
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa15933; 2 Oct 96 12:51 EDT
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14788;
          2 Oct 96 12:51 EDT
Received: from mailhost.onramp.net ("port 4815"@mailhost.onramp.net)
 by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.0-7 #8694) id <01IA5VS780409OCWXF@INNOSOFT.COM> for
 ietf-madman-list@INNOSOFT.COM; Wed, 02 Oct 1996 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.onramp.net ("port 4815"@mailhost.onramp.net)
 by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.0-7 #8694) id <01IA5VS5VYWO9OCUCE@INNOSOFT.COM> for
 ietf-madman@INNOSOFT.COM; Wed, 02 Oct 1996 09:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sooner.onramp.net (root@sooner.onramp.net [199.1.166.235])
 by mailhost.onramp.net (8.7.3/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA25575; Wed,
 02 Oct 1996 11:47:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from cwk@localhost) by sooner.onramp.net (8.6.9/8.6.9)
 id LAA08662; Wed, 02 Oct 1996 11:51:18 -0500
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 11:51:18 -0500
From: "Carl W. Kalbfleisch" <cwk@onramp.net>
Subject: terminology
To: ietf-madman@innosoft.com
Cc: cwk@onramp.net
Errors-to: ~ned+madman-errors@SIGURD.INNOSOFT.COM
Reply-to: cwk@onramp.net
Message-id: <199610021651.LAA08662@sooner.onramp.net>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


In some discussion on the Application MIB WG and WWW-MIB mailing lists,
it has become an issue as to what various groups call an "application".
NSM seems to use the terms "networked applications" and "network service 
applications" interchangeably. Unfortunately, these do not seem to map
to an extention of the sysApplMIB definition of an application. Instead,
they seem to be a "service" view while sysApplMIB is an "implementation"
view in terms of processes.

It would be useful if the APPLICATION-MIB could have a definition of
"network service application" inserted. At the least, it would be
beneficial to have a definition. I am thinking of something like:

A 'network service application' is a realization of some uniquely
addressable service residing on one or more host computers.

Thoughts, comments and clarification on this would be greatly appreciated.

Carl

--
Carl W. Kalbfleisch            This is the day which the LORD hath made; 
http://www.onramp.net/~cwk/       we will rejoice and be glad in it. 
cwk@onramp.net                              -- Psalm 118:24




Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa27668; 24 Oct 96 10:39 EDT
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12306;
          24 Oct 96 10:39 EDT
Received: from dicsmss1.jrc.it ("port 3775"@dicsmss1.jrc.it)
 by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.0-7 #8694) id <01IB0HJSAOQO9ODB61@INNOSOFT.COM> for
 ietf-madman-list@INNOSOFT.COM; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 07:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicsmss1.jrc.it ("port 3775"@dicsmss1.jrc.it)
 by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.0-7 #8694) id <01IB0HJPP6LS9ODIGL@INNOSOFT.COM> for
 ietf-madman@INNOSOFT.COM; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 07:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.jrc.it by dicsmss1.jrc.it (4.1/EB-950131-C)
 id AA05582; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 15:39:29 +0100
Received: from porto by porto.jrc.it (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA07576; Thu,
 24 Oct 1996 16:30:40 +0200
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 16:30:39 +0200
From: Harrie Hazewinkel <harrie.hazewinkel@jrc.it>
Subject: Re: terminology
Sender: harrie.hazewinkel@jrc.it
To: cwk@onramp.net
Cc: ietf-madman@innosoft.com
Errors-to: ~ned+madman-errors@SIGURD.INNOSOFT.COM
Message-id: <326F7D8F.750@porto.jrc.it>
Organization: SAI - JRC
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <199610021651.LAA08662@sooner.onramp.net>

Hi,

Sometime ago Carl W. Kalbfleisch asked what is defined as an
'networked applications' and 'network service applications'.

I will add a question to this.

Is a 'networked applications' or 'network service applications'
as used for the APPLICATION-MIB only addessable by 1 single
transport address?




Carl W. Kalbfleisch wrote:
> 
> In some discussion on the Application MIB WG and WWW-MIB mailing lists,
> it has become an issue as to what various groups call an 'application'.
> NSM seems to use the terms 'networked applications' and 'network service
> applications' interchangeably. Unfortunately, these do not seem to map
> to an extention of the sysApplMIB definition of an application. Instead,
> they seem to be a 'service' view while sysApplMIB is an 'implementation'
> view in terms of processes.
> 
> It would be useful if the APPLICATION-MIB could have a definition of
> 'network service application' inserted. At the least, it would be
> beneficial to have a definition. I am thinking of something like:
> 
> A 'network service application' is a realization of some uniquely
> addressable service residing on one or more host computers.
> 
> Thoughts, comments and clarification on this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Carl
> 
> --
> Carl W. Kalbfleisch            This is the day which the LORD hath made;
> http://www.onramp.net/~cwk/       we will rejoice and be glad in it.
> cwk@onramp.net                              -- Psalm 118:24

Ciao,
Harrie

0----------------------------------------------------------0
   Harrie Hazewinkel
   Email  : harrie.hazewinkel@jrc.it 
   WWW    : http://porto.jrc.it/    [-with SNMP-]
   Postal : Centre for Earth Observation
            Institute for Space Applications
            Joint Research Centre of the E.C. - TP. 950
            Ispra 21020 (VA) Italy
   Phone  : 39+(0)332+789384
   Fax    : 39+(0)332+785461
0----------------------------------------------------------0

Ik ben Harrie en ben 27 jaar en doe SNMP na. MIB, MIB.

