v6ops-2----Page:5
1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Next Steps and Status Complete the sections as planned currently? Complete the sections but add new input from WG? Tentative Suggestion: If we started writing, and all team members contributed actual “writing” on March 28th we can probably get updated spec by April 28th? But, not all authors can dedicate continuous cycles to this effort, and editor recommends they leave the team if they cannot work on the spec in this timeframe as stellar contributor? We are all busy on this team and most of us have things to do between now and end April, and even the proposed dates need to be checked on the team, can this WG wait, or should we assign a new team of authors? Plus the uncertain outcome of v6ops Charter, where engineers work on transition mechanisms, and zero input from the working group except for Pekka S. as Chair, is not motivating this team to complete the specification. How important is this spec to the WG? The Japan IPv6 Promotional Council IPv6 Deployment Guide is excellent work and many Enterprises have that now and may make moot any of our IETF analysis documents. Should we continue? |