
|
Interest in Stds Track Methods? Expert reviews provide only a basic level of conformance & quality assurance Is this enough, leave the rest to the market & other SDOs? Or should the EAP WG to take up the development of a standard method(s)? Some methods authors are interested in this, but we’d need (a) High quality contributions, people willing to work on them (b) Agreement on WHAT to do (c) A world that cares and uses the results Chairs recommendation: define a limited number (1-2) of methods for specific categories (charter change) Input from other SDOs? |