheme for packetizing an H.263 video stream
for transport using the Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP, RFC1889).
H.263 video coding for low bitrate communication is defined by ITU-T
Recommendation H.263 and is widely used for video teleconferencing.
It builds on H.261, offering more options and a compressed encoding
which is more supportive of lower bitrates.

Three modes are defined for the H.263 payload header. An RTP packet
can use one of the three modes for H.263 video streams depending on
the desired network packet size and H.263 encoding options employed.
The shortest H.263 payload header (mode A) supports fragmentation at
Group of Block (GOB) boundaries. The long H.263 payload headers (mode
Ba dn C) support fragmentation at Macroblock (MB) boundaries.

Working Group Summary

There was no debate or controversy in the working group.


Protocol Quality

This document was reviewed for the IESG by Allyn Romanow.



From rem-conf Fri Jun 13 07:26:48 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 13 07:26:47 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wcX0c-00052r-00; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 07:07:22 -0700
Message-ID: <19970613110704.33509@mscs.cs.dal.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 11:07:04 -0300
From: Trent MacDougall <trent@cs.dal.ca>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: 11th Annual Canadian Internet Conference
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

        MBone Broadcast Announcement
        ----------------------------

Title:
	11th Annual Canadian Internet Conference: Net '97

Date:
        June 22-25, 1997

Time:
	0900 AST Daily (starting June 23)

Contact:
	Trent.MacDougall@Dal.Ca

URL:
	http://net97.dal.ca

Description:
Canada's foremost Internet experts will meet at Dalhousie on June 22-25
for Net '97, the 11th Annual Canadian Internet Conference.

Net'97 brings together the pioneers of the Internet, and touches on the
latest issues in large-scale networking.  Topics include telemedicine,
community net software, the most recent news in videoconferncing and
Internet "multicasting" as well as results from the latest Internet user
survey.

Other Net '97 highlights include a presentation by Nick Ketchum on CRTC's
perspective on policy development, and an update on CA*Net II -- the
beginning of a new Internet backbone specifically for research and 
education.



From rem-conf Fri Jun 13 10:28:02 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 13 10:28:01 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wcZof-000110-00; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:07:13 -0700
From: Richard Gallup <rpg@SDSC.EDU>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:07:08 -0700
Message-Id: <199706131707.KAA01586@solomon>
To: mbone@isi.edu, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Mbone broadcast of President Clinton's USCD Commencement Address
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


UC San Diego and the San Diego Supercomputer Center to Present
Live Broadcast of President Clinton's Commencement Address.

On Saturday, June 14, 1997, President William Jefferson Clinton will
deliver the keynote address at the commencement ceremonies of the
University of California, San Diego (UCSD).  SDSC is providing the
enabling technology to broadcast President Clinton's address on the
Multicast Backbone (Mbone).

According to the White House Press Secretary Michael McCurry,
President Clinton will discuss the diversity of the American people, 
and will talk specifically about how to reconcile antagonisms between 
races and bring people together in one America to use diversity to 
make progress in the 21st century.

The Mbone broadcast will air from 9 a.m. to noon Pacific Standard
Time, and President Clinton's speech is slated to begin at about 
10 a.m.  

The commencement address will also be available live on the Internet
at http://www.ucsd.edu/commencement . More than 6,000 people will be
able to simultaneously view the Webcast. Viewers may choose to access
audio only or audio and video. The Webcast will use a new platform
called RealVideo which has been created by Progressive Networks.  This
platform provides live video for any user who has a connection to the
Internet and a 28.8 modem or higher.  Users will simply need to 
download free software from RealVideo.  A link is provided from the 
UC San Diego commencement Web site.

The SDR session will be announced as:

	"President Clinton's UCSD Commencement Address"


Richard Gallup --



From rem-conf Fri Jun 13 12:10:51 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 13 12:10:50 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wcbcE-0001jT-00; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:02:30 -0700
From: Mark Handley <mjh@east.isi.edu>
X-Organisation: Information Sciences Institute, USC
X-Phone: +1 617 253 6011
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: broken ICAST session announcements
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:01:21 -0400
Message-ID: <2303.866228481@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: mjh@buttle.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


It doesn't seem like anyone at ICAST reads their mail, so I'm sending
to the list instead....


Just in case anyone is wondering why they can't join various sessions,
or the calendar in sdr has stopped working; the reason is that ICAST
seem to be making session announcements with a broken session
directory tool.

Four obvious things show up:

- a media format of "RTP/AVP H261" which should read "RTP/AVP 31" (the
  payload type of H.261 is 31).  Also "RTP/AVP PCM" which should read
  "RTP/AVP 0".  Thus valid session directories shouldn't let you join
  these sessions.

- a repeat interval of 0 seconds!  This is what is causing sdr's
  calendar to break.  I've a fix in sdr 2.4 but don't want to release
  this yet until I've finished the SIP code.

- a protocol of RTP/SRM.  There is no RTP profile for SRM so this is
  invalid.

- an attribute of "datarate".  SDP has a perfectly usable bandwidth
  field, so no new attribute is required for this.

Perhaps someone at ICAST could fix their directory, or simply stop
using it until it is fixed.

Thanks,
	Mark





From rem-conf Fri Jun 13 13:50:02 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 13 13:50:01 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wcdF6-0002RG-00; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 13:46:44 -0700
Message-ID: <33A1B196.5340@icast.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 13:46:14 -0700
From: Vinay Kumar <vinay@icast.com>
Reply-To: vinay@icast.com
Organization: ICAST Corp
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Handley <mjh@east.isi.edu>
CC: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: broken ICAST session announcements
References: <2303.866228481@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

mark,
thank you for being impatient. all the stuff you mentioned have been
fixed (almost)..:) we are testing the fix's. thank you for your earlier
msg's, some of us are reading'em...:)
---
 vinay

Mark Handley wrote:
> 
> It doesn't seem like anyone at ICAST reads their mail, so I'm sending
> to the list instead....
> 
> Just in case anyone is wondering why they can't join various sessions,
> or the calendar in sdr has stopped working; the reason is that ICAST
> seem to be making session announcements with a broken session
> directory tool.
> 
> Four obvious things show up:
> 
> - a media format of "RTP/AVP H261" which should read "RTP/AVP 31" (the
>   payload type of H.261 is 31).  Also "RTP/AVP PCM" which should read
>   "RTP/AVP 0".  Thus valid session directories shouldn't let you join
>   these sessions.
> 
> - a repeat interval of 0 seconds!  This is what is causing sdr's
>   calendar to break.  I've a fix in sdr 2.4 but don't want to release
>   this yet until I've finished the SIP code.
> 
> - a protocol of RTP/SRM.  There is no RTP profile for SRM so this is
>   invalid.
> 
> - an attribute of "datarate".  SDP has a perfectly usable bandwidth
>   field, so no new attribute is required for this.
> 
> Perhaps someone at ICAST could fix their directory, or simply stop
> using it until it is fixed.
> 
> Thanks,
>         Mark



From rem-conf Fri Jun 13 18:17:18 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 13 18:17:17 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wch2U-00057s-00; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 17:49:58 -0700
Message-Id: <199706140049.RAA11465@tikal.synopsys.com>
To: baylisa@baylisa.org, rem-conf@es.net, sage-members@usenix.org
Cc: bigmac@baylisa.org
Subject: BayLISA June 19: Robert Harker on LDAP and Sendmail 8.8
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 17:49:49 -0700
From: Bryan McDonald <bigmac@synopsys.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


The BayLISA group meets monthly to discuss topics of interest to systems
and network administrators.  The meetings are free and open to the public.
Please feel free to redistribute this meeting announcement.
 
BayLISA holds monthly meetings on the third Thursday of each month at
7:30 PM PST.  We meet at Cisco Building J in San Jose, on Tasman Drive near
First street. See www.baylisa.org for more information.  The meetings are also
broadcast via MBONE.

Schedule
========

June 19, 1997: Robert Harker, LDAP and Sendmail 8.8


	"Lightwight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is currently one of
	the buzz words used by the Internet software providers.  It is
	touted as the solution to all of you information directory needs. 
	The problem is that not very many people know about it much less
	how an organization can use it, much less how to impliment and
	deploy it.
 
	This talk is an introduction to what LDAP is and how to use it. 
	It is based on my studies of using LDAP with sendmail 8.8."

[Schedule subject to change]
 
For further information on BayLISA, check out our web site:
http://www.baylisa.org/
 
To get further information on the meeting location, you can also ftp it from
 
        ftp.baylisa.org:/BayLISA/location
 
For any other information, please send email to:
 
        info@baylisa.org
 
If you have any questions, please contact me or the info alias listed above.

===============================================================================
Bryan McDonald                                          bigmac@baylisa.org
President						president@baylisa.org
BayLISA							http://www.baylisa.org
===============================================================================



From rem-conf Mon Jun 16 08:21:19 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 16 08:21:18 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wddEu-0005Er-00; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 07:58:40 -0700
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 10:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: kevin@cc.gatech.edu (Kevin C. Almeroth)
Message-Id: <199706161458.KAA29963@grinch.cc.gatech.edu>
To: kevin@cc.gatech.edu
Subject: Sessions on the IMJ
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

This e-mail is going out to a number of lists, and I cringe to do
it, but it is relevant to all...

I'm ready to announce that many of the sessions from the Memphis IETF
that were MBoned are now available on the IMJ (http://imj.gatech.edu)
for on-demand playback...  AVT, MMUSIC, IDMR, MBONED, TCPSAT, and
the multicast WWW BOF.  You can schedule programs via the WWW page and
start the MBone sessions via SDR (or the WWW page with a simple plug-in).

Other encoded sessions are forthcoming, but the turmoil of graduation, 
moving, etc might delay others.  (If anyone has a real interest in seeing 
something else in the very near future, please send me e-mail.)  In the 
future, I hope to have the sessions available much more rapidly.

Updates:  and just for those interested...  the imj has changed machines, 
but imj.gatech.edu moved with it.  Also MBone routing on campus has been
slightly upgraded (Solaris plus 3.9) so hopefully we'll be able to
avoid the memory leaks of 4.1.3.  Also, the volume problem on all the
new stuff should be fixed (thanks to an audio mixer),  and there is a
new section for oldies-but-goodies.

Finally, and as usual, I've included the originial IMJ e-mail 
announcement for those who haven't seen it.

Any suggestions for improvement are welcome.

-Kevin

              Announcing the Interactive Multimedia Jukebox


   At one point on the MBone list there was a discussion of what on-demand
servers exist or are being developed.  Well, I'd like to announce our 
version called the Interactive Multimedia Jukebox (IMJ).

  The IMJ web page is a request and scheduling interface for the playout 
of content over the MBone.  CONTENT IS ENCODED SO THAT IT CAN BE RECEIVED
WITH THE LATEST VERSIONS OF VIC AND VAT (ANY PLATFORM).

   The IMJ page is located at http://imj.gatech.edu.  Information about 
the IMJ including general info, a postscript version of a paper about the 
IMJ, how-to-use information, and how it was implemented can be found at 
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/computing/Telecomm/IMJ/.

