eap-4----Page:4
1  2  3  4 

Interest in Stds Track Methods?
Expert reviews provide only a basic level of conformance & quality assurance
Is this enough, leave the rest to the market & other SDOs?
Or should the EAP WG to take up the development of a standard method(s)?
Some methods authors are interested in this, but we’d need
(a) High quality contributions, people willing to work on them
(b) Agreement on WHAT to do
(c) A world that cares and uses the results
Chairs recommendation: define a limited number (1-2) of methods for specific categories (charter change)
Input from other SDOs?

PPT Version