behave-02----Page:9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
|
Port Parity Finally and agreement No change to requirement (RECOMMEND respecting port parity) Changed wording on RFC 3550 Explains that some implementation don’t support RFC 3605 and may substract one to an RTP port if it is odd causing lost media (even if the sender did everything correctly), thus the recommendation Note: SDP-new-24 now explains that if you don’t respect the parity and/or contiguity rule (because of NAT for example), then you must use RFC 3605 |