   Some quick additional information about the IMJ is included below:


IMJ Audio/Video
-----------------
   The IMJ uses the WWW to submit requests which are then scheduled
for playout on the MBone.  Right now we are offering three channels:
Channels 1 and 2 are being broadcast at a TTL of 127.  Channel 3 is
for internal testing and has a a TTL of 15.  Each channel provides 
DVI-2 audio and 128 Kbps H.261 video.  The encoding was done using 
Henning Schulzrinne's rtpplay and rtpdump.

Scheduling
----------
   Program scheduling uses a set of criteria to decide on which channel
to schedule a program.  The current set of criteria are listed just
below the interactive schedule.  We are exploring lots of different
options.

Content
-------
   We have been working on the jukebox paradigm with Turner Broadcasting,
and as a result of their interest they have agreed to let us broadcast
content on the MBone.  I am particularly excited about this aspect because
of their help and interest in investigating new applications on the Internet.

   The plan is to add a new set of content about every two weeks.  When this 
happens, the old content will be moved to the secondary request menu for two 
weeks.  The old-old stuff will be removed.  Hopefully I'll be able to 
advertise on the MBone list when the new stuff is available.

Development Platform
--------------------
   As is mentioned in the paper on the IMJ information page we are using
the IMJ as a platform for a variety of research issues including
providing interactivity, supporting multiple heterogeneous streams,
video server organization, tracking usage, program scheduling, and
pricing.

Acknowledgments
----------------
   In addition to Turner Broadcasting, several other groups have made the
IMJ possible.  The GT Broadband Telecommunications Center sponsored much 
of the research and some of the equipment, and GT Office of Information 
Technology offered technical assistance and additional equipment.


Please send me any feedback or suggestions.  Thanks.

-Kevin Almeroth



From rem-conf Tue Jun 17 07:21:14 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Tue Jun 17 07:21:13 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wdyv9-00057t-00; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:07:43 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 14:54:31 +0100
From: annemari@mcg.gla.ac.uk (Anne Marie Fleming)
Message-Id: <199706171354.OAA10019@kestrel.mcg.gla.ac.uk>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Vic and high frame rates
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


Hi folks,

Has anyone had any trouble running vic at a high frame rate?

We are attempting to run Vic (v2.8) on a dedicated network between two Sun sparc 20's 
running solaris 2.5.1. The two machines seem to have difficulty when they are 
both attempting to send and receive at approx 25 - 30 fps with a loss rate of about 70-80%. 
When we run two separate vics on each machine - one to transmit and the other to receive, the
problem evaporates and both machines can cope with sending and receiving 25 - 30 fps with 
little or no loss.

We would prefer not to be running multiple versions of vic so if anyone has any ideas ......

thanks

annemari
=============================================================================
                                Anne Marie Fleming
				              email: annemari@mcg.gla.ac.uk
Multimedia Communications Group           www url: http://www.mcg.gla.ac.uk/
University of Glasgow                                  Tel:  +44 41 330 5424
52 Hillhead Street                                     Fax:  +44 41 339 8889
Glasgow G12 8QB                                         Telex: 777070 UNIGLA
=============================================================================




From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 01:51:54 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 01:51:53 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weGHi-0001dx-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 01:40:10 -0700
Message-Id: <199706180839.KAA03879@renoir.uio.no>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Vic and harware compression (O2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:39:28 +0200
From: Frank J|rgen Solem <f.j.solem@usit.uio.no>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


As far as i know, the SGI O2 has some hardware for h.261 compression, but 
I don't think the normal vic distribution uses this hardware compression. 
Are there anyone who has used the h.261 hardware compression with vic on 
an O2? I assume this might decrease bandwith and increase quality, 
especially if the O2 has motion detection.

Are there any (other) workstations where vic might use h.261 hardware 
compression, either natively or with some optional hardware?

-- 
Frank Solem
University of Oslo                          Ph: +47 2285 2478
Center for Information Technology Services





From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 03:51:43 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 03:51:43 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weIGy-0002Al-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 03:47:32 -0700
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
From: Piers O'Hanlon <P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Organisation: MultiMedia Support and Comms Centre, University College London,Uk
Phone: +44 171 636 8333 ext 3056 (Hang on in there...)
X-url: http://www.avc.ucl.ac.uk
To: Frank J|rgen Solem <f.j.solem@usit.uio.no>
cc: rem-conf@es.net, P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Vic and harware compression (O2)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:39:28 +0200." <199706180839.KAA03879@renoir.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:35:13 +0100
Message-ID: <1750.866630113@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> 
> As far as i know, the SGI O2 has some hardware for h.261 compression, but 
> I don't think the normal vic distribution uses this hardware compression. 
> Are there anyone who has used the h.261 hardware compression with vic on 
> an O2? I assume this might decrease bandwith and increase quality, 
> especially if the O2 has motion detection.
> 
As I understand vic - It only uses Intra-H261 (ie only Intra coded frames with 
conditional(only send those above a threshold of change) replenishment) which 
means there would be no advantage gained from motion detection or prediction 
done in hardware, though the accelerated DCT would make a difference - Though 
I guess it depends on how configurable the hardware is and whether it allows 
much control of the encoding process so one could get it to generate H261 
usable by vic.

Although one could probably use H261 straight from hardware it is usually H261 
suitable for low loss ISDN type links, which when sent over [lossy] packet 
nets would grow nasty holes due to its dependence on prediction and motion 
detection. see
ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/vic-mm95.ps.Z
 
> Are there any (other) workstations where vic might use h.261 hardware 
> compression, either natively or with some optional hardware?
>
There was talk of using the Bitfield (http://www.bitfield.fi) EISA hardware 
codec in vic but I don't think it was done - possibly due to lack of access to 
useful H261.

Anyway it would be interesting to hear about hardware used.

Piers O'Hanlon
______________

MultiMedia Support and Comms Centre
University College London.





From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 06:57:13 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 06:57:12 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weL6O-0002pF-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 06:48:48 -0700
Message-Id: <199706181348.PAA17871@ganymede.cdt.luth.se>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: Piers O'Hanlon <P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Vic and harware compression (O2)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:35:13 BST." <1750.866630113@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 15:48:30 +0200
From: Hakan Lennestal <hakanl@cdt.luth.se>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

In message <1750.866630113@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, "Piers O'Hanlon" writes:

> means there would be no advantage gained from motion detection or predi=
ction=20
> done in hardware, though the accelerated DCT would make a difference - =
Though

There used to be an option (maybe it's still there ?) in vic to use
the jpeg DCT in the SunVideo hardware when encoding h.261.

/H=E5kan




From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 07:47:11 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 07:47:11 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weLw6-0003Fs-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 07:42:14 -0700
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
From: Piers O'Hanlon <P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Organisation: MultiMedia Support and Comms Centre, University College London,Uk
Phone: +44 171 636 8333 ext 3056 (Hang on in there...)
X-url: http://www.avc.ucl.ac.uk
To: Hakan Lennestal <hakanl@cdt.luth.se>
cc: Piers O'Hanlon <P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: Vic and harware compression (O2)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 1997 15:48:30 +0200." <199706181348.PAA17871@ganymede.cdt.luth.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 15:41:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2831.866644917@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: P.OHanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> =

> > means there would be no advantage gained from motion detection or pre=
diction =

> > done in hardware, though the accelerated DCT would make a difference =
- Though
> =

> There used to be an option (maybe it's still there ?) in vic to use
> the jpeg DCT in the SunVideo hardware when encoding h.261.
> =

It is there. It seemed to come from Steve McCanne and Elan Amir's vgw pro=
gram:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~elan/vgw/README.html
Although I have encountered the odd bit of wierdness with it - The receiv=
ed =

stream doesn't seem to be decoded if the receiving vic is started after t=
he =

transmitter has been started (with 'Use JPEG for H261' on sunvideo).


Piers O'Hanlon
______________

MultiMedia Support and Comms Centre
University College London.





From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 08:46:15 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 08:46:15 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weMtR-0003tW-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 08:43:33 -0700
From: Biersack Ernst <Ernst.Biersack@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 17:45:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199706181545.RAA16733@lilie.eurecom.fr>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: SIGCOMM 97 final program
Cc: erbi@alpes.eurecom.fr
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


The annual ACM SIGCOMM 97 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures 
and Protocols for Computer Communication will take place from September 14 to 18
in Cannes, France.

There are many good reasons why you should attend:

An outstanding technical program comprising
	- Tutorials: Sunday September 14 and Monday September 15 
	- Conference: Tuesday September 16 to Thursday (morning) September 18

A superb social program with:
	- Wine and cheese tasting: Monday September 15, 18:00 to 21:00
	- Pool session: Tuesday September 16, 19:00 to 22:00 around the Hotel 
		Majestic  pool

Workshops right after the conference:
	- Internet Simulations with the NS simulator: Thursday (afternoon) September 18
	- Reliable Multicast Meeting: Friday and Saturday September 19-20

Student travel Grants (application deadline July 1st !!)



Register now!!  (Early registration rates until August 1st)
For more information and the registrations forms see:

http://www.inria.fr/rodeo/sigcomm97/


Ernst Biersack
(SIGCOMM 97 publicity chair)



From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 20:44:27 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 20:44:27 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weY2H-0006oe-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 20:37:25 -0700
From: Alan Batie <batie@agora.rdrop.com>
Message-Id: <199706190337.UAA28307@agora.rdrop.com>
Subject: Re: BayLISA June 19: Robert Harker on Sendmail
To: bigmac@synopsys.com (Bryan McDonald)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 20:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: baylisa@baylisa.org, rem-conf@es.net, sage-members@usenix.org, 
    bigmac@baylisa.org
In-Reply-To: <199706120243.TAA27651@tikal.synopsys.com> from "Bryan McDonald" at Jun 11, 97 07:43:23 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

> June 19, 1997: Robert Harker, Sendmail

I would have tuned in, but the channel information was nowhere to be found...

-- 
Alan Batie                   ______      It's not my fault!  It's some guy
batie@agora.rdrop.com        \    /      named "General Protection"!
+1 503 452-0960               \  /       --Ratbert
PGP FP: DE 3C 29 17 C0 49      \/        7A 27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9

It is my policy to avoid purchase of any products from companies which
use unrequested email advertisements or telephone solicitation.



From rem-conf Wed Jun 18 21:04:36 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Wed Jun 18 21:04:36 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weYRc-0007At-00; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 21:03:36 -0700
Message-Id: <199706190403.VAA22063@tikal.synopsys.com>
To: baylisa@baylisa.org, rem-conf@es.net, sage-members@usenix.org
Cc: bigmac@baylisa.org
Subject: BayLISA June 19: Robert Harker on LDAP and Sendmail 8.8
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 21:03:33 -0700
From: Bryan McDonald <bigmac@synopsys.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list


          ===Last reminder about tomorrow nights talk.===

The BayLISA group meets monthly to discuss topics of interest to systems
and network administrators.  The meetings are free and open to the public.
Please feel free to redistribute this meeting announcement.
 
BayLISA holds monthly meetings on the third Thursday of each month at
7:30 PM PST.  We meet at Cisco Building J in San Jose, on Tasman Drive near
First street. See www.baylisa.org for more information.  The meetings are also
broadcast via MBONE.

