I was the SECDIR reviewer for this document.  In my view this document is ready,
but I found a couple of nits that the RFC-Editor would likely catch as well.

1. Some acronyms need to be expanded on first use since they do not have "*"
   by them at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list.
   These include at least: LAG, PCP, DEI

2. The draft is internally inconsistent in terms of whether a comma follows
   "e.g." and "i.e." or not. I believe the RFC Editor follows Chicago Manual
   of Style here and always puts a comma after them.

Dave