radext-14----Page:5
1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Issues 1/2 -- Virtual Services We are seeing new layer 3 services, e.g. PANA Should this be reflected as a NAS-Port-Type or as a virtual service? Keeping NAS-Port-Type as the physical layer seems reasonable Otherwise we will get PANA-Over-DSL-Kind-1 and PANA-Over-DSL-Kind-2 etc. Can PANA be modeled as a Tunnel-Type? Intuitively, does not feel quite right. NAS-Port-Type=IPsec vs. Virtual + TT=ESP? |