Schedule
========

June 19, 1997: Robert Harker, LDAP and Sendmail 8.8


	"Lightwight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is currently one of
	the buzz words used by the Internet software providers.  It is
	touted as the solution to all of you information directory needs. 
	The problem is that not very many people know about it much less
	how an organization can use it, much less how to impliment and
	deploy it.
 
	This talk is an introduction to what LDAP is and how to use it. 
	It is based on my studies of using LDAP with sendmail 8.8."

[Schedule subject to change]
 
For further information on BayLISA, check out our web site:
http://www.baylisa.org/
 
To get further information on the meeting location, you can also ftp it from
 
        ftp.baylisa.org:/BayLISA/location
 
For any other information, please send email to:
 
        info@baylisa.org
 
If you have any questions, please contact me or the info alias listed above.

===============================================================================
Bryan McDonald                                          bigmac@baylisa.org
President						president@baylisa.org
BayLISA							http://www.baylisa.org
===============================================================================



From rem-conf Thu Jun 19 00:39:14 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 19 00:39:13 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0webjG-0000gR-00; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:34:02 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706190733.AAA16548@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: jyluke <jyluke@ew.mimos.my>
Reply-to: jyluke@ew.mimos.my
Subject: Keynote and Plenary for INET 97 1st Session
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	Keynote and Plenary for INET 97 1st Session
Date:        
	Jun 25, 1997

Time:        
	08:30 GMT+8 2 hours

Contact:     
	jyluke@ew.mimos.my

URL:         
	http://www.isoc.org/inet97/

Description:        
	ISOC's INET 97 will be held in Kuala Lumpur this year.  There will be three prenary sessions to be held from  25/6 to 27/6.









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Thu Jun 19 00:39:16 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 19 00:39:16 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0weblG-0000gs-00; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:36:06 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706190735.AAA16579@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: jyluke <jyluke@ew.mimos.my>
Reply-to: jyluke@ew.mimos.my
Subject: Keynote and Plenary for INET 97 - 2nd Day
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	Keynote and Plenary for INET 97 - 2nd Day
Date:        
	Jun 26, 1997

Time:        
	08:30 GMT+8 2 hours

Contact:     
	jyluke@ew.mimos.my

URL:         
	http://www.isoc.org/inet97/

Description:        
	This is the 2nd day of INET 97 held in Kuala Lumpur.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Thu Jun 19 00:41:49 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Thu Jun 19 00:41:48 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0webo5-0000hK-00; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:39:01 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706190738.AAA16610@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: jyluke <jyluke@ew.mimos.my>
Reply-to: jyluke@ew.mimos.my
Subject: Closing Plenary for INET 97
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	Closing Plenary for INET 97
Date:        
	Jun 27, 1997

Time:        
	10:00 GMT8 2 hours

Contact:     
	jyluke@ew.mimos.my

URL:         
	http://www.isoc.org/inet97/

Description:        
	The last session for the INET 97 conference.   The actual starting time will be 10:30am (GMT8) and   will end at 12:30pm (GMT8).









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Fri Jun 20 11:43:45 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 20 11:43:44 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wf8NG-0007Os-00; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 11:25:30 -0700
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 11:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706201822.LAA06253@geoplex.geoplex.com>
From: "Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: tunnels/mrouted
Reply-to: dino@geoplex.com
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Hello,

is it true that in the current implementation of mrouted (3.8.2) and
corresponding multicast support (i.e. 3.5+ in Solaris), tunnels are
not treated the same way as interfaces? In particular, is it the case
that the multicast router on one side of a tunnel will forward all the
multicast data through the tunnel even though there may be no
multicast group participants, for (most of) the multicast data
forwarded, on the other side of the tunnel? I am lead to these
questions by my understanding that kernel does not keep the list of
multicast groups associated with a tunnel, while it does for a physint.

I also believe I understand correctly that the DVMRP V3 will treat
physints and tunnels identically, implying that multicast data would
not be forwarded on a tunnel unless there are participants on the
other side. Is this the case?

Thanks.

	-Dino

-- 
               _ ,
EDIN "DINO" HODZIC, AT&T 
phone: 408-576-1370
address: 2665 N. 1ST St. #300, San Jose, CA 95134
mailto:dino@geoplex.com, mailto:ehodzic@scu.edu
http://pcsel10.scu.edu/~ehodzic




From rem-conf Fri Jun 20 19:57:53 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Fri Jun 20 19:57:51 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wfGGp-0001JZ-00; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 19:51:23 -0700
Message-Id: <199706210250.TAA05858@mailhost.Ipsilon.COM>
To: dino@geoplex.com
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jun 1997 11:22:21 PDT." <199706201822.LAA06253@geoplex.geoplex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 19:50:36 -0700
From: "Danny J. Mitzel" <mitzel@Ipsilon.COM>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

>> is it true that in the current implementation of mrouted (3.8.2) and
>> corresponding multicast support (i.e. 3.5+ in Solaris), tunnels are
>> not treated the same way as interfaces? In particular, is it the case
>> that the multicast router on one side of a tunnel will forward all the
>> multicast data through the tunnel even though there may be no
>> multicast group participants, for (most of) the multicast data
>> forwarded, on the other side of the tunnel? I am lead to these
>> questions by my understanding that kernel does not keep the list of
>> multicast groups associated with a tunnel, while it does for a physint.

dvmrp forwards packets on an interface if any of the following 
conditions hold for the packet <source, group>:
  1) there are downstream dependent dvmrp routers for the source
  2) there are local group members

tunnels do not allow local group membership, thus condition (2) is
always FALSE.  so forwarding over a tunnel is completely dependent
on condition (1), and prune/graft works exactly as on any physical
interface.

>> I also believe I understand correctly that the DVMRP V3 will treat
>> physints and tunnels identically, implying that multicast data would
>> not be forwarded on a tunnel unless there are participants on the
>> other side. Is this the case?

DVMRPv3 states that IGMP packets (DVMRP probe/route/prune/graft) should be
sent ip-in-ip encapsulated, just like forwarded data packets.  in the current
model the IGMP packets are unicasted directly to the tunnel remote endpoint.
I believe this is primarily a hack to allow firewall configurations to
only open one hole between the tunnel endpoints, rather than two.  anyways,
it again has no effect on dvmrp prune/graft behaviour.

cheers,
danny




From rem-conf Sun Jun 22 14:13:29 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Sun Jun 22 14:13:28 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wftc0-00070G-00; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 13:51:52 -0700
To: dino@geoplex.com
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jun 97 11:22:21 PDT." <199706201822.LAA06253@geoplex.geoplex.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 13:51:31 PDT
Sender: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <97Jun22.135136pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

"Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com> wrote:
>In particular, is it the case
>that the multicast router on one side of a tunnel will forward all the
>multicast data through the tunnel even though there may be no
>multicast group participants, for (most of) the multicast data
>forwarded, on the other side of the tunnel?

It is true that mrouted does not keep a list of multicast group
memberships for tunnels, but that is because it's not possible to
have a group membership on a tunnel (in the current implementation
of tunnels).

However, a neighbor relationship with a peer over a tunnel acts just
like a neighbor relationship with a peer over a normal interface;
packets are only forwarded over the tunnel if the peer has built up
the forwarding tree for the packet's source with a poison-reverse
route update, and if the peer has not pruned the group.  On a normal
interface, packets can *also* be forwarded if there is a group
member on that interface, but that is completely independent of the
presence of a neighbor who has built the forwarding tree; mrouted
will forward a packet if either condition is true.

>I also believe I understand correctly that the DVMRP V3 will treat
>physints and tunnels identically, implying that multicast data would
>not be forwarded on a tunnel unless there are participants on the
>other side. Is this the case?

DVMRP has always treated neighbors on physical interfaces and tunnels
identically.  DVMRPv3 does not change anything in this respect.

  Bill



From rem-conf Sun Jun 22 22:13:40 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Sun Jun 22 22:13:39 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg1Mx-0000Vl-00; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 22:08:51 -0700
Message-Id: <199706230406.OAA03644@sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr>
To: "rem-conf@es.net" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: Reservation Session
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 97 14:04:57 -0500
From: Jong Kuk Lee <jklee@sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr>
X-Mailer: E-Mail Connection v2.5.03
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

Hello. 
I'm a member of Mbone-kr (Korean mbone group).
& a chief of Dept Mbone-kr Broadcasting 
I reserve a session. 
Session Name is "KR-Net'97 Workshop".
This workshop is a Greatest workshop of Internet in Korea.
This Workshop is broadcasted from 30.June to 2.July, ( During 3 Days ).
I will announce exactly this session after 3 days.
See you later.



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 04:29:30 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 23 04:29:30 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg7D3-0001bh-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:23:01 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706231121.EAA18954@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: sixvideo <sixvideo@si.ehu.es>
Reply-to: sixvideo@si.ehu.es
Subject: XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque 
         Country - Spain)
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque Country - Spain)
Date:        
	Jul 01, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 GMT+2 5 hours

Contact:     
	sixvideo@si.ehu.es

URL:         
	http://www.sc.ehu.es/scrwwwsu/c1.htm

Description:        
	 Course:"NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A PRINCIPLES            AND          PARAMETERS PERSPECTIVE"    Description: This course presents a general   overview of language processing based on the   Chomskyan model of principles and parameters.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 04:29:41 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 23 04:29:41 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg7Gu-0001cS-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:27:00 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706231125.EAA18981@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: sixvideo <sixvideo@si.ehu.es>
Reply-to: sixvideo@si.ehu.es
Subject: XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque 
         Country - Spain)
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque Country - Spain)
Date:        
	Jul 02, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 GMT+2 5 hours

Contact:     
	sixvideo@si.ehu.es

URL:         
	http://www.sc.ehu.es/scrwwwsu/c1.htm

Description:        
	 Course:"NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A PRINCIPLES            AND          PARAMETERS PERSPECTIVE"    Description: This course presents a general   overview of language processing based on the   Chomskyan model of principles and parameters.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 04:29:44 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 23 04:29:43 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg7H3-0001cW-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:27:09 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706231126.EAA19008@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: sixvideo <sixvideo@si.ehu.es>
Reply-to: sixvideo@si.ehu.es
Subject: XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque 
         Country - Spain) Day 2
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque Country - Spain) Day 2
Date:        
	Jul 02, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 GMT+2 5 hours

Contact:     
	sixvideo@si.ehu.es

URL:         
	http://www.sc.ehu.es/scrwwwsu/c1.htm

Description:        
	 Course:"NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A PRINCIPLES            AND          PARAMETERS PERSPECTIVE"    Description: This course presents a general   overview of language processing based on the   Chomskyan model of principles and parameters.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 04:30:21 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 23 04:30:21 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg7Hd-0001ci-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:27:45 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706231126.EAA19035@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: sixvideo <sixvideo@si.ehu.es>
Reply-to: sixvideo@si.ehu.es
Subject: XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque 
         Country - Spain) Day 3
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque Country - Spain) Day 3
Date:        
	Jul 03, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 GMT+2 5 hours

Contact:     
	sixvideo@si.ehu.es

URL:         
	http://www.sc.ehu.es/scrwwwsu/c1.htm

Description:        
	 Course:"NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A PRINCIPLES            AND          PARAMETERS PERSPECTIVE"    Description: This course presents a general   overview of language processing based on the   Chomskyan model of principles and parameters.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 04:31:36 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 23 04:31:36 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg7Iq-0001d1-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:29:00 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 04:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706231128.EAA19062@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: sixvideo <sixvideo@si.ehu.es>
Reply-to: sixvideo@si.ehu.es
Subject: XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque 
         Country - Spain) Day 4
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	XVI Summer School/IX European Courses (The University of the Basque Country - Spain) Day 4
Date:        
	Jul 04, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 GMT+2 5 hours

Contact:     
	sixvideo@si.ehu.es

URL:         
	http://www.sc.ehu.es/scrwwwsu/c1.htm

Description:        
	 Course:"NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A PRINCIPLES            AND          PARAMETERS PERSPECTIVE"    Description: This course presents a general   overview of language processing based on the   Chomskyan model of principles and parameters.  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 06:44:44 1997 
From rem-conf-request@tmpmail.es.net Mon Jun 23 06:44:43 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wg9NY-0003sX-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 06:42:00 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 06:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706231341.GAA19282@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: multicast <multicast@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Reply-to: multicast@dxcoms.cern.ch
Subject: CERN LHCC
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	CERN LHCC
Date:        
	Jul 10, 1997

Time:        
	09:00 GMT+1 4 hours

Contact:     
	multicast@noc.cern.ch

URL:         
	http://sunmed2.cern.ch:8888/LHCC_10_07_97.html

Description:        
	 LARGE HADRON COLLIDER COMMITTEE Session          on Thursday 10 July      from the CERN Auditorium  









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 14:53:26 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 23 14:53:26 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgGrA-00067H-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:41:04 -0700
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706232137.OAA08563@geoplex.geoplex.com>
From: "Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com>
To: mitzel@Ipsilon.COM
CC: rem-conf@es.net, arlied@microsoft.com, fenner@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
Reply-to: dino@geoplex.com
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Thank you all for your replies. My understanding is incorrect, I guess,
because of the documentation I have been using. I have primarily
focused on the "TCP/IP Illustrated Volume 2" book by Steven's, which
describes an earlier version of multicast, and only gives hints about
the version 3.3. The earlier version had multicast routing table
which included source address only and not the group address, and
didn't support pruning. The latest version of multicast support
multicast routing cache, which is substantially different (I guess
because of pruning support).

I have downloaded 4.4BSD-Lite which implements pre-3.3 multicast, so
it does not help me much. Here are my new questions:

	- is there any documentation which describes the 3.5
	  multicast. In particular, the interface between the kernel
	  and mrouted, and the division of responsibilities between the
	  kernel and mrouted w.r.t. multicast routing and forwarding?

	- is there free BSD code I can take a look at in order to
	  understand multicast 3.5?

	- is there any documentation describing the implementation of
	  mrouted, other than its source code?

Again, thank you for replies and for your help.

Sincerely,

	Dino

-- 
               _ ,
EDIN "DINO" HODZIC, AT&T 
phone: 408-576-1370
address: 2665 N. 1ST St. #300, San Jose, CA 95134
mailto:dino@geoplex.com, mailto:ehodzic@scu.edu
http://pcsel10.scu.edu/~ehodzic




From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 15:06:43 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 23 15:06:42 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgHEi-0006Yn-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 15:05:24 -0700
From: sohraby@lucent.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 97 17:46:39 EDT
Original-From: kas1@hoserve.ho.lucent.com
Message-Id: <9706232146.AA01747@qc54.ho.lucent.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: IEEE Network Magazine: CALL FOR PAPERS
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list


IEEE Network Magazine Special Issue on PCS Network Management

Guest editors:
Yi-Bing Lin				Kazem Shoraby
Dept. Comp. Sci. & Info. Engr.		Lucent Technologies
National Chiao Tung University		Bell Laboratories, Room 3K-334
Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C.			101 Crawfords Corner Rd.
Fax: +886-35724176			Holmdel, NJ 07733  USA
liny@csie.nctu.edu.tw			Email: sohraby@lucent.com
					Voice: 908-949-0496
					Fax: 908-834-5906

Scope: 
Personal communications services (PCS) provide communication services 
anywhere, anytime, with anybody, and in any form. To implement these 
communications concepts, extremely sophisticated network management
which integrates many diverse technologies are required. This special 
issue focuses on the research and development of advanced PCS network 
management techniques. 
Concise, tutorially oriented reference of the state-of-the art or
original contributions related to the following topics are solicited:

- Small scale mobility (inter-system handover) management 
- Large scale mobility (roaming) management
- Security (privacy and authentication) management
- Multi-system interworking
- PCS database reliability
- Intelligent networks for PCS
- Network management for PCS data and multimedia applications 
- PCS transport network issues (Internet, PSTN, PSDN, ATM)
- Modeling of PCS network management (measurement, analysis, and simulation)

Authors are invited to submit postscript files of their papers to
liny@csie.nctu.edu.tw or sohraby@lucent.com.
Papers should not exceed twenty double 
spaced pages in length, excluding figures and diagrams. 

Submission deadline: October 25, 1997
Acceptance notification: February 25, 1998
Final manuscript due: April 25, 1998




From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 15:19:19 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 23 15:19:19 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgHOx-0006sp-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 15:15:59 -0700
To: dino@geoplex.com
cc: rem-conf@es.net, fenner@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Jun 97 14:37:27 PDT." <199706232137.OAA08563@geoplex.geoplex.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 15:14:22 PDT
Sender: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <97Jun23.151437pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

"Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com> wrote:
>	- is there any documentation which describes the 3.5
>	  multicast. In particular, the interface between the kernel
>	  and mrouted, and the division of responsibilities between the
>	  kernel and mrouted w.r.t. multicast routing and forwarding?

Not really.  The division is farily straightforward, though -- the
kernel forwards, mrouted makes the forwarding decision.  If the kernel
gets a packet for which it doesn't have a forwarding cache entry, it
asks mrouted to install a forwarding cache entry for it.  The kernel
has no state other than the forwarding cache that mrouted installs and
can't make any decisions on its own.

>	- is there free BSD code I can take a look at in order to
>	  understand multicast 3.5?

All of FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the 3.5 multicast code.
They are each available from ftp.<fill-in-the-blank>bsd.org .

>	- is there any documentation describing the implementation of
>	  mrouted, other than its source code?

Unfortunately, no.

  Bill



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 16:05:03 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 23 16:05:03 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgI9H-0007Wa-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:03:51 -0700
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706232300.QAA12080@geoplex.geoplex.com>
From: "Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
CC: rem-conf@es.net, fenner@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
Reply-to: dino@geoplex.com
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 1997 15:14:22 PDT, Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> said:

    Bill> "Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com> wrote:
    >> - is there any documentation which describes the 3.5
    >> multicast. In particular, the interface between the kernel
    >> and mrouted, and the division of responsibilities between the
    >> kernel and mrouted w.r.t. multicast routing and forwarding?

    Bill> Not really.  The division is farily straightforward, though -- the
    Bill> kernel forwards, mrouted makes the forwarding decision.  If the kernel
    Bill> gets a packet for which it doesn't have a forwarding cache entry, it
    Bill> asks mrouted to install a forwarding cache entry for it.  The kernel
    Bill> has no state other than the forwarding cache that mrouted installs and
    Bill> can't make any decisions on its own.

    >> - is there free BSD code I can take a look at in order to
    >> understand multicast 3.5?

    Bill> All of FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the 3.5 multicast code.
    Bill> They are each available from ftp.<fill-in-the-blank>bsd.org .

    >> - is there any documentation describing the implementation of
    >> mrouted, other than its source code?

    Bill> Unfortunately, no.

    Bill>   Bill

Bill, thank you very much for the prompt replies.

Is the DVMRP protocol, as implemented by the latest mrouted, described
by an RFC or internet draft? I know about the original RFC-1075, the
version one DVMRP, and draft-ietf-idmr-dvmrp-v3-04.txt, the version
three of the protocol. Is the version of DVMRP which multicast
3.5/mrouted implement much different from DVMRP V3?

Thanks.

	-Dino





From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 16:15:40 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 23 16:15:39 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgIJh-00007t-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:14:37 -0700
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To: dino@geoplex.com, fenner@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
Message-Id: <97Jun23.161428pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:14:21 PDT
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

>Is the version of DVMRP which multicast
>3.5/mrouted implement much different from DVMRP V3?

No.  The DVMRP v3 document is an attempt to codify mrouted's behavior
and clear up ambiguities.  mrouted 3.x follows the DVMRPv3 spec pretty
closely, and I'm pretty sure that mrouted 3.9-beta
(ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/net-research/ipmulti/beta-test/)
follows it exactly.

  Bill



From rem-conf Mon Jun 23 17:21:07 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 23 17:21:07 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgJIu-0000nl-00; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 17:17:52 -0700
Message-Id: <v03007800afd44ae6dde9@[128.102.80.46]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 17:22:53 +0100
To: rem-conf@tmpmail.es.net
From: Ursula Hawkins <uhawkins@mail.arc.nasa.gov>
Subject: NASA STS-94 Space Shuttle session
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list


NASA Ames Research Center is pleased to provide live coverage of NASA
STS-94 Microgravity Science Laboratory-1 as a service to the MBone
community.

Mission STS-94 Microgravity Science Laboratory-1 is the 23rd flight of
Columbia and the 85th mission flown since the start of the Space Shuttle
program in April 1981 conducted by NASA.  This is a reflight for the Space
Shuttle Columbia and reflight of the Microgravity Science Laboratory-1.  As
many of you will recall the original MSL-1 mission during STS-83 was
shortned.

The experiments and activities associated with STS-94 are a preview for the
work that will be performed on the International Space Station.

Official launch date is scheduled for July 1, 1997.

Duration of mission scheduled for 15days, 16hours, and 46minutes.


Questions or comments:
Mark Allard
mallard@mail.arc.nasa.gov
or
Ursula Hawkins
uhawkins@mail.arc.nasa.gov

Ursula Hawkins
Video/Audio Networks& Systems
Engineering Group (VANSEG)
M/S 233-10
(415)604-2443
uhawkins@mail.arc.nasa.gov





From rem-conf Tue Jun 24 04:07:09 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Jun 24 04:07:08 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgTJC-0003EZ-00; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 03:58:50 -0700
Sender: hummes@eurecom.fr
Message-ID: <33AFA76E.8B3@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 12:54:38 +0200
From: Jakob Hummes <hummes@eurecom.fr>
Organization: Eurecom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: MBone Tools and Java
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Hi,

I have some questions regarding the MBone tools; especially I'm
interested in an audio conferencing tool like vat.

I want to write a Java GUI for the MBone tools.  The GUI would be
written as components (JavaBeans) and such be part that may be assembled
into other applications.  Before I start I need more information about
some points.

0) Did anyone do already the work???
1) Are documented APIs for the tools available?  For which tools?
2) Since the GUI is normally written in Tcl/Tk, their interface to C/C++
may be taken as startpoint for the Java GUI layer.  Has the c/C++
implementation direct dependencies on the Tcl/Tk sources?
3) Are there any known traps I should be aware of?

TIA,
- Jakob
-- 
WORK:                          
Jakob Hummes                   
EURECOM                        
2229, route des Cretes         
B.P. 193                       
06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: (+33) (0)4 93 00 26 70     WWW: http://www.eurecom.fr/~hummes
Fax: (+33) (0)4 93 00 26 27



From rem-conf Tue Jun 24 10:16:22 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Jun 24 10:16:21 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgZ7G-0005ep-00; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 10:10:54 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using 
                          -f
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 10:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706241709.KAA20672@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: mmadrid <mmadrid@psc.edu>
Reply-to: mmadrid@psc.edu
Subject: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center: Crystallography Workshop
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center: Crystallography Workshop
Date:        
	Jun 25, 1997

Time:        
	15:30 GMT 1 hours

Contact:     
	mmadrid@psc.edu

URL:         
	http://www.psc.edu/biomed/workshops/wk-97/crys97/crys97.html

Description:        
	The Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center  will broadcast lectures  by Prof. William Furey and Prof. Randy Read   as they discuss PHASES and  Maximum likelihood structure refinement.  Workshop will also be broadcasted on Thursday and  Saturday morning.     Agenda and lecture notes, when available, can be   found at the above-mentioned URL.    









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Tue Jun 24 15:00:06 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Jun 24 15:00:05 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgdQe-0000BO-00; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 14:47:12 -0700
Message-Id: <199706242146.XAA26817@piraya.electrum.kth.se>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
Cc: dino@geoplex.com, rem-conf@es.net
From: Magnus Danielson <magda@it.kth.se>
Subject: Re: tunnels/mrouted
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Jun 1997 15:14:22 PDT"
References: <97Jun23.151437pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.06 on Emacs 19.34.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:46:54 +0200
Sender: e93_mda@drum.it.kth.se
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

>>>>> "BF" == Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> writes:

 BF> "Edin (Dino) Hodzic" <dino@geoplex.com> wrote:
 >> - is there any documentation which describes the 3.5
 >> multicast. In particular, the interface between the kernel
 >> and mrouted, and the division of responsibilities between the
 >> kernel and mrouted w.r.t. multicast routing and forwarding?

 BF> Not really.  The division is farily straightforward, though -- the
 BF> kernel forwards, mrouted makes the forwarding decision.  If the kernel
 BF> gets a packet for which it doesn't have a forwarding cache entry, it
 BF> asks mrouted to install a forwarding cache entry for it.  The kernel
 BF> has no state other than the forwarding cache that mrouted installs and
 BF> can't make any decisions on its own.

 >> - is there free BSD code I can take a look at in order to
 >> understand multicast 3.5?

 BF> All of FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the 3.5 multicast code.
 BF> They are each available from ftp.<fill-in-the-blank>bsd.org .

 >> - is there any documentation describing the implementation of
 >> mrouted, other than its source code?

 BF> Unfortunately, no.

There is however some description in TCP/IP Illustrated Volume 2
Chapter 14 covering mainly mrouted 2.0 implementation and touching 3.3.

Cheers,
Magnus




From rem-conf Tue Jun 24 15:08:31 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Tue Jun 24 15:08:31 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgdjA-0001Kt-00; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:06:20 -0700
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 14:43:05 -0700 ()
From: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
Reply-To: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
cc: "M. Reha Civanlar" <civanlar@research.att.com>
Subject: Going to Last Call on draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-00.txt
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.3.95.970501192943.-140931U-100000@oak.precept.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.3.95.970624143738.-450409K-100000@oak.precept.com>
X-X-Sender: casner@little-bear.precept.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

To the AVT working group:

In May, I issued a working group last call for comments on
draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-00.txt.  This is an update, written by Reha
Civanlar, to the RTP MPEG payload format specified in RFC 2038 to
allow the packet loss resilience mechanisms to work for MPEG2 in
addition to MPEG1.

I stated a last call period of two weeks, but needed to give more time
for a couple of volunteers to complete their reviews.  No changes were
requested, and no comments were received the rest of the working
group, so we shall now proceed to the official IESG Last Call.  The
new RFC will again be at Proposed Standard status.

Reha, please prepare an update to the Internet-Draft to incorporate
the one wording change we discussed earlier (and any typos or other
corrections you may have accumulated), and send that update to
internet-drafts@ietf.org.  Then I will send the request for Last Call
to the IESG Secretary.
							-- Steve




From rem-conf Wed Jun 25 00:56:10 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Jun 25 00:56:09 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgmp3-0004Oh-00; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:49:01 -0700
Message-ID: <01BC8111.98DD5340@dyn-max03-13.chi.ais.net>
From: Stuart Johnstone <stuj@vosaic.com>
To: 'Jakob Hummes' <hummes@eurecom.fr>, "rem-conf@es.net" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: RE: MBone Tools and Java
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:11:38 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Yup.  A version thereof in any case using GSM audio and shortly Dolby AC3.

Take the time to peek at URL http://www.vosaic.com.  There you can download
a free version of the VOSAIC RadioStation for monkeying around with down
at INRIA or your beautiful offices at Sophia  Antinopolis....we miss seeing you
all there.

Prof. Campbell sends his regards.

Regards,

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jakob Hummes [SMTP:hummes@eurecom.fr]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 24, 1997 5:55 AM
To:	rem-conf@es.net
Subject:	MBone Tools and Java

Hi,

I have some questions regarding the MBone tools; especially I'm
interested in an audio conferencing tool like vat.

I want to write a Java GUI for the MBone tools.  The GUI would be
written as components (JavaBeans) and such be part that may be assembled
into other applications.  Before I start I need more information about
some points.

0) Did anyone do already the work???
1) Are documented APIs for the tools available?  For which tools?
2) Since the GUI is normally written in Tcl/Tk, their interface to C/C++
may be taken as startpoint for the Java GUI layer.  Has the c/C++
implementation direct dependencies on the Tcl/Tk sources?
3) Are there any known traps I should be aware of?

TIA,
- Jakob
-- 
WORK:                          
Jakob Hummes                   
EURECOM                        
2229, route des Cretes         
B.P. 193                       
06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: (+33) (0)4 93 00 26 70     WWW: http://www.eurecom.fr/~hummes
Fax: (+33) (0)4 93 00 26 27





From rem-conf Wed Jun 25 06:52:59 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Jun 25 06:52:58 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3)
	id 0wgsQU-00063f-00; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 06:48:02 -0700
Message-Id: <33B12767.62A8@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 15:12:55 +0100
From: Claudio Catania <cld@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Reply-To: cld@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Organization: HP Labs
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (WinNT; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: VAT.. help
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Hello,

Does anyone know where can I find the source code of VAT for Win32?

Does anyone know why the latest version of VAt I found is dated June 96?
Did people stop developing it?

Does anyone know where can I find some complete documentation about this
tool. Any pointer, articles, overview, instruction manuals, developers
helpers, results from tests.... would be very useful.

Are there any performance results for VAT and its voice codecs? Where
are they?

Claudio

  
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
 Claudio Catania		Research engineer
 mailto:cld@hpl.hp.com   	Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
 Phone: +44 117 922 8235     	
 Fax:   +44 117 922 8003    	Filton Road, Stoke Gifford
 Telnet: 312 8235           	BS12 6QZ Bristol (U.K.)
----------------------------------------------------------



From rem-conf Wed Jun 25 14:58:29 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Wed Jun 25 14:58:28 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0wgzvP-0001o2-00; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:48:27 -0700
Message-ID: <33B1A25B.F43E407@faslab.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 15:57:31 -0700
From: Charles Brauer <brauer@faslab.com>
Reply-To: brauer@faslab.com
Organization: Fujitsu Network Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Please help
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Howdy:

I am tantalizingly close to getting an mbone feed to work.  My
tunnel partner is BBN and my mrouted machine inside my firewall
is a Sun SPARCstation that is running Solaris 2.51. My program
guide is getting SDR announcements; but when I try to view
any broadcast, I cannot seem to send IGMP group join requests.

I am wondering if my problem is in BBN Cisco filters or if it
is a configuration problem with mrouted.  My mrouted.conf looks
like:

tunnel 204.161.60.33 192.42.110.249 metric 1 threshold 32 rate_limit 0

A trace of "netstat -M" on my mrouted machine looks like:

Script started on Wed Jun 25 14:17:29 1997
berkeley 2 MBone/mtrace-5.1# ./netstat -M



Virtual Interface Table
 Vif Thresh  Rate_Lim  Local-Address  Remote-Addr  Pkt_in  Pkt_out

  0     1       0        berkeley                    1295    34917

  1    32       0        berkeley    paloalto-mbo   37866        0

Numvifs: 2

Multicast Forwarding Cache

 Origin-Subnet       Mcastgroup #Pkts In-Vif  Out-vifs/Forw-ttl

 demo-40.psc.edu  SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 mbone1.csc.cuhk  SAP.MCAST.NET   2     1          0 (1)

 miller-genuine-  SAP.MCAST.NET   3     1          0 (1)

 irl.eecs.umich.  SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 owe.isi.edu      SAP.MCAST.NET  20     1          0 (1)

 192.240.135.201   224.2.226.16   1     1    

 rot.rvs.uni-han  SAP.MCAST.NET   1k    1          0 (1)

 202.186.142.2    SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 203.240.251.150  SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 paras-ss20.cisc  224.2.233.212   1     1    

 aem005.amc.anl.  SAP.MCAST.NET   2     1          0 (1)

 wile.lbl.gov     SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 198.202.88.45    SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 polenta.pop-mg.  SAP.MCAST.NET   2     1          0 (1)

 d01.hkt.net      SAP.MCAST.NET   1     1          0 (1)

 donald.fokus.gm  SAP.MCAST.NET   3     1          0 (1)

Total no. of entries in cache: 16

berkeley 4 MBone/mtrace-5.1# exit
script done on Wed Jun 25 14:18:42 1997

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Charles Brauer
Fujitsu Advanced Software Lab
800 El Camino, #150
Menlo Park, California 94025
brauer@faslab.com
(415) 325-8612, FAX (415) 325-6015



From rem-conf Thu Jun 26 03:33:33 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Jun 26 03:33:32 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whBhw-0004xI-00; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 03:23:20 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: msri.org: smap set sender to <nobody@msri.org> using -f
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 03:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706261022.DAA21600@hille.msri.org>
To: rem-conf@es.net
From: <mbone@ust.hk>
Reply-to: mbone@ust.hk
Subject: Live Broadcast of Hong Kong Handover 1997 Event
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

	MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	Live Broadcast of Hong Kong Handover 1997 Event
Date:        
	Jun 30, 1997

Time:        
	12:00 Hongkong 12 hours

Contact:     
	mbone@ust.hk

URL:         
	http://www.ust.hk/handover/mbone.html

Description:        
	The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) will broadcast  a 24-hr live of Hong Kong 1997 Handover event from June 30 1200 to July 1  1200 (HKT).  The broadcast is especially targeted for Asia Pacific countries.   Video signal is received from the Pearl Channel (English channel) of the   Television Broadcasts Limited (TVB).   









mbone broadcast schedule http://www.msri.org/mbone



From rem-conf Thu Jun 26 04:29:35 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Jun 26 04:29:33 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whCie-0005T8-00; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 04:28:08 -0700
Message-Id: <199706261026.UAA28652@sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr>
To: "rem-conf@es.net" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: KR-Net'97 Workshop Broadcast
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 20:24:53 -0500
From: Jong Kuk Lee <jklee@sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr>
X-Mailer: E-Mail Connection v2.5.03
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	KR-Net'97 Workshop Broadcast
Date:        
	 1st July, 1997 - 3th July 1997

Time:        
	02:00-10:00 (GMT)
              10:00-18:00 (Korea)

Contact:     
	mbone@knc.or.kr

URL & Schedule :         
	http://sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr/Mbone/index-e.html

Description:        
	Mbone-kr(Mbone Group of Korea) will broadcast  the KR-Net'97 Workshop in
Seoul, Korea from 1st July to 3th July 1997, 02:00 - 10:00 GMT.  Mbone-kr
will broadcast a semina about Mbone, Multimedia, Internet Protocol, etc
during 3 days. The broadcast is especially relaying from the spot about
Preparation prosess & Interview (Speaker & People) during rest & lunch time.

schedule http://sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr/Mbone/index-e.html




From rem-conf Thu Jun 26 04:44:00 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Jun 26 04:44:00 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whCwd-0005pf-00; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 04:42:35 -0700
Message-Id: <199706261040.UAA28748@sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr>
To: "rem-conf@es.net" <rem-conf@es.net>
Subject: KR-Net'97 Workshop Broadcast
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 20:39:37 -0500
From: Jong Kuk Lee <jklee@sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr>
X-Mailer: E-Mail Connection v2.5.03
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

MBone Broadcast Announcement
	----------------------------

Title:       
	KR-Net'97 Workshop Broadcast
Date:        
	 1st July, 1997 - 3th July 1997

Time:        
	02:00-10:00 (GMT)
              10:00-18:00 (Korea)

Contact:     
	mbone@knc.or.kr

URL & Schedule :         
	http://sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr/Mbone/index-e.html

Description:        
	Mbone-kr(Mbone Group of Korea) will broadcast  the KR-Net'97 Workshop in
Seoul, Korea from 1st July to 3th July 1997, 02:00 - 10:00 GMT.  Mbone-kr
will broadcast a semina about Mbone, Multimedia, Internet Protocol, etc
during 3 days. The broadcast is especially relaying from the spot about
Preparation process & Interview (Speaker & People) during rest & lunch time.

schedule http://sarang.kyungsung.ac.kr/Mbone/index-e.html




------- FORWARD, End of original message -------





From rem-conf Thu Jun 26 08:13:51 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Jun 26 08:13:49 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whG5b-0006uo-00; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 08:04:03 -0700
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 11:03:59 EDT
From: andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick)
Message-Id: <9706261503.AA23677@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
Reply-To: andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: rem-conf@es.net, mbone@ISI.EDU, multicast@canarie.ca, merci@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: "MPoll" - Beta 1.1 release
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

As part of the MERCI project, I have been working on a new multicast
application for real-time polling of opinions and ratings. "MPoll"
was developed with the following uses in mind:

   - collecting quality ratings during multicast sessions
   
   - collecting opinions and votes during multicast collaborative
      work sessions
   
   - collecting opinions on general topics or current events

MPoll may be useful during multicast sessions to get opinions from
all the participants quickly and efficiently.  It may also be useful
for collecting quality and reception ratings during MBONE events.  

You can pick-up the current (Beta) version of MPoll at

   ftp://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/pub/mbone/MPoll/

source code and binaries for SunOS, Solaris, and WIN32 are
available.  Assistance in compiling MPoll for other platforms will be
appreciated.

Below are some more details about this program.  You can also find
more information at:

   http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/mbone/MPoll/MPoll.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Using MPoll
-----------

   Usage: mpoll [-D] [-V] [-l] [-t ttl] [-C "title"] address/port
   
    OPTIONS:
      -D  : use default address and port (224.2.2.200/6666; for
      debugging)
      -V  : print version number and exit
      -l  : print logging information (for debugging)
      -C "title" :  the theme title for the questions
      -t ttl : the multicast TTL (default = 15)

MPoll normally requires specifying a multicast address and port.  
MPoll can be used by itself, or with other multicast tools such as
VAT and VIC in an MBONE session. MPoll can be started from SDR once
an appropriate "plugin" is installed (see below), or from the command
line.  Command options that MPoll accepts include the multicast TTL
(-t), which defaults to 15, and a session title (-C), which defaults
to "Unknown Theme".  These are the same command options used by other
multicast tools.

Once MPoll is started, there is built-in help for each of the windows
that explains the features and functions.


How MPoll Works
---------------

MPoll works by sending question and response packets to the multicast
address, and listening for packets from other hosts.  The users can
create a new question, and this will become available to all the
users who have joined that multicast session.  As users answer the
question, the responses are distributed to all the participants,
where they are tallied and displayed.  MPoll packets are
redistributed periodically as long as the program is running, so that
all current users will see all the results.

   Normally, MPoll will be left running continuously during a polling
   period or multicast session.

MPoll uses a simple plain-text protocol for constructing multicast
packets that is similar to the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
used in SDR.  There are currently 4 types of packets generated by
MPoll: questions, remove question instructions, user responses, and 
membership information.

MPoll creates a cache file in your home directory ("~/.mpoll_cache")
for storing the questions and your responses from your last MPoll
session.  This allows you to quit and restart MPoll and have the
questions and your responses for the last session reloaded.


Installing MPoll
----------------

   Binary Distribution
   -------------------
   
   The MPoll binary file is a stand-alone C program that does not
   require any extra libraries in order to run.  Simply copy the
   MPoll program to a directory that is in your path.

   Currently, binary distributions of MPoll are available for:

      - Solaris 2.5
      - SunOS 4.1.4
      - Win32 (Windows 95 & NT)

   Anyone who can help to compile MPoll for other platforms is asked
   to contact the author.


   Source Distribution
   -------------------
   
   MPoll is written in C and Tcl/Tk.  The development environment is:

      UNIX:
      - SPARC Solaris 2.5
      - gcc version 2.7.2
      - Tcl 7.6 / Tk 4.2
      
      WIN32:
      - Microsoft Visual C++ 5.0 on Windows95
      - Tcl/Tk 8.0 on Windows95

   In addition, MPoll uses the Embedded Tk (ET) toolkit by Richard
   Hipp (http://users.vnet.net/drh/ET.html) for integrating C and
   Tcl/Tk programming.  Version 1.7.1 of ET is included as part of the
   MPoll sources and will be built during the make process.
   
   No configuration procedure is available yet for MPoll.  There are
   some configuration options at the beginning of the makefiles that
   you will probably have to set.  MPoll has been developed under
   Solaris 2.5, so that is the default platform for make.  Possible
   make commands are currently: 
   
   For Solaris 2.5:  "make"
   For SunOS 4.1.x:  "make sunos" 
   For Windows95:    "nmake -f Makefile.vc"
   
   I would love to hear about any problems in building and running
   the program.  Also, if you port MPoll to another platform, please
   contact me with any information about changes necessary, and if
   you can supply a binary for my archive site.


   The SDR Plugin
   --------------
   
   Since MPoll is a new program, and polling is a new MBONE
   application, an appropriate media has not been defined in SDR. 
   So, in order to use MPoll from SDR you must install a "plugin".  
   The plugin provided in the distribution is
   
      sdr2.plugin.S53.control.udp.mpoll.mpoll
   
   and you should copy this to a "~/.sdr/plugins" directory on your
   system.  See the SDR documentation for more information about
   plugins.

   
Limitations
-----------

- MPoll currently has no unicast support

- MPoll is currently limited to 100 questions per session, and up to
   10 possible answers per multiple-choice question.  The question
   limit
   should be configurable be editing the MAX_TOPICS parameter in
   "mpoll.h", but changes to the MAX_RESPONSES parameter will probably
   not work.

- MPoll should someday read the ~/.RTPdefaults file, and perhaps some
   other X resources

- a function to remind users to update their responses should be
   added

- we may need a function to edit an existing question


Known Problems
--------------

- this program is in a Beta stage of development.  There are
   probably some features missing, and maybe some bugs.

- MPoll was developed on Sun systems and has been tested on a few
   other platforms.  More work on portability is required.

- no attempt is made to do robust font selection, so MPoll will
   probably fail if the fonts I use are not on your system.  See
   "mpoll.h" for the font definitions.

- the command line args "-h or -help" dump core, use "--help" instead


Acknowledgements
----------------

The protocol used in MPoll is fashioned after the SDP protocol used
in SDR, and I thank Mark Handley, Van Jacobson, and other
contributors for their work on SDP and SDR.

I also used the SDR source code as an example while working on MPoll,
and that code was useful for techniques like multicast socket
management and periodic redistribution of packets.  I learned a lot
>from viewing other people's code, and I am sure that I made lots of
mistakes, for which I am wholely responsible.  Although I don't
believe that I have used any of their code directly, to be safe I
include their acknowledgement:

   This product includes software developed by the Computer Science
   Department at University College London

Portions of the code used to support the WIN32 platform were copied
>from the SDR program, and they were borrowed by Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory.  In accordance with the copyright notice, I
hereby state:

   This product includes software developed by the Network Research
   Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
   
 
Licence Terms
-------------

   Copyright (c) Communications Research Centre, Government of Canada
   1997.  All rights reserved.
   
   License is granted to copy and use this software, for research and
   evaluation purposes, provided that the Communications Research
   Centre is acknowledged in all documentation pertaining to any such
   copy or use. The Communications Research Centre grants no other
   licenses expressed or implied. Title, ownership rights, and
   intellectual property rights in the software shall remain with the
   Communications Research Centre.  The Centre's name and the
   Government of Canada should not be used in any advertising without
   written permission.
   
   THE COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS
   CONCERNING EITHER THE MERCHANTABILITY OF THIS SOFTWARE OR THE
   SUITABILITY OF THIS SOFTWARE FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  The
   software is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty
   of any kind.
   
   These notices must be retained in any copies of any part of this
   software.
   
  
Author
------

      Dr. Andrew Patrick
      Network Services & Interface Design Laboratory
      Communications Research Centre
      Industry Canada
      3701 Carling Ave.
      P.O. Box 11490, Station 'H'
      Ottawa, ON CANADA
      K2H 8S2

      Phone: (613) 990-4675
      FAX:   (613) 998-9648
      E-Mail: andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca
      WWW: http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/~andrew
      

      

-- 
           Andrew Patrick, Ph.D. <andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
                    http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/~andrew/



From rem-conf Thu Jun 26 12:36:16 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Jun 26 12:36:15 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whJab-0004MO-00; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 11:48:17 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
To: IETF-Announce@ietf.org
cc: rem-conf@es.net
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt, .ps
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:49:25 -0400
Sender: cclark@ietf.org
Message-ID:  <9706261449.aa13975@ietf.org>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

--NextPart

 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
 directories. This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport 
 Working Group of the IETF.                                                

Note: This revision reflects comments received during the last call period.

       Title     : RTP Payload for Redundant Audio Data                    
       Author(s) : C. Perkins, I. Kouvelas, O. Hodson, V. Hardman, 
                   M. Handley, J. Bolot, A. Garcia S. Parisis
       Filename  : draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt, .ps
       Pages     : 10
       Date      : 06/25/1997

This document describes a payload format for use with the real-time 
transport protocol (RTP), version 2, for encoding redundant audio data.  
The primary motivation for the scheme described herein is the development 
of audio conferencing tools for use with lossy packet networks such as the 
Internet Mbone, although this scheme is not limited to such applications.  

Internet-Drafts are available by anonymous FTP.  Login with the username
"anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address.  After logging in,
type "cd internet-drafts" and then
     "get draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt".
 Or 
     "get draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.ps".
A URL for the Internet-Draft is:
ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt
 
Internet-Drafts directories are located at:	
	                                                
     o  Africa:  ftp.is.co.za                    
	                                                
     o  Europe:  ftp.nordu.net            	
                 ftp.nis.garr.it                 
	                                                
     o  Pacific Rim: munnari.oz.au               
	                                                
     o  US East Coast: ds.internic.net           
	                                                
     o  US West Coast: ftp.isi.edu               
	                                                
Internet-Drafts are also available by mail.	
	                                                
Send a message to:  mailserv@ds.internic.net. In the body type: 
     "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt".
 Or 
     "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.ps".
							
NOTE: The mail server at ds.internic.net can return the document in
      MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
      feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
      command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
      a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail readers
      exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
      "multipart" MIME messages (i.e., documents which have been split
      up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
      how to manipulate these messages.
							
							

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader 
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the Internet-Draft.

--NextPart
Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess"

--OtherAccess
Content-Type:  Message/External-body;
        access-type="mail-server";
        server="mailserv@ds.internic.net"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <19970625120526.I-D@ietf.org>

ENCODING mime
FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt

--OtherAccess
Content-Type:   Message/External-body;
        name="draft-ietf-avt-rtp-redundancy-00.txt";
        site="ds.internic.net";
        access-type="anon-ftp";
        directory="internet-drafts"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <19970625120526.I-D@ietf.org>

--OtherAccess--

--NextPart--



From rem-conf Thu Jun 26 23:48:56 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Thu Jun 26 23:48:55 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whUif-0005Me-00; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 23:41:21 -0700
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 23:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
To: Andrew Patrick <andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: "MPoll" - Beta 1.1 release
In-Reply-To: <9706261503.AA23677@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.PCW.3.95.970626232734.10286D-100000@revelstoke.precept.com>
X-X-Sender: casner@little-bear.precept.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

[cc list trimmed to rem-conf]

Andrew,

>    - collecting quality ratings during multicast sessions

I expect MPoll will be useful in a variety of scenarios, and may even
be useful for collecting subjective quality measures from the
participants.  However, RTCP packet loss measurement, as displayed by
rtpmon for example, is likely to be much more useful for measuring
quality of reception in multicast sessions (that use RTP).  That's
because the reporting is automatic, so you don't have to coax a human
to respond, and it is objective and relatively frequent.

							-- Steve




From rem-conf Fri Jun 27 09:29:47 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Fri Jun 27 09:29:47 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whde7-0007QC-00; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 09:13:15 -0700
Message-Id: <33B3E78F.4F4A1928@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 12:17:19 -0400
From: Andrew Patrick <andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca>
Reply-To: andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca
Organization: Communications Research Centre
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Casner <casner@precept.com>
Cc: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Re: "MPoll" - Beta 1.1 release
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <Pine.PCW.3.95.970626232734.10286D-100000@revelstoke.precept.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Stephen Casner wrote:

> I expect MPoll will be useful in a variety of scenarios, and may even
> be useful for collecting subjective quality measures from the
> participants.  However, RTCP packet loss measurement, as displayed by
> rtpmon for example, is likely to be much more useful for measuring
> quality of reception in multicast sessions (that use RTP).  That's
> because the reporting is automatic, so you don't have to coax a human
> to respond, and it is objective and relatively frequent.

I agree.  Hopefully MPoll or something like it will be a useful addition
to RTCP statistics and provide the subjective component that is needed. 
In addition, perhaps MPoll can allow us to collect feedback during
sessions in a more systematic way then scribbling notes on the
whiteboard.

Of course you are right that the interesting task is coaxing humans to
respond...


-- 
Andrew Patrick, Ph.D.             Communications Research Centre
andrew@calvin.dgbt.doc.ca         Ottawa, CANADA
http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca/~andrew  Phone: +1 613 990-4675 (Voice)



From rem-conf Fri Jun 27 14:10:41 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Fri Jun 27 14:10:41 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whiD0-0001Rh-00; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 14:05:34 -0700
From: rameshn@lucent.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 97 17:04:59 EDT
Original-From: ramesh@hoserve.ho.lucent.com
Message-Id: <9706272104.AA01530@hopaw33>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: IEEE INFOCOM'98 Paper Submission - Due July 15
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

Dear Colleagues,

The deadline to submit papers for IEEE INFOCOM'98, July 15,
is almost upon us. You may now submit papers by visiting
the web site http://www-test1.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/infocom/1998
and following the instructions therein. In case of problems, 
please contact the technical program chair, Ian Akyildiz, at
infocom98@ee.gatech.edu. For all other information
on INFOCOM'98 including the detailed call for papers, please
visit one of the following web sites:

  USA:           http://www.comsoc.org/~infocom98  
  Europe:        http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/infocom98
  Asia/Pacific:  http://www.iss.nus.sg/INFOCOM
 

Thanks and looking forward to your submissions,

Ramesh Nagarajan.



From rem-conf Fri Jun 27 16:02:03 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Fri Jun 27 16:02:03 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0whjyH-0002H2-00; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 15:58:29 -0700
X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBM RESEARCH
From: "Dilip Kandlur"<kandlur@watson.ibm.com>
To: end2end-interest@ISI.EDU, rem-conf@es.net
Message-ID: <852564C3.007DF4DC.00@watngi01.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 18:57:01 -0400
Subject: CFP: Multimedia Computing and Networking
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list






   ========================================================================
===

                Multimedia Computing and Networking 1998 (MMCN98)
                             January 26-28, 1998
                             San Jose, California

                          Sponsored by SPIE and IS&T
                   ACM SIG Multimedia Co-Sponsorship Pending

   ========================================================================
===

   Conference Chairs:   Kevin Jeffay, University of North Carolina
                        Dilip Kandlur, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
                        Timothy Roscoe, Persimmon Inc.

   Program Committee:   Peter Beadle, University of Wollongong
                        Ming-Syan Chen, National Taiwan University
                        Wu-Chi Feng, Ohio State University
                        Martin Freeman, Philips Research
                        J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, U.C. Santa Cruz
                        Anoop Gupta, Stanford University
                        Mark Hayter, DEC SRC
                        Sugih Jamin, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
                        Paul Jardetzky, Sun Microsystems
                        Chuck Kalmanek, AT&T Research
                        Ian Leslie, University of Cambridge
                        Sape Mullender, University of Twente
                        Klara Nahrstedt U.I. Urbana-Champaign
                        Guru Parulkar, Washington University
                        Lawrence Rowe, U.C. Berkeley
                        Debanjan Saha, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
                        Henning Schulzrinne, Columbia University
                        Doug Shepherd, Lancaster University
                        Brian Smith, Cornell University
                        Cormac Sreenan, AT&T Research
                        Ralf Steinmetz, T.U. Darmstadt
                        Harrick Vin, University of Texas at Austin
                        Jonathan Walpole, Oregon Graduate Institute
                        Raj Yavatkar, Intel Corporation
                        Hui Zhang, Carnegie Mellon University



   Advances in computer and networking technologies have fueled the
   rapid growth of research and development in multimedia computing and
   high-speed networking.  As emerging multimedia technologies set higher
   performance levels at competitive costs, they are starting to enable
   and proliferate multimedia solutions in a spectrum of commercial and
   laboratory projects.

   The objective of this conference is to bring together researchers,
   developers, and practitioners working in all facets of multimedia
   computing and networking. The conference will serve as a forum for the
   dissemination of state-of-the-art research, development, and
   implementations of multimedia systems, technologies, and
   applications. Presenters will be encouraged to make multimedia
   presentations and demonstrate their solutions.

   Papers are solicited in all areas of multimedia, including, but not
   limited to:

        * Multimedia Computing Systems:
         - set-top technologies and operating systems
         - network computers and multimedia
         - hardware support and hardware accelerators
         - multimedia operating system services
         - real-time operating system services
         - video-on-demand servers and services

        * Multimedia Networking:
         - active networks
         - quality-of-service control and scheduling algorithms
         - synchronization mechanisms
         - mobile network architectures
         - wireless networks
         - access technologies and community networking
         - network and transport protocols
         - multimedia over heterogeneous networks

        * Multimedia and the Internet:
         - web servers and web-based services
         - internet appliances
         - push technologies
         - wide area caching architectures
         - data streaming and delivery mechanisms
         - compression
         - handling heterogeneous media formats

        * Measurement and modelling:
         - performance measurement of multimedia systems
         - statistical modelling of server traffic and server software
         - multimedia system simulations

        * Applications areas:
         - multimedia search engines and databases
         - entertainment and games
         - adaptive applications
         - synthetic animation
         - distributed virtual reality

        * User Interfaces and Authoring Systems:
         - media and user interaction
         - intelligent information access
         - interactive navigation schemes
         - multimedia authoring languages
         - authoring metaphors and editing techniques


   IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS:
   ---------------------------------

   Please submit full papers for review. The submissions should not
   exceed 15 single-spaced pages including figures, tables, and
   references, using a typeface no smaller than 10 points. To expedite
   the reviewing process, please submit the paper electronically (in
   postscript format, through e-mail) to jeffay@cs.unc.edu
   Additionally, please send 1 hard copy of your paper to:

           Professor Kevin Jeffay
           Department of Computer Science,
           University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
           Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
           Phone  : (919) 962-1938
           E-mail : jeffay@cs.unc.edu

   Please also submit electronically (in plain text format)
   a cover page to jeffay@cs.unc.edu. Each cover page should contain:

   1. Title of paper
   2. Author names and affiliations
   3. Name and address (both postal and electronic) of contact author
   4. Abstract (500 words)
   5. Keywords
   6. Submission area (from the list of relevant areas in the call for
papers)

   In addition, please also submit the 500 word abstract by accessing
   the web page at URL: http://www.spie.org/forms/ei98_submissions.html
   and following the instructions.

   Each paper will be reviewed by the members of the program
   committee. Authors of accepted papers will be asked to submit a
   camera-ready manuscript that will appear in the conference
   proceedings.

   Important Dates:
   ----------------

   Electronic submission deadline:      July 8, 1997
   Deadline for receiving a hardcopy:   July 11, 1997
   Notification of acceptance:          September 5, 1997
   Camera-ready manuscripts due:        October 21, 1997

   The call for papers as well as the deadline information can also be
   obtained from http://www.persimmon.com/mmcn/

   ====================================================================





From rem-conf Sat Jun 28 17:21:00 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Sat Jun 28 17:20:59 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0wi7ad-0007Hm-00; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 17:11:39 -0700
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 17:10:41 -0700
From: gerard@hsmpka-122.Eng.Sun.COM (Gerard Fernando)
Message-Id: <199706290010.RAA12237@halei.eng.sun.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Review of the bundled MPEG IETF draft 
Cc: casner@precept.com
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

As agreed at the AVT meeting in Memphis I have written a review of the bundled 
MPEG IETF draft. 

Gerard Fernando

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Review of the bundled MPEG IETF draft [1]
	-----------------------------------------

This IETF draft describes a payload type for bundled MPEG2 encoded
video and audio data to be used with RTP. There are two points on which
I tend to have doubts about the usefulness of this proposal.

One is on the argument for bundling. There are disadvantages with
transporting of bundled MPEG data. The modularity inherent in having
separate video and audio streams would be lost by having bundled MPEG2
data. This is admitted by the authors. I disagree with the authors on
the premise that the benefits of transporting bundled MPEG data
outweigh their disadvantages.

There is another point on which I have doubts, and that is - why this
proposal for bundling MPEG2 is any better than encapsulating MPEG2
Systems data. RFC2038 and the subsequent revision
(draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-00.txt)[2] defines an encapsulation for MPEG2
and MPEG1 Systems streams. Admittedly, there is a very minor overhead
(approximately 1%) in utilizing Systems streams as opposed to bundling
audio and video streams. In my opinion, a 1% gain is not sufficient to
justify this bundled MPEG proposal.

The section on "data partitioning" for recovering in the event of
packet loass appears to have some merit. It proposes separating the
high priority (HP) information, like headers, from the low priority
(LP) data stream.  There are two proposals in this draft for
transmitting the HP information. One proposal is to use a reliable
protocol. This can lead to out-of-order arrival of HP data from LP
data. The other proposal is to use layered multimedia transmission
techniques for RTP[3].

Summary: The benefits of the bundled MPEG proposal are not sufficient
to justify this IETF draft. The alternative definition for
encapsulating MPEG data provide the necessary functionality to satisfy
most requirements.  The "data partitioning" part of the draft has
sufficient merit for it to be separated from the rest so that it may be
included with a proposal on error protection, or it may be included
within a layered multimedia transmission proposal.

References:
[1] M. Reha Civanlar, Glenn L. Cash, Barry G. Haskell, "RTP Payload Format 
    for Bundled MPEG," Internet Draft, draft-civanlar-bmpeg-01.txt, Feb,1997.

[2] D. Hoffman, G. Fernando, V. Goyal, M. Civanlar "RTP Payload Format
    for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video," Internet Draft, draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-00.txt, 
    April, 1997.

[3] M. F. Speer, S. McCanne, "RTP Usage with Layered Multimedia
    Streams," Internet Draft, draft-speer-avt-layered-video-02.txt,
    December 1996.

========================================================================
Gerard Fernando                         Technology Development Group
Sun Microsystems Computer Company       Chief Technology Office
2550 Garcia Ave.,  MPK15-214            
Mountain View, CA 94043-1100            
Email: gerard.fernando@sun.com          
http://www.sun.com/
Phone: +1.415.786.6373
Fax:   +1.415.786.6445
========================================================================






From rem-conf Mon Jun 30 07:57:13 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 30 07:57:12 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0wihc6-0000yu-00; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 07:39:34 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
To: IETF-Announce@ietf.org
cc: rem-conf@es.net
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 10:00:21 -0400
Sender: cclark@ietf.org
Message-ID:  <9706301000.aa07484@ietf.org>
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

--NextPart

 A Revised Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
 directories. This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport 
 Working Group of the IETF.                                                

       Title     : RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video                
       Author(s) : D. Hoffman, G. Fernando, V. Goyal, R. Civanlar
       Filename  : draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt
       Pages     : 14
       Date      : 06/27/1997

This memo describes a packetization scheme for MPEG video and audio 
streams.  The scheme proposed can be used to transport such a video or 
audio flow over the transport protocols supported by RTP.  Two approaches 
are described. The first is designed to support maximum interoperability 
with MPEG System environments.  The second is designed to provide maximum 
compatibility with other RTP-encapsulated media streams and future 
conference control work of the IETF.         
                              
This memo is a revision of RFC 2038, an Internet standards track protocol, 
prepared for publication as a revised RFC.  In this revision, the packet 
loss resilience mechanisms in Section 3.4 were extended to include 
additional picture header information required for MPEG2.                  

Internet-Drafts are available by anonymous FTP.  Login with the username
"anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address.  After logging in,
type "cd internet-drafts" and then
     "get draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt".
A URL for the Internet-Draft is:
ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt
 
Internet-Drafts directories are located at:	
	                                                
     o  Africa:  ftp.is.co.za                    
	                                                
     o  Europe:  ftp.nordu.net            	
                 ftp.nis.garr.it                 
	                                                
     o  Pacific Rim: munnari.oz.au               
	                                                
     o  US East Coast: ds.internic.net           
	                                                
     o  US West Coast: ftp.isi.edu               
	                                                
Internet-Drafts are also available by mail.	
	                                                
Send a message to:  mailserv@ds.internic.net. In the body type: 
     "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt".
							
NOTE: The mail server at ds.internic.net can return the document in
      MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
      feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
      command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
      a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail readers
      exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
      "multipart" MIME messages (i.e., documents which have been split
      up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
      how to manipulate these messages.
							
							

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader 
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the Internet-Draft.

--NextPart
Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess"

--OtherAccess
Content-Type:  Message/External-body;
        access-type="mail-server";
        server="mailserv@ds.internic.net"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <19970627172734.I-D@ietf.org>

ENCODING mime
FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt

--OtherAccess
Content-Type:   Message/External-body;
        name="draft-ietf-avt-mpeg-new-01.txt";
        site="ds.internic.net";
        access-type="anon-ftp";
        directory="internet-drafts"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <19970627172734.I-D@ietf.org>

--OtherAccess--

--NextPart--



From rem-conf Mon Jun 30 15:59:44 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 30 15:59:44 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0wipJO-0003QX-00; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 15:52:46 -0700
From: Mark Handley <mjh@east.isi.edu>
X-Organisation: Information Sciences Institute, USC
X-Phone: +1 617 253 6011
To: rem-conf@es.net, mbone@isi.edu
Subject: New sdr (2.4a6n) available
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 18:51:22 -0400
Message-ID: <2304.867711082@buttle.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: mjh@buttle.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list


As several people have pointed out, the current versions of sdr
contain a bug which can cause sdr to crash on receiving an
announcement which is missing the session name field.  As clones of
sdr have been appearing increasingly frequently recently along with
the accompanying broken announcements, I am releasing a version of sdr
that is at least a little more hardened to receiving bogus messages.

I hadn't planned to release another sdr version until I had the
session invitation code properly conformant with the SIP spec we're
about to release.  The SIP code in sdr 2.4 is not compatible with the
code in 2.3 or 2.2, and there's a fair chance 2.4a6 won't be
compatible with 2.4a7 either.  If you don't use session invitations
this won't affect you.

This version of sdr also uses the local administratively scoped range
(see draft-ietf-mboned-admin-ip-scope-03.txt) for *local*
announcements.  This means previous versions of sdr won't hear its
local announcements unless they are all configured to do so.  Thus
it's best if you upgrade all the platforms at a site simultaneously if
you use sdr internally.  This version of sdr makes these local
announcements with a ttl of 15, but this ttl limit is only because I
don't believe all the site-admin people out there have configured site
borders for local scope yet.  Please encourage your network
administrator to do this.

To comply with US export regulations, this version of sdr does not
contain the encryption capabilities that were in sdr 2.3a1.  

Binaries for SunOS, Solaris, FreeBSD and Digital Unix as well as
source code are all available from http://buttle.lcs.mit.edu/sdr/

As always, please let me know if you have any problems or if you build
sdr for another platform.

Cheers,
	Mark



From rem-conf Mon Jun 30 19:49:10 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 30 19:49:09 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0wiswL-0004wD-00; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 19:45:13 -0700
Message-Id: <199707010245.TAA22114@icebox.vnd.tek.com>
To: rem-conf@es.net
Cc: tedb@auspex.vnd.tek.com
Subject: draft-ietf-mboned-admin-ip-space-03.txt question
From: Ted Brunner <ted.brunner@tek.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 19:45:21 -0700
Sender: tedb@icebox.tek.com
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list


I would like to check with the list that I understand the
distinction between two of the address ranges defined in
draft-ietf-mboned-admin-ip-space-03.txt, namely
the IPv4 organizational local scope (239.192.0.0/14)
and the IPv4 Local Scope (239.255.0.0/16).

As I read it, the organizational local scope may be used
throughout an intranet, extending through administrative boundries
configured at routers, while the local scope cannot
extend through such boundries.  So if an intranet needs and establishes
internal boundries, only the organizational local scope
could be configured to reach every portion of the intranet.

Right?

More practically, for a multicast audio/video stream,
intended for consumption within an Intranet;
assuming I want to be able to administratively limit streams if necessary,
but allow them the full scope of the Intranet if desired,
a (default) multicast address should be selected from
organizational local scope.
On the other hand if I want them to always stay within
the smallest multicast boundry (eg. for bandwidth considerations)
the address should come from the Local Scope.

Right?


Ted Brunner		Video and Networking Division
			Tektronix
			MS 50-490
ted.brunner@tek.com	14150 SW Karl Braun
503.627.1317		Beaverton OR 97005	
		



From rem-conf Mon Jun 30 23:07:56 1997 
From rem-conf-request@es.net Mon Jun 30 23:07:56 1997
Received: from list by mail1.es.net with local (Exim 1.62 #2)
	id 0wiw0z-00068f-00; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 23:02:13 -0700
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 18:33:21 -0400
Message-Id: <97063018332166@cards.cis.ohio-state.edu>
From: jain@cards.cis.ohio-state.edu (Raj Jain, The Ohio State University)
To: rem-conf@es.net
Subject: Lectures on Internet [sent to @mbone]
X-VMS-To: SMTP%"rem-conf@es.net"
X-Mailing-List: <rem-conf@es.net> 
X-Loop: rem-conf@es.net
Precedence: list

For the next six weeks, the Ohio State University is
experimenting with live MBone transmission of our graduate class:

CIS788.08q: Recent Advances in Networking

If your organization has the MBone access, you
are welcome to view it. The lectures covers recent topics
such as ATM Networks, LAN Emulation, IP Switching, LAN Switching,
Virtual LANs, Gigabit Ethernet, Multimedia over IP, Wireless LANs, 
Residential Broadband (Cable Modems), etc.

The classes are held every Tuesday and Thursday, 5:30-6:45PM EST.
For further information, please see

http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~jain/cis788-97/schedule.htm

Any comments or feedback should be sent to mbone@netlab.ohio-state.edu

Thanks.




